Is software need to be developed first, or is hardware needed beforehand?


Recommended Posts

Guys, I've been wondering for a while, whether the software needs to be developed first or the hardware needs to be created beforehand in order to "advance in technology" or "create more powerful machines".

There are sometimes I believe that software needs to be developed first such as Windows Vista with its Direct X 10 and Win7 with its Direct X 11. On the other hand there are cases such as cellphones and Android based devices, in which hardware is developed first and then comes the software....

So which is it? Are they needed to be developed at the same time? Or is software/hardware needs to exist first so the other one completes it?

Please help me clarify this doubt :/

P.S: Sorry for posting it on General Discussion... I didn't find another place to put so...

Software can be created on anything, as it's mainly just coding. It will have a set criteria, normally based/compatible with already-available hardware, or hardware due within the coming 12 months.

Both hardware and software push each other forward, neither are required first, but they do need each other.

I'm guessing the OP is referring to creating software today that requires hardware from tomorrow vs creating hardware and then depending on software to push its limits.

Depends on the market. For GPUs and other computer components, it's definitely the former. Lets face it, gaming is probably the #1 thing that's driving the incredible speed at which consumer computer hardware advances and many AAA games require future hardware just to be able to run at maximum settings.

On the other hand, for things like gaming consoles, it needs to be the latter. The hardware in there doesn't change and it needs to stay relevant for years.

I'd assume hardware first in all cases. You need to know at least the baseline hardware you're working with before you can properly create the software, for the best experience at least.

I think you are confusing its always the hardware first. lets say you are installing Windows 7 on a PC that was made after 7 is made RTM.

Many hardware wont work because the drivers are not there. and how are the drivers made? Hardware first then the software ie. drivers...

Windows OS would give you some generic drives for many devices like Sound,display etc but if you want better you get the drivers from the device manufacturer.

Depends on the market. For GPUs and other computer components, it's definitely the former. Lets face it, gaming is probably the #1 thing that's driving the incredible speed at which consumer computer hardware advances and many AAA games require future hardware just to be able to run at maximum settings.

This is only because computers are disgustingly inefficient at playing games. Have you ever looked at hardware specs for a video game console? They're peanuts. At this point, the hardware is as strong as it can be. Any further developments, and you won't notice the difference on current televisions.

Having said that, you need hardware to write software.... this isn't chicken and egg, it's pretty one-way. If you don't have the hardware to support something, how can you write it?

This is only because computers are disgustingly inefficient at playing games. Have you ever looked at hardware specs for a video game console? They're peanuts. At this point, the hardware is as strong as it can be. Any further developments, and you won't notice the difference on current televisions.

Consoles also don't have an full blown OS or multitude of layers of frameworks and libraries to go through like a PC does. For the most part, games on a console talk directly to the hardware and not through layers. That is why PCs are "inneficient". PCs can also do a helluva lot more than a console can in terms of graphics and processing. Not sure what the hell you mean regarding televisions.

Sounds like you don't play many games (if at all).

How else would you write a program, let alone run it? ;)

His question was pretty ambiguous to begin with.

Consoles also don't have an full blown OS or multitude of layers of frameworks and libraries to go through like a PC does. For the most part, games on a console talk directly to the hardware and not through layers. That is why PCs are "inneficient". PCs can also do a helluva lot more than a console can in terms of graphics and processing. Not sure what the hell you mean regarding televisions.

Sounds like you don't play many games (if at all).

Those are all very good reasons. Thanks for explaining my statement. Not sure where we're disagreeing though?

PCs have more raw horsepower then consoles, yes, but nothing more is done with it, as far as gaming is concerned. That extra power is needed because of all the non-gaming functions going on. If you put the hardware of a gamer's PC into a video game console, developers wouldn't know what to do with it. Hardware is no longer the bottleneck for gaming development - it's our software and user interfaces (televisions, controllers, etc)

And I used to play games non-stop, but it's true, I've mellowed out a bit. Still enjoy playing the "latest and greatest" blockbusters to see where the industry is headed though (plus its fun), and I always love a good game of SSBM. :)

I believe (I could be wrong though, I cannot cite sources for this wild speculation) that hardware stores existed way before the computer era started!

Just a guess though... :shiftyninja:

Glassed Silver:ios

If you look through the long history of computing, hardware has always existed first, infact the first computer the (the Colossus Machine) used in WW2 had no "software" at all it was programmed by changing the way the system was wired

Tbh, I don't see how this is a question. A basic understanding of the relationship between hardware and software immediately explains why one needs the former to even start worrying about the latter.

It's like asking which came first - Television, or television shows? Why don't you think about that. :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!