What should I pick more RAM, quad core upgrade or SSD drive?


Recommended Posts

I can only pick one and not sure which one I should pick. I will be upgrading and using my computer for photo editing and some video editing but nothing too heavy. Also I am a programming student. The RAM is the cheapest of all three of them and the SSD drive the most expensive but it will provide the most speed. Not sure what to do at this point. Hopes someone here can help me out with this. Thank you.

JC

What are the current specs of your machine, those would help when advising you what to upgrade?

  • Like 1

Since you need your computer for video editing, a SSD doesn't sound like a good option considering the cost per MB, of course, you can always have the SSD as your main drive for Windows and some applications and a secondary drive for your work; RAM is always welcome, especially if you have 4GB or less. The CPU, it would be good to know your current specs and see if it's worthy the upgrade, and decide what kind of CPU you can use because you might need to upgrade your motherboard and/or RAM in order to be able to use the latest CPU models

  • Like 1

RAM will be the limiting factor in editing any HD video and large picture editing, I'd go for 16 GB (Assuming that you are running a 64bit OS). SSD's are nice for general use but not massively important in your case. Quad core would of course boost video/photoshop times, possibly programming too (not sure how demanding your projects are). RAM would be my choice, 2nd CPU, third SSD.

I have a HP Paviliion model p6350z computer. I have a Athlon X2 dual core 64 bit processor running at 2.9 ghz. I have 8 gigs of DDR3 RAM. I am currently running Windows 7 64 bit OS. I have a 500 GB 7200 RPM hard drive. I have a ATI Radeon HD 4200 integrated graphics chip. I think my graphics chip is the weakest component in my computer specs.

The programs I usually mostly are in no particular order:

1. Different web browsers, IE, Firefox, SRWare Iron (Google Chrome but privacy features taken out), Opera

2. Adobe Photoshop

3. Adobe Premiere

4. Microsoft Office suite

5. I have YNAB a Adobe Air based program.

6. Also various programming software too many to mention.

I hope that helps.

if you can, I'd go with the SSD, you'll really notice the difference with it

and since RAM is cheap I'd go ahead and up that as well to 16gb, that'll help with video encoding

The limiting factor in video editing is generally processor speed. The faster your processor and the more cores it has, the quicker your video will encode. HDD or RAM are not the bottleneck there. That being said, and SSD would dramatically boost the overall application and windows loading times.

It depends where you priorty lies I guess. If you want your videos to encode faster, then go for CPU, then RAM, then SSD. If you want an overall systemwide load time reduction, then go SSD first, CPU second, RAM third. 8GB of ram is plenty for most things, so not a priority to upgrade that. 16gb is just a "nice to have" at the moment.

I have a HP Paviliion model p6350z computer. I have a Athlon X2 dual core 64 bit processor running at 2.9 ghz. I have 8 gigs of DDR3 RAM. I am currently running Windows 7 64 bit OS. I have a 500 GB 7200 RPM hard drive. I have a ATI Radeon HD 4200 integrated graphics chip. I think my graphics chip is the weakest component in my computer specs.

The programs I usually mostly are in no particular order:

1. Different web browsers, IE, Firefox, SRWare Iron (Google Chrome but privacy features taken out), Opera

2. Adobe Photoshop

3. Adobe Premiere

4. Microsoft Office suite

5. I have YNAB a Adobe Air based program.

6. Also various programming software too many to mention.

I hope that helps.

SSD or the CPU. Although I suspect the CPU might just edge it looking at the quite CPU intensive applications you use.

At 8GB RAM, you're pretty much fine. I wouldn't bother with an SSD as an upgrade in this particular case. That being said, I would prioritize as CPU, RAM, SSD.

For an AMD Athlon II X4 3.0GHz quad-core, you're looking at around $100 on Newegg. Slightly more than you might pay to double your RAM. Maybe you'd be better off explaining what you have for a budget, rather than choosing 1 particular component to upgrade. You never know, you might end up with both RAM and a CPU upgrade as the prices differ slightly depending on the component.

Is it possible you can build another PC from scratch instead ? Reason I ask is because getting a better processor like at least a Intel i5 with Hyperthreading will make a huge difference.

The good thing you really don't need a graphics card unless your a gamer then I would suggest a dedciated graphics card. 16 GB of ram will help a lot too. Photoshop loves ram. SSD could help a lot if you put your scartch disk for photoshop on it. Though it would be even better to use 8 GB of the 16 GB of ram as a ram drive for this.

If you must upgrade this computer then your processor would be best first then ram and finally a SSD.

Is it possible you can build another PC from scratch instead ? Reason I ask is because getting a better processor like at least a Intel i5 with Hyperthreading will make a huge difference.

Where is this i5 with HT? I thought only the i7 chips have HT.

OP- I would get the quad core Phenom II. Going from dual to quad is a nice jump as well as L3 cache that you don't have on the Athlon plus the benefits of higher clock speed. In most games and when you're multitasking you'll notice a difference but with photo and video editing you'll see a great jump in performance. However, an SSD would bring the most *noticeable* speed increase overall as everything loads very quickly. So if budget allows, get the quad core CPU and a 60 gig SSD and use the HDD you have now as a storage drive. It'll be like you have a brand new computer for about $250-$300 USD.

You have enough RAM, so I wouldn't worry about that. And upgrading the CPU won't help too much.

An SSD will give you a huge huge difference in performance, but make sure you get a good brand (Intel, OCZ, Corsair, etc). Don't just go with the cheapest one you can find.

I'd actually look into a new GPU, as your editing will benefit from that a LOT if you use smart applications, which you do.

Other than that: CPU, RAM, SSD (in that order)

If you have small, light video projects, RAM is placed third I'd say.

Glassed Silver:mac

Hello,

If you are going to have this computer for a while, I would suggest getting it with the best CPU possible, since that is the most difficult part to upgrade. Then, over time, you can add more easily-installable upgrades to it, like RAM and an SSD.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Hello,

If you are going to have this computer for a while, I would suggest getting it with the best CPU possible, since that is the most difficult part to upgrade. Then, over time, you can add more easily-installable upgrades to it, like RAM and an SSD.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

As I understood it he has the machine already, so the upgradeability for now is set the same way as it is one or two years in...

But generally speaking this is sound practice! :)

Glassed Silver:mac

RAM will be the limiting factor in editing any HD video and large picture editing, I'd go for 16 GB (Assuming that you are running a 64bit OS). SSD's are nice for general use but not massively important in your case. Quad core would of course boost video/photoshop times, possibly programming too (not sure how demanding your projects are). RAM would be my choice, 2nd CPU, third SSD.

I have 16GB of r.a.m. and my system does not feel any different that if I have 4GB ( I have a x64 ops + quadcore CPU).

  • 6 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!