What should I pick more RAM, quad core upgrade or SSD drive?


Recommended Posts

I can only pick one and not sure which one I should pick. I will be upgrading and using my computer for photo editing and some video editing but nothing too heavy. Also I am a programming student. The RAM is the cheapest of all three of them and the SSD drive the most expensive but it will provide the most speed. Not sure what to do at this point. Hopes someone here can help me out with this. Thank you.

JC

What are the current specs of your machine, those would help when advising you what to upgrade?

  • Like 1

Since you need your computer for video editing, a SSD doesn't sound like a good option considering the cost per MB, of course, you can always have the SSD as your main drive for Windows and some applications and a secondary drive for your work; RAM is always welcome, especially if you have 4GB or less. The CPU, it would be good to know your current specs and see if it's worthy the upgrade, and decide what kind of CPU you can use because you might need to upgrade your motherboard and/or RAM in order to be able to use the latest CPU models

  • Like 1

RAM will be the limiting factor in editing any HD video and large picture editing, I'd go for 16 GB (Assuming that you are running a 64bit OS). SSD's are nice for general use but not massively important in your case. Quad core would of course boost video/photoshop times, possibly programming too (not sure how demanding your projects are). RAM would be my choice, 2nd CPU, third SSD.

I have a HP Paviliion model p6350z computer. I have a Athlon X2 dual core 64 bit processor running at 2.9 ghz. I have 8 gigs of DDR3 RAM. I am currently running Windows 7 64 bit OS. I have a 500 GB 7200 RPM hard drive. I have a ATI Radeon HD 4200 integrated graphics chip. I think my graphics chip is the weakest component in my computer specs.

The programs I usually mostly are in no particular order:

1. Different web browsers, IE, Firefox, SRWare Iron (Google Chrome but privacy features taken out), Opera

2. Adobe Photoshop

3. Adobe Premiere

4. Microsoft Office suite

5. I have YNAB a Adobe Air based program.

6. Also various programming software too many to mention.

I hope that helps.

if you can, I'd go with the SSD, you'll really notice the difference with it

and since RAM is cheap I'd go ahead and up that as well to 16gb, that'll help with video encoding

The limiting factor in video editing is generally processor speed. The faster your processor and the more cores it has, the quicker your video will encode. HDD or RAM are not the bottleneck there. That being said, and SSD would dramatically boost the overall application and windows loading times.

It depends where you priorty lies I guess. If you want your videos to encode faster, then go for CPU, then RAM, then SSD. If you want an overall systemwide load time reduction, then go SSD first, CPU second, RAM third. 8GB of ram is plenty for most things, so not a priority to upgrade that. 16gb is just a "nice to have" at the moment.

I have a HP Paviliion model p6350z computer. I have a Athlon X2 dual core 64 bit processor running at 2.9 ghz. I have 8 gigs of DDR3 RAM. I am currently running Windows 7 64 bit OS. I have a 500 GB 7200 RPM hard drive. I have a ATI Radeon HD 4200 integrated graphics chip. I think my graphics chip is the weakest component in my computer specs.

The programs I usually mostly are in no particular order:

1. Different web browsers, IE, Firefox, SRWare Iron (Google Chrome but privacy features taken out), Opera

2. Adobe Photoshop

3. Adobe Premiere

4. Microsoft Office suite

5. I have YNAB a Adobe Air based program.

6. Also various programming software too many to mention.

I hope that helps.

SSD or the CPU. Although I suspect the CPU might just edge it looking at the quite CPU intensive applications you use.

At 8GB RAM, you're pretty much fine. I wouldn't bother with an SSD as an upgrade in this particular case. That being said, I would prioritize as CPU, RAM, SSD.

For an AMD Athlon II X4 3.0GHz quad-core, you're looking at around $100 on Newegg. Slightly more than you might pay to double your RAM. Maybe you'd be better off explaining what you have for a budget, rather than choosing 1 particular component to upgrade. You never know, you might end up with both RAM and a CPU upgrade as the prices differ slightly depending on the component.

Is it possible you can build another PC from scratch instead ? Reason I ask is because getting a better processor like at least a Intel i5 with Hyperthreading will make a huge difference.

The good thing you really don't need a graphics card unless your a gamer then I would suggest a dedciated graphics card. 16 GB of ram will help a lot too. Photoshop loves ram. SSD could help a lot if you put your scartch disk for photoshop on it. Though it would be even better to use 8 GB of the 16 GB of ram as a ram drive for this.

If you must upgrade this computer then your processor would be best first then ram and finally a SSD.

Is it possible you can build another PC from scratch instead ? Reason I ask is because getting a better processor like at least a Intel i5 with Hyperthreading will make a huge difference.

Where is this i5 with HT? I thought only the i7 chips have HT.

OP- I would get the quad core Phenom II. Going from dual to quad is a nice jump as well as L3 cache that you don't have on the Athlon plus the benefits of higher clock speed. In most games and when you're multitasking you'll notice a difference but with photo and video editing you'll see a great jump in performance. However, an SSD would bring the most *noticeable* speed increase overall as everything loads very quickly. So if budget allows, get the quad core CPU and a 60 gig SSD and use the HDD you have now as a storage drive. It'll be like you have a brand new computer for about $250-$300 USD.

You have enough RAM, so I wouldn't worry about that. And upgrading the CPU won't help too much.

An SSD will give you a huge huge difference in performance, but make sure you get a good brand (Intel, OCZ, Corsair, etc). Don't just go with the cheapest one you can find.

I'd actually look into a new GPU, as your editing will benefit from that a LOT if you use smart applications, which you do.

Other than that: CPU, RAM, SSD (in that order)

If you have small, light video projects, RAM is placed third I'd say.

Glassed Silver:mac

Hello,

If you are going to have this computer for a while, I would suggest getting it with the best CPU possible, since that is the most difficult part to upgrade. Then, over time, you can add more easily-installable upgrades to it, like RAM and an SSD.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Hello,

If you are going to have this computer for a while, I would suggest getting it with the best CPU possible, since that is the most difficult part to upgrade. Then, over time, you can add more easily-installable upgrades to it, like RAM and an SSD.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

As I understood it he has the machine already, so the upgradeability for now is set the same way as it is one or two years in...

But generally speaking this is sound practice! :)

Glassed Silver:mac

RAM will be the limiting factor in editing any HD video and large picture editing, I'd go for 16 GB (Assuming that you are running a 64bit OS). SSD's are nice for general use but not massively important in your case. Quad core would of course boost video/photoshop times, possibly programming too (not sure how demanding your projects are). RAM would be my choice, 2nd CPU, third SSD.

I have 16GB of r.a.m. and my system does not feel any different that if I have 4GB ( I have a x64 ops + quadcore CPU).

  • 6 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!