Recommended Posts

So the other day I was browsing Facebook and happened upon my cousin-in-laws page and saw some pictures he took with his Canon T2i with the kit lens and the 55-250mm lens - The same lenses and body I currently have and use. His pictures looked, well, a lot better than most of mine. The colours seem more vibrant, the photos less grainy.

One thing that's irritating me is the colours in my pictures. Nothing seems to really make them stand out. When I first open an image in Picasa, the colours actually don't look all that bad. I understand any noise is due to high iso but then after a moment, when Picasa has finished loading the image, the colours appear dull and rather bland. In lighter photos they become darker, darker photos almost too light and washed out. Either way, the way they look for that second before they finish loading is great. Once the image finishes loading it's as I mentioned. Not sure if that's my doing or Picasa's. For all I know, it could just be a lack of knowledge causing my shots to be what I perceive as dull. It's pretty irritating however to open a photo, be happy with the lighting and then have picasa darken it and make it look a little worse.

Now, with Chconline's permission, I wanted to post a picture of his - It's just a picture of a T2i. No fast action shots, nothing crazy going on: img0026gp.jpg

It's clean, crisp and vibrant. I don't know if any editing was done (I'll get to my editing woes in a moment :p) but it looks great. Granted, he may be using a better lens but I'm going off of the assumption it's not crazy expensive and super high end.

Here's an indoor shot from me: IMG_2855.jpg

Again, before fully loading in Picasa, it actually looks pretty good...And then..Washed out lol.

Outdoor shots are a different story. Outdoor day shots anyways. Those look pretty good! Colours are decent, lighting isn't bad. Still looks a little dull when I open them in Picasa. So maybe these lenses just aren't ideal for indoor shooting and I should just break down and buy a nifty fifty.

When it comes to editing, I have Lightroom 3 and well, at the risk of sounding like a total newbie...Have no idea how to do much of anything in there. I see the colour correction tools, some hue and saturation but...What do most people use when editing pictures? Is it simple colour correction and adjusting the saturation? I also haven't changed the exposure on my T2i it's pretty much stock. I might have switched it over to sRGB but that's about it. All the pictures have been in RAW for the most part. Should I be doing manual or auto shooting modes? (Focus I use a mixture depending on the situation.) Bokeh is another thing I'm having trouble capturing. I'm going out on a limb here and thinking it has to do with the limitations of the kit lens and the 55-250mm.

One thing I'm wondering is how do you determine, with reliable accuracy, what kind of aperture rating and f numbers you should be using in situations? I mean, it seems what live view shows is different than what the image actually is. Especially concerning low light, indoor shots...Or indoor shots in general. Same with night time shots.

Anyways, I'll be more than happy to hear any tips, tricks, constructive criticisms.

This probably should have just been a blog lol. I haven't updated my account yet...Speaking of which...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1051573-i-think-i-suck-at-photography-lol/
Share on other sites

Hmm...Well thank you. And if you really think so, maybe it's just Picasa that's making everything look dull. I just see pictures like this one, and wonder what they did to make it look so good.

4468213356_07ffffd287_z.jpg

I guess the issue isn't so much what I'm doing with the camera, but rather what I'm not doing in post processing.

As a photographer, I can tell you the trick is Adobe Lightroom, practice and... more practice. Stop using Picasa, start shooting in RAW. It's worth it. Let me show you an example, be right back...

Edit: OK, here's a photo BEFORE Lightroom.

post-253493-0-24014900-1326615068_thumb.

And here's what it looks like after I've post-processed it.

post-253493-0-59258500-1326615085_thumb.

Neat, huh? This is why you need to shoot in RAW.

  • Like 3

The color change on load that you're describing suggests you might have some messed up color profile loaded in the Windows color management system. Poor monitor drivers for example can store a color profile that makes things look yellow. I had a samsung monitor where installing the driver caused a big yellowing problem but now I use a Dell IPS panel.

So look at Windows color management and set it to the default profile if needed. See if that makes a difference.

Color profiles aside, I perfer to get good color in my shots through good lighting. Lightbulbs are not good lighting. IMO the best color comes from negative films like Ektar or Portra shot in daylight.

You just need to work on your composition.

There's really nothing wrong with the colours in your dinner shot, the problem is the shot itself (not to sound harsh). You simply aimed your camera at your plate and pressed the shutter. You need to compose your pictures to make them more interesting before you worry too much about post-processing.

Google "Rule of Thirds". This is one of the basics to composing nice photos. Basically it involves imagining a 9-cell grid over the scene and lining up key parts of the scene in that grid.

Colours and exposure aside, which of these two shots is more interesting to you?

AWA1y.jpg6629127419_c382ea2091_z.jpg

And keep in mind that most people do post-process their photos, so don't worry if not all your shots come out looking perfect. That's why we have Photoshop :)

  • Like 1

Lightroom is God's gift to photos. I like to get shots I don't have to process though. In saying that, I do a lot of night photography.

On your food photo, it looks like your focus is on the asparagus and steak. Is the potato out of focus slightly?

This was with my Nikon D5100.

390293_10150668681559338_626744337_11992056_1394774360_n.jpg

  • Like 1

Lightroom is God's gift to photos. I like to get shots I don't have to process though. In saying that, I do a lot of night photography.

On your food photo, it looks like your focus is on the asparagus and steak. Is the potato out of focus slightly?

This was with my Nikon D5100.

390293_10150668681559338_626744337_11992056_1394774360_n.jpg

Thats beautiful. Makes me wish i was talented.

To start with I suggest using ANYTHING but Picasa, it's color handling of RAW files is terrible, and it's color adjustement tools are even worse. if you can't afford lightroom, use Windows Live Photo Gallery, it's much better. or use on of the non library tols to manage and adjust the photos, better control, but more work since you need to work the photos one by one.

As a photographer, I can tell you the trick is Adobe Lightroom, practice and... more practice. Stop using Picasa, start shooting in RAW. It's worth it. Let me show you an example, be right back...

Edit: OK, here's a photo BEFORE Lightroom.

post-253493-0-24014900-1326615068_thumb.

And here's what it looks like after I've post-processed it.

post-253493-0-59258500-1326615085_thumb.

Neat, huh? This is why you need to shoot in RAW.

Too much green in the clouds, and possibly the sea, should have used a gradient filter as well.

Lightroom is God's gift to photos. I like to get shots I don't have to process though. In saying that, I do a lot of night photography.

On your food photo, it looks like your focus is on the asparagus and steak. Is the potato out of focus slightly?

This was with my Nikon D5100.

390293_10150668681559338_626744337_11992056_1394774360_n.jpg

lol okay I've been to that place and spot a dozen times and it never looks that good, a big tip of the hat to you for that shot. Its interesting seeing a shot of somewhere you've been like that, there really is some magic in post processing (not to take away from the work that went into taking that pic of course)

Yes, but it's a bit of overkill, I'd stick with just WLPG.

lol okay I've been to that place and spot a dozen times and it never looks that good, a big tip of the hat to you for that shot. Its interesting seeing a shot of somewhere you've been like that, there really is some magic in post processing (not to take away from the work that went into taking that pic of course)

while post processing is part of what makes that image what it is. the way it was taken is also improtant. No matter what Post he did, he wouldn't get that result with the camera set to automatic and just point and shooting it :)

Lightroom is God's gift to photos. I like to get shots I don't have to process though. In saying that, I do a lot of night photography.

On your food photo, it looks like your focus is on the asparagus and steak. Is the potato out of focus slightly?

This was with my Nikon D5100.

390293_10150668681559338_626744337_11992056_1394774360_n.jpg

Could you upload a higher res on that photo? thanks :)

This will make photographers laugh but all I need and use is Windows Live Photo Gallery as an alternative to Picasa. I am not professional or patient enough to use Lightroom.

if you can't afford Bibble (now done by Corel), Lightroom, etc, the software that comes with canon cameras is 95% as good, Digital Photo Professional.

Install it off the CD that came with your camera and download the upgrade from the canon web site, it's almost all i use

To start with I suggest using ANYTHING but Picasa, it's color handling of RAW files is terrible, and it's color adjustement tools are even worse. if you can't afford lightroom, use Windows Live Photo Gallery, it's much better. or use on of the non library tols to manage and adjust the photos, better control, but more work since you need to work the photos one by one.

Too much green in the clouds, and possibly the sea, should have used a gradient filter as well.

I know ;). There's lots of gradient filters in there, I was just giving a (quick) example anyway.

For indoor shots, the trick is the flash... when I took a picture of my T2i, I used my Canon EOS 60D, Canon 24-105 f/4L, and a Canon Speedlite 430EX II flash aimed at the ceiling. ISO 200 f/4 1/60. Used Photoshop and adjusted the white balance slightly.

Personally, if you want to achieve a sort of "lifestyle" look to your images, I'd avoid using flash and try to use natural light. As in, from a (ideally large) window. (unless you have access to a lot of studio lighting)

Your image is good and with lightroom a white balance shift and bit of exposure and contrast tweaking would look make it even better, but I think it'd look even better in daylight.

Btw, taking photos of food is tricky business, there's a load of stuff photographers do to make the food stay looking yummy while they're working.

Check this out:

http://www.pixiq.com/article/food-photo-tricks

I don't think my camera can shoot RAW images, can I still use Lightroom to improve the photos ?

Yes, though it won't be as effective.

To OP: If you don't want to spend too much on software right now you can use the software that came with your Canon camera, it'll allow you to do a plethora of adjustments and process the RAW files correctly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!