Recommended Posts

So the other day I was browsing Facebook and happened upon my cousin-in-laws page and saw some pictures he took with his Canon T2i with the kit lens and the 55-250mm lens - The same lenses and body I currently have and use. His pictures looked, well, a lot better than most of mine. The colours seem more vibrant, the photos less grainy.

One thing that's irritating me is the colours in my pictures. Nothing seems to really make them stand out. When I first open an image in Picasa, the colours actually don't look all that bad. I understand any noise is due to high iso but then after a moment, when Picasa has finished loading the image, the colours appear dull and rather bland. In lighter photos they become darker, darker photos almost too light and washed out. Either way, the way they look for that second before they finish loading is great. Once the image finishes loading it's as I mentioned. Not sure if that's my doing or Picasa's. For all I know, it could just be a lack of knowledge causing my shots to be what I perceive as dull. It's pretty irritating however to open a photo, be happy with the lighting and then have picasa darken it and make it look a little worse.

Now, with Chconline's permission, I wanted to post a picture of his - It's just a picture of a T2i. No fast action shots, nothing crazy going on: img0026gp.jpg

It's clean, crisp and vibrant. I don't know if any editing was done (I'll get to my editing woes in a moment :p) but it looks great. Granted, he may be using a better lens but I'm going off of the assumption it's not crazy expensive and super high end.

Here's an indoor shot from me: IMG_2855.jpg

Again, before fully loading in Picasa, it actually looks pretty good...And then..Washed out lol.

Outdoor shots are a different story. Outdoor day shots anyways. Those look pretty good! Colours are decent, lighting isn't bad. Still looks a little dull when I open them in Picasa. So maybe these lenses just aren't ideal for indoor shooting and I should just break down and buy a nifty fifty.

When it comes to editing, I have Lightroom 3 and well, at the risk of sounding like a total newbie...Have no idea how to do much of anything in there. I see the colour correction tools, some hue and saturation but...What do most people use when editing pictures? Is it simple colour correction and adjusting the saturation? I also haven't changed the exposure on my T2i it's pretty much stock. I might have switched it over to sRGB but that's about it. All the pictures have been in RAW for the most part. Should I be doing manual or auto shooting modes? (Focus I use a mixture depending on the situation.) Bokeh is another thing I'm having trouble capturing. I'm going out on a limb here and thinking it has to do with the limitations of the kit lens and the 55-250mm.

One thing I'm wondering is how do you determine, with reliable accuracy, what kind of aperture rating and f numbers you should be using in situations? I mean, it seems what live view shows is different than what the image actually is. Especially concerning low light, indoor shots...Or indoor shots in general. Same with night time shots.

Anyways, I'll be more than happy to hear any tips, tricks, constructive criticisms.

This probably should have just been a blog lol. I haven't updated my account yet...Speaking of which...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1051573-i-think-i-suck-at-photography-lol/
Share on other sites

Hmm...Well thank you. And if you really think so, maybe it's just Picasa that's making everything look dull. I just see pictures like this one, and wonder what they did to make it look so good.

4468213356_07ffffd287_z.jpg

I guess the issue isn't so much what I'm doing with the camera, but rather what I'm not doing in post processing.

As a photographer, I can tell you the trick is Adobe Lightroom, practice and... more practice. Stop using Picasa, start shooting in RAW. It's worth it. Let me show you an example, be right back...

Edit: OK, here's a photo BEFORE Lightroom.

post-253493-0-24014900-1326615068_thumb.

And here's what it looks like after I've post-processed it.

post-253493-0-59258500-1326615085_thumb.

Neat, huh? This is why you need to shoot in RAW.

  • Like 3

The color change on load that you're describing suggests you might have some messed up color profile loaded in the Windows color management system. Poor monitor drivers for example can store a color profile that makes things look yellow. I had a samsung monitor where installing the driver caused a big yellowing problem but now I use a Dell IPS panel.

So look at Windows color management and set it to the default profile if needed. See if that makes a difference.

Color profiles aside, I perfer to get good color in my shots through good lighting. Lightbulbs are not good lighting. IMO the best color comes from negative films like Ektar or Portra shot in daylight.

You just need to work on your composition.

There's really nothing wrong with the colours in your dinner shot, the problem is the shot itself (not to sound harsh). You simply aimed your camera at your plate and pressed the shutter. You need to compose your pictures to make them more interesting before you worry too much about post-processing.

Google "Rule of Thirds". This is one of the basics to composing nice photos. Basically it involves imagining a 9-cell grid over the scene and lining up key parts of the scene in that grid.

Colours and exposure aside, which of these two shots is more interesting to you?

AWA1y.jpg6629127419_c382ea2091_z.jpg

And keep in mind that most people do post-process their photos, so don't worry if not all your shots come out looking perfect. That's why we have Photoshop :)

  • Like 1

Lightroom is God's gift to photos. I like to get shots I don't have to process though. In saying that, I do a lot of night photography.

On your food photo, it looks like your focus is on the asparagus and steak. Is the potato out of focus slightly?

This was with my Nikon D5100.

390293_10150668681559338_626744337_11992056_1394774360_n.jpg

  • Like 1

Lightroom is God's gift to photos. I like to get shots I don't have to process though. In saying that, I do a lot of night photography.

On your food photo, it looks like your focus is on the asparagus and steak. Is the potato out of focus slightly?

This was with my Nikon D5100.

390293_10150668681559338_626744337_11992056_1394774360_n.jpg

Thats beautiful. Makes me wish i was talented.

To start with I suggest using ANYTHING but Picasa, it's color handling of RAW files is terrible, and it's color adjustement tools are even worse. if you can't afford lightroom, use Windows Live Photo Gallery, it's much better. or use on of the non library tols to manage and adjust the photos, better control, but more work since you need to work the photos one by one.

As a photographer, I can tell you the trick is Adobe Lightroom, practice and... more practice. Stop using Picasa, start shooting in RAW. It's worth it. Let me show you an example, be right back...

Edit: OK, here's a photo BEFORE Lightroom.

post-253493-0-24014900-1326615068_thumb.

And here's what it looks like after I've post-processed it.

post-253493-0-59258500-1326615085_thumb.

Neat, huh? This is why you need to shoot in RAW.

Too much green in the clouds, and possibly the sea, should have used a gradient filter as well.

Lightroom is God's gift to photos. I like to get shots I don't have to process though. In saying that, I do a lot of night photography.

On your food photo, it looks like your focus is on the asparagus and steak. Is the potato out of focus slightly?

This was with my Nikon D5100.

390293_10150668681559338_626744337_11992056_1394774360_n.jpg

lol okay I've been to that place and spot a dozen times and it never looks that good, a big tip of the hat to you for that shot. Its interesting seeing a shot of somewhere you've been like that, there really is some magic in post processing (not to take away from the work that went into taking that pic of course)

Yes, but it's a bit of overkill, I'd stick with just WLPG.

lol okay I've been to that place and spot a dozen times and it never looks that good, a big tip of the hat to you for that shot. Its interesting seeing a shot of somewhere you've been like that, there really is some magic in post processing (not to take away from the work that went into taking that pic of course)

while post processing is part of what makes that image what it is. the way it was taken is also improtant. No matter what Post he did, he wouldn't get that result with the camera set to automatic and just point and shooting it :)

Lightroom is God's gift to photos. I like to get shots I don't have to process though. In saying that, I do a lot of night photography.

On your food photo, it looks like your focus is on the asparagus and steak. Is the potato out of focus slightly?

This was with my Nikon D5100.

390293_10150668681559338_626744337_11992056_1394774360_n.jpg

Could you upload a higher res on that photo? thanks :)

This will make photographers laugh but all I need and use is Windows Live Photo Gallery as an alternative to Picasa. I am not professional or patient enough to use Lightroom.

if you can't afford Bibble (now done by Corel), Lightroom, etc, the software that comes with canon cameras is 95% as good, Digital Photo Professional.

Install it off the CD that came with your camera and download the upgrade from the canon web site, it's almost all i use

To start with I suggest using ANYTHING but Picasa, it's color handling of RAW files is terrible, and it's color adjustement tools are even worse. if you can't afford lightroom, use Windows Live Photo Gallery, it's much better. or use on of the non library tols to manage and adjust the photos, better control, but more work since you need to work the photos one by one.

Too much green in the clouds, and possibly the sea, should have used a gradient filter as well.

I know ;). There's lots of gradient filters in there, I was just giving a (quick) example anyway.

For indoor shots, the trick is the flash... when I took a picture of my T2i, I used my Canon EOS 60D, Canon 24-105 f/4L, and a Canon Speedlite 430EX II flash aimed at the ceiling. ISO 200 f/4 1/60. Used Photoshop and adjusted the white balance slightly.

Personally, if you want to achieve a sort of "lifestyle" look to your images, I'd avoid using flash and try to use natural light. As in, from a (ideally large) window. (unless you have access to a lot of studio lighting)

Your image is good and with lightroom a white balance shift and bit of exposure and contrast tweaking would look make it even better, but I think it'd look even better in daylight.

Btw, taking photos of food is tricky business, there's a load of stuff photographers do to make the food stay looking yummy while they're working.

Check this out:

http://www.pixiq.com/article/food-photo-tricks

I don't think my camera can shoot RAW images, can I still use Lightroom to improve the photos ?

Yes, though it won't be as effective.

To OP: If you don't want to spend too much on software right now you can use the software that came with your Canon camera, it'll allow you to do a plethora of adjustments and process the RAW files correctly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!