Recommended Posts

Intel, Microsoft may start W8 tablets at 599 plus

An insistence on earlier pricing policies from Intel and Microsoft may put Windows 8 tablets out of contention, notebook PC builders getting into the field claimed Monday. Intel was reported by Digitimes contacts as unwilling to cut profit margins on its Clover Trail-based Atom chips, while Microsoft wasn't planning on trimming its Windows 8 price. As such, Intel-based Windows 8 tablets might start at a minimum $599 and scale up to $899, all well over the benchmark $499 price of the iPad.

The two sides may be facing an uncomfortable middle ground because of the nature of a "Wintel" PC, the insiders argued. If they do decide to cut prices on Clover Trail and Windows 8, they could build market share but would also be cutting prices on conventional PCs and cut profit across the board. Should Intel decline to cut prices, though, it may send some companies running to cheaper ARM-based tablets to get closer to an ideal price.

While strictly an observation, the tipsters saw these plus the Android situation as a confluence of multiple factors that would ultimately favor Apple. Along with Windows 8 tablets being too expensive, quad-core Android 4.0 tablets from ASUS, Lenovo, and possibly Samsung might only arrive on or after the rumored launch of the iPad 3 in March, overshadowing their efforts.

Windows 8 tablets themselves aren't due to show until the release of the OS roughly in the second half of the year, giving both Android and iOS ample lead time.

http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/01/16/intel.microsoft.may.start.w8.tablets.at.599.plus/#ixzz1jh1Pswxg

Microsoft has a big battle ahead to overcome the overwhelming popularity of the iPad on the tablet computing front, and its Intel-powered slates might be starting at a distinct disadvantage if a DigiTimesreport is to be believed. The site indicates that neither Intel nor Microsoft are willing to cut their prices to help manufacturers, the former providing the Clover Trail hardware and the latter the Windows 8software, which could see these machines starting at $599 and going way up from there. This could send manufacturers looking for lesser-expensive ARM-powered hardware, creating tablets incapable of executing the current gamut of x86 Windows software. Will users pay a premium for app compatibility as tablet prices on other platforms plummet? Just how attached are you to that copy of Wing Commander you've been hanging on to for decades?

Engadget

here;s the thing though... lets just say for its and shiggles.... people will buy a windows 8 arm tablet at the lower price point and since they've been sold the idea they can run desktop apps on it, will try to install photoshop or premiere on it and it wouldn't work (unless they compile an arm version) and get mad and return the tablets...

what if companies like adobe won't compile photoshop or premiere for arm devices?

I really hope the companies make this clear or people will be very dissapointed.

This was clearly expected.

Why would one purchase an ARM based device if He/She can get a full blown x86 tablet that will run legacy apps aswell.

Also. I know x86 devices will be thicker and offer lower battery life. But they also will sport bigger HDDs if this years tablets are to be followed whereas ARM tablets will offer smaller cap SSDs in the 64GB to 128GB range im dead sure!

If you look at how slow Microsoft moves...They are really are in trouble in the low end. In a lot of areas browser, mobile phone, search they either failing or not gaining traction. I think they really need a management shake-up. Of course this won't happen before windows 8 releases. But if it does not sell well....I think Ballmer as well as other management of microsoft could be in trouble.

Actually i dont agree with you if you mean their products are inferior.

Whether its Browser or Mobile Phones or Bing Search.

I use all of them and they compete with the very best and provide counter features if not the same.

What microsoft needs is to change their image.

They are not associated with people as for example Apple is.

They need to do that.

Redo their image in some way. Advertise the hell out of their products.. Specially Bing and WP7. Bing is amazing. They also have maps which are brilliant if you live in the US.

They need to expand it. Now i own a WP7 device but i have to use google maps because there are no bing maps for where i live.

The bing experience would be so much better only if i can use it.

They need to expand.. Globally. They focus on their customers in the US. what about the rest of the world?

I plan to develop apps for windows 8. But im sure i cant register from my country directly as a developer.

So they need to expand their services to the whole globe. And advertise it everywhere!

This was clearly expected.

Why would one purchase an ARM based device if He/She can get a full blown x86 tablet that will run legacy apps aswell.

because it would be cheaper to them... saving 200-400 bucks savings,.. would be a big deal to a lot of people...

What i meant was..

if i can buy a x86 for the same price as an ARM tablet.. why would i buy an ARM tablet?

ARM wouldve needed to further reduce their prices and that is not going to happen... in 2 years or so.

There are low price tablets but those have smaller screens or slower hardware.

What i meant was.. if i can buy a x86 for the same price as an ARM tablet.. why would i buy an ARM tablet? ARM wouldve needed to further reduce their prices and that is not going to happen... in 2 years or so. There are low price tablets but those have smaller screens or slower hardware.

Clearly ARM right now lost its purpose, ARM tablets where supposed to be cheap, far cheaper than an x86 tablet but... oh well, fashion seems to be getting into tablets and price with it.

yah I guess I was asking too much to have a windows 8 tablet to run x86 apps for 400 bucks or less ;-( mabye some day... ;-(

It honestly is... but I will totally pay up to $1500 for a tablet as long as it runs the application I want and works the way I want. i.e. I need to be able to run onenote and write on it with a pen.

Yess.. $1500 is too expensive . .

I very much like the Samsung slate 7 ..

Its pricey. But you get a dock with iy. A keyboard. And you get a pen. N that is sweet to actually use it. Great tablet for artists. I can't wait to buy it when windows 8 comes out. I trust Samsung with the hardware. But I wish we see such tablets for under 600. That will.totally eat android on the high end.

Yess.. $1500 is too expensive . .

I very much like the Samsung slate 7 ..

Its pricey. But you get a dock with iy. A keyboard. And you get a pen. N that is sweet to actually use it. Great tablet for artists. I can't wait to buy it when windows 8 comes out. I trust Samsung with the hardware. But I wish we see such tablets for under 600. That will.totally eat android on the high end.

Yess.. $1500 is too expensive . .

I very much like the Samsung slate 7 ..

Its pricey. But you get a dock with iy. A keyboard. And you get a pen. N that is sweet to actually use it. Great tablet for artists. I can't wait to buy it when windows 8 comes out. I trust Samsung with the hardware. But I wish we see such tablets for under 600. That will.totally eat android on the high end.

Yess.. $1500 is too expensive . .

I very much like the Samsung slate 7 ..

Its pricey. But you get a dock with iy. A keyboard. And you get a pen. N that is sweet to actually use it. Great tablet for artists. I can't wait to buy it when windows 8 comes out. I trust Samsung with the hardware. But I wish we see such tablets for under 600. That will.totally eat android on the high end.

In short, you are saying that the ability to run real applications (or even light games) is worth no price premium whatever over an iDevice (iPad2, for example) or Android tablet or slate.

The SAMSUNG Series 7 is pricey due almost entirely to that i5 inside - it's overkill for a slate or tablet - and the price reflects that. It's priced like a notebook with the same CPU - i3, actually, would be a better choice if you wanted to lower the price. (And despite that seemingly high price, that's exactly what the Series 7 competes with; notebooks, not netbooks, which it simply embarrasses. It also beats several NOTEBOOKS like a big bass drum in a marching band.)

I respectfully disagree - tablets and slates that can run real applications have - and certainly deserve - a premium in terms of price over the iPad2 or any Android tablet.

If anything, it's ARM-based tablets and slates that don't deserve a price premium over either iPad2 or Android - because they are just as limited in terms of applications (due to the lack of ARM traditional applications).

Here's how I see the market breakdown: low-end tablets and slates (mostly Android)->midrange ARM-based tablets and slates (and the iPad2)->x86 tablets, slates, and Ultrabooks (the space currently occupied by high-end netbooks, which they will largely replace)->midrange notebooks->desktop-replacement notebooks->gaming notebooks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!