British Airways flight mistakenly tells passengers plane will crash


Recommended Posts

When it's trivial, I agree.. however I can imagine quite a few distressed people being left with a post traumatic disorder. I'm sure their life flashed before their eyes etc etc etc... Things like that change you.

I think you to have post-traumatic stress disorder, there has to be some sort of trauma (like a real accident). Hearing part of a recording is not a trauma-inducing event. That would change somebody? What are you smoking bro?

**** me, it reminds you lot of a cartoon! Get a frigging grip on life will you.I only hope you dont suffer a loss due to a airplane crash or even slightly threatened in some way in this nature...

How low has Neowin become.

:blink:

Did any of these passengers or their families suffer a loss from this incident? No. It was a mistake. I guarantee you that if the plane had crashed, people would probably take a graver-stance on the matter. As it is, nothing was wrong, everyone was alive afterwards, we can joke about it.

^ Put yourself in the situation, I don't think you'd walk off happy. If something like that was happened you would panic (yes you would) some people deal with panic much differently to others.

So you can't really tell people to joke about it, because you weren't in their shoes.

Be as tough as you like, but I bet a little bit of poo would of come out! I would of :|

Be as tough as you like, but I bet a little bit of poo would of come out! I would of :|

Oh no, if you look at my very first post I said something very similar - while including the cartoon by Gary Larson.

My point was that Midnight Mick makes it sound like the plane did crash, everyone on board died and their families are going to live with that terrible tragedy for the rest of their lives. The truth of the matter is that while they might be angry for the unnecessary stress right now, it's hardly as grave as he's making it out to be.

Show some understanding of human nature! Those people were truly terrified for no reason or fault of their own. I wouldn't get off the plane thankful I'm alive Id get off being more angry than I ever thought possible. And an apology letter would be extremely insulting.

Surely the means to play that message isn't just a button that can be accidently pressed.

1) How do you know the people were "truly terrified"?

Would you rather no letter or anything? What you would prefer, the person next to you probably wouldn't.

In lief, you're never going to please everyone.

And so? It's people who have this attitude that has caused all this "i'm gonna sue you for this and that" business.

Life happens, you're not dead, get on with it.

On Oct. 3, 2002, I was on NWA flight 85, that left Detroit at 13:30.

6 days late, that same flight crashed. When I first heard about the crash I was shocked... and thought "what if I had to delay my trip?"

if it helps, statisticlly you would have to fly everyday for thirty six thousand years before you crash.

But 401 passengers died in 2011. :laugh: And that's lower than previous years.

2011 was setting up to be "the best year ever for safety," Paul Hayes, the director of safety for London-based aviation consulting company Ascend told MSNBC.

According to the agency's count, 401 people died on commercial and charter planes in 2011 around the world, down from 726 in 2010.

I think you to have post-traumatic stress disorder, there has to be some sort of trauma (like a real accident). Hearing part of a recording is not a trauma-inducing event. That would change somebody? What are you smoking bro?

Trauma certainly is being in a plane full of screaming people being told you're going to crash. A traumatic experience does not require physical harm, it can be mental. For example, hostages being threatened undergo a traumatic experience, but they don't necessarily receive any physical harm. I doubt anyone would dispute their 'trauma'.

Obviously it was an accident, and brief, but for goodness sake - this isn't a black or white situation.

Of course, it doesn't mean they should get compensation as if it had actually come to pass, and probably a full refund is too much. But it also doesn't mean they should just 'suck it up'.

Put yourself in their situation. Massive relief afterwards, for sure ... but man, that would have been awful on the plane.

Trauma certainly is being in a plane full of screaming people being told you're going to crash. A traumatic experience does not require physical harm, it can be mental. For example, hostages being threatened undergo a traumatic experience, but they don't necessarily receive any physical harm. I doubt anyone would dispute their 'trauma'.

Obviously it was an accident, and brief, but for goodness sake - this isn't a black or white situation.

Of course, it doesn't mean they should get compensation as if it had actually come to pass, and probably a full refund is too much. But it also doesn't mean they should just 'suck it up'.

Put yourself in their situation. Massive relief afterwards, for sure ... but man, that would have been awful on the plane.

Awful for like what, a few minutes? And it wasn't like the plane nose dived or anything. It was a smooth ride, with a warning message that was accidentally played. Maybe if the plane had nose dived a thousand feet or so, then there would be a huge reason to be mad. But you experience this type of "trauma" ( as some of you like to put it as ) every day when you get on the road, do handy work, or eat fast food.

Awful for like what, a few minutes? And it wasn't like the plane nose dived or anything. It was a smooth ride, with a warning message that was accidentally played. Maybe if the plane had nose dived a thousand feet or so, then there would be a huge reason to be mad. But you experience this type of "trauma" ( as some of you like to put it as ) every day when you get on the road, do handy work, or eat fast food.

If someone pointed a gun at me for a few minutes, threatening me, would you doubt that having a longer term effect? Even if you were told afterwards it wasn't loaded?

And so what if the plane didn't appear to have issues? It could have been an issue with fuel running out. It's not like we work particularly well under high stress, and the human imagination can think up all sorts of terrors if prodded.

No, you don't experience this sort of 'trauma' every day, that's a ridiculous assertion, and makes no sense.

I'm not saying this was right up there on the scale of terrible things to happen (it's fairly low down) ... but it's certainly not a non-event, and I don't understand some people's seeming lack of compassion.

If someone pointed a gun at me for a few minutes, threatening me, would you doubt that having a longer term effect? Even if you were told afterwards it wasn't loaded?

And so what if the plane didn't appear to have issues? It could have been an issue with fuel running out. It's not like we work particularly well under high stress, and the human imagination can think up all sorts of terrors if prodded.

No, you don't experience this sort of 'trauma' every day, that's a ridiculous assertion, and makes no sense.

I'm not saying this was right up there on the scale of terrible things to happen (it's fairly low down) ... but it's certainly not a non-event, and I don't understand some people's seeming lack of compassion.

Big difference between pointing a gun at someone, and hearing a message. It would be like if you were at a bank, someone ran in, said "This is a stick up" and then said, "NA , just kidding." There was no threat given besides a verbal one.

Sticks and stones can break bones, but words can never hurt you... unless you are a *****. ( not calling anyone here that, just saying it )

Actually, many people hear threats daily. Just play a game online, and you will hear tons lol. People just need to stop being such *******.

That's not a reasonable comparison, and you know it.

There is a big difference between a direct threat of "you might be about to die" and online comments. How does the sticks and stoned analogy even work? This isn't about insults or silly threats - this is a direct message saying: you are in a plane that's going to crashland.

There's two events here: during the event, where people were quite reasonably scared. And afterwards, when they were told it'll be okay. That it turned out okay doesn't completely negate the original event - it will still have an effect on some people.

My responce would have been "That's nice.. " as i listen to some music.

I mean seriously.. Unless superman himself or the hands of God came down from the sky to help the plane, screaming around the plane isn't going to help anything.

My responce would have been "That's nice.. " as i listen to some music.

I mean seriously.. Unless superman himself or the hands of God came down from the sky to help the plane, screaming around the plane isn't going to help anything.

no, you would not just say thats nice...

That's not a reasonable comparison, and you know it.

There is a big difference between a direct threat of "you might be about to die" and online comments. How does the sticks and stoned analogy even work? This isn't about insults or silly threats - this is a direct message saying: you are in a plane that's going to crashland.

There's two events here: during the event, where people were quite reasonably scared. And afterwards, when they were told it'll be okay. That it turned out okay doesn't completely negate the original event - it will still have an effect on some people.

yes it is, it is the exact same thing. A verbal threat of death is the same, no matter if it is prerecorded or spoken aloud by someone near you. It is still just a verbal threat.

How does stick and stones work? Lets pick apart a childrens saying... sheesh I can't believe neowin is degrading into such drivel.

You should probably stay inside, if you become so "traumatized" by peoples words. As well as never go online, because you will hear it plenty in games lol.

People now days just want to complain about any little thing. They apparently have no real troubles, and thus must make the smallest thing into a huge thing via "oh they are sooo traumatized by what someone said to them."

If you think anyone is permanently traumatized by this, they probably already had downs syndrome to begin with. I've been on roller coaster rides scarier and more life threatening than this....

Big difference between pointing a gun at someone, and hearing a message. It would be like if you were at a bank, someone ran in, said "This is a stick up" and then said, "NA , just kidding." There was no threat given besides a verbal one.

Sticks and stones can break bones, but words can never hurt you... unless you are a *****. ( not calling anyone here that, just saying it )

Actually, many people hear threats daily. Just play a game online, and you will hear tons lol. People just need to stop being such *******.

if you said that in the uk, you'd be arrested.

if you said that in the uk, you'd be arrested.

if you said that in the uk, you'd be arrested.

Well, one just does not walk into a bank and accidentally yell out, "This is a stick up." But I'm sure, if we all had a button on us that said that, it would happen more often and wouldn't be an offense worth arresting someone over. This was an accident, done by a recording...

How many fire alarms have been pulled accidentally? That's the same thing as what happened here... Except I would rather die in a plane crash over a ocean than in a building on fire.

Awful for like what, a few minutes? And it wasn't like the plane nose dived or anything. It was a smooth ride, with a warning message that was accidentally played. Maybe if the plane had nose dived a thousand feet or so, then there would be a huge reason to be mad. But you experience this type of "trauma" ( as some of you like to put it as ) every day when you get on the road, do handy work, or eat fast food.

Exactly. I imagine it was pretty scary when it happened, but if I was there It would be something I could laugh about later. I certainly wouldn't sue the airline. It was a complete accident, sometimes things like this happen.

Exactly. I imagine it was pretty scary when it happened, but if I was there It would be something I could laugh about later. I certainly wouldn't sue the airline. It was a complete accident, sometimes things like this happen.

The most I'd ask for, is probably a beer with the pilots when we landed so we could joke about it.

And Hum, that would have been an epic responce and an even better story.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!