Recommended Posts

It would be my primary OS if Windows Media Center weren't so gimped in Windows 8. Don't get me wrong, I love the OS, but because Windows Media Center has stagnated, it hasn't been replaced with anything else, making my TV tuner less useful.

You keep saying that the UI is no longer biased/tailored/optimized for specific input schemes then write off any and all criticism that highlights the problem with that approach (even while ignoring that it obviously still does have control bias built in - just stupid ones for most of us - like hotcorners).

I still don't understand what you mean PG by " touchpads are using mouse emulation - not a truly native driver."

Touchpads ARE mice (ie they move a cursor). What exactly does this magical native driver do again?

You keep saying that the UI is no longer biased/tailored/optimized for specific input schemes then write off any and all criticism that highlights the problem with that approach (even while ignoring that it obviously still does have control bias built in - just stupid ones for most of us - like hotcorners).

I still don't understand what you mean PG by " touchpads are using mouse emulation - not a truly native driver."

Touchpads ARE mice (ie they move a cursor). What exactly does this magical native driver do again?

Touchpads are NOT mice - anymore than trackpads (which preceded them) are mice.

Touchpads (and trackpads) used mouse emulation (for the understandable (and sensible) reason that there was no native support for touchpads/trackpads). In other words, mouse emulation acts as a shim for normally-incompatible hardware.

By insisting that touchpad (and trackpad) developers continue using that shim, you are saying that mouse emulation is good enough. Tell Wacom that. (Their tablets also support mouse emulation, in addition to the much more precise native interface.)

Tell ANY user of touchpads and trackpads that emulation is as good as native support - then DUCK!

"A touchpad (or trackpad) is a pointing device featuring a tactile sensor, a specialized surface that can translate the motion and position of a user's fingers to a relative position on screen."

Touchpads/trackpads are the same thing and most certainly are mice. (Mouse is a common metaphor for any device that moves a cursor) You didn't answer the question. How will the use of a trackpad change with this magic driver? Will it no longer move an on-screen cursor around as the user navigates? Who are these users that have this native support, whatever the **** that means, again?

Graphics tablets like the Wacom are OBVIOUSLY different because there is a direct correlation between a point on the tablet and a point on the screen.

"A touchpad (or trackpad) is a pointing device featuring a tactile sensor, a specialized surface that can translate the motion and position of a user's fingers to a relative position on screen."

Touchpads/trackpads are the same thing and most certainly are mice. (Mouse is a common metaphor for any device that moves a cursor) You didn't answer the question. How will the use of a trackpad change with this magic driver? Will it no longer move an on-screen cursor around as the user navigates? Who are these users that have this native support, whatever the **** that means, again?

Graphics tablets like the Wacom are OBVIOUSLY different because there is a direct correlation between a point on the tablet and a point on the screen.

Now YOU are being willfully obtuse.

Trackpads (and touchpads) are different from mice; however, they connect similarly to (and compete with) mice (Microsoft itself used to make a trackpad, for example) - all are, in fact, members of the *pointing device* subgroup. (Kensington and Logitech remain the leading manufacturers of non-mouse pointing devices, and especially for Windows - Synaptics is the leading manufacturer of touchpads.)

You can still buy trackpads for external connection - even for desktops; heck, you can even buy touchpads for desktops.

Why is there ANY demand for trackpads and touchpads among desktop users? One reason - precision. While you can do a lot with customized software for gaming devices (Razer, anyone?) such software is so hyperniche and proprietary as to be useless outside that niche use. There are users for whom a mouse is NOT precise enough - and for whom emulation won't cut it, either. (Just as there are users for which nothing less than Windows 7 - complete with Start menu - will suffice.)

-I have only just started using Windows 8. I don't understand the point of the metro screen, if practically every application I use, such as MS Word, Windows Messenger, Google Talk, Football Manager, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox..yeh you name it...they all open up in the desktop, so it is very annoying to have to switch back and fourth. I can definitely understand now why there have been lots of complaints to this.

-I love IE 10 though, but there does seem to be a problem in google search, you can't re-click on the phrase you entered...

-The speed of Windows 8 is great and it feels more responsive than Windows 7.

-I don't have a clue what the charms bar is for or why it is needed.

-I don't understand apps or what on earth they are for. They all seem negligible for me so far since I access everything online and its easier to view things inside a browser than from an "app" e.g. The weather app, to view the weather, you need to click the app, same with the news app. Why don't you just set your home page to bbc.co.uk or something and get to view both in one page from one click of the browser button?

-Messaging? What the **** is this? Seriously. I am so lost inside messaging/ people, I don't know what the **** is going on there.

Obviously I have only just started using this, but thus far, I can't see myself staying with the OS once the release preview is over. However, having said that, I guess I have to use this on a daily basis and learn a bit more and them come to a more reasoned opinion.

-I have only just started using Windows 8. I don't understand the point of the metro screen, if practically every application I use, such as MS Word, Windows Messenger, Google Talk, Football Manager, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox..yeh you name it...they all open up in the desktop, so it is very annoying to have to switch back and fourth. I can definitely understand now why there have been lots of complaints to this.

It's a screen for launching apps. I wouldn't say you're "switching back and forth" so much as you're just opening the launcher screen to launch the app you want, and then it launches however it does. This would be equally the case for Metro style apps, it's not like they actually launch inside the start screen.

Now YOU are being willfully obtuse.

Trackpads (and touchpads) are different from mice; however, they connect similarly to (and compete with) mice (Microsoft itself used to make a trackpad, for example) - all are, in fact, members of the *pointing device* subgroup. (Kensington and Logitech remain the leading manufacturers of non-mouse pointing devices, and especially for Windows - Synaptics is the leading manufacturer of touchpads.)

You can still buy trackpads for external connection - even for desktops; heck, you can even buy touchpads for desktops.

Why is there ANY demand for trackpads and touchpads among desktop users? One reason - precision. While you can do a lot with customized software for gaming devices (Razer, anyone?) such software is so hyperniche and proprietary as to be useless outside that niche use. There are users for whom a mouse is NOT precise enough - and for whom emulation won't cut it, either. (Just as there are users for which nothing less than Windows 7 - complete with Start menu - will suffice.)

Touchpads are not any more precise than a mouse, what are you talking about, both devices just transfer coordinates of travel to the system, while trackpads do know exactly where you put the finger, this is of limited use outside of hot corners and gestures.

It sounds like you're confusing tablets/digitizers with trackpads/mice. These can in fact use a mouse emulation to act like a mouse, but it's generally awkward. and these are the only devices with the "precision" you speak of.

I was going to... but decided on running mine on my Virtual Machine instead. I have been testing all my hardware/drivers and other applications and was shocked that they all worked? Well at the moment. (Y)

[/color]

It's a screen for launching apps. I wouldn't say you're "switching back and forth" so much as you're just opening the launcher screen to launch the app you want, and then it launches however it does. This would be equally the case for Metro style apps, it's not like they actually launch inside the start screen.

Sorry, but I don't know what that means. If I pinned appliciations to the desktop start bar, why do I need the metro interface? No matter what I seem to do, I seem to be always end up at the desktop. So it feels like extra work for no added gain.

PG, I can't explain it to you more clearly than that. If you don't want to comprehend the difference between a relative input method (mice/trackpads/pointing stick) and a direct one (touchscreens, digitizers), that's your business. When you clutter up the threads speaking about UI optimization without understanding this fundamental difference, you drag the entire discussion down.

You still didn't explain what 'native' means or how a new driver would change their use/behavior. I'm assuming that you think this native driver will turn a relative input into a direct based one. The only change MS has indicated is that there will be added gestures (swipe in etc), not the removal of the cursor, hence its still a relative input system.

The claim that touchpads have any superiority to mice, except for their size, is laughable. High precision mice are hyperniche? :rofl:

PG, I can't explain it to you more clearly than that. If you don't want to comprehend the difference between a relative input method (mice/trackpads/pointing stick) and a direct one (touchscreens, digitizers), that's your business. When you clutter up the threads speaking about UI optimization without understanding this fundamental difference, you drag the entire discussion down.

You still didn't explain what 'native' means or how a new driver would change their use/behavior. I'm assuming that you think this native driver will turn a relative input into a direct based one. The only change MS has indicated is that there will be added gestures (swipe in etc), not the removal of the cursor, hence its still a relative input system.

The claim that touchpads have any superiority to mice, except for their size, is laughable. High precision mice are hyperniche? :rofl:

I won't dive into this argument you two have at this point but I'll say one thing, touchpads, at least with the right drivers, under Windows 8 should be superior. The thing is that they're going to support a good number of gestures which, as far as I see, you can't do with a mouse. All the touch gestures you can do on a tablet/touch screen in Windows 8 you can reproduce on a touchpad now, right down to pinch and zoom and so on. On a laptop/notebook without a touch screen like the new stuff we've seen at computex, that's huge usability wise.

Of course on the flip side you can spend some extra cash and get one of those mouses with a few more buttons and probably set them to bring up things like the charms bar or the new task switcher. Any mouse that lets you custom set kb shortcuts to it's buttons would probably do a good job in that regard. But very few people use those types of mouses.

while touchpads are superior in the way that they can have gestures, they're still inferior in their effective and precise use, limited travel, limited accuracy, annoying, in the way when typing, not as easy to right and left click, totally useless for any sort of gaming.

mice with a touch surface however... and I won't even miss the gestures if MS allows click and hold to drag stuff like the start screen back and forth like a touch surface would.

while touchpads are superior in the way that they can have gestures, they're still inferior in their effective and precise use, limited travel, limited accuracy, annoying, in the way when typing, not as easy to right and left click, totally useless for any sort of gaming.

mice with a touch surface however... and I won't even miss the gestures if MS allows click and hold to drag stuff like the start screen back and forth like a touch surface would.

Those are valid points for the mouse, but you're not going to use a touchpad for any type of precision work, which is why we have usb ports on notebooks etc. Having one of the touch mouses so you can do the gestures plus have the accuracy of the mouse would be a benefit but we do have to keep in mind that very few people use those. I think the majority of people using Win8 will be on a tablet or one of the new notebooks/ultrabooks that will probably have touch, once you get used to the touch gestures then moving that same gesture over to the touchpad will help keep things uniform, consistent and also faster for most than moving the pointer into one of the corners, which you can do fast with a mouse of course but not with a touchpad.

I use a mouse for precision work in 3DS MAX any day, it's far better suited for that kidn of precision work over a tablet. in fact a tablet/digitizer isn't that suited for precision work, but is great in photoshop and drawing stuff where you don't need precision precision, but rather artistic presicion in the ability to draw good curves and freehand.

As for touch, good for tablet, I don't think you'll see many people using touch and on their 14+ inch laptop screens. awful for your hands and just plain awkward.

As for touch, good for tablet, I don't think you'll see many people using touch and on their 14+ inch laptop screens. awful for your hands and just plain awkward.

I disagree. We're going to see a lot more tablet / laptop hybrids and people will gravitate towards touch for interactions that benefit from it (i.e. closing a window, launching an app, etc). Don't forget that most people are already familiar with touch interfaces thanks to smart phones. I used to use a Windows XP touch screen at work and when I went to use a laptop I'd often find myself pressing the screen before releasing my mistake. At the end of the day any action that can be completed more quickly and more accurately with touch will be used more by users - using a trackpad to close a window is much more hassle than simply touching the screen.

I disagree. We're going to see a lot more tablet / laptop hybrids and people will gravitate towards touch for interactions that benefit from it (i.e. closing a window, launching an app, etc). Don't forget that most people are already familiar with touch interfaces thanks to smart phones. I used to use a Windows XP touch screen at work and when I went to use a laptop I'd often find myself pressing the screen before releasing my mistake. At the end of the day any action that can be completed more quickly and more accurately with touch will be used more by users - using a trackpad to close a window is much more hassle than simply touching the screen.

This is true, once people get used to using touch, say on one of the hybrids that are both a tablet and then can be made into a notebook they'll be used to using touch on the screen that even in laptop/notebook form their first instinct will be to touch the screen, from habit really. Honestly when i'm using my netbook the screen isn't all that far from my hands on the keyboard, reaching up to touch the screen for me would be the same as moving my right hand off of the keyboard to grab the mouse, though with the mouse your hand is resting true, though you're only going to interact with the touch screen for a very short period of time.

Sorry, but I don't know what that means. If I pinned appliciations to the desktop start bar, why do I need the metro interface? No matter what I seem to do, I seem to be always end up at the desktop. So it feels like extra work for no added gain.

Sure, you could always pin applications to the desktop taskbar. Why do you need the metro interface? Just call it an oversized start menu. It performs the same functions and more (please, nobody jump in and say a function has been removed). So you need the start screen for the same reason you needed a start menu in Windows 7. And in Windows 7, a program opened using the start screen also opened it on the desktop. It's consistent with Windows 7.

Opening the start screen is no more work than opening the start menu, and it involves the same exact action - either a keyboard button press, or putting the mouse in the same exact position that you had to for the start menu and clicking. And with the start screen taking up the whole screen, it has room for more content, so it should be easier to find.

Touch on a 10 inch pad is one thing, moving your hand all over a 15 inch screen is something completely different, especially in laptop mode where you have to hold your hand raised all the time.

on convertibles that are used primarily for browsing and 14 and below, myeah I can see it, to some degree.

Touch on a 10 inch pad is one thing, moving your hand all over a 15 inch screen is something completely different, especially in laptop mode where you have to hold your hand raised all the time.

on convertibles that are used primarily for browsing and 14 and below, myeah I can see it, to some degree.

But you're using the assumption that people will keep their hand raised all the time. Why would they? I'm simply saying that for some quick tasks like going into the char bar and using those menus that people, with a touch enabled notebook, be it 14" even, could quickly do it with touch or otherwise they'll just use the touchpad with it's gesture support. The point being that people will get used to touch with a tablet or a convertible and then even when using it in laptop/notebook mode they'll probably reach for the screen at times not really thinking about it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
    • Please I need help I been trying to find this secure boot on my ColorFul motherboard in the bios But i cant i turned off CSM everything watch every video i cant find it. BATTLE-AX B660M-HD DELUXE V20
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!