Recommended Posts

It would be my primary OS if Windows Media Center weren't so gimped in Windows 8. Don't get me wrong, I love the OS, but because Windows Media Center has stagnated, it hasn't been replaced with anything else, making my TV tuner less useful.

You keep saying that the UI is no longer biased/tailored/optimized for specific input schemes then write off any and all criticism that highlights the problem with that approach (even while ignoring that it obviously still does have control bias built in - just stupid ones for most of us - like hotcorners).

I still don't understand what you mean PG by " touchpads are using mouse emulation - not a truly native driver."

Touchpads ARE mice (ie they move a cursor). What exactly does this magical native driver do again?

You keep saying that the UI is no longer biased/tailored/optimized for specific input schemes then write off any and all criticism that highlights the problem with that approach (even while ignoring that it obviously still does have control bias built in - just stupid ones for most of us - like hotcorners).

I still don't understand what you mean PG by " touchpads are using mouse emulation - not a truly native driver."

Touchpads ARE mice (ie they move a cursor). What exactly does this magical native driver do again?

Touchpads are NOT mice - anymore than trackpads (which preceded them) are mice.

Touchpads (and trackpads) used mouse emulation (for the understandable (and sensible) reason that there was no native support for touchpads/trackpads). In other words, mouse emulation acts as a shim for normally-incompatible hardware.

By insisting that touchpad (and trackpad) developers continue using that shim, you are saying that mouse emulation is good enough. Tell Wacom that. (Their tablets also support mouse emulation, in addition to the much more precise native interface.)

Tell ANY user of touchpads and trackpads that emulation is as good as native support - then DUCK!

"A touchpad (or trackpad) is a pointing device featuring a tactile sensor, a specialized surface that can translate the motion and position of a user's fingers to a relative position on screen."

Touchpads/trackpads are the same thing and most certainly are mice. (Mouse is a common metaphor for any device that moves a cursor) You didn't answer the question. How will the use of a trackpad change with this magic driver? Will it no longer move an on-screen cursor around as the user navigates? Who are these users that have this native support, whatever the **** that means, again?

Graphics tablets like the Wacom are OBVIOUSLY different because there is a direct correlation between a point on the tablet and a point on the screen.

"A touchpad (or trackpad) is a pointing device featuring a tactile sensor, a specialized surface that can translate the motion and position of a user's fingers to a relative position on screen."

Touchpads/trackpads are the same thing and most certainly are mice. (Mouse is a common metaphor for any device that moves a cursor) You didn't answer the question. How will the use of a trackpad change with this magic driver? Will it no longer move an on-screen cursor around as the user navigates? Who are these users that have this native support, whatever the **** that means, again?

Graphics tablets like the Wacom are OBVIOUSLY different because there is a direct correlation between a point on the tablet and a point on the screen.

Now YOU are being willfully obtuse.

Trackpads (and touchpads) are different from mice; however, they connect similarly to (and compete with) mice (Microsoft itself used to make a trackpad, for example) - all are, in fact, members of the *pointing device* subgroup. (Kensington and Logitech remain the leading manufacturers of non-mouse pointing devices, and especially for Windows - Synaptics is the leading manufacturer of touchpads.)

You can still buy trackpads for external connection - even for desktops; heck, you can even buy touchpads for desktops.

Why is there ANY demand for trackpads and touchpads among desktop users? One reason - precision. While you can do a lot with customized software for gaming devices (Razer, anyone?) such software is so hyperniche and proprietary as to be useless outside that niche use. There are users for whom a mouse is NOT precise enough - and for whom emulation won't cut it, either. (Just as there are users for which nothing less than Windows 7 - complete with Start menu - will suffice.)

-I have only just started using Windows 8. I don't understand the point of the metro screen, if practically every application I use, such as MS Word, Windows Messenger, Google Talk, Football Manager, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox..yeh you name it...they all open up in the desktop, so it is very annoying to have to switch back and fourth. I can definitely understand now why there have been lots of complaints to this.

-I love IE 10 though, but there does seem to be a problem in google search, you can't re-click on the phrase you entered...

-The speed of Windows 8 is great and it feels more responsive than Windows 7.

-I don't have a clue what the charms bar is for or why it is needed.

-I don't understand apps or what on earth they are for. They all seem negligible for me so far since I access everything online and its easier to view things inside a browser than from an "app" e.g. The weather app, to view the weather, you need to click the app, same with the news app. Why don't you just set your home page to bbc.co.uk or something and get to view both in one page from one click of the browser button?

-Messaging? What the **** is this? Seriously. I am so lost inside messaging/ people, I don't know what the **** is going on there.

Obviously I have only just started using this, but thus far, I can't see myself staying with the OS once the release preview is over. However, having said that, I guess I have to use this on a daily basis and learn a bit more and them come to a more reasoned opinion.

-I have only just started using Windows 8. I don't understand the point of the metro screen, if practically every application I use, such as MS Word, Windows Messenger, Google Talk, Football Manager, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox..yeh you name it...they all open up in the desktop, so it is very annoying to have to switch back and fourth. I can definitely understand now why there have been lots of complaints to this.

It's a screen for launching apps. I wouldn't say you're "switching back and forth" so much as you're just opening the launcher screen to launch the app you want, and then it launches however it does. This would be equally the case for Metro style apps, it's not like they actually launch inside the start screen.

Now YOU are being willfully obtuse.

Trackpads (and touchpads) are different from mice; however, they connect similarly to (and compete with) mice (Microsoft itself used to make a trackpad, for example) - all are, in fact, members of the *pointing device* subgroup. (Kensington and Logitech remain the leading manufacturers of non-mouse pointing devices, and especially for Windows - Synaptics is the leading manufacturer of touchpads.)

You can still buy trackpads for external connection - even for desktops; heck, you can even buy touchpads for desktops.

Why is there ANY demand for trackpads and touchpads among desktop users? One reason - precision. While you can do a lot with customized software for gaming devices (Razer, anyone?) such software is so hyperniche and proprietary as to be useless outside that niche use. There are users for whom a mouse is NOT precise enough - and for whom emulation won't cut it, either. (Just as there are users for which nothing less than Windows 7 - complete with Start menu - will suffice.)

Touchpads are not any more precise than a mouse, what are you talking about, both devices just transfer coordinates of travel to the system, while trackpads do know exactly where you put the finger, this is of limited use outside of hot corners and gestures.

It sounds like you're confusing tablets/digitizers with trackpads/mice. These can in fact use a mouse emulation to act like a mouse, but it's generally awkward. and these are the only devices with the "precision" you speak of.

I was going to... but decided on running mine on my Virtual Machine instead. I have been testing all my hardware/drivers and other applications and was shocked that they all worked? Well at the moment. (Y)

[/color]

It's a screen for launching apps. I wouldn't say you're "switching back and forth" so much as you're just opening the launcher screen to launch the app you want, and then it launches however it does. This would be equally the case for Metro style apps, it's not like they actually launch inside the start screen.

Sorry, but I don't know what that means. If I pinned appliciations to the desktop start bar, why do I need the metro interface? No matter what I seem to do, I seem to be always end up at the desktop. So it feels like extra work for no added gain.

PG, I can't explain it to you more clearly than that. If you don't want to comprehend the difference between a relative input method (mice/trackpads/pointing stick) and a direct one (touchscreens, digitizers), that's your business. When you clutter up the threads speaking about UI optimization without understanding this fundamental difference, you drag the entire discussion down.

You still didn't explain what 'native' means or how a new driver would change their use/behavior. I'm assuming that you think this native driver will turn a relative input into a direct based one. The only change MS has indicated is that there will be added gestures (swipe in etc), not the removal of the cursor, hence its still a relative input system.

The claim that touchpads have any superiority to mice, except for their size, is laughable. High precision mice are hyperniche? :rofl:

PG, I can't explain it to you more clearly than that. If you don't want to comprehend the difference between a relative input method (mice/trackpads/pointing stick) and a direct one (touchscreens, digitizers), that's your business. When you clutter up the threads speaking about UI optimization without understanding this fundamental difference, you drag the entire discussion down.

You still didn't explain what 'native' means or how a new driver would change their use/behavior. I'm assuming that you think this native driver will turn a relative input into a direct based one. The only change MS has indicated is that there will be added gestures (swipe in etc), not the removal of the cursor, hence its still a relative input system.

The claim that touchpads have any superiority to mice, except for their size, is laughable. High precision mice are hyperniche? :rofl:

I won't dive into this argument you two have at this point but I'll say one thing, touchpads, at least with the right drivers, under Windows 8 should be superior. The thing is that they're going to support a good number of gestures which, as far as I see, you can't do with a mouse. All the touch gestures you can do on a tablet/touch screen in Windows 8 you can reproduce on a touchpad now, right down to pinch and zoom and so on. On a laptop/notebook without a touch screen like the new stuff we've seen at computex, that's huge usability wise.

Of course on the flip side you can spend some extra cash and get one of those mouses with a few more buttons and probably set them to bring up things like the charms bar or the new task switcher. Any mouse that lets you custom set kb shortcuts to it's buttons would probably do a good job in that regard. But very few people use those types of mouses.

while touchpads are superior in the way that they can have gestures, they're still inferior in their effective and precise use, limited travel, limited accuracy, annoying, in the way when typing, not as easy to right and left click, totally useless for any sort of gaming.

mice with a touch surface however... and I won't even miss the gestures if MS allows click and hold to drag stuff like the start screen back and forth like a touch surface would.

while touchpads are superior in the way that they can have gestures, they're still inferior in their effective and precise use, limited travel, limited accuracy, annoying, in the way when typing, not as easy to right and left click, totally useless for any sort of gaming.

mice with a touch surface however... and I won't even miss the gestures if MS allows click and hold to drag stuff like the start screen back and forth like a touch surface would.

Those are valid points for the mouse, but you're not going to use a touchpad for any type of precision work, which is why we have usb ports on notebooks etc. Having one of the touch mouses so you can do the gestures plus have the accuracy of the mouse would be a benefit but we do have to keep in mind that very few people use those. I think the majority of people using Win8 will be on a tablet or one of the new notebooks/ultrabooks that will probably have touch, once you get used to the touch gestures then moving that same gesture over to the touchpad will help keep things uniform, consistent and also faster for most than moving the pointer into one of the corners, which you can do fast with a mouse of course but not with a touchpad.

I use a mouse for precision work in 3DS MAX any day, it's far better suited for that kidn of precision work over a tablet. in fact a tablet/digitizer isn't that suited for precision work, but is great in photoshop and drawing stuff where you don't need precision precision, but rather artistic presicion in the ability to draw good curves and freehand.

As for touch, good for tablet, I don't think you'll see many people using touch and on their 14+ inch laptop screens. awful for your hands and just plain awkward.

As for touch, good for tablet, I don't think you'll see many people using touch and on their 14+ inch laptop screens. awful for your hands and just plain awkward.

I disagree. We're going to see a lot more tablet / laptop hybrids and people will gravitate towards touch for interactions that benefit from it (i.e. closing a window, launching an app, etc). Don't forget that most people are already familiar with touch interfaces thanks to smart phones. I used to use a Windows XP touch screen at work and when I went to use a laptop I'd often find myself pressing the screen before releasing my mistake. At the end of the day any action that can be completed more quickly and more accurately with touch will be used more by users - using a trackpad to close a window is much more hassle than simply touching the screen.

I disagree. We're going to see a lot more tablet / laptop hybrids and people will gravitate towards touch for interactions that benefit from it (i.e. closing a window, launching an app, etc). Don't forget that most people are already familiar with touch interfaces thanks to smart phones. I used to use a Windows XP touch screen at work and when I went to use a laptop I'd often find myself pressing the screen before releasing my mistake. At the end of the day any action that can be completed more quickly and more accurately with touch will be used more by users - using a trackpad to close a window is much more hassle than simply touching the screen.

This is true, once people get used to using touch, say on one of the hybrids that are both a tablet and then can be made into a notebook they'll be used to using touch on the screen that even in laptop/notebook form their first instinct will be to touch the screen, from habit really. Honestly when i'm using my netbook the screen isn't all that far from my hands on the keyboard, reaching up to touch the screen for me would be the same as moving my right hand off of the keyboard to grab the mouse, though with the mouse your hand is resting true, though you're only going to interact with the touch screen for a very short period of time.

Sorry, but I don't know what that means. If I pinned appliciations to the desktop start bar, why do I need the metro interface? No matter what I seem to do, I seem to be always end up at the desktop. So it feels like extra work for no added gain.

Sure, you could always pin applications to the desktop taskbar. Why do you need the metro interface? Just call it an oversized start menu. It performs the same functions and more (please, nobody jump in and say a function has been removed). So you need the start screen for the same reason you needed a start menu in Windows 7. And in Windows 7, a program opened using the start screen also opened it on the desktop. It's consistent with Windows 7.

Opening the start screen is no more work than opening the start menu, and it involves the same exact action - either a keyboard button press, or putting the mouse in the same exact position that you had to for the start menu and clicking. And with the start screen taking up the whole screen, it has room for more content, so it should be easier to find.

Touch on a 10 inch pad is one thing, moving your hand all over a 15 inch screen is something completely different, especially in laptop mode where you have to hold your hand raised all the time.

on convertibles that are used primarily for browsing and 14 and below, myeah I can see it, to some degree.

Touch on a 10 inch pad is one thing, moving your hand all over a 15 inch screen is something completely different, especially in laptop mode where you have to hold your hand raised all the time.

on convertibles that are used primarily for browsing and 14 and below, myeah I can see it, to some degree.

But you're using the assumption that people will keep their hand raised all the time. Why would they? I'm simply saying that for some quick tasks like going into the char bar and using those menus that people, with a touch enabled notebook, be it 14" even, could quickly do it with touch or otherwise they'll just use the touchpad with it's gesture support. The point being that people will get used to touch with a tablet or a convertible and then even when using it in laptop/notebook mode they'll probably reach for the screen at times not really thinking about it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!