Recommended Posts

That was definitely worth getting up early for, even though I did fall back to sleep before switching the race on, so I missed the first 20 or so laps. :p

Fantastic drive from Jenson, hopefully he'll continue to dominate, and we'll have 2009 all over again. :) Anyone else amazed at Sergio Perez's performance? I can't help but wonder how much higher up the grid he would have finished if he didn't start dead last. Shame about Maldonado's last lap crash, as he had a blinding race up until then; I actually thought he was gonna overtake Alonso. And a little shout out to cheeky jock Paul Di Resta for nicking the last championship point on the finish straight in the final lap. :p There was a lot of action on the final lap, and I was amazed how close the 8th - 11th placed cars were going over the line; less than half a second between them. :o That's like watching NASCAR, seeing them so close together.

superb pace by mclaren, i expected nothing else than a win, but it looks like redbull has come much closer in race pace. shame about schumacher, i would have loved to see how his tires would have behaved later on.

raikkonen from 17th to 7 thats a nice effort!

sorry for maldonado he was set up to take that one more place and finish 5th.

somethings tell me that webber wont fight for the titel this year. it will be mclaren vs. vettel.

Yeah that's smart, the reason they couldn't cover all the races was because of the license fee freeze, if people stop paying their license fee then you will get even less original programming including F1.

the F1 on the bbc was just about the only thing apart from bbc news in the mornings that i would watch thats broadcasted on UK airwaves.

all the other content like american tv shows are streamed. apart from those 2 chanels i dont watch any tv in the evenings.

it has nothing to do with the freeze, its down to who pays bernie the most.

the F1 on the bbc was just about the only thing apart from bbc news in the mornings that i would watch thats broadcasted on UK airwaves.

all the other content like american tv shows are streamed. apart from those 2 chanels i dont watch any tv in the evenings.

it has nothing to do with the freeze, its down to who pays bernie the most.

Um, it has nothing to do with Bernie.

The BBC couldn't afford to cover F1 from 2012 onwards because the government has frozen the license fee. If it weren't for Sky the BBC would have had to forfeit all rights to F1 and Sky would have bought them all.

One other driver who deserves praise for today's race is Kimi R?ikk?nen. He hasn't lost any of his racecraft, and one can only wonder where he would have finished hadn't it been for the Q1 blunder.

Then there was this typical Kimi moment during the race:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2ffKWVZbug

But they give us so much action by blundering into the first corners and smashing someone up, Then they're out after that anyway so let them be. :p

It did seem pretty unfair on how Vettel jumped Hammy with the safety car, can anyone explain how that happened?

I thoroughly enjoyed the race. Hamilton was unlucky really and I'd have liked to have seen more or Schumacher. Think a lot of young drivers showed their true potential today (Verge, Ricciardo, Perez, Kobayashi, etc) while others showed how poor they can be (Massa). Maldonado is dangerous IMHO. Can't believe him running Grosjean off the track wasn't even investigated. Then again, deliberately crashing into people is apparently ok too. :rolleyes: (I categorically can not forgive that.)

Lots of great stories in this race. We're in for a cracker of a season.

I can't say I missed HRT one single bit. They just need to get Marussia chucked out next and it'll be perfect.

Although I sort of agree, people would then moan about Lotus being last, too slow, etc... someone has to finish last unfortunately. Perhaps worth pointing out that despite their hopeless starts, HRT beat Virgin/Marussia in both 2010 and 2011. But I can't help but imagine how much better it would have been if the new teams had been picked based on merit and not on politics. There were some promising candidates like Lola and Prodrive.

But they give us so much action by blundering into the first corners and smashing someone up, Then they're out after that anyway so let them be. :p

It did seem pretty unfair on how Vettel jumped Hammy with the safety car, can anyone explain how that happened?

Basically while Hamilton was in the pits Vettel was doing a racing lap - same as usual. Normally this would be countered by Hamilton then doing a racing lap while Vettel was pitting. But due to the safety car and the track-wide speed limit, he couldn't claim it back. The SC forced them both to the same speed at their current positions on the track. A pit stop takes the same amount of time but the SC speed limit forces them to a slower lap time.

Ah so Hammy's catch up lap whilst Vettel was pitting was under speed limit so he couldn't get past infront. Thanks for that! Had me confused as I thought Hammy would of been able to slot back in but infact he would of been third place when the SC rolled onto the track.

Got it! :p

One other driver who deserves praise for today's race is Kimi R?ikk?nen. He hasn't lost any of his racecraft, and one can only wonder where he would have finished hadn't it been for the Q1 blunder.

Then there was this typical Kimi moment during the race:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2ffKWVZbug

This isn't half as funny when people realise that Jenson asked the exact same thing (but that didn't get into the main F1 transmission).

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xpistf_2012-f1-australian-grand-prix-pit-channel-team-radio-feature_auto

@8:25

This season is much more competitive by the looks of things, and it's looking excellent. :)

I really loved the Australian GP. Vettel made the overtake of the race, and the usual suspects like Kobayashi had good overtakes too.

I'm happy that the Williams is looking like a better car this year. :)

'Jenson Button was 'more than marginal' on fuel during the Australian Grand Prix'

The McLarens could have been even faster? Bad news for those of us who want to see a fight for the title, good news for all McLaren fans.

Good race, glad to see JB at the front and winning again.

Thought Hamilton was a bad loser, he messed up start. He just turning into a PR nightmare.

Great racing right down the field, loved Paul Di Resta pushing right to the flag, that's what it's all about.

Really think Massa's days are numbered.

The coverage was good too, only real complaint was Geordie Thompson, I really hope Sky woo Lee McKenzie, at least she knows what's she's talking about.

Good race, glad to see JB at the front and winning again.

Thought Hamilton was a bad loser, he messed up start. He just turning into a PR nightmare.

Great racing right down the field, loved Paul Di Resta pushing right to the flag, that's what it's all about.

Really think Massa's days are numbered.

The coverage was good too, only real complaint was Geordie Thompson, I really hope Sky woo Lee McKenzie, at least she knows what's she's talking about.

Yeah. That picture from the article Meph posted pretty much sums Lewis up.

1332079716.jpg

I was routing for McLaren as a whole this year, but Lewis is so pathetic I'm just going to stick with Jenson. He's such a cool character and his bottom lip doesn't sink to the floor when he loses a couple of places over a race. On top of that, he's very strategic, always asking about other teams and how they are looking in comparison. Whenever Lewis goes on the radio it always seems to be about losing rear grip or how another car cut him up (I know the transmissions are chosen for broadcast and we don't hear the full story, but after three years, this seems to be the trend).

Enjoyable race. Looks like the midfield is going to be even more competitive this year with Williams looking like they have a decent car.

While i hope McLaren win this year, i hope it goes to the final race with hopefully a couple of teams in the fight.

I agree with mps69, Lewis is a PR nightmare. No doubt he is on the best drivers on the grid but if things don't go his way he just comes across as a spoilt kid.

  • Like 1

In Lewis' defence, I should imagine he may be a bit annoyed at McLaren's continual race strategy blunders. So far it is a continuation of last year where their insistence on treating the cars equally (whoever is in the lead pits first) cost them places. I get why they do it and applaud them for trying to be fair and equal, but quite simply it doesn't work. All their rivals have to do is wait for car 1 to pit, then follow them in and they've got the jump on the other. It actually forced them into pitting them on the same lap at the second round of stops (which was brilliant). If they'd repeated the same process as usual Vettel would have ended up in second without any assistance from the safety car whatsoever.

They need to let them pit when they need to pit and be done with it. If they both need to pit at the same lap and are close enough on track that it will negatively effect the leader, then prioritise them and hope for the best. But yesterday they'd have lost nothing from pitting Lewis first.

In Lewis' defence, I should imagine he may be a bit annoyed at McLaren's continual race strategy blunders. So far it is a continuation of last year where their insistence on treating the cars equally (whoever is in the lead pits first) cost them places. I get why they do it and applaud them for trying to be fair and equal, but quite simply it doesn't work. All their rivals have to do is wait for car 1 to pit, then follow them in and they've got the jump on the other. It actually forced them into pitting them on the same lap at the second round of stops (which was brilliant). If they'd repeated the same process as usual Vettel would have ended up in second without any assistance from the safety car whatsoever.

It's not Mclarens fault, they could never have predicted that the safety car would have come out just after the pitstop, they pulled the stops off flawlessly and if the safety car hadn't have come out all this would be academic.

I think its great that the cars/drivers are treated equally, with the other teams there is a clear divide between main driver and second driver, there is no other team that has two world champions that are so closely match. I love Mark Webber and I hate the way Red Bull treat him in favour of Vettel, if you treat the drivers equally they have an equal chance of winning.

They need to let them pit when they need to pit and be done with it. If they both need to pit at the same lap and are close enough on track that it will negatively effect the leader, then prioritise them and hope for the best. But yesterday they'd have lost nothing from pitting Lewis first.

That still would have negatively affected them, say they brought Hamilton in first what would have happened if Vettel had reacted the same as Jenson coming in, Hamilton and Vettel would have gone out then the safety car would have come out and he would have come out worse off than Hamilton he would have come out behind them or even further down the field, then he had to conserve fuel so there would have been no chance of him coming on the podium.

+1 Its to their credit and detriment that they have to #1 drivers...I'm glad they try and be as fair as possible, they even managed to pit them both on the same lap to try and keep it fair and even....Lewis just got unlucky.

It's not Mclarens fault, they could never have predicted that the safety car would have come out just after the pitstop, they pulled the stops off flawlessly and if the safety car hadn't have come out all this would be academic.

I think its great that the cars/drivers are treated equally, with the other teams there is a clear divide between main driver and second driver, there is no other team that has two world champions that are so closely match. I love Mark Webber and I hate the way Red Bull treat him in favour of Vettel, if you treat the drivers equally they have an equal chance of winning.

That still would have negatively affected them, say they brought Hamilton in first what would have happened if Vettel had reacted the same as Jenson coming in, Hamilton and Vettel would have gone out then the safety car would have come out and he would have come out worse off than Hamilton he would have come out behind them or even further down the field, then he had to conserve fuel so there would have been no chance of him coming on the podium.

You've misunderstood me. I'm talking about the first round of stops which were unaffected by the safety car. By forcing Hamilton to pit at least one lap later, Vettel could just follow Button in and gain a load of time on Hamilton because of him doing an extra lap on rubbish tyres (which he did). Plus they dumped him behind Perez (may not have cleared him, but as Hamilton was +3s on Button and -10s on Vettel prior to the first stop I'd say Perez should have ended up between Hamilton and Vettel). If they'd have done it the other way round then he'd have most likely have been in front of Vettel and still behind Button. The second round of stops were a reaction to the fact that Vettel could just repeat the same move - follow Button in and get the jump on Hamilton. By pitting them the same lap they eliminated it as it becomes a straight pit race. That came down to luck for Vettel. But assuming Hamilton/Vettel pitted the same lap at the second stop and Button did one more lap, Button would have been comfortably clear (as Vettel's luck proved).

Maybe this one was just bad luck, but Hamilton has had so many bad strategy calls in the last two years it is impossible to tell anymore. At least McLaren's stops look a lot quicker and cleaner now.

You've misunderstood me. I'm talking about the first round of stops which were unaffected by the safety car. By forcing Hamilton to pit at least one lap later, Vettel could just follow Button in and gain a load of time on Hamilton because of him doing an extra lap on rubbish tyres (which he did). Plus they dumped him behind Perez (may not have cleared him, but as Hamilton was +3s on Button and -10s on Vettel prior to the first stop I'd say Perez should have ended up between Hamilton and Vettel). If they'd have done it the other way round then he'd have most likely have been in front of Vettel and still behind Button. The second round of stops were a reaction to the fact that Vettel could just repeat the same move - follow Button in and get the jump on Hamilton. By pitting them the same lap they eliminated it as it becomes a straight pit race. That came down to luck for Vettel. But assuming Hamilton/Vettel pitted the same lap at the second stop and Button did one more lap, Button would have been comfortably clear (as Vettel's luck proved).

Maybe this one was just bad luck, but Hamilton has had so many bad strategy calls in the last two years it is impossible to tell anymore. At least McLaren's stops look a lot quicker and cleaner now.

That's McLaren's equality.

How do you think Button would feel, running in 1st, but his teammate behind him gets the first stop, despite them both being on the same strategy.

That's McLaren's equality.

How do you think Button would feel, running in 1st, but his teammate behind him gets the first stop, despite them both being on the same strategy.

Providing it keeps them 1-2 in the order they are then I don't see anything wrong with it. As I said before, if they are close enough for it to affect each other then do the leader gets first choice thing. But McLaren shoot themselves in the foot with it at times.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • OpenAI is now rolling out Lockdown Mode to more ChatGPT users by Pradeep Viswanathan Back in February, OpenAI first announced Lockdown Mode for users who want the most comprehensive protection from potential attacks. At the time of the announcement, the company mentioned that this feature was available to a small set of highly security-conscious users, including executives or security teams at leading organizations. Today, OpenAI announced that Lockdown Mode is now rolling out to all personal ChatGPT accounts, including Free, Go, Plus, and Pro, and also self-serve ChatGPT Business accounts. Users can enable the feature from ChatGPT Settings > Security when it is available for their account. When Lockdown Mode is enabled, ChatGPT limits or disables several features that connect to the web or external services. These include live web browsing, Deep Research, Agent Mode, and more. Here is the complete list of services that will be disabled in Lockdown Mode: Live web browsing: Web browsing is limited to accessing only cached content. Search results may be limited, unavailable, or stale. Image support: ChatGPT may not display images in regular responses or retrieve images from the web. Users can still upload image files, and image generation remains available where it is otherwise available. Deep research: Deep research is disabled. Agent mode: Agent mode is disabled. Canvas networking: Users cannot approve Canvas-generated code to access the network. File downloads: ChatGPT cannot download files for data analysis. ChatGPT can still operate on your manually uploaded files. It is important to note that Lockdown Mode does not completely block prompt injections from appearing in content that ChatGPT processes. For example, a malicious instruction could still be present in an uploaded file or cached web content. However, the mode is designed to reduce the ways such an attack could send sensitive information outside the conversation. Along with Lockdown Mode, OpenAI today also announced that the Active sessions feature is now available across ChatGPT accounts and workspace types. This feature allows users to review where their account is signed in across devices and end sessions if required. A session will have the following information displayed: Device or browser information. First-party app context, such as ChatGPT, Codex, or API Platform. Approximate location. Sign-in date and time. Whether the device is a trusted device. Whether it is your current session. OpenAI highlighted that the Active sessions feature will not be available for accounts linked to an organization’s single sign-on setup, including SAML or OIDC.
    • with LSTC and ESU, moving to w11 or linux because w10 suddenly will not work when in reality it works and its a better choice, of course there are also developers that only test in 11 or force you to have TPM and Secure boot for the sake of "better security" in games. or most likely people is buying new PC that only ship with 11
    • with LTSC and ESU there are still viable as a stable platform not that they care and let people deal with w11 crashing and burning every month support mean shet if the platform is trash
    • Most boring game ever. Repetitive, empty, predictable, and full of cliches. Total waste of time and money, IMO.
    • Mafia: The Old Country expansion Man of Honor announced, brings back Salieri from original by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe During Summer Game Fest, 2K and Hanger 13 brought out a new Mafia: The Old Country trailer, revealing the game's first expansion. Named Man of Honor, this is slated to add two new chapters to the Enzo storyline that the game follows. There is an iconic character returning to the series with this expansion, with players set to run into Ennio Salieri, the future Don of the Salieri crime family. Fans of the original Mafia, or its Definitive Edition remake, may remember that name as one of the biggest characters in the storyline. This expansion is set prior to his rise to being the kingpin in the City of Lost Heaven. "Set in Sicily during the winter of 1905, Enzo Favara has proven himself a reliable soldier of the Torrisi crime family in the months since his initiation," says the studio about the new chapters. "Now, the Don entrusts him and Cesare with a delicate assignment of assisting Ennio Salieri, a man of honor recently released from prison and intent on reclaiming what is his." Working at Salieri's side, players will be heading into fresh environments as they return to the role of Enzo as a high-ranking soldato. The studio also promises brand-new weapons, fresh vehicles, and charms to collect in this expansion. Moreover, the expansion will add new content to the updated Free Ride mode. Alongside new collectibles and locations, this will add more challenges to beat alongside Salieri, which are described as runs that will "test the skills of even the most elite mafiosi." The Mafia: The Old Country Man of Honor story expansion will release on August 14, 2026, across PC, Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5. It will cost $10 for owners of the base game to jump into.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!