Recommended Posts

Android.Counterclank Found in Official Android Market

Symantec has identified multiple publisher IDs on the Android Market that are being used to push out Android.Counterclank. This is a minor modification of Android.Tonclank, a bot-like threat that can receive commands to carry out certain actions, as well as steal information from the device.

_original

For each of these malicious applications, the malicious code has been grafted on to the main application in a package called ?apperhand?. When the package is executed, a service with the same name may be seen running on a compromised device. Another sign of an infection is the presence of the Search icon above on the home screen.

The combined download figures of all the malicious apps indicate that Android.Counterclank has the highest distribution of any malware identified so far this year.

post-1302-0-62412000-1327751224.png

Symantec is continuing with further investigation and we will post more information as we discover it.

Source: Symantec

Forget fragmentation, Google need to fix this. Android apps need to be sandboxed and don't get access to any User Data or to Modify system settings unless the user explicitly permits, rather than prompting the user for 10 different permissions they don't understand when they install it and giving the app free reign. The Android Market is very immature in this regard in comparison to iOS App Store.

Moar Android malware? Color me not surprised. Android's a mess of epic proportions.

This is why you shouldn't download apps such as "Stripper Touch girl" and "Pretty women lingerie puzzle"

You're talking about the same users who did the same thing on their Windows systems. "Click here to download FREE screensavers!"

Apple's policies are sometimes a pain in the ass, but when I see things like that ruining the Android Market, I'm glad to have an iPhone. My 4S is jailbroken, so I *CAN* download a virus if I'm not careful, but at least I KNOW the risk, I know there's crap on the Cydia Store cuz I know it's an alternative store, not the "real thing"... It sucks for Android users, who assume that if it's offered on the official Android Market it's safe, to get an infected phone. I know I can trust what is offered in the App Store.

I like Android, but Google must do something about that! The Market is a jungle

Apple's policies are sometimes a pain in the ass, but when I see things like that ruining the Android Market, I'm glad to have an iPhone. My 4S is jailbroken, so I *CAN* download a virus if I'm not precaucious, but at least I KNOW the risk, I know there's crap on the Cydia Store.... It sucks for Android users, who assume that if it's offered on the Android Market it's safe, to get an infected phone. I know I can trust what is offered in the App Store.

Symantec has been proven wrong...these are not trojans or anything like that.

And no amount of security will protect you if you are stupid user. Doesnt matter if you are WP7, Android, or Apple.

  • Like 1

Symantec has been proven wrong...these are not trojans or anything like that.

And no amount of security will protect you if you are stupid user. Doesnt matter if you are WP7, Android, or Apple.

This. When you install an app on an Android device, it will tell you the permissions it needs and then it's up to you to determine if it's asking for too much. Just like with a desktop or laptop computer, users need to get educated to protect themselves against those that would exploit their ignorance.

This. When you install an app on an Android device, it will tell you the permissions it needs and then it's up to you to determine if it's asking for too much. Just like with a desktop or laptop computer, users need to get educated to protect themselves against those that would exploit their ignorance.

Not every user is tech savvy or enjoys spending his day reading and checking what it does, how it does it and how it can affect him. iPhone users at least don't have to worry about that and I think it goes the same way with WP. We need to try and see here we're not the only ones using technology and not everyone enjoys learning as much as others do about it.

This. When you install an app on an Android device, it will tell you the permissions it needs and then it's up to you to determine if it's asking for too much. Just like with a desktop or laptop computer, users need to get educated to protect themselves against those that would exploit their ignorance.

Negative.... When I use a designated store from my operating system provider I expect a certain level of integrity from that provider. This is not some third party whom I am downloading from. If I were to download the application from an outside source, outside of their ecosystem your point would be valid.

I do however agree that education is vital and may have saved people from these applications, however I will stand by my previous statement and that these types applications damage the integrity of their store and should not be allowed.

This. When you install an app on an Android device, it will tell you the permissions it needs and then it's up to you to determine if it's asking for too much. Just like with a desktop or laptop computer, users need to get educated to protect themselves against those that would exploit their ignorance.

Not every user is tech savvy or enjoys spending his day reading and checking what it does, how it does it and how it can affect him. iPhone users at least don't have to worry about that and I think it goes the same way with WP. We need to try and see here we're not the only ones using technology and not everyone enjoys learning as much as others do about it.

What I mean about security is this..

You can password protect anything...put a pin number on it...pattern unlock...whatever. People are so dumb that they will give this info to their friends or family members. Or, they will write their passwords someplace next to what they are "protecting" So again, no amount of security will protect the stupid...and there are many of those out there...and I know this article is about software, not password protection.

And education is the key. If you buy something and dont spend the time to learn how to use it correctly, then I will not feel sorry for you if something goes wrong.

To bad Symantec is stupid and doesnt know what they are talking about.

http://m.androidcent...A11&sitesearch=

No according to that it's most definitiely a trojan, only a fanboy would claim an app that does all that is not when it sneaks in as part of another app that you haven't requested.

Come on!! You forgot the Sexy Girl Puzzle!! Whats wrong with you???

Somehow I dont think that the situation is as bad as some would make it out to be... And lookOut helps :)

Its not. They are not trojans just software for ads. Symantec spoke to soon.

No according to that it's most definitiely a trojan, only a fanboy would claim an app that does all that is not when it sneaks in as part of another app that you haven't requested.

Trojans cause damage or something malicious to the system it is on...like deleting files, destroying info, or allowing remote accesss. This software, as pointed out by Lookout, does not do this and is just for use for advertising.

Its not. They are not trojans just software for ads. Symantec spoke to soon.

Trojans cause damage or something malicious to the system it is on...like deleting files, destroying info, or allowing remote accesss. This software, as pointed out by Lookout, does not do this and is just for use for advertising.

No.

A Trojan, sneaks in by pretending to be something it is not. it does not necessarily cause damage, but in this case it spies and steals data which qualifies enough.

A virus spreads by itself by attaching to other programs and hides, it also does not necessarily cause damage.

A worm is kind of like a virus but it doesn't need to infect another program to spread. it spreads fully by itself. it also does not necessairly need to cause any damage.

Causing damage was never a pre-requisite for any of these definitions though in the past it was the primary reason for them. Today int he itnernet age however, there are many more "uses" for these, though they are all bad. but the definition of Trojan, Virus and Worm is just a delivery method for malware or badware. The payload can be anything, like in this case malicious spyware and adware.

Not every user is tech savvy or enjoys spending his day reading and checking what it does, how it does it and how it can affect him. iPhone users at least don't have to worry about that and I think it goes the same way with WP. We need to try and see here we're not the only ones using technology and not everyone enjoys learning as much as others do about it.

I do not disagree with you. When I am asked by family and friends which computer or other device they should choose I always take their lifestyle into consideration. Right now and in it's current state, Android is probably not the best option for people who are not tech enthusiasts. The same could be said of Linux, but probably to a greater degree. For most people I know who just need something that works and is well supported, I tend to recommend Apple and Microsoft products. For myself, I like Android BECAUSE of the open platform approach and I'd really hate to see it restricted instead of becoming more open.

Negative.... When I use a designated store from my operating system provider I expect a certain level of integrity from that provider. This is not some third party whom I am downloading from. If I were to download the application from an outside source, outside of their ecosystem your point would be valid.

I do however agree that education is vital and may have saved people from these applications, however I will stand by my previous statement and that these types applications damage the integrity of their store and should not be allowed.

I will concede to agree with you on the point of the Marketplace. Google should probably take steps to make the default Marketplace more secure, but I wouldn't want them to move in a direction that would make it so restrictive as to discourage legitimate app developers on the platform.

Trojans cause damage or something malicious to the system it is on...like deleting files, destroying info, or allowing remote accesss. This software, as pointed out by Lookout, does not do this and is just for use for advertising.

A Trojan horse, or Trojan, is software that is intended to perform, simultaneously, a desirable (expected) effect and a covert (unexpected) effect...

But, yes they are associated with malicious acts as that is typically the only reason to inflict such an action on a user(s) system.

A Trojan horse, or Trojan, is software that is intended to perform, simultaneously, a desirable (expected) effect and a covert (unexpected) effect...

But, yes they are associated with malicious acts as that is typically the only reason to inflict such an action on a user(s) system.

The apps are legit and the "trojan" is just an advertising component. Granted, more aggressive than other ads but a lot of apps on all markets have advertising components. So its no big deal.

The apps are legit and the "trojan" is just an advertising component. Granted, more aggressive than other ads but a lot of apps on all markets have advertising components. So its no big deal.

it's undesires spyware and malware that infects your phone without your wishes.

it's a Trojan.

So it's adware that people don't actually want, that also takes serials numbers from phones (why would it even need your MAC address at any rate)? Dishonest adware? That technically can be classified as malware - though it's not destructive. Might not be sinister either, though I doubt anyone here can prove either way right now.

The apps are legit and the "trojan" is just an advertising component. Granted, more aggressive than other ads but a lot of apps on all markets have advertising components. So its no big deal.

Stop trying to defend the undefensible. Lets get two things straight.

1. As Android developer and Supplier of the Android Marketplace, Google should not be allowing damaging Apps to be put up there, they need to do something, either change Android that it runs apps better in a sandbox or something or police the market place a lot better even if it closes it up. Remember, Google charges the Carriers/manufacturers for access to the market and take a cut of the apps paid for, with this should come the responsibility to police it, its only time before they are hit with a massive law suit.

2. We should not have to put virus checkers on our Phones, if that is the future then their is something seriously gone wrong.

If this was that big of deal, Google would have removed the apps like they have did so before. But right now, Google is refusing to do so and the Apps are still on the market. So far, nothing has been proven that this causes any damage or is being used for malicious intent. So IMO, no big issue at the moment.

We have Symantec (says its malware/trojan) saying one thing, and Lookout (says its not malware or a trojan) saying another. So unless Symantec says its not an issue, or Lookout says it is...It is just a matter of opinion if it is something to be concerned about.

Stop trying to defend the undefensible. Lets get two things straight.

1. As Android developer and Supplier of the Android Marketplace, Google should not be allowing damaging Apps to be put up there,

This is no proof, so far, that this is damaging.

And dont tell me what I can and cannot do. I will post my opinion on this as much as I want.

Going by the definition of trojan some people have here DRM softwares are trojan and all stores should stop selling games using them (almost all games) right now because of it.

Sorry but virus and trojan do bad things to your computer. If not then they are not a virus or a trojan. They are either spyware or bloatware.

90% (number is from my ***) of sotware these days install unwanted apps doing useless things for the user.

If this was that big of deal, Google would have removed the apps like they have did so before. But right now, Google is refusing to do so and the Apps are still on the market. So far, nothing has been proven that this causes any damage or is being used for malicious intent. So IMO, no big issue at the moment.

We have Symantec (says its malware/trojan) saying one thing, and Lookout (says its not malware or a trojan) saying another. So unless Symantec says its not an issue, or Lookout says it is...It is just a matter of opinion if it is something to be concerned about.

This is no proof, so far, that this is damaging.

And dont tell me what I can and cannot do. I will post my opinion on this as much as I want.

Stop being agro over a common saying.

If you don't think that this needs improving before it starts damaging android, then I'm speechless. Freedom is all very well but their needs to be checks in place so that people can be secure in their devices. You argue about Android being hackable and update Roms, etc, but a lot of people buy it just as a phone or simple content browser, they don't want the hassle of having to managing like a Windows 98 computer they just want it to work.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!