Recommended Posts

In all seriousness though, I think there will be major breakthroughs in voice recognition and other technologies that allow this type of system usage without physical interaction long before we can do that much on free standing glass. In short, before we get that type of glass, we will go beyond touch-screen controls IMO.

In all seriousness though, I think there will be major breakthroughs in voice recognition and other technologies that allow this type of system usage without physical interaction long before we can do that much on free standing glass. In short, before we get that type of glass, we will go beyond touch-screen controls IMO.

This, very much this.

It is an awesome concept though >.<

I sense a lot of broken glass in the future (based on the first video as the second video would just see smarter windows replace existing windows).

Considering it's Gorilla Glass, I doubt it. The way their technology is advancing, we'll probably have bulletproof phones in 5-10 years. :p

I saw some things in there that could really work. Specifically the auto-dimming glass and having it synced up to your alarm clock to help wake you up in the morning. Also, combining touch glass and tele-presence could really be something. The glass like communications devices however would be a no-go. Who would want others to be able to see every text you send your wife :p

Most definitely a very nice gadgetry, basic concept has been predicted even by most feeble minds. Loads of suboptimal models, incompatible interfaces, software support (few useful apps and millions of shiny buggy turds) and, finally, Apple will f*k it all up, as usually, though.

well ... they forgot about dec 2012 and really ... would the military want this stuff out to the gen public?! .... nooooo ...

would politics and bandwidth stifle technological advancement ....? YES!!!!

are we going to die like the dinosaurs before we see all this? maybe not ... then again, I would not be surprised if part of this technology is already implemented without us knowing about it.

Last night I downloaded the first issue of T3 to my iPad (http://www.t3.com/news/t3-issue-200)

I remember buying it back in 1996, and was just gobsmacked at how far we'd come in such a short time - so this glass stuff is probably more possible than we'd realise at this time :)

(well, here's hoping anyway!!)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!