Recommended Posts

Carrollwood, Florida -- A Wesley Chapel man was critically burned after investigators say a plan to torch his estranged wife backfired.

From her upstairs apartment, Capitola Scott could hear her neighbor, 47-year-old Gloria Davis, shrieking for help and then saw Davis being chased. Scott opened the door, yelling at her to get inside.

Police say the man chasing Davis with a jug full of gasoline was her husband of 25 years, 50-year-old Matthew Wong. The two had been separated since October.

Detectives say Wong had apparently planned to ambush Davis. They say he rented a car and blacked out the windows. But Davis spotted Wong and immediately began to run, screaming for help.

As he frantically chased his wife, investigators say Wong inadvertently splattered gasoline all over himself, and when he went to torch the apartment where his wife was seeking refuge, it was Wong who went up in flames.

Neighbors used fire extinguishers to put out the fire that was consuming him and some nearby bushes. A scorched patch of grass now marks the spot where he fell to the ground.

Investigators say Wong was rushed to Tampa General Hospital with life-threatening burns. They say the couple has two older children who also live in the Bay area.

source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056390-man-attempts-to-set-wife-on-fire/
Share on other sites

As he frantically chased his wife, investigators say Wong inadvertently splattered gasoline all over himself, and when he went to torch the apartment where his wife was seeking refuge, it was Wong who went up in flames.

:happy:

Come on, please show some damned respect. The guy is in hospital with life threatening burns!!! He clearly has some major issues with his estranged wife.

And al lyou can do is make jokes about his name? That's sick and wong!

No he didn't deserve that. The wife deserved what should have happened. She probably bled him dry financially in court and I think thats evil. A divorce should give the wife just enough money above the poverty line not half the guy's earnings. I would never let my wife take half my money if I was in such a position. I would transport the money to offshore swiss accounts and give her a few thousands saying thats all I got. Then after the court case closes, transfer back the money. You'll loose around 10% but thats better than losing 50%.

No he didn't deserve that. The wife deserved what should have happened. She probably bled him dry financially in court and I think thats evil. A divorce should give the wife just enough money above the poverty line not half the guy's earnings. I would never let my wife take half my money if I was in such a position. I would transport the money to offshore swiss accounts and give her a few thousands saying thats all I got. Then after the court case closes, transfer back the money. You'll loose around 10% but thats better than losing 50%.

Umadbro? How did he not deserve it? He tried to kill her..

  • Like 2

No he didn't deserve that. The wife deserved what should have happened. She probably bled him dry financially in court and I think thats evil. A divorce should give the wife just enough money above the poverty line not half the guy's earnings. I would never let my wife take half my money if I was in such a position. I would transport the money to offshore swiss accounts and give her a few thousands saying thats all I got. Then after the court case closes, transfer back the money. You'll loose around 10% but thats better than losing 50%.

Absolute myssoginistic nonsense. You're talking about **** you don't know. And moreover - your "offshore" trick wouldn't work! Guessing you are single huh...

  • Like 3

Come on, please show some damned respect. The guy is in hospital with life threatening burns!!! He clearly has some major issues with his estranged wife.

And al lyou can do is make jokes about his name? That's sick and wong!

I see what you did there.... :shifty: That's so wong of you

I find it fitting that as I read this article, someone is playing the radio in the background here, and Kid Rock is on atm:

"...you get what you put in, and people get what they deserve..."

No he didn't deserve that. The wife deserved what should have happened. She probably bled him dry financially in court and I think thats evil. A divorce should give the wife just enough money above the poverty line not half the guy's earnings. I would never let my wife take half my money if I was in such a position. I would transport the money to offshore swiss accounts and give her a few thousands saying thats all I got. Then after the court case closes, transfer back the money. You'll loose around 10% but thats better than losing 50%.

Also, what an idiot. You have no idea what their situation was. When my husband and I split, I didn't want anything from him--I withdrew only the money from our joint account that I had put in, and even gave him the ring back, because I didn't want anything from him or any reminders. Quit tarring us all with your bitter brush. If this guy would douse his wife with gasoline and set her ablaze, don't you think there's a chance he was abusive to her before? If not abusive, at least not the innocent, loving, hardworking guy you seem to be acting like he was, getting worked over by a heartless con-woman. :rolleyes:

(Besides, you forget the man's responsbility in some of those situations--if you marry a shallow, gold-digging ###### of a woman just because she's hot or good in bed or something, you deserve what happens to you.)

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Blast from the past.
    • Hello, Were you using a product or service from one of the companies affected by the Klue data breach?  See https://klue.com/blog/an-update-on-recent-klue-security-incident for the company's public statement.  That blog post does not list affected customer. From looking around at reports, I created this list: Gong HackerOne Huntress Insurity Jamf LastPass OneTrust Recorded Future ReliaQuest Salesforce Snyk Sprout Social Tanium It is likely there are other companies affected as well. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • SpaceX reportedly plans a Starlink mobile service for U.S. consumers by Karthik Mudaliar SpaceX reportedly wants to sell mobile phone plans directly to consumers in the United States as part of a wider expansion of Starlink. According to a report from the Financial Times, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell discussed the plan with investors during the company’s recent IPO roadshow. The company is also said to be considering building a terrestrial mobile network to complement Starlink’s satellite coverage. The plan is quite different from how Starlink currently operates in the U.S. mobile market. SpaceX already provides satellite connectivity for T-Mobile’s T-Satellite service, but T-Mobile remains responsible for the subscription, billing, and customer support. A Starlink-branded mobile service would give SpaceX control of the customer relationship instead. It could also turn the company from a partner of traditional mobile operators into a direct competitor. T-Mobile also began testing its Starlink-powered satellite service in early 2025. The beta was initially limited to text messaging and was also available to some AT&T and Verizon customers. The service has since expanded to support limited data access through selected apps, including WhatsApp, Google Maps, AccuWeather, and AllTrails. It is designed to provide a connection in areas where normal cell towers are unavailable, rather than replace a conventional mobile network. However, if SpaceX actually has a plan to serve nationwide, it needs to do more than just satellite networks and actually support on-ground operations. It can also partner up with existing carriers and become a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). With that said, SpaceX has already spent heavily to support its mobile ambitions. Just last year, the company agreed to acquire wireless spectrum licences from EchoStar in deals worth a combined $19.6 billion. EchoStar's spectrum includes AWS-4, H-Block, and AWS-3 frequencies that could be used for both satellite and terrestrial communications. According to a SpaceX securities filing, the Federal Communications Commission approved the transaction in May 2026, although it is not expected to close until late 2027. There's no official statement by SpaceX for now. Pricing, availability, and other details remain unknown. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      400
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!