Recommended Posts

A Utah mother, who allegedly forced her son to walk alongside a moving car she was driving after he had missed his school bus, has been charged with child abuse and reckless driving, ABC News has learned.

Stacie Johnson, 37, reportedly was angry that her 9-year-old son had missed the bus to school one too many times, and was again refusing to walk. But what Johnson may have thought was teaching her son a lesson, turned into criminal charges Monday, 11 days after she was arrested in the incident.

"He had missed the bus repeatedly ? he refused to go to school," Johnson wrote in an email to ABC News. "The reason I did not walk with him is that I was already late for work."

Police responded to a call on Jan. 26 reporting that a boy was being pulled alongside a moving car by his belt, which was being held by the female driver, as it headed down a Woods Cross neighborhood street.

Woods Cross Police Chief Greg Butler told ABC News that Johnson was driving at a slow enough speed that the boy could keep pace with the vehicle, but that he could have been hit by traffic driving in the opposite direction.

Police turned the case over to the Davis County District Attorney's office and Johnson was charged Monday with child abuse, a class A misdemeanor, and a class B misdemeanor of reckless driving.

While the story has been making its way around the internet, Johnson's identity was not known until after she was charged Monday.

Johnson told ABC News that contrary to other media reports, she did not "drag her son through the car window in the middle of the road," but rather that the door was "ajar" as she drove slowly to the side of the two-lane road.

source

And here is where the world is going wrong. Parents are being punished for trying to teach their children right from wrong. When I was growing up, this kind of punishment was normal.

you can't properly teach right from wrong unless punishment is given. It's is not like the child will say "I will behave". :(

And here is where the world is going wrong. Parents are being punished for trying to teach their children right from wrong. When I was growing up, this kind of punishment was normal.

you can't properly teach right from wrong unless punishment is given. It's is not like the child will say "I will behave". :(

I remember my school counselor called the cops on my mom because I was seeing her for having anger problems and she asked if my mom ever spanked me, I told her "once in a blue moon". That was back in 7th grade I believe '99-'00.

I get called to retarded stuff, so if I was the officer that responded, I would have told her that I understood where she was coming from, but since I was called just drive him the rest of the way inside of the vehicle. I wouldn't charge her of something stupid like that.

And here is where the world is going wrong. Parents are being punished for trying to teach their children right from wrong. When I was growing up, this kind of punishment was normal.

you can't properly teach right from wrong unless punishment is given. It's is not like the child will say "I will behave". :(

I lack the amount of wit enough to counter this in the way it deserves.

I'm sure others might have their witty 5 minutes and give you a proper response to this. I hope so at least.

Creepy hell...

Glassed Silver:mac

And here is where the world is going wrong. Parents are being punished for trying to teach their children right from wrong. When I was growing up, this kind of punishment was normal.

you can't properly teach right from wrong unless punishment is given. It's is not like the child will say "I will behave". :(

What did she do wrong? Sounds like she was doing a decent job of parenting actually.

The problem is that the kid was being pulled by his belt outside of the car by his mother while driving.

  • Like 2

The problem is that the kid was being pulled by his belt outside of the car by his mother while driving.

even that wasn't the problem... the driver is on the side closest to the on-coming cars. This means the child was basically pulled down the center of the street - walking towards oncoming cars only feet from him on one side and his mother's car on the other. Had anything gone wrong, the child had no where to go.

even that wasn't the problem... the driver is on the side closest to the on-coming cars. This means the child was basically pulled down the center of the street - walking towards oncoming cars only feet from him on one side and his mother's car on the other. Had anything gone wrong, the child had no where to go.

Say it already, you're just against the old fashioned way, that ALWAYS worked flawlessly and are a pu**y in denial! :angry:

Softies these days... No wonder our society goes downhill, becomes less caring for each other, less social and more people get hurt. :rolleyes:

/SARCASM

oh the hypocrisy with some people... :rolleyes:

You got that right! (Y)

The problem is that this child was put in serious danger she couldn't even control remotely well anymore and of cause the child has now lost a lot of trust, faith and an idol (which a caring mother should be to some extend).

And did I mention that the child probably had a good chunk of fear?

Oh no problem, all some in here care about is that the child learned some lesson.

Screw the child's mental state or safety.

Some people... really...

Glassed Silver:mac

  • Like 2

I would of walked behind the kid with a cattle prod....

Kids these days don't respect their parents and its the parents fault. I would of grabbed the kid, put his ass in the car (whether or not he was still in his PJs of regular clothes) drove him to school and dragged him inside in front of everyone. A little embarrassment goes a long way and just the threat of doing that would of been enough.

I would of walked behind the kid with a cattle prod....

Kids these days don't respect their parents and its the parents fault. I would of grabbed the kid, put his ass in the car (whether or not he was still in his PJs of regular clothes) drove him to school and dragged him inside in front of everyone. A little embarrassment goes a long way and just the threat of doing that would of been enough.

Do you have children?

Glassed Silver:mac

Actually she should've just given more intense punishment so the idiot child wouldn't dare be late again. He takes the money his mom is paying for his education for granted and so deserves a lot worse than being made to walk. She should've not given him a ride at all and let him miss school:

1. The more he did this , the more his grades would fall and he wouldn't get a decent college education

2. Then he'd be a failure the rest of his life like he deserves.

OR

1. He learns to value what he's getting and gets his ass up on time

2. Goes to school on time and realizes his mistakes.

Actually she should've just given more intense punishment so the idiot child wouldn't dare be late again. He takes the money his mom is paying for his education for granted and so deserves a lot worse than being made to walk. She should've not given him a ride at all and let him miss school:

1. The more he did this , the more his grades would fall and he wouldn't get a decent college education

2. Then he'd be a failure the rest of his life like he deserves.

OR

1. He learns to value what he's getting and gets his ass up on time

2. Goes to school on time and realizes his mistakes.

You're tripping...

Glassed Silver:mac

And here is where the world is going wrong. Parents are being punished for trying to teach their children right from wrong. When I was growing up, this kind of punishment was normal.

you can't properly teach right from wrong unless punishment is given. It's is not like the child will say "I will behave". :(

What did she do wrong? Sounds like she was doing a decent job of parenting actually.

I doubt any sensible parent would put their child in danger to teach them a lesson. The mother mentioned in the article exposed her son to unnecessary danger. That's the issue here and that's why she was charged with reckless driving and child abuse. Instead of exposing him to oncoming traffic, she could have told him to walk on the sidewalk.

Do you have children?

Glassed Silver:mac

Nope, but that doesnt matter. I have taken care of my nieces and nephews sometimes weeks at at time. My sisters yell at their kids and expect them to do as they are told. They give excuses and nothing ever gets done. Like cleaning their room. They never make sure the kids do what they are told. I get up, turn the TV off, PC off, and take away their electronics and tell them they can have everything back once things are done. I ignore their excuses on why they cannot do what I tell them to do and stand around and makes sure they do as told. A couple times of doing that, they now do what I tell them to do the first time without me repeating myself. Because I dont let them get away with it and now they respect me and know I mean business and always love when I am around and we have a good time.. I never yelled at them, never spanked/slapped them, and was only stern and direct and let them know what was what. My sisters, however, are still a different story.

You don't have to have kids to make sure you are respected as an adult and kids these days don't respect adults like they once did and how they should.

1. The more he did this , the more his grades would fall and he wouldn't get a decent college education

2. Then he'd be a failure the rest of his life like he deserves.

He deserves to be a failure because his parents are not doing their jobs? Its the parents job to raise their kids properly and become a functional member of society. No kid deserves that because the parents are lacking.

Nope, but that doesnt matter. I have taken care of my nieces and nephews sometimes weeks at at time. My sisters yell at their kids and expect them to do as they are told. They give excuses and nothing ever gets done. Like cleaning their room. They never make sure the kids do what they are told. I get up, turn the TV off, PC off, and take away their electronics and tell them they can have everything back once things are done. I ignore their excuses on why they cannot do what I tell them to do and stand around and makes sure they do as told. A couple times of doing that, they now do what I tell them to do the first time without me repeating myself. Because I dont let them get away with it and now they respect me and know I mean business and always love when I am around and we have a good time.. I never yelled at them, never spanked/slapped them, and was only stern and direct and let them know what was what. My sisters, however, are still a different story.

You don't have to have kids to make sure you are respected as an adult and kids these days don't respect adults like they once did and how they should.

My question wasn't intended to question where you're believes come from.

What you however just described sounds more sensible.

So I guess, good for you.

Glassed Silver:mac

I doubt any sensible parent would put their child in danger to teach them a lesson. The mother mentioned in the article exposed her son to unnecessary danger. That's the issue here and that's why she was charged with reckless driving and child abuse. Instead of exposing him to oncoming traffic, she could have told him to walk on the sidewalk.

my bad, I misread. I didn't know she had a belt 0_0. I also thought it was just small side streets and he was on the side walk.

My question wasn't intended to question where you're believes come from.

What you however just described sounds more sensible.

So I guess, good for you.

Glassed Silver:mac

Its common sense really. If kids dont do as they are directed, then you get up and make sure they do it. People are just to lazy and caught up in their lives to put forth the effort. Its easier to yell at the kids or do it yourself than to make sure your orders are followed. I see it with my sisters all the time and I dont put up with it. And the older the kids get, the harder it is to correct their behavior so if you dont get them on the right track when they are younger, good luck.

my bad, I misread. I didn't know she had a belt 0_0. I also thought it was just small side streets and he was on the side walk.

Thank god... And I thought there were really that many wingnuts around here in this thread... :laugh:

Ratio just got a little better.

Its common sense really. If kids dont do as they are directed, then you get up and make sure they do it. People are just to lazy and caught up in their lives to put forth the effort. Its easier to yell at the kids or do it yourself than to make sure your orders are followed. I see it with my sisters all the time and I dont put up with it. And the older the kids get, the harder it is to correct their behavior so if you dont get them on the right track when they are younger, good luck.

Definitely agree with you there.

I don't have kids myself, in case you're wondering, but I was a kindergarten teacher for a year (civil service) and previously I always had this concept of parenting.

However, what you said on page 1 really went too far imho.

Enforcing the child's school duty all fine and dandy, but with only a pyjama on them, that's too harsh.

Glassed Silver:mac

Thank god... And I thought there were really that many wingnuts around here in this thread... :laugh:

Ratio just got a little better.

Definitely agree with you there.

I don't have kids myself, in case you're wondering, but I was a kindergarten teacher for a year (civil service) and previously I always had this concept of parenting.

However, what you said on page 1 really went too far imho.

Enforcing the child's school duty all fine and dandy, but with only a pyjama on their hips, that's too harsh.

Glassed Silver:mac

Why not PJs? A lot of kids these days go to school like that purposely. Its not like I would drag the kid there in his underwear.

Why not PJs? A lot of kids these days go to school like that purposely. Its not like I would drag the kid there in his underwear.

Possibly depends on the kid, the PJ and the area.

I agree that some kids do it purposely, but there's more to it.

Glassed Silver:mac

Thank god... And I thought there were really that many wingnuts around here in this thread... :laugh:

Ratio just got a little better.

god, if i had kids I couldnt dream of doing that! I thought she was just driving slowly next to him making sure he walked.
  • Like 1

Thank god... And I thought there were really that many wingnuts around here in this thread... :laugh:

Ratio just got a little better.

god, if i had kids I couldnt dream of doing that! I thought she was just driving slowly next to him making sure he walked.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!