USA People - What Are Your ATM Habits?


Recommended Posts

We were talking at work about how much cash is in an ATM and figured some must have well over ?20,000. However in researching I found this:

Who withdrawls only 40 bucks? I get $400 from the ATM every time I go, otherwise I'd be going to the ATM every two-three days instead of every two weeks.

This makes me think people hardly use ATMs in the USA?

In the UK I would say it seems silly to spend less than ?10 on a debit/credit card. But I don't walk around with ?400 in my pocket either. I personally don't have more than ?20 around the home in cash. However I would say many people DO visit cash machines every few days to take money out.

What say you Americans?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1057252-usa-people-what-are-your-atm-habits/
Share on other sites

I typically visit the ATM about once every 2 weeks and draw out $60. I take my lunch to work every day and that $60 is enough throughout 2 weeks for incidentals like sodas, snacks and the occasional dining out.

I don't know why anyone would draw out their maximum every time they visit an ATM. Debit/check cards are accepted at 99% of stores and are often faster to use than cash.

  • Like 1

In the UK I would say it seems silly to spend less than ?10 on a debit/credit card. But I don't walk around with ?400 in my pocket either. I personally don't have more than ?20 around the home in cash. However I would say many people DO visit cash machines every few days to take money out.

Why would it be silly, do they charge you a fee for usage of your debit/credit card for stuff under 10?

Why would it be silly, do they charge you a fee for usage of your debit/credit card for stuff under 10?

No, but I agree with him. Using a card for anything under ?10 seems silly to me.

I know you weren't asking about Europe, but I'll throw my opinion in. I take out 50 francs every couple of days, but at the same time I buy my breakfast and lunch on the way to work. In the UK I took out ?20 regularly, sometimes multiple times a day depending on what was going on.

I rarely go, only if I need a large amount of cash. Just about every store I visit offers a cash back option, so if I need $20-$40 I just do that. I will never use a ATM machine that does not belong to my bank because I refuse to pay fees for taking out my money.

Why would it be silly, do they charge you a fee for usage of your debit/credit card for stuff under 10?

No, but the credit card companies do charge the shop a fee. If it's local place, and it's something cheap, I try to pay in cash. If I spending $5 at Wallmart or something, then sure, charge it.

I don't know why anyone would draw out their maximum every time they visit an ATM. Debit/check cards are accepted at 99% of stores and are often faster to use than cash.

This exactly. The only time I go to an ATM is if I know I'm going somewhere that only takes cash, or if I need to get a money order.

No, but I agree with him. Using a card for anything under ?10 seems silly to me.

Actually many places will charge you a fee if you spend less than ?10. For instance, most/all off licenses charge up to 50p for purchases less than ?10.

To me it seems silly to use cash at all and I look forward to the day when you can use a card anywhere for any amount without having to worry about vendor charges.

Actually many places will charge you a fee if you spend less than ?10. For instance, most/all off licenses charge up to 50p for purchases less than ?10.

To me it seems silly to use cash at all and I look forward to the day when you can use a card anywhere for any amount without having to worry about vendor charges.

in the US, the "exchange fee" for debit transactions is significantly lower than for credit card transactions (with Amex charging the highest credit card fees). Most businesses that give discounts for paying in cash will give the same discount if you use a debit card instead of a credit card.

Also, I don't use an ATM unless I'm in a bind because the fee is extremely high to withdraw cash (from 3 to 6 or more dollars depending on the arrangement, usually you get a fee from the bank that owns the ATM and another one from your own bank). Many people withdraw cash when they are doing a debit transaction somewhere else (grocery store, Target, barbershops will often give you cash even on a credit card transaction) so they don't have to pay a fee. You can usually take out cash from an ATM owned by your bank or sometimes from a network without a fee, but finding one can be a pain in the ass.

Surprising how different it is over there, I'll regularly use the "hole in the wall" to pull out tenners or twenties when I'd like a bit of cash on me. Usually to avoid the "?5 minimum spend" that a lot of retailers put on card payments.

Before moving in with my girlfriend, I would go to the ATM about once every few months. I have direct-deposit for my paychecks, and I always pay for everything with a credit card when possible. (I pay it off every month, and I get points for every dollar I spend; so it's basically free money) Very rarely would I ever go to the ATM. This set up was nice, since I get charged $3 just for taking money out, no matter where I go; which is complete BS.

Now that I live with my girlfriend and we split bills and groceries, she just gives me cash for her part and I never go to the ATM. I honestly think I haven't used an ATM since last May (when we moved in). In fact, my new debit/ATM card that I got in the mail from the bank has yet to be used. It still has the "call this number if you have problems" sticker on it.

i never really carry cash at all, unless im off out to the pub, i pay for everything on debit card, wether its a loaf of bread at 90p or milk at ?1.20

i find that if i have any cash on me i waste it on things i dont need. even going to the shop i pick up stuff i dont need because i have the money on me :/

so whenever ive been out and had cash as soon as i get home i put all the change in a jar, i regulary bank ?200 from "change" ive saved.

i visit the ATM every 2-3 weeks and take out $100-160. I use cash on small food purchases and liquor. a lot of liquor stores will wont let you pay for it w/ a CC. They'll let you buy beer and wine with a CC, but not liquor. i just use cash when it's a smaller amount, that's all. i have many friends who never carry cash. it's pretty annoying. they think they can pay for everything w/ a CC, but when the time comes, they dont have even $2 to throw my way.

i never really carry cash at all, unless im off out to the pub, i pay for everything on debit card, wether its a loaf of bread at 90p or milk at ?1.20

i find that if i have any cash on me i waste it on things i dont need. even going to the shop i pick up stuff i dont need because i have the money on me :/

so whenever ive been out and had cash as soon as i get home i put all the change in a jar, i regulary bank ?200 from "change" ive saved.

this is what my friends do and it's freaking annoying. as soon as youre together and need a couple bucks to cover something - "oh, sorry man, i dont have any cash" AT LEAST carry some ones or a ten spot.

i visit the ATM every 2-3 weeks and take out $100-160. I use cash on small food purchases and liquor. a lot of liquor stores will wont let you pay for it w/ a CC. They'll let you buy beer and wine with a CC, but not liquor. i just use cash when it's a smaller amount, that's all. i have many friends who never carry cash. it's pretty annoying. they think they can pay for everything w/ a CC, but when the time comes, they dont have even $2 to throw my way.

this is what my friends do and it's freaking annoying. as soon as youre together and need a couple bucks to cover something - "oh, sorry man, i dont have any cash" AT LEAST carry some ones or a ten spot.

annoying? why because i dont have cash on me to lend other people? how is that annoying?

Why would it be silly, do they charge you a fee for usage of your debit/credit card for stuff under 10?

Some places charge for using credit cards, but do you have chip and pin in the US?

Cash is usually faster but I guess spending less than a few pounds on a card just seems silly.

I just find it really interesting how different it is.

I almost never use cash. Everything goes on my debit card. The only time I stop is if I know I need cash (borrowed from a friend, going to a place I know only accepts cash, ect.) Usually then I'll only take out what I need, and if it's only $10, then that's all I'll get. (I know one ATM around here you can withdraw only a dollar if you wish).

I used my ATM Debit Card to make most of my purchases at the point-of-sale so I rarely visit an actual atm for anything other than a balance inquiry if I think my balance spreadsheet is out of alignment for some reason. If I do withdraw, it is usually only $20-40 and maybe once a month.

I take out about $50 every two weeks, mostly used for settling a bill with a group of people when we don't want to split the bill up 5+ ways. I use a credit card for everything to get cash back - Chase pays me around $400-$500 a year just for using their card. Not sure why anyone would ever use a debit card (unless credit is not accepted of course)...

i never really carry cash at all, unless im off out to the pub, i pay for everything on debit card, wether its a loaf of bread at 90p or milk at ?1.20

i find that if i have any cash on me i waste it on things i dont need. even going to the shop i pick up stuff i dont need because i have the money on me :/

so whenever ive been out and had cash as soon as i get home i put all the change in a jar, i regulary bank ?200 from "change" ive saved.

This (Y) Cash just seems so much easier to spend. I think it's because I look at my bank statements frequently and know how much I have in the bank, and cash seems like 'extra' that doesn't count in that number. I always think about it when I pull out the debit/credit card (I use credit in some situations, it's better protected than the debit card if the number were to get swiped somehow, but I always pay off the balance at the end of the month so it's coming from the same place essentially).

That being said, I do usually try to keep a few dollars around in case someone needs to borrow, or in case I randomly decide to stop at Starbucks or something--but that's very infrequent, I make coffee at home or we have a nice Keurig maker at work so I rarely have to buy it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • google, meta, microsoft, true cancers of modern society
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 changelog: Fixed a bug where Overwrite behaved as Overwrite All during same-drive move operations. AdvancedInstaller fixed the installer’s security vulnerability: EXE Bootstrapper resolved the %appdata% location incorrectly for the System account. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 | 14.6 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
    • New AMD graphics driver fixes install issues and FSR 4.1 crashes on RX 7000 GPUs by Taras Buria AMD is rolling out yet another graphics driver. Version 26.6.4 is now available for download, bringing two important fixes. One is for those still using Windows 10 and having trouble installing driver 26.6.2. In fact, this patch is coming from the recently released hotfix, so it is not new if you are already running version 26.6.3. The second fix is for RX 7000 owners. AMD recently brought FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen graphics cards, but there was a bug with certain games crashing when using FSR 4.1. I experienced this issue with Forza Horizon 6, so today's driver should take care of that. Here is the official changelog: Intermittent install issue seen when installing AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 on Windows® 10 systems for Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Intermittent application crash may be observed in some games with AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 enabled on Radeon™ RX 7000 series graphics products. Known issues include the following: Intermittent application crash or driver timeout may be observed while playing Battlefield™ 6 on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. AMD is actively working on a resolution with the developer to be released as soon as possible. Texture flickering or corruption may appear while playing Battlefield™ 6 with AMD Record and Stream on some AMD graphics products. AMD FSR Upscaling and AMD FSR Frame Generation may show as inactive in AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition while playing Battlefield™ 6 when enabled on Radeon™ RX 9000 series graphics products. Failure to install may be observed while installing AI Bundle components in some regions with limited access to HuggingFace and GitHub. Model flickering or rendering failure may be observed in Maxon Cinema 4D and Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. Intermittent application crash may be observed on some models while running Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. You can download the AMD Radeon driver 26.6.4 from the official website here. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!