Blizzard sues Valve over DOTA trademark

By dknm
in Back Page News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Rising Star

dknm

Posted
Posted

Activision is bickering with Valve yet again, this time over the DOTA trademark.

As Blizzard sees it, DOTA has become synonymous with their Warcraft franchise. Developed as a free mod, a DOTA spinoff is now under development at Valve software - the latter treating it as a new IP. As a retail product, which by contrast costs money, Valve needs to acquire trademark rights before going public.

By this opposition, Blizzard seeks to prevent registration by its competitor Valve Corporation ("Valve") of a trademark, DOTA, that for more than seven years has been used exclusively by Blizzard and its fan community, under license from Blizzard. By virtue of that use, the DOTA mark has become firmly associated in the mind of consumers with Blizzard, including to signify a highly popular scenario or variant of one of Blizzard's best-selling computer games, Warcraft III. Over the past seven years, the mark DOTA has been used exclusively in connection with Blizzard and its products, namely Warcraft III. Most notably, DOTA has been used as the popular name of a Warcraft III software "mod" file that has been distributed, marketed, and promoted by Blizzard and its fans (under license from Blizzard); that utilizes and is built upon the Warcraft III game engine, interface, and gameplay mechanics; that is comprised of Warcraft III characters, items, spells, artwork, textures, and color palates; that can be played only using Warcraft III software and via Blizzard's online service Battle.net ; and whose name (DOTA, an acronym for "Defense of the Ancients") is a reference to Warcraft III characters known as the "Ancients."

Read the legal stuff here

Credit : Neogaf

Grand Master

Chasethebase Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Wasn't DOTA a third party mod? How can Blizzard enforce something like this? Seems absurd.

Yeah, probably will get thrown out, but surely Valve would have made the contact before this anyway, and you would think they would have mentioned this earlier in the development cycle.

Grand Master

+Mirumir Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted

My WoW character is the property of Blizzard with all its items.

I assume that it is mentioned somewhere in the WC3 TOS that anything you create with the mapeditor, Blizzard's tool, can be claimed as Blizzard's as far as the ownership rights go - 'cause they own all the pixels, the pictures, and the graphics in that map.

Additionally, DOTA is featured at Blizzard's own tournaments. Since it's Blizzard who pays for and organizes these events, everything belongs to them - all the logos and the artwork.

The whole issue is an outright attempt by Valve to profit from DOTA's popularity. Sorry, I like Valve and all, but it's not fair and possibly illegal. Let the courts decide.

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

Yeah, probably will get thrown out, but surely Valve would have made the contact before this anyway, and you would think they would have mentioned this earlier in the development cycle.

You're expecting a bit much from a judge considering previous experience. These are the guys that banned a game, because you count modify it with a third party mod to unlock hot coffee.

Grand Master

Chasethebase Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

You're expecting a bit much from a judge considering previous experience. These are the guys that banned a game, because you count modify it with a third party mod to unlock hot coffee.

Not entirely sure what you're trying to say, but what I mean is that Valve would have contacted Blizzard regarding producing Dota anyway...

Veteran

Athernar

Posted
Posted

My WoW character is the property of Blizzard with all its items.

I assume that it is mentioned somewhere in the WC3 TOS that anything you create with the mapeditor, Blizzard's tool, can be claimed as Blizzard's as far as the ownership rights go - 'cause they own all the pixels, the pictures, and the graphics in that map.

Additionally, DOTA is featured at Blizzard's own tournaments. Since it's Blizzard who pays for and organizes these events, everything belongs to them - all the logos and the artwork.

The whole issue is an outright attempt by Valve to profit from DOTA's popularity. Sorry, I like Valve and all, but it's not fair and possibly illegal. Let the courts decide.

What a load of absolute rubbish. You may have a point if Dota 2 used assets from Dota 1, but the fact of the matter is, it doesn't.

Unless you want to bicker over the basic 3-lane + dividing river layout of the map in Dota, but then you'd probably also have to go after LoL and HoN.

Blizzard didn't create Dota and make it what it is today. They had their chance to sweep up the mod for their own, but they didn't. Tough luck.

Grand Master

_neutrino Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

so far as i am concerned neither of them should get it as Dota has become a genre of game rather than just a title. not to mention the folks that make League of Legends technically would own the rights to it as they are the folks that made the original dota (as well as some of the folks at Valve that are making dota 2)

Mentor

Amarok

Posted
Posted

Very good point, and it's pretty much the reason why Blizzard definitely doesn't have a case here.

Read the quoted text in the OP, they may have a case. It's not too likely that it will go anywhere, but it will definitely delay Valve somewhat. I'm kind of interested to see how this works out, but I imagine for Dota fans it may be a little annoying. Thankfully I'm not one, I've dabbled in LoL and HoN a tiny bit, but hardly a fan.

What a load of absolute rubbish. You may have a point if Dota 2 used assets from Dota 1, but the fact of the matter is, it doesn't.

Blizzard's reasoning is that the name Dota is associated with their products and their services, not the game or the genre, but just the name. They also state that since Dota stands for defense of the Ancients and "The Ancients" in question are Blizzard created characters that they feel they have a case.

Worst case scenario is that Valve would have to change the name, and that's not a bad thing because Dota 2 is a silly name anyway, they could do much better I think.

Grand Master

Nagisan

Posted
Posted

so far as i am concerned neither of them should get it as Dota has become a genre of game rather than just a title. not to mention the folks that make League of Legends technically would own the rights to it as they are the folks that made the original dota (as well as some of the folks at Valve that are making dota 2)

Actually, other than the WC3 mod, the first DotA was Demigod, not League of Legends (might be some other game, but I'm pretty sure Demigod was the first true DotA style game).

But I agree, DotA is more of a genre not a specific game IMO.

Community Regular

Bertch

Posted
Posted

and whose name (DOTA, an acronym for "Defense of the Ancients") is a reference to Warcraft III characters known as the "Ancients."

Not true the characters are heroes, the ancients are the things the heroes are trying to protect in each base, the Tree or Life and w/e the other one was called.

Mentor

Amarok

Posted
Posted

Not true the characters are heroes, the ancients are the things the heroes are trying to protect in each base, the Tree or Life and w/e the other one was called.

How does that make it not true? The ancients that the heroes are trying to protect are characters from Blizzard's WarCraft universe.

Veteran

Athernar

Posted
Posted

so far as i am concerned neither of them should get it as Dota has become a genre of game rather than just a title. not to mention the folks that make League of Legends technically would own the rights to it as they are the folks that made the original dota (as well as some of the folks at Valve that are making dota 2)

Well, no not quite. From what I understand, the original author of DotA was a guy called Eul that created the original map, he lost interest and the guys behind LoL came in. Allegedly, the guy(s) in question was pretty terrible at balancing the game, and eventually was replaced in some manner by the current author, IceFrog.

Blizzard's reasoning is that the name Dota is associated with their products and their services, not the game or the genre, but just the name. They also state that since Dota stands for defense of the Ancients and "The Ancients" in question are Blizzard created characters that they feel they have a case.

Worst case scenario is that Valve would have to change the name, and that's not a bad thing because Dota 2 is a silly name anyway, they could do much better I think.

Dota doesn't stand for "Defense of the Ancients", Dota as in "Dota 2" is a word and not an acronym. That's why it's "Dota" rather than "DotA" in Valve's usage.

How does that make it not true? The ancients that the heroes are trying to protect are characters from Blizzard's WarCraft universe.

<derpsnip>

Sorry, misread this. But regardless, the ancients are objects, not characters.

Grand Master

Shadrack

Posted
Posted

Both Blizzard and Valve have good arguments to claim the trademark.

The fact that Blizzard has used the DOTA name commercially before (in tournaments for example) may give them an edge.

I think that Valve is the rightful owner of the DOTA name. The person who came up with DOTA works for them now... he may not own the original WC3 mod because blizzard came up with the graphics and sounds (etc). But he came up with the name, not Blizzard.

It could go either way. Litigation is unpredictable and it ultimatly falls on some guy in a robe who may not have a clue.

Grand Master

Yusuf M. Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I thought this was why Valve went for the name "Dota 2" instead of the acronym "DotA 2". It's obvious that it's Defense of the Ancients but they never refer to it like that. It's always "Dota" [doh-tuh].

Veteran

CentralDogma

Posted
Posted

Both Blizzard and Valve have good arguments to claim the trademark.

The fact that Blizzard has used the DOTA name commercially before (in tournaments for example) may give them an edge.

I think that Valve is the rightful owner of the DOTA name. The person who came up with DOTA works for them now... he may not own the original WC3 mod because blizzard came up with the graphics and sounds (etc). But he came up with the name, not Blizzard.

It could go either way. Litigation is unpredictable and it ultimatly falls on some guy in a robe who may not have a clue.

My understanding is that Blizzard never supported DOTA in any official capacity, tornaments or otherwise.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG

      By Skyfrog · Posted

      For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG

      By Nas · Posted

      So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval

      By excalpius · Posted

      For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. I guess you're conveniently ignoring the fact that your country and commonwealth just happened to work much better when it was still part of the E.U.? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval

      By ad47uk · Posted

      Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices

      By Fiza Ali · Posted

      4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      491
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!