Recommended Posts

here comes the fallout from the massive James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) cost overruns; cancellation of joint missions with ESA etc. Maybe it'll spur Congress to add to NASA's budget, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

NBC....

WASHINGTON ? Scientists say NASA is about to propose major cuts in its exploration of other planets, especially Mars. But even before the cuts are unveiled, lawmakers are vowing to fight "tooth and nail" to preserve missions to the Red Planet.

With limited money for science and an over-budget new space telescope, the space agency essentially had to make a choice in where it wanted to explore: the neighboring planet or the far-off cosmos.

Based on the advance word about NASA's budget for the coming year, Mars lost out.

Two scientists who were briefed on the 2013 NASA budget, due to be released on Monday, said the space agency is eliminating two proposed joint missions with Europeans to explore Mars in 2016 and 2018. NASA had agreed to pay $1.4 billion for those missions. Some Mars missions will continue, but the fate of future flights is unclear, including a much-sought project to bring rocks from the Red Planet back to Earth.

The two scientists spoke with The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the budget.

They said the cuts to the Mars missions would be part of a proposed reduction of about $300 million in NASA's $1.5 billion planetary science budget. The other big part of NASA science spending ? the $1.8 billion Earth science budget ? is not being cut, the two scientists said.

Honestly James Webb Space Telescope Is way may more important then Mars missions though it has big cost overruns.

I agree.

When you look at all the things we've learned about the universe from Hubble compared to all the things we've learned from sending probes to Mars it clearly indicates that the telescope is more important and will give us much more value and over a longer period of time. If we were to send people to Mars we would have under a decades worth of scientific discovery. Possible 3-4 years at most. But by funding the telescope we could still be using it in 20-30 years from now or longer.

Now I'm not saying we should abandon a manned mission to Mars I still think we should go there but if it was a toss up between the telescope and a manned mission to Mars I'd choose the telescope, we have forever to make a trip to Mars and the longer we wait the better our technology progresses. We will get to Mars eventually, there's no rush.

Oh that's right, there's nobody living in poverty in the US.

Poverty in the USA is like being a king in Zimbabwe though. Some people in these poverty stricken countries are eating dirt to stop hunger pains, that is true poverty. How many Americans are you aware of that eat dirt just to keep their stomachs full? -- For the first time in history the fattest people are the poorest.

Oh that's right, there's nobody living in poverty in the US.

Way to completely miss the point... What he said was completely stupid because it's already a top priority in this country to hold the hand of everybody in poverty.

The budget for helping the poor puts NASA's budget to shame. I'd rather have my money go towards the super brains expanding our scientific abilities rather than somebody sitting on a couch all day.

Excuse my generalizations, but you get the point.

And? Do you really think that out of 300+ million people, that there aren't going to be a few sad unlucky souls? The taxpayers are still footing the bills to keep them alive.

The people in Africa that are eating dirt and each other would die to have the same treatment as the very poorest in this country.

Sorry, but if that report is true then its the parents fault as there are innumerable federal and state programs specifically for feeding the poor and especially kids. All too often the adults just won't sign up for them or take the "food stamp" debit card & sell it on the black market so they can buy drugs.

I know this because of working with food programs that attempt to serve the poor.

Also; being technically "poor" in the US is far different than elsewhere. Here large percentages of those in that group have air conditioning, a car, cable/satellite TV, a computer, a game system, live in a larger space and have many other amenities you wouldn't necessarily find in many other countries.

Off topic: Good lord...is this thread about NASA and their budget or the comparison of America's poor to the rest of the world? It's one thing to discuss the situation, but hell some of you just can't resist the urge to argue it into the ground to show off your incredible intellectual skills/egos. And it seems like it's always the same people...

On topic: NASA's budget will be cut by only $59 million, the cuts are aimed at the unmanned planetary/solar bodies and Mars missions, they still have $1.2 billion in funding. Other programs saw an increase in funding, commercial spaceflight and human exploration and space technology. The James Webb program has been terribly managed, though it does involve some of the most advanced technology that the USA is capable of and really pushes the envelope, which is not a bad thing. NASA is still one of our best investments, the returns have been priceless.

  • Like 1

The US Senate is the fly in the ointment - they are the ones who chopped Obama's funding request and insisted on SLS - a $38B+ franken-rocket that could be developed for far less if done in a competative program similar to Commercial Crew.

Thank you Raze for some common sense. The cuts are not that massive, I think mostly meant to show that NASA is trying to be more responsible and efficient. Plus many of you seem to have missed on the fact that these are cuts proposed by NASA themselves, not congress. I wouldn't worry too much, the space program is still here and Mars exploration will pick up over the next decade. Having said that, NASA living on fifteen billion a year while wall street gets trillions is really beyond words.

  • 2 weeks later...

Honestly James Webb Space Telescope Is way may more important then Mars missions though it has big cost overruns.

Until something such as a small planet starts heading towards earth, then everyone will have wished we had somewhere already colonized to get off the planet.

Its interesting you bring up asteroids. I was recently somewhat convinced that NASA's desire for an asteroid.mission over a Mars mission was justified due to interdiction concerns and the more pertinent reality that asteroids are quite feasible sources or precious metals and minerals for human industries. I was always under the impression Mars was a ball of resources flying through space, but it seems current data indicates that aside from iron.which we don't lack, old Mars doesn't have too much to offer in terms of mining?

Anyway I think the current NASA budget is still ok, they are still committed to the same basic goals.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!