Recommended Posts

They will never abandon SIU, NB, NR. It's half the feature of their EFI setup. I completely disagree with you and you're only looking at it from a "consumer" view. They use too many tools for their own deployments to abandon these methods.

They've already moved to doing OS updates through the Application Store. They are no longer offering the OS on Disc or USB Stick. They are already doing Delta OS updates on the iPhone. All this stuff to me says they are working on making OS updates smaller and more streamlined.

I do think in the future an OS update will only contain the changes from your current OS to the one you're getting through software update. It won't contain an entire base system with an entire working OS, just the changes from what you have to what they have changed.

They've already moved to doing OS updates through the Application Store. They are no longer offering the OS on Disc or USB Stick. They are already doing Delta OS updates on the iPhone. All this stuff to me says they are working on making OS updates smaller and more streamlined.

I do think in the future an OS update will only contain the changes from your current OS to the one you're getting through software update. It won't contain an entire base system with an entire working OS, just the changes from what you have to what they have changed.

Apple has and will continue to offer Delta/Combo updates to bring all OS X products to the same OS build, regardless of model type. I understand what you are saying, but as an Apple admin, I completely disagree with you.

When Apple fixes this ( http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1159 ), then your idea will be relevant. Until then, it's a pipe dream.

Apple has and will continue to offer Delta/Combo updates to bring all OS X products to the same OS build, regardless of model type. I understand what you are saying, but as an Apple admin, I completely disagree with you.

When Apple fixes this ( http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1159 ), then your idea will be relevant. Until then, it's a pipe dream.

i don't see how that is a problem because again Apple knows the machines they've shipped and what they do and do not have and they are the ones delivering service packs and major OS releases through the App Store. I really do believe in the future that OS X Releases (major OS releases) will be delivered with only the changed files and not the complete operating system. They will probably do different OS Release Files for different Macs just like they have always done with the minor service packs.

And I'd also expect for system administrators they will distribute combo packs which are like the combo updates but for major OS releases which support all Macs by containing all their required changed files but again no base system only the changed files from the last OS release.

And I think the recovery partition will continue to offer only the base system and then it will connect to Apples servers (like it always has) and will download the relevant OS Updates and apply them to your OS like it does currently with .1 service packs.

i don't see how that is a problem because again Apple knows the machines they've shipped and what they do and do not have and they are the ones delivering service packs and major OS releases through the App Store. I really do believe in the future that OS X Releases (major OS releases) will be delivered with only the changed files and not the complete operating system. They will probably do different updates for different Macs that have come with different build numbers that enable features other Mac's don't have just like they have always done with the minor service packs.

We shall agree to disagree then. You can't have Apple Store technicians doing Internet Recovery for every model type they have because you want to move to some type of Delta update pack. Apple restores their machines constantly, especially when new OS/updates arrive. If they don't have a method for easy system restores, that are connected via a server, they will just screw themselves.

With iOS, you have a small set of hardware types that are managed. While iOS does offer "delta" updates, they still have "full" builds for when you have to restore. Computers will fail and simply relying an delta/update options will screw you up. If Apple made it where I couldn't do a full install for a server and that I would have to upgrade every time, I would move back to Windows servers.

I could argue heavily over this, and like I said, I disagree 100% with your opinion, but you are definitely entitled to it.

I did a clean install to Lion and then upgraded to Mountain Lion because I just wanted to start fresh on my SSD drive because of having limited space and already had a load of apps on it to clear. Seems to be no issues at all for me having done an upgrade, all is good, OS appears much quicker to startup, nothing slower than before.

Seriously an upgrade surely is just like upgrading an app like Google Chrome? Would you reinstall your OS just to upgrade an App each time a new version came out? It replaces System files, deletes old files and cleans up after itself Finder, login screen etc are all just essentially core apps, I don't really see the fuss and don't see how it can slow down the OS really.

That is where I foresee Apple taking us and at that point clean installs will not be possible you'll only be able to reset the machine back to the base OS from a few years ago and then after the install is completed a large update download will begin with all the changes since then to current day.

Turning OS X Releases more in to service packs is I think the avenue they will take.

If you have a recovery partition you would still have a slipstreamed disc image of the latest OS version somewhere allowing you to do a clean install. Even today the App Store OS X Installer is being updated to the latest 10.x.x version.

Something I noticed for the very first time after installing Microsoft Office 2011; Apple made massive improvements to Launchpad. I don't get those tons of useless support apps anymore! Just the main Office apps. Yay!

post-128385-0-46036100-1343350398_thumb.

We shall agree to disagree then. You can't have Apple Store technicians doing Internet Recovery for every model type they have because you want to move to some type of Delta update pack. Apple restores their machines constantly, especially when new OS/updates arrive. If they don't have a method for easy system restores, that are connected via a server, they will just screw themselves.

With iOS, you have a small set of hardware types that are managed. While iOS does offer "delta" updates, they still have "full" builds for when you have to restore. Computers will fail and simply relying an delta/update options will screw you up.

I could argue heavily over this, and like I said, I disagree 100% with your opinion, but you are definitely entitled to it.

When you get an OS like Lion for example. On release day there are no service packs yet. So over 12 months you get each update as it releases. Each .1 release individually. But if you go to reinstall you don't do that do you? You don't download 10.7.1 then 10.7.2 then 10.7.3 - Instead you instantly get the last major update because Apple has rolled all the changes they've ever done in to one convenient update which brings your OS up to the latest version.

That is how they would do it with OS X Major Releases.

So if you're in an Apple Store and a genius needs to reinstall your machine they would access the recovery partition do the base install then their on-site server (which btw they already have for delivering Lion recovery installs and iOS installs, it was in the news several months ago) and then there server would deliver on top of that base install an update file which contains all the changes since that OS was released to present.

I really don't think it is such a stretch to suggest Apple will move to doing OS Releases like .1 service packs they already have a working and setup infrastructure for offering it, the prices of the OS's keep going down to almost nothing and they've moved everything including service pack updates in to the App Store.

And yes we can disagree and you're entitled to your opinion, I don't know why you're arguing with me about it to be honest, it's like we can't even state our opinions on Neowin for some reason. All I'm doing is thinking about what will happen in the future and where I foresee Apple going.

When you get an OS like Lion for example. On release day there are no service packs yet. So over 12 months you get each update as it releases. Each .1 release individually. But if you go to reinstall you don't do that do you? You don't download 10.7.1 then 10.7.2 then 10.7.3 - Instead you instantly get the last major update because Apple has rolled all the changes they've ever done in to one convenient update which brings your OS up to the latest version.

That is how they would do it with OS X Major Releases.

So if you're in an Apple Store and a genius needs to reinstall your machine they would access the recovery partition do the base install then their on-site server (which btw they already have for delivering Lion recovery installs and iOS installs, it was in the news several months ago) and then there server would deliver on top of that base install an update file which contains all the changes since that OS was released to present.

I really don't think it is such a stretch to suggest Apple will move to doing OS Releases like .1 service packs they already have a working and setup infrastructure for offering it, the prices of the OS's keep going down to almost nothing and they've moved everything including service pack updates in to the App Store.

And yes we can disagree and you're entitled to your opinion, I don't know why you're arguing with me about it to be honest, it's like we can't even state our opinions on Neowin for some reason. All I'm doing is thinking about what will happen in the future and where I foresee Apple going.

And yet you continue to argue back, lol.

Okay I'll bite one last time. Right now they are clean imaging computers when they bring them in with all of the updates. So what you're describing is in the future they will have one OS and they will install that OS, then post-flight/post-install the necessary updates afterwards?

Why would they move backwards? Why not continue to have the what they have in place, which is the full thing to begin with? You have two conflicting ideas there.

And yet you continue to argue back, lol.

Okay I'll bite one last time. Right now they are clean imaging computers when they bring them in with all of the updates. So what you're describing is in the future they will have one OS and they will install that OS, then post-flight/post-install the necessary updates afterwards?

Why would they move backwards? Why not continue to have the what they have in place, which is the full thing to begin with? You have two conflicting ideas there.

You don't need to "bite" at anything. I'm not antagonizing you. If you don't want to argue with me then don't simple as that.

I like the new features but, man, there are some bugs. Safari is slow as ****. It starts loading a page (using progress bar), a quarter of the way through it pauses, then finishes. The earlier version of Safari was faster. I originally did an upgrade from Lion to Mountain Lion but noticing how some things were just not behaving, I deleted the partition and reinstalled Mountain Lion. I'm just not liking how Safari seems to messed up in terms of speed. I've had to reboot my iMac two or three times now since installing Mountain Lion. Not a good sign.

I like the new features but, man, there are some bugs. Safari is slow as ****. It starts loading a page (using progress bar), a quarter of the way through it pauses, then finishes. The earlier version of Safari was faster. I originally did an upgrade from Lion to Mountain Lion but noticing how some things were just not behaving, I deleted the partition and reinstalled Mountain Lion. I'm just not liking how Safari seems to messed up in terms of speed. I've had to reboot my iMac two or three times now since installing Mountain Lion. Not a good sign.

There is a solution for that. It's called: Google Chrome :D

If you have a recovery partition you would still have a slipstreamed disc image of the latest OS version somewhere allowing you to do a clean install. Even today the App Store OS X Installer is being updated to the latest 10.x.x version.

Something I noticed for the very first time after installing Microsoft Office 2011; Apple made massive improvements to Launchpad. I don't get those tons of useless support apps anymore! Just the main Office apps. Yay!

I find the icons and the UI much, more sharper and clear than before. It looks very, very nice. I bought my iMac in 2010 and I can't complaint. It has served me well. As for the new OS, it looks cool. I disabled all the animations because I simply hate them.

I was going to ask you, how do you like the Office suite you have? I had it but I found it to be sluggish compared to iWorks, especially Word. It was so slow. How is yours working?

There is a solution for that. It's called: Google Chrome :D

I do have Chrome and Firefox downloaded but, I also use iCloud. I have an iPhone and iPad and use Safari (never had an issue until now) for the synchronization across my devices. It's really nice except now Safari is just kinda weird. Although, I can't say I'm too surprised. It is a new OS release and new Safari release. I'm sure there are probably bugs. Lol

Although, on a wim, I disabled Kaspersky. I had Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Mac and had NO problems. However, after a clean install, I went to their site to download the latest version and they got rid of that and replaced it with Kaspersky Security for Mac or something like that. I disabled that and bam. My internet is working again. WTF. LOL

I do have Chrome and Firefox downloaded but, I also use iCloud. I have an iPhone and iPad and use Safari (never had an issue until now) for the synchronization across my devices. It's really nice except now Safari is just kinda weird. Although, I can't say I'm too surprised. It is a new OS release and new Safari release. I'm sure there are probably bugs. Lol

Although, on a wim, I disabled Kaspersky. I had Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Mac and had NO problems. However, after a clean install, I went to their site to download the latest version and they got rid of that and replaced it with Kaspersky Security for Mac or something like that. I disabled that and bam. My internet is working again. WTF. LOL

Contrary to what many people here will tell you, there is no need for an anti-virus on a Mac. As long as you stay away from Porn Sites, Poker Sites, Game Sites with questionable content and use common sense, you will never get infected. I have had my iMac for 3 years now and I have never, ever gotten a virus of any kind. Nothing. Zero. Zip. Nada.

Traversing the directory structure is one thing, but being able to open all those files at will is another.

If this has been like this since the beginning of computing, it?s time to change.

Every version of OS X has read-only SMB support for the express purpose of reading NTFS volumes (an inheritance via BSD, which shares the support, which is also built into most recent Linux kernels) - however, without third-party software, you don't have *write* access to those volumes - either local or networked. The access to previous versions of OS X is the same - read-only, not read/write. That is, to be honest, different from Windows, which can't even *read* Apple_HFS volumes without third-party software. Windows 8 has read-only *local* access to volumes of previous versions of WIndows - however, as is the case with OS X and its previous versions, it's strictly read-only *unless* you enter the proper password.

'That is, to be honest, different from Windows, which can't even *read* Apple_HFS volumes without third-party software.'

Because HFS is more strictly licensed only to Apple (who own it) and you can only get the windows reader for it (read only) by installing bootcamp.

'Windows 8 has read-only *local* access to volumes of previous versions of WIndows'

Not used W8 in a while, but I highly doubt it's read only. NTFS will be read/write, FAT will be read/write.

'it's strictly read-only *unless* you enter the proper password.'

Now you're talking about permisssions. No, files and folders are locked and only administrators can unlock them, but they can all be unlocked.

Can anyone here get iMessages working without the popup error?

I do have Chrome and Firefox downloaded but, I also use iCloud. I have an iPhone and iPad and use Safari (never had an issue until now) for the synchronization across my devices. It's really nice except now Safari is just kinda weird. Although, I can't say I'm too surprised. It is a new OS release and new Safari release. I'm sure there are probably bugs. Lol

Although, on a wim, I disabled Kaspersky. I had Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Mac and had NO problems. However, after a clean install, I went to their site to download the latest version and they got rid of that and replaced it with Kaspersky Security for Mac or something like that. I disabled that and bam. My internet is working again. WTF. LOL

It's called *compatibility issues*, and are typical with any update to an operating system from anybody. (If you think that this hasn't happened to Apple before, then obviously you don't follow forums even partially dedicated to OS X - even before the shift to Intel CPUs.)

What was the biggest surprise to *me* is the appearance of rather high-end Apple hardware on the *not compatible with Mountain Lion* HCL - specifically the 1.x versions of the single-Xeon or dual-Xeon Mac Pro. (Further digging uncovers that it's due to the GPUs that came in these Mac Pros is no supported by Mountain Lion - which is, in fact, the only thing that made sense.)

'That is, to be honest, different from Windows, which can't even *read* Apple_HFS volumes without third-party software.'

Because HFS is more strictly licensed only to Apple (who own it) and you can only get the windows reader for it (read only) by installing bootcamp.

'Windows 8 has read-only *local* access to volumes of previous versions of WIndows'

Not used W8 in a while, but I highly doubt it's read only. NTFS will be read/write, FAT will be read/write.

'it's strictly read-only *unless* you enter the proper password.'

Now you're talking about permisssions. No, files and folders are locked and only administrators can unlock them, but they can all be unlocked.

Can anyone here get iMessages working without the popup error?

It's read-only without the proper password, which has been the case for all NT versions of Windows.

And you are correct - it *is* a permissions issue; the same is, in fact, true with any OS readable from any other OS

The same, in fact, applies to OS X volumes.

The growing interest in Btrfs is due pretty much to the lack of a userbase for this GPL-licensable filesystem - even most Linux professionals stick with tried-and-true ext4 for local volumes.

However, I'm not saying that either the OS X or Windows approaches are necessarily *bad* or even *evil* from a security standpoint; I'm merely saying that the approaches are different (in minor ways).

I like the new features but, man, there are some bugs. Safari is slow as ****. It starts loading a page (using progress bar), a quarter of the way through it pauses, then finishes. The earlier version of Safari was faster. I originally did an upgrade from Lion to Mountain Lion but noticing how some things were just not behaving, I deleted the partition and reinstalled Mountain Lion. I'm just not liking how Safari seems to messed up in terms of speed. I've had to reboot my iMac two or three times now since installing Mountain Lion. Not a good sign.

I haven't used Safari as my default browser on OS X - ever. Also, did you upgrade to Mountain Lion, or do a clean install?

One area I have found that *all* operating systems are alike is tha a lot of *crud* builds up over time - just because your OS isn't Windows, don't even DARE think you aren't immune! (If Linux distributions and the BSDs aren't immune, why would OS X be immune?)

Therefore, in *every* case, a clean install beats an upgrade install.

Eh? No password is required, right click the folder, go to properties and claim ownership over all objects in the folder and the folder itself (as an adminstrator), no password needed...

The user's password is stored hashed in a registry hive so you wouldn't even be able to ask for a password anyway.

I haven't used Safari as my default browser on OS X - ever. Also, did you upgrade to Mountain Lion, or do a clean install?

One area I have found that *all* operating systems are alike is tha a lot of *crud* builds up over time - just because your OS isn't Windows, don't even DARE think you aren't immune! (If Linux distributions and the BSDs aren't immune, why would OS X be immune?)

Therefore, in *every* case, a clean install beats an upgrade install.

At first I did an upgrade. However, the system just seemed "off" and not as fast as before. Then I decided it was best to do a clean install and did just that.

Contrary to what many people here will tell you, there is no need for an anti-virus on a Mac. As long as you stay away from Porn Sites, Poker Sites, Game Sites with questionable content and use common sense, you will never get infected. I have had my iMac for 3 years now and I have never, ever gotten a virus of any kind. Nothing. Zero. Zip. Nada.

I'm not to terribly concerned about my system becoming infected. I do use common sense and I'm careful with where I go. I mainly use it to keep from passing on Windows infections to the Windows computers I interact with constantly, file transfers, etc. I know its not really needed but, I rather try and be helpful if I can in any way. Af far as Kaspersky is concerned it looks like their latest release for Mac is still a bit buggy.

I like the new features but, man, there are some bugs. Safari is slow as ****. It starts loading a page (using progress bar), a quarter of the way through it pauses, then finishes. The earlier version of Safari was faster. I originally did an upgrade from Lion to Mountain Lion but noticing how some things were just not behaving, I deleted the partition and reinstalled Mountain Lion. I'm just not liking how Safari seems to messed up in terms of speed. I've had to reboot my iMac two or three times now since installing Mountain Lion. Not a good sign.

Odd. Safari 6 is loads faster for me.

Odd. Safari 6 is loads faster for me.

You may have caught my earlier posting but, it looks like the culprit was Kaspersky. They released a new version about a week ago and it doesn't seem to play well with Mountain Lion even though they said it would. Lol. I've seen in their forums that people have complained as well.

Although, I can't seem to install the Extensions I use such as Ad Block. I keep getting an error.

Anyone having issues with Messages? I enable the menu in status bar but it keeps saying I'm offline. I am able to send messages but not change my status. This was an issue in the beta as well, can't believe its not fixed.

Also, do I have to keep Messages app open to receive them? :/

Every version of OS X has read-only SMB support for the express purpose of reading NTFS volumes (an inheritance via BSD, which shares the support, which is also built into most recent Linux kernels) - however, without third-party software, you don't have *write* access to those volumes - either local or networked. The access to previous versions of OS X is the same - read-only, not read/write. That is, to be honest, different from Windows, which can't even *read* Apple_HFS volumes without third-party software. Windows 8 has read-only *local* access to volumes of previous versions of WIndows - however, as is the case with OS X and its previous versions, it's strictly read-only *unless* you enter the proper password.

OS X didn't inherit SMB support from BSD, it got it by using Samba originally (And now they wrote their own system), even then SMB is purely for network shares, and doesn't care about the underlying file system (Which is why read/write is down to permissions, not the file system used)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!