65 y/o man kills teen mugger, wounds another


Recommended Posts

No charges: Pennsylvia has a Castle Doctrine law.

http://readingeagle.com/article.aspx?id=361731

A 65-year-old Reading man who was riding his bicycle was justified in shooting two teens - one fatally - who tried to rob him on a Schuylkill River trail as part of a crime spree, the Berks County district attorney said Thursday.

The teens, age 16 and 15, and another 15-year-old boy skipped school Wednesday and robbed two pedestrians in West Reading before they attacked the man as he rode on the Thun Trail in Cumru Township at 11 a.m., police said.

The man, whose name authorities withheld, will not be charged for shooting the teens because he acted in self-defense, which is legal under Pennsylvania's Castle Doctrine, District Attorney John T. Adams said.

"While I don't condone violence, the bike rider had no choice," Adams said. "It was justifiable homicide."

Julius Johnson, 16, of Reading was pronounced dead at the scene Wednesday morning after he was shot in his chest with a handgun, officials said.

An autopsy Thursday by Dr. Supriya Kuruvila, a forensic pathologist at Reading Hospital, determined Johnson died of a gunshot wound to the chest, according to the county coroner's office. The death was ruled a homicide, officials said.

The 15-year-old shot in the neck remained in Reading Hospital on Thursday, officials said. Information about his medical condition could not be obtained. Police did not release his name because he has not been charged.

The third teen, Michael Gonzalez, 15, address unavailable, was charged with robbery, aggravated assault and related offenses and committed to the county youth center in Bern Township.

Officials said an investigation continues.

Johnson was a Reading High School student, and the 15-year-olds are Gov. Mifflin High School students, Adams said.

Adams gave this account:

Johnson was on probation for previous offenses. Juvenile probation officers had gone to his Oakbrook residence earlier Wednesday and found the three teens playing video games.

They told the two 15-year-olds to leave. The officers put an electronic monitoring device on Johnson's ankle, ordered him to stay home and report to their office with his parents at 4 p.m.

Instead, the three met up and decided to jump and rob random victims.

They first robbed an elderly man in West Reading shortly after 10 a.m., taking money from his pockets, then tried to rob another man in West Reading, kneeing him in the stomach and pushing him to the ground. Neither man was hurt.

The bike rider was on the trail between Reading and West Reading.

As he rode past the teens, the 15-year-old whose name was not released punched the man in the face, knocking him from his bike. Johnson ran and kicked the man, who was sitting against a chain-link fence along the trail.

As one of the teens ran toward the man, he shot Johnson and the 15-year-old.

People who found the man called 9-1-1 and waited for police to arrive. It was unclear if the people heard the shots or were on the trail.

The teens weren't armed, but the shootings were legal because the man was unable to escape, thought his life was in danger and had a permit to carry his gun, Adams said.

The man told investigators: "I was scared for my life. I was in big trouble. If I could have kept my bike on the trail, I would have gotten out of there."

The man was unhurt but shaken by the shootings, Adams said.

Adams did not know if Johnson's monitoring device had GPS tracking capabilities or if it simply triggered an alarm when he left his home. Adams said juvenile probation officers acted appropriately.

Cumru Police Chief Jed Habecker credited his department for its quick investigation.

He said the crime was only the second robbery to occur along the Cumru section of the Thun Trail in about a decade.

Adams said he has heard from many people in the community that the bicyclist was a hero for successfully defending himself.

"When your life is in danger, you have no choice but to use deadly force," he said.

I should have noted in the OP that Pennsylvania has a Shall Issue concealed weapons permit system - a good citizen without the disqualifiers listed in the law can get a 5 year permit in about 45 days. Recertification is likewise streamlined.

A lot of these all too numerous punks are straight out of A Clockwork Orange - preying on those weaker than them; the elderly, disabled, females, younger/smaller kids etc. This is why the fastest growing handgun demographica are females, the disabled and the elderly.

  • Like 1

It's a shame that the teenager's life had to be taken. If I was in the old man's position, I would've fired a warning shot first. I'll never understand this "kill the criminal" mentality that some people have.

I am sorry to hear that the other two still breath my air.

You don't own the air. And if you condone the killing of teenagers, then I truly feel sorry for you.

  • Like 4

We don't condone the unreasoned killing of teens, just dangerous criminals in the act of harming others. In this case the two classifications intersected.

In the trainng classes for a concealed carry license you are taught NEVER to shoot a warning shot. These classs are taught either by certified cops or certified trainers that also train cops. My trainer was the Police Commissioner, who had 30+ years of service and an ex-Marine.

1) if the situation has deteriorated to where you have to pull the gun then it's too late for warnings.

2) a warning shot is very likely to either ricochet or fly wild for up to a mile, quite possibly hitting an innocent or damaging property.

Bottom line: a flying bullet needs to find a home: the perp.

I dunno. I don't own a firearm and don't want to own a firearm, but when punks like this stir up the trouble that they do I want them to be worried about being shot by someone. They should have that kind of fear because God knows they don't give a **** about the police. Obviously the one that was shot and killed already had a rap-sheet and was already in trouble... the system didn't do anything to keep him from hurting people. Maybe if that kid was serving time at a juvenile detention center like he should have been instead of out on parole he would still be alive. Law makers should take notes.

.... And if you condone the killing of teenagers, then I truly feel sorry for you.

No one condones the killing of teenagers. But, what we do condone is the killing of such low-life scum that feel it is OK to attack a 65 year old senior citizen.

  • Like 2

The fact that this is alright, is a problem. They were young people who, with the right help, could have gone on to lead good lives.

are you willing to bet "your" life on that?

Whoah. It's weird reading about this kind of thing when it happens in your own neighborhood. Oakbrook is an apartment complex full of poverty stricken foreigners and gangsters. It's a terrible place. I lived right across from it back in the 90s. You'd hear gunshots at least once every night. It's unfortunate... 'cause my own neighborhood was so cozy until they came along and ruined it.

The fact that this is alright, is a problem. They were young people who, with the right help, could have gone on to lead good lives.

News Flash: teens this violent seldom reform - they remane a danger to others well into their 50's. Before 18 they call it conduct disorder, and after it's antisocial personality disorder. They are malignant sociopaths, and you can't fix that.

It's a shame that the teenager's life had to be taken. If I was in the old man's position, I would've fired a warning shot first. I'll never understand this "kill the criminal" mentality that some people have.

You don't own the air. And if you condone the killing of teenagers, then I truly feel sorry for you.

Once a scumbag, usually always a scumbag. Some of these teens these days just need to be snuffed out before they waste anymore peoples time.

Sad that someone had to die, but criminals could care less about their victims and people have to be allowed to defend themselves. I fear that the gentleman that was defending himself from a violent crime may also be further victimized by being sued by the criminals parents. Not knowing the laws in PA, hopefully he may be protected from lawsuits.

  • Like 2

It's a shame that the teenager's life had to be taken. If I was in the old man's position, I would've fired a warning shot first. I'll never understand this "kill the criminal" mentality that some people have.

You don't own the air. And if you condone the killing of teenagers, then I truly feel sorry for you.

sure, it's probably best if you CAN avoid it but when your in the heat of the moment and that's going down within seconds you ain't got to much time to think and you just react especially if you feel your life in in danger especially since it appears there is THREE of them and at 15-16 years old they ain't little kids anymore and if they wanted (like had the intension to really hurt him) they could have really messed up the 65year old so i can't blame him for not taking any chances although a warning shot might have been a good idea if possible just to give them 'a chance' to step off. but then again at the same time... if you start robbing people you have to realize there is some chance they could have a gun on them and might be ready to shoot you.

but from the looks of things it appears they where not just a couple of average teens that did something stupid (in which case i might feel a little more sorry for them) but had a bad rep for doing stuff of this sort. because if they are the type who would have ended up in a life of crime and hurt people etc etc then this guy probably did that neighborhood a favor in the long run.

but at the end of the day... THEY (the three teens) are the bad guy. not the guy who killed them.

Sad that someone had to die, but criminals could care less about their victims and people have to be allowed to defend themselves. I fear that the gentleman that was defending himself from a violent crime may also be further victimized by being sued by the criminals parents. Not knowing the laws in PA, hopefully he may be protected from lawsuits.

lets hope he CANT be sued... no one should be able to be sued if they seriously thought their lives where in danger and like i was saying when you got three people coming to attack you, you ain't got time to mess around as it's not like they where little 11-12 year old kids as by 15-16 your not a little kid anymore and could cause serious harm to someone if that where their intent.

the way i see it... if those kids where into trouble quite a bit with robbing and hitting people etc, they had it coming eventually.

Whoah. It's weird reading about this kind of thing when it happens in your own neighborhood. Oakbrook is an apartment complex full of poverty stricken foreigners and gangsters. It's a terrible place. I lived right across from it back in the 90s. You'd hear gunshots at least once every night. It's unfortunate... 'cause my own neighborhood was so cozy until they came along and ruined it.

after reading that comment i am very confident those teens had it coming ;) (he should have been awarded a medal for getting rid of the scum of the area)

i don't feel sorry for them at all now if they are of the type they appear to be from that general quote.

**** is really going to hell when 16 year olds are already on probation and need to wear gps monitoring devices. I'm only 32 but when I was 16 I was all about high school sports, girls, video games, and just hanging out with my friends. These kids are skipping school and jumping old people just for the hell of it (can't imagine they are getting much money out of it).

The fact that this is alright, is a problem. They were young people who, with the right help, could have gone on to lead good lives.

The system, with policies like mandatory minimum sentences, are geared to punish not to rehabilitate. That's what voters want and that's what voters get. It doesn't matter what the experts say. Damn the facts and let's go for blood.

**** is really going to hell when 16 year olds are already on probation and need to wear gps monitoring devices. I'm only 32 but when I was 16 I was all about high school sports, girls, video games, and just hanging out with my friends. These kids are skipping school and jumping old people just for the hell of it (can't imagine they are getting much money out of it).

Exactly. i am same age as you. (i am 32, ill be 33 later this year)

it's like some people are just so dead inside that they don't even think twice before harming another person just for some petty stuff like a little bit of cash etc. hell, i am sure some of those people who are violence happy probably do it for fun in some cases which is even worse. those types are dead people walking basically and taking any of those out is nothing but a good thing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!