65 y/o man kills teen mugger, wounds another


Recommended Posts

News Flash: teens this violent seldom reform - they remane a danger to others well into their 50's. Before 18 they call it conduct disorder, and after it's antisocial personality disorder. They are malignant sociopaths, and you can't fix that.

Said the guy that would obviously blow an intruders head off than have correct procedures followed.

This is my opinion, but I think EVERYONE deserves the right to live, and be given a chance to better themselves. While I understand how the American prison system is geared, I still think a Correctional System would be more beneficial.

To not even want to try is basically treating these kids like Dogs. Must be sick, put it down. That's not the way I personally think things should work, I understand people will be different.

This is also not me arguing about American gun laws and what I think of them in any way.

I just think this is a total waste of life, and am saddened that so many people don't have any issue with this at all. But hey, each to their own, and I respect their personal opinions.

Once a scumbag, usually always a scumbag. Some of these teens these days just need to be snuffed out before they waste anymore peoples time.

Actually I think you'll find that stats from other western countries who adopt a correctional system will state that you are off the mark.

Said the guy that would obviously blow an intruders head off than have correct procedures followed.

This is my opinion, but I think EVERYONE deserves the right to live, and be given a chance to better themselves. While I understand how the American prison system is geared, I still think a Correctional System would be more beneficial.

To not even want to try is basically treating these kids like Dogs. Must be sick, put it down. That's not the way I personally think things should work, I understand people will be different.

This is also not me arguing about American gun laws and what I think of them in any way.

I just think this is a total waste of life, and am saddened that so many people don't have any issue with this at all. But hey, each to their own, and I respect their personal opinions.

And what would your opinion be if one of these criminals killed one of their victims? Your dog comparison is flawed as well, this kid was killed as he was attacking someone.

And what would your opinion be if one of these criminals killed one of their victims? Your dog comparison is flawed as well, this kid was killed as he was attacking someone.

I feel the exact same way if they had killed someone, just as I feel the same way for murderers here in Australia. I feel for the victims, I really, really do, but I also understand that there is more than likely something behind this, mentally, or whatever, I think those people deserve to be treated for a condition, not killed.

>

I fear that the gentleman that was defending himself from a violent crime may also be further victimized by being sued by the criminals parents.

>

NO - a key part of the Castle Doctrine, Stand Your Ground and similar laws is that the defender gets civil immunity for the incident - neither the perp nor their relatives can sue for their injuries or death. The operating theory is that they brought it on themselves.

Also; in most all states (49) the victim or a witness to the crime has the right of citizens arrest, and in many of these this includes the right to fire on a fleeing felony suspect.

I feel the exact same way if they had killed someone, just as I feel the same way for murderers here in Australia. I feel for the victims, I really, really do, but I also understand that there is more than likely something behind this, mentally, or whatever, I think those people deserve to be treated for a condition, not killed.

I may be wrong, but I bet your tone would change if someone you loved, was brutally raped and then murdered.

There are some individuals who are beyond repair or treatment.

I may be wrong, but I bet your tone would change if someone you loved, was brutally raped and then murdered.

You're not wrong - some of the most ardent supporters of these laws are former opponents who were victimized or had a family member victimized. The turnaround is in some cases dizzying.

There are some individuals who are beyond repair or treatment

Absolutely 200% correct. The best we can do is to protect ourselves from them if/when necessary, and to understand that some of these malignant souls start as young as 10. Michigan has convicted very violent murderers as young as 11.

I may be wrong, but I bet your tone would change if someone you loved, was brutally raped and then murdered.

There are some individuals who are beyond repair or treatment.

I can't comment on that, and I can't say I wouldn't change my mind.

I feel the exact same way if they had killed someone, just as I feel the same way for murderers here in Australia. I feel for the victims, I really, really do, but I also understand that there is more than likely something behind this, mentally, or whatever, I think those people deserve to be treated for a condition, not killed.

You make it seem like he was convicted and sentenced to the death penalty, he was killed by someone defending themselves. Are you saying if you "feel" like your life is in danger you are not going to do anything you can (including killing them if you must) to survive?

NO - a key part of the Castle Doctrine, Stand Your Ground and similar laws is that the defender gets civil immunity for the incident - neither the perp nor their relatives can sue for their injuries or death. The operating theory is that they brought it on themselves.

Also; in most all states (49) the victim or a witness to the crime has the right of citizens arrest, and in many of these this includes the right to fire on a fleeing felony suspect.

Good to know, thank you.

  • Like 1

Said the guy that would obviously blow an intruders head off than have correct procedures followed.

Blowing an intruder's head off is the only correct procedure.

If someone is in my house uninvited, they are being put down unless they surrender on the spot. To think otherwise is delusional.

>

To think otherwise is delusional often suicidal.

Fixed.

Good to know, thank you.

Best to check your particular state. Here in Michigan we have those provisions, including the right to carry a weapon unlicensed as long as it isn't concealed, but elsewhere it may differ.

Blowing an intruder's head off is the only correct procedure.

If someone is in my house uninvited, they are being put down unless they surrender on the spot. To think otherwise is delusional.

Psycos like you shouldn't own a gun. Simple.

You make it seem like he was convicted and sentenced to the death penalty, he was killed by someone defending themselves. Are you saying if you "feel" like your life is in danger you are not going to do anything you can (including killing them if you must) to survive?

No no no. Sorry, I'm not great at wording my posts. I feel defending yourself is your right, and while I don't like the outcome of this situation, what's happened has happened.

What I don't like is seeing comments like "Deserved it", "Had it coming", etc. Making it sound like killing someone is a good thing. While I understand what's happened, why this young person is dead, I don't like that people just seem to think it's fine.

What's happened here is a horrible, horrible thing for all involved, and I highly doubt the person who killed the kid feels all mucho and big as some people making comments in this thread. Personally, I think it's disgraceful that people think a death like this is pretty much nothing.

  • Like 1

Psycos like you shouldn't own a gun. Simple.

What I don't like is seeing comments like "Deserved it", "Had it coming", etc. Making it sound like killing someone is a good thing.

If you had a family, and someone broke into YOUR house, you would do the same thing. If not, you don't deserve a family.

Yes he had it coming. Read this fully before you think it sounds wrong: Yes killing someone CAN be a good thing. If an intruder was going to come into your home (or street or business) and pose a threat to your family, HIS death CAN be a good thing if YOUR FAMILY gets to survive instead. If someone is going to die, it should be the one doing the crime. Every criminal knows the cost of doing something criminal. Its up to them if they want to gamble.

One thing a lot of people, especially those overseas, misunderstand - 'murder' has a specific legal meaning in the US; an unjustified homicide.

OTOH, 'self defense' is a justified homicide, and perfectly legal. Therefore: this was not murder.

A victimizer surrenders his right to safety as soon as he tries to take it from someone else.

  • Like 2

This is why I disagree with guns being legal. Whether he was frightened for his life or not, the fact of the matter is that the kids wouldn't have actually killed him.

If he was carrying a taser or something that would simply help subdue the attackers, then fine... but killing them? Bit harsh.

Teenagers can (and do) reform. Younger people are very impressionable and often grow out of such offending as they get older.. waste of a life.

This is why I disagree with guns being legal. Whether he was frightened for his life or not, the fact of the matter is that the kids wouldn't have actually killed him.

>.

THAT is the single most clueless statement I've read in this thread yet!! People are bludgeoned to death during street crimes every single day, with the elderly being more susceptible because of their inherent frailty. Add AA with theft and you have robbery.

FBI stats for 2009 say 806,843 aggravated (severe) assaults that year, 2,210 a day, and that doesn't include rapes or attempted rapes - themselves s special class within self-defense law.

Total: 6.6 million violent crimes (murder, rape, assault and robbery), or 23,562 a day. As such - we either need a cop every half block, including the alleys, or the physical & legal means to protect ourselves.

One thing a lot of people, especially those overseas, misunderstand - 'murder' has a specific legal meaning in the US; an unjustified homicide.

OTOH, 'self defense' is a justified homicide, and perfectly legal. Therefore: this was not murder.

A victimizer surrenders his right to safety as soon as he tries to take it from someone else.

I understand this, really I do. I'm not saying the bloke that shot the kid is a murderer, I'm not saying he did anything wrong by killing him, he was within his rights.

What I'm saying is, this whole shoot to kill ideal that is in this thread. That's what I don't understand. I'm not saying those people are terrible people, but I really think it's horrible to think that people here would genuinely shoot to kill. I bullet to the knee is going to stop the person, and give you time to apprehend.

Of course even I can see if another firearm was involved, then I can completely understand.

But there was no gun mentioned in this thread, so who knows, the kid could have had a gun, or something that looked like a gun. However, some of the responses in this thread tell me that armed or not, shoot to kill is the way.

You don't have to have a weapon to be a threat to someones life, especially if there's a size or strength disparity, and more so when the victim is outnumbered 3-1. As such, armed status isn't a big part of the justification calculus. Fact is, in CD-SYG states the victim gets a presumption of it being a 'good shoot' until/unless proven otherwise.

Also, the combat training classes we have to take stress shoot to kill for the tactical reasons noted upthread. These are state mandated classes taught by certified instructors, most often cops or those who train them.

The fact that this is alright, is a problem. They were young people who, with the right help, could have gone on to lead good lives.

They clearly knew what they were doing. 3rd assault in the same day, just waiting to attack the wrong person which they did and got what was coming to them.

I may be wrong, but I bet your tone would change if someone you loved, was brutally raped and then murdered.

There are some individuals who are beyond repair or treatment.

By the same token, he is living in a less violent society and thus is less likely to have an immediate family member that becomes a victim of a brutal crime. Australia and Canada incarcerate a much smaller percentage of their population and those they do incarcerate have at least some chance at rehabilitation and skills training before it goes too far.

Incarceration_rates_worldwide.gif

My condolences go out to . . . the man who had to experience such a dreadful crime. No one should have to go through what that man experienced at the hands of those troublemakers, and I am happy that there is now one less person in the world who has previously unjustifiably harmed others.

It's a shame that the teenager's life had to be taken. If I was in the old man's position, I would've fired a warning shot first. I'll never understand this "kill the criminal" mentality that some people have. You don't own the air. And if you condone the killing of teenagers, then I truly feel sorry for you.

Keeping them alive ensures they're able to terrorise and hurt more people. If people wish to remain alive, they have the choice not to unjustifiably terrorise and hurt people. I don't think I'll ever understand why so many people feel it's fine to keep certain criminals alive, after they've been proven to unjustifiably terrorise and hurt others. Everyone makes mistakes, but some mistakes are unforgivable, and sane adults know better. In this case, 15-year-old kids should know better than this, so their age wouldn't be a reasonable justification. Rehabilitation often doesn't work, so the only way to truly help protect society would be to put these people down. It's a shame anyone may have to die, but they made their choice to hurt others, and the protection of society should be the priority.

This is why I disagree with guns being legal. Whether he was frightened for his life or not, the fact of the matter is that the kids wouldn't have actually killed him.

If he was carrying a taser or something that would simply help subdue the attackers, then fine... but killing them? Bit harsh.

Teenagers can (and do) reform. Younger people are very impressionable and often grow out of such offending as they get older.. waste of a life.

and how do you know that? more importantly, how would the victim know that? He was just out enjoying his day riding his bike when 3 punks decided to punch him in his face. People who go an attack people just for fun are unpredictible, maybe they were just getting started with the first two - this time they were on a trail with less people, maybe assault isnt enough this time. Point is there is no way to know the outcome, especially when you have little time to react. If I ever feel that my life is in danger, shoot first and I'll evaluate the situation once I am out of harms way.

I understand this, really I do. I'm not saying the bloke that shot the kid is a murderer, I'm not saying he did anything wrong by killing him, he was within his rights.

What I'm saying is, this whole shoot to kill ideal that is in this thread. That's what I don't understand. I'm not saying those people are terrible people, but I really think it's horrible to think that people here would genuinely shoot to kill. I bullet to the knee is going to stop the person, and give you time to apprehend.

Of course even I can see if another firearm was involved, then I can completely understand.

But there was no gun mentioned in this thread, so who knows, the kid could have had a gun, or something that looked like a gun. However, some of the responses in this thread tell me that armed or not, shoot to kill is the way.

Shooting someone in the knee is not practical, the knee is a very small target especially when it's someone running towards you, the man had no choice but to go for the torso which is much more likely to hit and disable the target (hopefully not kill).

I agree with you on how it's strange that some people can have the mindset of blowing someone's head off if they are trespassing, that's a bit extreme...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Making US citizens pay is a prominent tool? Joke of the week…
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!