65 y/o man kills teen mugger, wounds another


Recommended Posts

Escalation happens because they either get away with some initial crimes and begin to feel themselves to be invincible

My point exactly. These punks had already gotten away with this behavior before, and the likelihood of escalation was there. Hardcore's comment that "They didn't kill the other people they mugged. They were little ****s, robbers, but not killers." holds no water.

Sad story, sad that someone had to die, if it was not the teen the senior could have been the one or injured. Another sad issue here is the fact that every single comment did NOT mention parenting, where are the parents of the three teens involved?.. I'll bet my life on it, that the parents of the dead teen will sue someone out of that.. only in America..

only in the us, the rest of america does't have this sue-happy culture

US states with Castle Doctrine, Stand Your Ground, Make My Day or similar laws now give civil immunity to the self-defender in cases like this. This is the vast majority of states. Neither the perp (if they survive) or their families can sue.

Ever heard of escalation (as it applies to criminal behavior)?

I'm sure you have, but are either too ignorant to understand it, or don't want to admit that your hugs and kisses approach to dealing with violent thugs simply isn't realistic.

Sure ive heard of escalation..but escalation tends to happen over a period of time, not in the same day. Did you read the report in its entirety? They robbed two men earlier the same day and neither of the men were hurt. You think in the space of a few hours they'd escalate into murderers?

That's preposterous. All of the evidence suggests that the third robbery would have ended the same way as the first two.

My point exactly. These punks had already gotten away with this behavior before, and the likelihood of escalation was there. Hardcore's comment that "They didn't kill the other people they mugged. They were little ****s, robbers, but not killers." holds no water.

Yeah, a few hours before...that's not what I would call "getting away with it" ..just not enough time for the law to catch up with them.

I don't think many people here value the lives of innocents over criminals. In my country it is not left to question the protection of innocents against criminals. Innocents have the right to protect themselves from being injured or killed.

No one can say the elderly man would not have been killed. That is an assumption, not a truth. Maybe when you realize that you'll see there is good reason to have the ability to protect yourself against whatever maliciousness may happen.

Point proven. People like you should not have a gun. I couldn't care less if you hve reasons of protecting your family. Your shoot to kill mentality is over the top and scary.

Oh right. So we'll just put a bullet in them, no worries.

Are you ****ing kidding me?

Are you kidding me? What would you do in that situation? Let your loved one be killed?

I don't think many people here value the lives of innocents over criminals. In my country it is not left to question the protection of innocents against criminals. Innocents have the right to protect themselves from being injured or killed.

No one can say the elderly man would not have been killed. That is an assumption, not a truth. Maybe when you realize that you'll see there is good reason to have the ability to protect yourself against whatever maliciousness may happen.

So vigilante law next? Eye for eye?

I don't think many people here value the lives of innocents over criminals. In my country it is not left to question the protection of innocents against criminals. Innocents have the right to protect themselves from being injured or killed.

No one can say the elderly man would not have been killed. That is an assumption, not a truth. Maybe when you realize that you'll see there is good reason to have the ability to protect yourself against whatever maliciousness may happen.

You don't have to kill to protect yourself.

You don't have to kill to protect yourself.

Sometimes you do or risk being killed yourself as in this very case. It seems you don't know how to put yourself in this situation and understand that the intentions of these criminals are unknown. This man did not know he wouldn't walk away alive if he let them attack and rob him.

Can you please stop making assumptions.

No one can say the elderly man would not have been killed. That is an assumption, not a truth. Maybe when you realize that you'll see there is good reason to have the ability to protect yourself against whatever maliciousness may happen.

Nobody can say for sure that the old lady down the street won't shoot me in the back one day. To claim otherwise would be an assumption not a truth since you can't guarantee that it won't happen. Perhaps we should all go on preemptive shooting sprees to ensure that it never could happen. There can be only one...

I'm sorry but that sort of "logic" doesn't really cut it.

Nobody can say for sure that the old lady down the street won't shoot me in the back one day. To claim otherwise would be an assumption not a truth since you can't guarantee that it won't happen. Perhaps we should all go on preemptive shooting sprees to ensure that it never could happen. There can be only one...

I'm sorry but that sort of "logic" doesn't really cut it.

Can you honestly not see the difference between criminals and innocent bystanders? Do the chain of events not matter to you? These kids attacked a man.

You just lost an amount of credibility talking about how my logic is flawed when you go on not even understanding that simple barrier between criminal and bystander.

Can you honestly not see the difference between criminals and innocent bystanders? Do the chain of events not matter to you? These kids attacked a man.

You just lost an amount of credibility talking about how my logic is flawed when you go on not even understanding that simple barrier between criminal and bystander.

You don't trust my value judgments, why should I trust your value judgments? This is why common citizens should not walk around with concealed weapons.

You don't trust my value judgments, why should I trust your value judgments? This is why common citizens should not walk around with concealed weapons.

Everything I said still stands. You haven't done anything. On one side of your scenario, you have old lady. It stops there. On the other side, you have two kids who attacked a man. Jee, I wonder who is the criminal here and who it is that is endangering another human being.

Sometimes you do or risk being killed yourself as in this very case. It seems you don't know how to put yourself in this situation and understand that the intentions of these criminals are unknown. This man did not know he wouldn't walk away alive if he let them attack and rob him.

Can you please stop making assumptions.

These kids weren't armed. You can't assume that somebody is going to kill you just because you get punched in the face. That is an example of massively jumping to a conclusion.

If you get into a fight in a bar, you can't just respond by killing them because you got punched. That's stupid.

would YOU be willing to take that chance?

Yes - with three unarmed kids.

These kids weren't armed. You can't assume that somebody is going to kill you just because you get punched in the face.

Yet teen 'wolf pack' attacks, many fatal, occur all the time and often the cause of death has nothing to do with them being armed with even a stick. Stomping to death works quite well, especially when the victim is outnumbered, at a strength disadvantage or physically infirm. Smashin the victims head into the sidewalk or a wall works too.

If you get into a fight in a bar, you can't just respond by killing them because you got punched. That's stupid.

What's stupid is making arguments absent facts; bars and many other places are exclusion zones - you can't legally carry there even with a permit. Carrying while impared is also a huge offense.

And for the record: carry permit holders have a lower violent crime rate than most any other demographic, including cops. Total number in the US: almost 7 million and growing fast.

Yes - with three unarmed kids.

Once again - the human body, especially young & strong ones in a pack, is plenty lethal.

Everything I said still stands. You haven't done anything. On one side of your scenario, you have old lady. It stops there. On the other side, you have two kids who attacked a man. Jee, I wonder who is the criminal here and who it is that is endangering another human being.

You completely miss the point. I don't trust your judgement as to whether you consider some teenager a criminal and thus more dangerous than the woman down the street from me. Those are the sorts of decisions that should be made by a properly trained judge or a jury. I don't want individual citizens arbitrarily deciding who's life is worth more than someone else's.

Yet teen 'wolf pack' attacks, many fatal, occur all the time and often the cause of death has nothing to do with them being armed with even a stick. Stomping to death works quite well, especially when the victim is outnumbered, at a strength disadvantage or physically infirm. Smashin the victims head into the sidewalk or a wall works too.

What's stupid is making arguments absent facts; bars and many other places are exclusion zones - you can't legally carry there even with a permit. Carrying while impared is also a huge offense.

And for the record: carry permit holders have a lower violent crime rate than most any other demographic, including cops. Total number in the US: almost 7 million and growing fast.

Once again - the human body, especially young & strong ones in a pack, is plenty lethal.

Just because you can die because of someone's bare hands, does not make it okay to kill somebody who's not armed, in my view. One punch can kill somebody (there are special sentencing guidelines here in the UK for "one punch manslaughters"), but you don't see everybody getting charged with attempted murder when they punch people. Why? Because physical attacks without weapons don't usually kill.

I think regular people being allowed to carry guns is pretty stupid and this report is a shining example of why. I'm pleased I don't live in the US.

Put your statistics away. I'm talking about THIS case, not the other 23,561 violent crimes that occurred that day. The kids weren't going to kill him, just rough him up a bit and mug him like they did with the others.

The lad should've been locked up not killed.

Shooting first is stupid... If he pointed that gun at the kid and declared that he had it, I bet all three would've ran for their lives.

You can use a gun to protect yourself without killing people.

Worst case, he could've shot him in the leg to immobilise him.

You've been watching too many friekin' movies. The chances he hits him in the leg and doesn't miss and hit a bystander are almost nonexistent.

Whats even worse is I learned the hard way how dangerous that can be. If enough requests are made, I may file a public records request and get a copy of the security camera video and upload it so these idiots can see what happens when you pull a gun without immediately firing.

Personal insults to prove a point. Righto tough guy, get the video.

You've been watching too many friekin' movies. The chances he hits him in the leg and doesn't miss and hit a bystander are almost nonexistent.

Which is why the license instructors and every cop & police official says shoot for the center of mass (chest & upper abdomen) and to kill. I'll take their instructions over the clueless opinions expressed by some here, especially since I've 'been there.'.

Which is why the license instructors and every cop & police official says shoot for the center of mass (chest & upper abdomen) and to kill. I'll take their instructions over the clueless opinions expressed by some here, especially since I've 'been there.'.

I bet they wouldn't teach you to shoot to kill unarmed children though. :)

I bet they wouldn't teach you to shoot to kill unarmed children though. :)

These criminals were children only by sake of a date. They were behaving like hardened criminals. One of them was on probation for pete's sake.

These punks don't need a knife or bat to kill you. You can kill someone by repeatedly kicking and punching them.

People get too hung up on their age when it's their behavior that is important. Calendars don't matter when dealing with violent sociopaths, and there really aren't effective treatments so recidivism is very high - about 80% according the the Feds.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Making US citizens pay is a prominent tool? Joke of the week…
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!