65 y/o man kills teen mugger, wounds another


Recommended Posts

Escalation happens because they either get away with some initial crimes and begin to feel themselves to be invincible

My point exactly. These punks had already gotten away with this behavior before, and the likelihood of escalation was there. Hardcore's comment that "They didn't kill the other people they mugged. They were little ****s, robbers, but not killers." holds no water.

Sad story, sad that someone had to die, if it was not the teen the senior could have been the one or injured. Another sad issue here is the fact that every single comment did NOT mention parenting, where are the parents of the three teens involved?.. I'll bet my life on it, that the parents of the dead teen will sue someone out of that.. only in America..

only in the us, the rest of america does't have this sue-happy culture

US states with Castle Doctrine, Stand Your Ground, Make My Day or similar laws now give civil immunity to the self-defender in cases like this. This is the vast majority of states. Neither the perp (if they survive) or their families can sue.

Ever heard of escalation (as it applies to criminal behavior)?

I'm sure you have, but are either too ignorant to understand it, or don't want to admit that your hugs and kisses approach to dealing with violent thugs simply isn't realistic.

Sure ive heard of escalation..but escalation tends to happen over a period of time, not in the same day. Did you read the report in its entirety? They robbed two men earlier the same day and neither of the men were hurt. You think in the space of a few hours they'd escalate into murderers?

That's preposterous. All of the evidence suggests that the third robbery would have ended the same way as the first two.

My point exactly. These punks had already gotten away with this behavior before, and the likelihood of escalation was there. Hardcore's comment that "They didn't kill the other people they mugged. They were little ****s, robbers, but not killers." holds no water.

Yeah, a few hours before...that's not what I would call "getting away with it" ..just not enough time for the law to catch up with them.

I don't think many people here value the lives of innocents over criminals. In my country it is not left to question the protection of innocents against criminals. Innocents have the right to protect themselves from being injured or killed.

No one can say the elderly man would not have been killed. That is an assumption, not a truth. Maybe when you realize that you'll see there is good reason to have the ability to protect yourself against whatever maliciousness may happen.

Point proven. People like you should not have a gun. I couldn't care less if you hve reasons of protecting your family. Your shoot to kill mentality is over the top and scary.

Oh right. So we'll just put a bullet in them, no worries.

Are you ****ing kidding me?

Are you kidding me? What would you do in that situation? Let your loved one be killed?

I don't think many people here value the lives of innocents over criminals. In my country it is not left to question the protection of innocents against criminals. Innocents have the right to protect themselves from being injured or killed.

No one can say the elderly man would not have been killed. That is an assumption, not a truth. Maybe when you realize that you'll see there is good reason to have the ability to protect yourself against whatever maliciousness may happen.

So vigilante law next? Eye for eye?

I don't think many people here value the lives of innocents over criminals. In my country it is not left to question the protection of innocents against criminals. Innocents have the right to protect themselves from being injured or killed.

No one can say the elderly man would not have been killed. That is an assumption, not a truth. Maybe when you realize that you'll see there is good reason to have the ability to protect yourself against whatever maliciousness may happen.

You don't have to kill to protect yourself.

You don't have to kill to protect yourself.

Sometimes you do or risk being killed yourself as in this very case. It seems you don't know how to put yourself in this situation and understand that the intentions of these criminals are unknown. This man did not know he wouldn't walk away alive if he let them attack and rob him.

Can you please stop making assumptions.

No one can say the elderly man would not have been killed. That is an assumption, not a truth. Maybe when you realize that you'll see there is good reason to have the ability to protect yourself against whatever maliciousness may happen.

Nobody can say for sure that the old lady down the street won't shoot me in the back one day. To claim otherwise would be an assumption not a truth since you can't guarantee that it won't happen. Perhaps we should all go on preemptive shooting sprees to ensure that it never could happen. There can be only one...

I'm sorry but that sort of "logic" doesn't really cut it.

Nobody can say for sure that the old lady down the street won't shoot me in the back one day. To claim otherwise would be an assumption not a truth since you can't guarantee that it won't happen. Perhaps we should all go on preemptive shooting sprees to ensure that it never could happen. There can be only one...

I'm sorry but that sort of "logic" doesn't really cut it.

Can you honestly not see the difference between criminals and innocent bystanders? Do the chain of events not matter to you? These kids attacked a man.

You just lost an amount of credibility talking about how my logic is flawed when you go on not even understanding that simple barrier between criminal and bystander.

Can you honestly not see the difference between criminals and innocent bystanders? Do the chain of events not matter to you? These kids attacked a man.

You just lost an amount of credibility talking about how my logic is flawed when you go on not even understanding that simple barrier between criminal and bystander.

You don't trust my value judgments, why should I trust your value judgments? This is why common citizens should not walk around with concealed weapons.

You don't trust my value judgments, why should I trust your value judgments? This is why common citizens should not walk around with concealed weapons.

Everything I said still stands. You haven't done anything. On one side of your scenario, you have old lady. It stops there. On the other side, you have two kids who attacked a man. Jee, I wonder who is the criminal here and who it is that is endangering another human being.

Sometimes you do or risk being killed yourself as in this very case. It seems you don't know how to put yourself in this situation and understand that the intentions of these criminals are unknown. This man did not know he wouldn't walk away alive if he let them attack and rob him.

Can you please stop making assumptions.

These kids weren't armed. You can't assume that somebody is going to kill you just because you get punched in the face. That is an example of massively jumping to a conclusion.

If you get into a fight in a bar, you can't just respond by killing them because you got punched. That's stupid.

would YOU be willing to take that chance?

Yes - with three unarmed kids.

These kids weren't armed. You can't assume that somebody is going to kill you just because you get punched in the face.

Yet teen 'wolf pack' attacks, many fatal, occur all the time and often the cause of death has nothing to do with them being armed with even a stick. Stomping to death works quite well, especially when the victim is outnumbered, at a strength disadvantage or physically infirm. Smashin the victims head into the sidewalk or a wall works too.

If you get into a fight in a bar, you can't just respond by killing them because you got punched. That's stupid.

What's stupid is making arguments absent facts; bars and many other places are exclusion zones - you can't legally carry there even with a permit. Carrying while impared is also a huge offense.

And for the record: carry permit holders have a lower violent crime rate than most any other demographic, including cops. Total number in the US: almost 7 million and growing fast.

Yes - with three unarmed kids.

Once again - the human body, especially young & strong ones in a pack, is plenty lethal.

Everything I said still stands. You haven't done anything. On one side of your scenario, you have old lady. It stops there. On the other side, you have two kids who attacked a man. Jee, I wonder who is the criminal here and who it is that is endangering another human being.

You completely miss the point. I don't trust your judgement as to whether you consider some teenager a criminal and thus more dangerous than the woman down the street from me. Those are the sorts of decisions that should be made by a properly trained judge or a jury. I don't want individual citizens arbitrarily deciding who's life is worth more than someone else's.

Yet teen 'wolf pack' attacks, many fatal, occur all the time and often the cause of death has nothing to do with them being armed with even a stick. Stomping to death works quite well, especially when the victim is outnumbered, at a strength disadvantage or physically infirm. Smashin the victims head into the sidewalk or a wall works too.

What's stupid is making arguments absent facts; bars and many other places are exclusion zones - you can't legally carry there even with a permit. Carrying while impared is also a huge offense.

And for the record: carry permit holders have a lower violent crime rate than most any other demographic, including cops. Total number in the US: almost 7 million and growing fast.

Once again - the human body, especially young & strong ones in a pack, is plenty lethal.

Just because you can die because of someone's bare hands, does not make it okay to kill somebody who's not armed, in my view. One punch can kill somebody (there are special sentencing guidelines here in the UK for "one punch manslaughters"), but you don't see everybody getting charged with attempted murder when they punch people. Why? Because physical attacks without weapons don't usually kill.

I think regular people being allowed to carry guns is pretty stupid and this report is a shining example of why. I'm pleased I don't live in the US.

Put your statistics away. I'm talking about THIS case, not the other 23,561 violent crimes that occurred that day. The kids weren't going to kill him, just rough him up a bit and mug him like they did with the others.

The lad should've been locked up not killed.

Shooting first is stupid... If he pointed that gun at the kid and declared that he had it, I bet all three would've ran for their lives.

You can use a gun to protect yourself without killing people.

Worst case, he could've shot him in the leg to immobilise him.

You've been watching too many friekin' movies. The chances he hits him in the leg and doesn't miss and hit a bystander are almost nonexistent.

Whats even worse is I learned the hard way how dangerous that can be. If enough requests are made, I may file a public records request and get a copy of the security camera video and upload it so these idiots can see what happens when you pull a gun without immediately firing.

Personal insults to prove a point. Righto tough guy, get the video.

You've been watching too many friekin' movies. The chances he hits him in the leg and doesn't miss and hit a bystander are almost nonexistent.

Which is why the license instructors and every cop & police official says shoot for the center of mass (chest & upper abdomen) and to kill. I'll take their instructions over the clueless opinions expressed by some here, especially since I've 'been there.'.

Which is why the license instructors and every cop & police official says shoot for the center of mass (chest & upper abdomen) and to kill. I'll take their instructions over the clueless opinions expressed by some here, especially since I've 'been there.'.

I bet they wouldn't teach you to shoot to kill unarmed children though. :)

I bet they wouldn't teach you to shoot to kill unarmed children though. :)

These criminals were children only by sake of a date. They were behaving like hardened criminals. One of them was on probation for pete's sake.

These punks don't need a knife or bat to kill you. You can kill someone by repeatedly kicking and punching them.

People get too hung up on their age when it's their behavior that is important. Calendars don't matter when dealing with violent sociopaths, and there really aren't effective treatments so recidivism is very high - about 80% according the the Feds.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!