• 0

Sudden drop in utorrent download speed


Question

Hello,

I've just started using utorrent on my laptop today and originally I could only reach 30 KB/s max. I configured the setting in preference and was able to get it up to around 300 KB/s.

The problem is that it only stays at this speed for 1 min max and then falls around the 30 KB/s ish area again. Occasionally it will climb back up too 300 KB/s again before dropping back down again

Can anyone help

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

A few things to do.

  1. Set your upload limit to about half of your maximum upload speed to prevent the upload clogging up the download overhead.
  2. Enable encryption on the BitTorrent tab. To be really sure you could set it to Forced, and uncheck the 'legacy connections'.
  3. If the torrent consists of multiple files your speeds could drop when ?Torrent is reserving file space. When the speeds drop, check the status bar for Disk Overload. If it says Disk Overload your speed drop is perfectly fine. After the first few percent of your download you probably won't see any more Disk Overloads.

In general ?Torrent works perfectly fine. Speed drops happen from time to time at the start, but it'll stable out after a few minutes max.

  • 0

Thanks. Some of the thing you suggested i had already done but I tried the one about upload speed and it's seemed to level out.

What's the best port to use?

Anything really, just hit random port and make sure the port check works out. Make sure UPnP is enabled both in ?Torrent and on your router's config page. But it doesn't even matter that much for speed, good port forwarding just helps you getting connections faster.

  • 0

You don't need UPnP -- this is for people that do not understand what a port is, or how to forward it through their routers.. Its for grandma to be able to have unsolicited inbound traffic get to her machine ;)

Are you wireless? Wireless and torrents not really a good fit!

300KB is pretty slow download.. What are you internet speeds -- quick test from speedtest.net should give us something close. Just make sure you not in the middle of doing torrents when you test.

300KB is like 2.5Mbps -- sounds like a wireless G connection to me.

edit: If you on a wired decent speed internet connection. These are more common speeds you should be seeing

post-14624-0-09663100-1329579000.jpg

And i am in the middle of uploading 1.5 GB of stuff to my dropbox as well. Unless your on a really bad internet connection, or wireless 300KB is really slow for a decent seeded torrent.

  • 0

Oh right thanks for that!

Yes I am wireless. It's a BT home hub 2. I don't think my Internet download speed is too great (around 2.5 like you said). I'm not sure if it's that low from my dad being a tight arse and not paying for a good package or BT ripping us off!

  • 0

Well you never going to see your true internet speed wireless, unless its less than your wireless speeds.

Connect your box to the router with a ethernet cable and then test your internet connection.

Doing torrents over wireless kills WIRELESS!! for anyone one else on wireless.

  • 0

"I get my 6.8MB/s (yes Byte, not Bits)"

And your not on G wireless are you ;)

And I get

[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth

[156] 0.0-10.0 sec 978 MBytes 97.8 MBytes/sec

Over my gig connection -- so what is your point?

Wireless is SHARED bandwidth -- does not what portion you try and choke up or down. Its not duplex and its shared.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
    • Gamers Nexus already did their review, and building your own will be faster and cheaper, so not very convincing.
    • They've told outlets who got review units that it isn't. Partially because they believe that contributes to closed ecosystems. GamersNexus also believes this is because Valve's fighting a monopolistic practices lawsuit in Europe right now. They've also never subsidized any of their past hardware efforts and well, they definitely aren't subsidizing the Steam Deck right now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!