Google's Dart Programming language comes to Chromium


Recommended Posts

Developers!!! Attention!

  Quote
An attractive feature of Web programming is a rapid development cycle. Reloading the application after the source code has changed takes a fraction of a second. We want to offer you that same experience when using Dart, and today we?re making Mac and Linux binaries available that integrate the Dart VM into Chromium.

This technology preview allows you to run your Dart programs directly on the Dart VM in Chromium and avoid a separate compilation step. Over time, these programs will take advantage of the VM?s faster performance and lower startup latency.

Dart has been designed from the start to work with the entire modern web, and we?re simultaneously continuing to improve our fast Dart-to-JavaScript compiler. Both the Dart VM and modern JavaScript engines are first-class targets for Dart.

This release of Chromium with Dart VM integration is a technology preview, and should not be used for day-to-day browsing. After more testing and developer feedback, we plan to eventually include the Dart VM in Chrome.

Today?s release of the Chromium + Dart VM integration is another step forward for the open source "batteries included" Dart platform. Our goal is to help you build complex, high performance apps for the modern web,

http://blog.chromium...-with-dart.html

  • Like 1
  On 19/02/2012 at 23:07, funkydude said:

Can't believe Google is silly enough to keep pushing this instead of contributing to new versions of ECMAScript, which is the standard.

Could be that it doesn't suit Google's needs, so they created DART and are nice enough to let others use it too, for free

Dart reminds me of JScript that MS pushed, before they started aligning with the spec. It's like JS, but not, and other browsers need compatibility code (In the case of Dart, it's a lot of compatibility code, so Chrome would load DART sites faster because it simply has less to load than other browsers)

I really hope this gets popular. Javascript needs to die as soon as possible. It was designed for simple HTML manipulation, not complex applications, and it's a huge pain to work with. The sooner developers switch to something more adapted, the sooner browsers support it, the better for the web as a whole.

Dart isn't the only alternative to Javascript currently: CoffeeScript is also quickly gaining popularity. What makes Dart unique is direct support in the browser through a VM rather than compiling to Javascript (which Dart also supports).

Mozilla have already said they won't support Dart, Google's the only one pushing it.

The only thing Dart really has over JavaScript is classes, and they were only dropped from the latest JavaScript revision because they couldn't agree on the syntax.

  On 20/02/2012 at 00:52, Dr_Asik said:

I really hope this gets popular. Javascript needs to die as soon as possible. It was designed for simple HTML manipulation, not complex applications, and it's a huge pain to work with. The sooner developers switch to something more adapted, the sooner browsers support it, the better for the web as a whole.

Dart isn't the only alternative to Javascript currently: CoffeeScript is also quickly gaining popularity. What makes Dart unique is direct support in the browser through a VM rather than compiling to Javascript (which Dart also supports).

You have no idea what you're talking about, I guess you've never even bothered to research it. ECMAScript has evolved over many versions, you seem to be under the delusion that we're using a 15 year old language.

The latest version (5.1) was pushed out in June last year. The new version is currently in development but Google just wants to make the web its own instead of contributing, like Microsoft stupidly tried to do 10 years ago. See: http://www.ecmascript.org/ & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECMAScript and learn something. There's also http://test262.ecmascript.org/ to test how compliant your browser is, a test which up until recently IE9 was king of.

  The_Decryptor said:
Mozilla have already said they won't support Dart, Google's the only one pushing it.
They don't have to, it'll be compiled to JS like every other non-JS language out there currently used to develop large-scale web application. If it gets really popular, then they'll probably change their stance and provide direct support.
  funkydude said:
You have no idea what you're talking about, I guess you've never even bothered to research it.
Don't you find it ironic to make an uninformed claim (you have no idea of my work or research experience) that my claims were uninformed?

Anyway, wrong and wrong. :rolleyes:

  Quote
ECMAScript has evolved over many versions, you seem to be under the delusion that we're using a 15 year old language.

But you are. Your array is still kinda-but-not-really an object, and you can still accidentally hide global variables, and order of iteration for foreach loops is still not defined, and white space matters in places it should not because of semi-colon auto-insertion, and the scoping rules for "this" are still as broken as ever and as they always will be, etc. Javascript gets patches, but the patches can't fix bugs that would break backward compatibility.

If it's not Dart it'll be something else. Languages like CoffeeScript, Script#, and countless others are quickly gaining in popularity. They use the same compile-to-JS approach as Dart. What Dart has going for it is support by a large company with lots of money, and one that makes a popular, cross-platform web browser.

  On 20/02/2012 at 02:54, Dr_Asik said:

They don't have to, it'll be compiled to JS like every other non-JS language out there currently used to develop large-scale web application. If it gets really popular, then they'll probably change their stance and provide direct support.

...

Yeah, you can compile Dart code to JS, but of course that adds lots of overhead (Your "Hello World!" code becomes 17,259 lines of JavaScript). You can compile C/C++ (I hear they're even more popular) to JavaScript, that doesn't mean Mozilla and MS are going to drop JavaScript and adopt C in it's place.

If you're going to replace something, you don't have to just match it functionality wise, you have to vastly exceed it. Just having classes and a few less quirks isn't enough (especially since JS could/is getting those additions and fixes)

  On 21/02/2012 at 04:42, The_Decryptor said:

Yeah, you can compile Dart code to JS, but of course that adds lots of overhead (Your "Hello World!" code becomes 17,259 lines of JavaScript).

That's the cost of the entire framework, without any effort to remove unused code. With Google Closure Compiler this gets trimmed down to 2000 lines, an amount comparable to jQuery, which every website uses today.
  Quote
If you're going to replace something, you don't have to just match it functionality wise, you have to vastly exceed it. Just having classes and a few less quirks isn't enough (especially since JS could/is getting those additions and fixes).
It's enough that Office Web is written in Script# rather than Javascript, and that this paradigm of languages that compile to Javascript is quickly gaining in popularity. It would be nice if a new language became the norm.

Perhaps Dart isn't the best we can hope for, I haven't put that much thought into it, but I certainly do hope the world moves away from Javascript.

  • 5 years later...
  On 08/05/2017 at 21:18, duble0 said:

could be cool, but I hate propietary language!...flash and silverligh are failing examples!

Expand  

Everything starts by being proprietary 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Oh wow, a patch for an Unreal game to improve performance? We'll see...
    • Get this massive 4TB WD_BLACK SN7100 SSD at a new all-time low price by Taras Buria Xbox owners recently received a new storage upgrade option, which allows them to equip the Xbox Series X|S with 4TB of extra space. That card, however, has an eye-watering price tag—nearly as much as the 1TB Xbox Series S. On the PC side, though, things are much better. Right now, if you need a 4TB SSD without selling a kidney, you can get the WD_BLACK SN7100 PCIe Gen4 SSD. It is now available on Amazon at a new all-time low price after a 16% discount (nearly half the cost of the new 4TB Xbox Storage Expansion Card). The SN7100 is a fast, reliable, and, more importantly, affordable Gen4 solid-state drive. Its speeds are rated up to 7,000MB/s sequential read and 6,700MB/s sequential write, while random input-output speeds are rated at 900K IOPS read and 1,350K IOPS write. These specs are not record-breaking, but they are fast enough for modern gaming (DirectStorage is supported), fast loading times in games and apps, and quick file transfer. The WD_BLACK SN7100 has a limited five-year warranty and endurance rating up to 2,400 TBW. You can monitor the health of your drive in the WD_Black Dashboard app on Windows. As for compatibility, you can use the SN7100 in any PC that accommodates M.2 2280 PCIe Gen4 drives, including PlayStation 5. It is compatible with PCIe Gen3 systems, but the maximum speeds will be limited. 4TB WD_BLACK SN7100 PCIe Gen4 Solid-State Drive - $249.99 | 16% off on Amazon US This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Snagit 2025.2.0 by Razvan Serea Snagit is the most complete screen capture utility available. Showing someone exactly what you see on your screen is sometimes the quickest and clearest way to communicate. With Snagit, you can select anything on your screen – an area, image, article, Web page, or error message – and capture it. Then, save the screen capture to a file, send it to Snagit​'s editor to add professional effects, share it by e-mail, or drop it into PowerPoint®, Word®, or another favorite application. Capture and share images, text or video from your PC. Create beautiful presentations, flawless documentation and quickly save online content. The latest version of Snagit offers a totally new interface and workflow - making SnagIt easier for beginners to use, while still providing maximum convenience and flexibility for the screen capture experts. Snagit 2025.2.0 changelog: Edit Images from Camtasia Snagit can now be used to seamlessly edit images from Camtasia. Requires Camtasia version 2025.2.0 or later. In the Camtasia Media Bin, right-click an image and select the Edit in Snagit option. In Snagit, make your edits. When finished, click Send in the "Send changes to Camtasia" notification to replace the image on your Camtasia timeline. Step Capture Improved the Step Capture template to accommodate longer auto-populated step text. Annotations such as Callout or Arrow tool objects now anchor to and move with sections as sections are added to, reordered, or deleted from templates. Subscription Software Updated the Account dropdown to open automatically when new subscription related messages are present. Performance Improvements Improved the startup time for Snagit Capture application. Updates for IT Administrators Updated BouncyCastle.Cryptography package to address CVE-2024-29857 and CVE-2024-30172. Removed dependency on Xceed Zip. Updated LeadTools DLLs. Fixed an issue where Snagit might not recognize offline subscription activation. Fixed an issue where the video recording toolbar could be hidden from users when using Snagit in virtual environments or with remote desktop applications. Bug Fixes Fixed an issue where using Step Capture with the Share destination set to File in the Capture Window could result in data loss. Fixed a crash that could occur when capturing on some HDR monitors. Fixed an issue where the cursor object in a capture might include some of the background image in certain situations. Fixed an issue with the Box share destination to use the default browser for authentication. Fixed an issue where the Blur tool Color property could show when the blur or pixelate Type was selected. Fixed an issue where the privacy policy link in Snagit's installer might not open in the expected language. (PONRPD) Download: Snagit 64-bit | 419.0 MB (Shareware) Links: SnagIt Home Page | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Markdown's creator weighs in on rumored Apple Notes export feature by David Uzondu The rumor mill is churning as we draw closer to WWDC2025, and one of the interesting developments being discussed is a report from 9To5Mac that claimed Apple Notes in iOS 19 iOS 26, will finally get Markdown export capabilities. This caught the attention of many, including the person who actually invented Markdown. John Gruber, the creator of Markdown, shared his thoughts on this potential new feature on his weblog. For those who don't know, Markdown, which Gruber developed back in 2004 with significant input from Aaron Swartz (RIP!), is a lightweight markup language designed for creating formatted text using a plain text editor. Its main advantage is that it is easy to read and easy to write. When the news first broke, some interpretations suggested Apple Notes would gain full Markdown support, transforming it into an application where users could directly type and see Markdown syntax, much like how specialized editors like Obsidian operate. These tools are intended for users to work directly within the Markdown framework for all their note-taking. Gruber himself indicated that he does not believe Apple Notes should become a full-fledged "Markdown editor," even as an option. He stated that such a change would be a "huge mistake." His reasoning is rooted in his original vision for Markdown and his view of Apple Notes' purpose. He reiterated that he initially designed Markdown as a "text-to-HTML conversion tool for web writers" and for contexts requiring plain text file storage. He feels Apple Notes serves a different, valuable role with its current WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) rich text editing. This interface, he argues, is excellent for quickly capturing thoughts, particularly on an iPhone, and aligns with the Macintosh philosophy of user-friendliness. He pointed out that creating a syntactically incorrect markdown is trivial, whereas a malformed note should not be possible with Apple Notes. Despite his reservations about a complete Markdown overhaul for the editing experience, Gruber finds the prospect of exporting notes in Markdown format very appealing. He wrote that this specific capability "sounds awesome." He pointed out, quite rightly, that Apple Notes' current export functions are rather limited, primarily offering PDF and Pages document formats. Adding Markdown export would provide a much more flexible way for users, especially those in the "niche" he identifies with, to move their content out of Notes and into other applications. Gruber did express curiosity about how Apple might handle images embedded in notes during a Markdown export, as image handling can be a tricky aspect of Markdown.
    • What? Every single app I've installed from the Microsoft Store comes from its intended developer and works perfectly fine. What apps do you install?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      jfam earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      survivor303 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      survivor303 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jbatch earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      183
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      181
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      177
    5. 5
      Xenon
      140
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!