How big were the different Windows versions? (95 = 19 MB)


Recommended Posts

I am interested in finding out:

  • How large Window's OSs files are before install (e.g. Windows 95 is 19 MB)
  • How much space it took after install
  • General hard drive space requirements

After some brief research (Wikipedia!), I believe:

  • Windows 3.1 - installed size between 10?15MB.
  • Windows 95 was 19 MB and needed 50?55 MB of hard drive space depending on features selected.
  • Windows 98 needed at least 500 MB of hard drive space depending on features selected.
  • Windows XP needed 1.5 GB or higher of hard drive space depending on features selected.

and suddenly Vista and 7 use like 15GB in a default install :laugh:

I read that was due to the inclusion of as many drivers as possible to ensure 90% of computers were up and running from a base install without the need to hunt for drivers.

  • Like 2

What I never understood is if it is all drivers why they install all of them. You only need the drivers for the hardware at first install to get it running. Why not only copy those across?

Would making the installer that bit smarter have been that much work?

Also when you add a new piece of kit who uses the default windows drivers? Half the time there isn't any proper ones if it came out recently.

What I never understood is if it is all drivers why they install all of them. You only need the drivers for the hardware at first install to get it running. Why not only copy those across?

Would making the installer that bit smarter have been that much work?

Also when you add a new piece of kit who uses the default windows drivers? Half the time there isn't any proper ones if it came out recently.

All the drivers are copied over so that if you happen to replace that AMD Radeon graphics card with shiny New Nvidia, your PC won't show the colorful rainbow on screen or even worse, refuse to load windows. Or demand you to insert your Windows CD which you may have happily donated to some charity.

The minimum disk space requirements should be a good indication of how much space it takes up.

Would like to see a comparison between Vista and Windows 7.

I think the requirements are the same except for the disk space requirement which is slightly less, if I remember correctly.

Those were the days.

Even now GPU-drivers are over 100 MB...

And hard drives are over 3 TB.

The minimum disk space requirements should be a good indication of how much space it takes up.

I think the requirements are the same except for the disk space requirement which is slightly less, if I remember correctly.

And hard drives are over 3 TB.

and 200 bucks.... :-( money I don't have......

Good thing Apple has been shipping computers that can boot >2TB drives since 2006 :rolleyes:

I don't know anyone with a >2tb hard drive, unless it's a raid setup but even then they have multiple 1tb or multiple 1.5tb

What I never understood is if it is all drivers why they install all of them. You only need the drivers for the hardware at first install to get it running. Why not only copy those across?

Would making the installer that bit smarter have been that much work?

Also when you add a new piece of kit who uses the default windows drivers? Half the time there isn't any proper ones if it came out recently.

I don't think it installs all of them during setup. The new-age installers copy themselves entirely to the drive prior to running the actual setup, which expands the OS and installs the drivers for all devices that are detected at that time. It seems that running the setup off the home drive rather than the installation media significantly speeds up the installation process.

I don't see the issue with drivers taking up space. It's pretty amazing how much you can plug into a Windows computer and expect to have it run right away without any setup.

Personally I would rather if the computer would just go directly online and find the latest and greatest driver and download it right away. Mind you that would mean that Ethernet and Wireless drivers still have to be included ;)

Personally I would rather if the computer would just go directly online and find the latest and greatest driver and download it right away. Mind you that would mean that Ethernet and Wireless drivers still have to be included ;)

Really? Have you ever searched for drivers online? Most hardware manufacturers have god-awful sites, if they're even in English. I'd rather not have a hardware install rely on my internet connection, a server in China, and a valid link between the two.

Really? Have you ever searched for drivers online? Most hardware manufacturers have god-awful sites, if they're even in English. I'd rather not have a hardware install rely on my internet connection, a server in China, and a valid link between the two.

What kind of cheap hardware are you buying. :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IT admins feel overwhelmingly "sick of" Microsoft and Windows 11 "garbage" apps, products by Sayan Sen From time to time, Microsoft brings changes to Windows 11, like improvements to its core features, such as the Start menu. One such change began rolling out recently with new policies, alongside a major bug fix that finally came after a year. However, not every change or "improvement" Microsoft makes may land. For example, earlier today, we wrote an article on the user reaction to an earlier design choice Microsoft made on Windows 10, when it was making an updated system specs page. You can read about the response, which was mostly negative, in our report here. Aside from general home users, professionals too, or at least some of them, are not very satisfied with Microsoft's overall policies and product functionalities. There are multiple instances of people ranting and complaining online, highlighting various issues they are facing or have faced recently when working with Microsoft products like Windows 11 or other Microsoft 365-based apps. For example, one such user, nostradamefrus, shared their experience on Reddit wherein they had to deal with an apparently buggy patch that broke authentication on Microsoft 365 apps when using RDS (Remote Desktop Services). The user wrote: "I'm so sick of Microsoft ... Their latest security patch broke probably our most important business app and uninstalling the patch breaks auth with 365 apps in RDS environments. So the options are either "you can't use the app" or "you can't use any Office 365 product" until they clean up their mess. But shoving Copilot into every facet of existence is what's really important, right? Someone break this company up already" On a separate thread, another Reddit user made a sarcastic post about the difficulties of working with Microsoft Graph PowerShell due to some of the command complexities. A commenter Trelfar chimed in, saying that much of it had to do with how it's inherently designed and alleged that it was done in that way by Microsoft to save time and budget. The words were certainly pretty harsh as they wrote: "The key to understanding why some of the commands are garbage is that every command is a wrapper that calls the native Graph API which requires JSON params, and many of them were procedurally implemented based on the underlying API so they could hit release ahead of the deprecation deadline for the modules it was replacing (like the AzureAD module). ... In short, it wasn't a design choice to make it work like this, it was a time/budget compromise to not put the effort in for some of the commands." Finally, a user Godzillian123, who is clearly very displeased about having to work daily with the management and deployment of Windows apps in their enterprise environment. The Redditor writes: "I wake up every day with but one lamenting thought in my head. That I will be having to deal with WindowsApps and appx style application at my organisation, for another day .... Sincerely whoever designed this. You are an idiot. .... you take the cake for biggest smart idiot award. I'm sure you think you are very clever, after all you architected a whole fresh new method of software deployment for your garbage Operating System that is still based on Windows NT. ..... Please reconsider your life choices and just throw this entire Microsoft store into the bin where it belongs, far away from enterprise machines where system admins live and don't have time to learn how your misguided application system design works." Interestingly, each and every one of these posts has been overwhelmingly upvoted by others in the sysadmin subreddit, indicating that these resonated with them. Of course, not everyone likely agrees, but they are probably in the minority. We also know Neowin is visited and read by many IT admins as well. Let us know in the comments below whether you feel the same way or whether you think they are simply overblown reactions from some frustrated, or perhaps overworked, employees. Source: Reddit (link1, link2, link3)
    • If you need Adobe Air, it's not dead actually. https://airsdk.harman.com/runtime  
    • WSCC - Windows System Control Center 10.0.4.0 by Razvan Serea Windows System Control Center is a free, portable program that allows you to install, update, execute and organize the utilities from various system utility suites. WSCC can install and update the supported utilities automatically. Alternatively, WSCC can use the http protocol to download and run the programs. WSCC is portable, installation is not required. Extract the content of the downloaded zip archive to any directory on your computer. Free for personal use. The setup packages and updates are downloaded directly from their author's website! This edition of WSCC supports the following utility suites: Windows Sysinternals Suite (including support for "Sysinternals Live" service) NirSoft Utilities Mitec and more... WSCC - Windows System Control Center 10.0.4.0 changelog: [CHANGED] installer now supports Windows on Arm [FIXED] large icons were not scaled correctly [FIXED] minor fixes Download: WSCC (64-bit) | 5.2 MB (Free for personal use) Download: WSCC (32-bit) | 6.2 MB View: WSCC Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Save 90% on a lifetime of AdGuard Family Plan (9 devices) by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 90% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $15.97, that's a saving of $158.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      pahariyaseo earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pahariyaseo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      hadiaali45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      arone_24 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      417
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      142
    3. 3
      Nick H.
      89
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      80
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!