Recommended Posts

I really have a hard time understanding the hostility about people who wants to customize their operating system. If someone wants to use the old windows 95 desktop background on their new computer because they like the way it looks you don't tell them to go back and use windows 95, you help them copy it to their new computer. This is similar. People don't want to use an old operating system, they want to find a way to make the operating system behave in a way they like. And of course it can be done, we are just trying to figure out a way to do it with minimal effort. If I want to run Linux apps on my windows computer it can be done. The question is how to do it and if it is realistic to do it without spending hundred of hours rewriting large portions of code to get it to work.

For me personally the best solution would be a combo with both the "old" windows 7 start menu and the new metro interface working side by side.

This thread has gone way way offtopic.

I explicitly stated in the first post that I don't want to discuss whether one should or should not disable metro.

I simply asked if anyone knew if it was possible.

That shouldn't be too much to understand, people.

  • Like 5

If you want to disable Metro, what's the point of upgrading to Windows 8? Why not just stay with 7?

there are a lot of nice new features in 8 that aren't metro... some of us would love to have them and no metro start crap

  • Like 2

From what I understand Windows Server 8 beta has the old start menu. Maybe that is where to start looking? And I'm not suggesting running a server OS as your desktop OS, only that we might find a way to use information or files from that beta.

Sorry, buddy....

Sorry, buddy....

I actually like Windows 8 Server because it doesn't come with any Metro Apps installed since i am not interested in them. I wonder if Businesses get option to disable Metro Start Menu, i am sure that will be one of the questions for Microsoft.

Don't you think if enough people respond negatively regarding Metro that MS will implement a disable option like they did with UAC. Have you techno scientists looked into the bowels of 8 to see if its hiding.

no, because the head of the windows division right now is very do it my way who cares what the public thinks... I think he got a big head when he said do the ribbon in office everyone will love it... now he seems to think he can do what ever he wants and people will love it

when we basically get blog entries from MS saying tough and deal with the UI you know they no longer care about public opinnion like they use to

no, because the head of the windows division right now is very do it my way who cares what the public thinks... I think he got a big head when he said do the ribbon in office everyone will love it... now he seems to think he can do what ever he wants and people will love it

when we basically get blog entries from MS saying tough and deal with the UI you know they no longer care about public opinnion like they use to

They took a bit of Apple approach but that explains why Apple has only <10% Desktop Market Share. if it wasn't for mobile devices Apple wouldn't be mentioned a lot. I am glad they got Ribbon interface across whole Desktop. I thought they MS will stop there and focus more on back end changes and improvements such as Task Bar with Windows 8.

no, because the head of the windows division right now is very do it my way who cares what the public thinks... I think he got a big head when he said do the ribbon in office everyone will love it... now he seems to think he can do what ever he wants and people will love it

when we basically get blog entries from MS saying tough and deal with the UI you know they no longer care about public opinnion like they use to

Oh hello, you seem to be repeating arguments that people made about Windows 95. Thankfully, there weren't forums around then that I had to read your crap on.

Don't you think if enough people respond negatively regarding Metro that MS will implement a disable option like they did with UAC. Have you techno scientists looked into the bowels of 8 to see if its hiding.

No, that won't happen. They're going all in with Metro. I wouldn't be surprised if by Windows 9 there's no legacy mode.

I don't know if the actual code has been removed, but I DO know that the start orbs are no longer present AT ALL in explorer.exe

BUT, in Vista, the start orbs were located in Aero.msstyles. so they may have easily put them there (I highly doubt it though.)

One way I've found to bring back some Start Menu functionality is to create a toolbar in the taskbar which goes to this folder:

C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs

As long as you install programs for "All Users" instead of "Just Me" you'll have a menu which basically acts like the All Programs section of the traditional Start Menu.

It's not as if all Windows versions prior to Win 8 by default had much happening on the desktop, other than a wallpaper and desktop icons. I don't mind Metro really at all, at least the screen space is occupied with somewhat useful tiles, I'm just finding certain layouts awkward. For example, I find it cumbersome to access sleep / restart or power down. It would make better sense rather than have it hidden in PC settings to have it to the right of your profile picture in the upper right.

It's easy enough to add a tile linked to shutdown -s -t 00 I know, but it's a waste of tile space.

No, that won't happen. They're going all in with Metro. I wouldn't be surprised if by Windows 9 there's no legacy mode.

Can't. Not for another few (and by few I mean pretty much never) years. Too many legacy apps to support yet. FAR too many.

They took a bit of Apple approach but that explains why Apple has only <10% Desktop Market Share. if it wasn't for mobile devices Apple wouldn't be mentioned a lot.

That doesn't make any sense. Apple are in no way trying to eliminate Desktop apps on the Desktop (computer) where they have a <10% market share. The area where Apple is going with full-screen only immersive apps, is only on tablets, where they basically own the market with the iPad.

Microoft's (weird) reaction to this is to not only apply the iPad approach on tablets, but in the process rid themselves of the Desktop on regular computers as well, to the extent that that is possible. Newly added functionality, like the PDF reader, isn't even provided as a Desktop app anymore.

That doesn't make any sense. Apple are in no way trying to eliminate Desktop apps on the Desktop (computer) where they have a <10% market share. The area where Apple is going with full-screen only immersive apps, is only on tablets, where they basically own the market with the iPad.

Microoft's (weird) reaction to this is to not only apply the iPad approach on tablets, but in the process rid themselves of the Desktop on regular computers as well, to the extent that that is possible. Newly added functionality, like the PDF reader, isn't even provided as a Desktop app anymore.

I am just saying that if Apple had a good approach in the past they would own 90% of Market. But i agree. Not even Apple tried to do what MS is trying to do which is irrational.

They took a bit of Apple approach but that explains why Apple has only <10% Desktop Market Share. if it wasn't for mobile devices Apple wouldn't be mentioned a lot. I am glad they got Ribbon interface across whole Desktop. I thought they MS will stop there and focus more on back end changes and improvements such as Task Bar with Windows 8.

That's hilarious. What the hell do you think Win8 is targeted at genius?

The Mobile market is cutting out the bottom of MS's cash cow and this is release is a attempt to stem it.

I don't know if the actual code has been removed, but I DO know that the start orbs are no longer present AT ALL in explorer.exe

BUT, in Vista, the start orbs were located in Aero.msstyles. so they may have easily put them there (I highly doubt it though.)

Ahh finally some progress. Thanks for the infos.

I don't know if the actual code has been removed, but I DO know that the start orbs are no longer present AT ALL in explorer.exe

BUT, in Vista, the start orbs were located in Aero.msstyles. so they may have easily put them there (I highly doubt it though.)

But full menu start is present in Windows 8 Aero.msstylles, I've open it in WSB 1.5, all images, margins etc are on right place, I think MS can push one update to enable normal menu start ;)

Or they will remove this part later... who knows?

But full menu start is present in Windows 8 Aero.msstylles, I've open it in WSB 1.5, all images, margins etc are on right place, I think MS can push one update to enable normal menu start ;)

Or they will remove this part later... who knows?

Interesting! Wonder if they are seeing what the feedback is?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google Chrome 149.0.7827.156 (offline installer) by Razvan Serea The web browser is arguably the most important piece of software on your computer. You spend much of your time online inside a browser: when you search, chat, email, shop, bank, read the news, and watch videos online, you often do all this using a browser. Google Chrome is a browser that combines a minimal design with sophisticated technology to make the web faster, safer, and easier. Use one box for everything--type in the address bar and get suggestions for both search and Web pages. Thumbnails of your top sites let you access your favorite pages instantly with lightning speed from any new tab. Desktop shortcuts allow you to launch your favorite Web apps straight from your desktop. Chrome has many useful features built in, including automatic full-page translation and access to thousands of apps, extensions, and themes from the Chrome Web Store. Google Chrome is one of the best solutions for Internet browsing giving you high level of security, speed and great features. This update includes 33 security fixes. [N/A][516496659] Critical CVE-2026-12437: Use after free in WebShare. Reported by Google on 2026-05-25 [N/A][516947912] Critical CVE-2026-12438: Inappropriate implementation in WebView. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][519728275] Critical CVE-2026-12439: Use after free in Digital Credentials. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][519731619] Critical CVE-2026-12440: Use after free in DigitalCredentials. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][520157118] Critical CVE-2026-12441: Use after free in File Input. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][521950423] Critical CVE-2026-12442: Use after free in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-06-09 [N/A][522566295] Critical CVE-2026-12443: Use after free in Web Authentication. Reported by Google on 2026-06-11 [N/A][513160088] High CVE-2026-12444: Out of bounds read in Chromoting. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513199795] High CVE-2026-12445: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513313107] High CVE-2026-12446: Insufficient data validation in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513405023] High CVE-2026-12447: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][513458233] High CVE-2026-12448: Inappropriate implementation in WebView. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][513480539] High CVE-2026-12449: Use after free in Chromoting. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][514531776] High CVE-2026-12450: Inappropriate implementation in Media. Reported by Zhixin Tu on 2026-05-19 [N/A][514741076] High CVE-2026-12451: Use after free in DigitalCredentials. Reported by Google on 2026-05-19 [N/A][515462244] High CVE-2026-12452: Use after free in Downloads. Reported by Google on 2026-05-21 [N/A][516448843] High CVE-2026-12453: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input. Reported by Google on 2026-05-25 [N/A][516926968] High CVE-2026-12454: Race in Safe Browsing. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517069848] High CVE-2026-12455: Use after free in Tab Strip. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517124587] High CVE-2026-12456: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517153117] High CVE-2026-12457: Insufficient data validation in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517258337] High CVE-2026-12458: Incorrect security UI in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517406035] High CVE-2026-12459: Inappropriate implementation in Serial. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28 [N/A][517484284] High CVE-2026-12460: Insufficient policy enforcement in File System Access. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28 [N/A][517727318] High CVE-2026-12461: Out of bounds read in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29 [N/A][517916024] High CVE-2026-12462: Use after free in Media. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29 [N/A][518042749] High CVE-2026-12463: Inappropriate implementation in Views. Reported by Google on 2026-05-30 [N/A][519358344] High CVE-2026-12464: Use after free in Browser. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][520189702] High CVE-2026-12465: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Metrics. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][520199394] High CVE-2026-12466: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][520202726] High CVE-2026-12467: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][521485244] High CVE-2026-12468: Inappropriate implementation in Updater. Reported by Google on 2026-06-08 [N/A][521618871] High CVE-2026-12469: Uninitialized Use in GPU. Reported by Google on 2026-06-09 Important to know! The offline installer links do not include the automatic update feature. Download web installer: Google Chrome Web 32-bit | Google Chrome 64-bit | Freeware Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 64-bit | Direct Link | 131.0 MB Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 32-bit | Direct Link | 119.0 MB Download page: Google Chrome Portable Download: Chrome ARM64 | Direct Link View: Chrome Website | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • they couldnt do W11 LTSC so the support lasts longer....
    • The fact that the pref is not enabled by default tells you that what you see is what you get...for now. Hopefully the final version will have all the quirks ironed out.
    • It's enterprise, not consumer. And "...affected scenarios involve third-party software..." Would be good to know that in headline, not way down in the article. Instead, you lead with Windows update, which is not very helpful and misleading, IMHO. Just saying.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      85
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!