Recommended Posts

I really have a hard time understanding the hostility about people who wants to customize their operating system. If someone wants to use the old windows 95 desktop background on their new computer because they like the way it looks you don't tell them to go back and use windows 95, you help them copy it to their new computer. This is similar. People don't want to use an old operating system, they want to find a way to make the operating system behave in a way they like. And of course it can be done, we are just trying to figure out a way to do it with minimal effort. If I want to run Linux apps on my windows computer it can be done. The question is how to do it and if it is realistic to do it without spending hundred of hours rewriting large portions of code to get it to work.

For me personally the best solution would be a combo with both the "old" windows 7 start menu and the new metro interface working side by side.

This thread has gone way way offtopic.

I explicitly stated in the first post that I don't want to discuss whether one should or should not disable metro.

I simply asked if anyone knew if it was possible.

That shouldn't be too much to understand, people.

If you want to disable Metro, what's the point of upgrading to Windows 8? Why not just stay with 7?

there are a lot of nice new features in 8 that aren't metro... some of us would love to have them and no metro start crap

  • Like 2

From what I understand Windows Server 8 beta has the old start menu. Maybe that is where to start looking? And I'm not suggesting running a server OS as your desktop OS, only that we might find a way to use information or files from that beta.

Sorry, buddy....

Sorry, buddy....

I actually like Windows 8 Server because it doesn't come with any Metro Apps installed since i am not interested in them. I wonder if Businesses get option to disable Metro Start Menu, i am sure that will be one of the questions for Microsoft.

Don't you think if enough people respond negatively regarding Metro that MS will implement a disable option like they did with UAC. Have you techno scientists looked into the bowels of 8 to see if its hiding.

no, because the head of the windows division right now is very do it my way who cares what the public thinks... I think he got a big head when he said do the ribbon in office everyone will love it... now he seems to think he can do what ever he wants and people will love it

when we basically get blog entries from MS saying tough and deal with the UI you know they no longer care about public opinnion like they use to

no, because the head of the windows division right now is very do it my way who cares what the public thinks... I think he got a big head when he said do the ribbon in office everyone will love it... now he seems to think he can do what ever he wants and people will love it

when we basically get blog entries from MS saying tough and deal with the UI you know they no longer care about public opinnion like they use to

They took a bit of Apple approach but that explains why Apple has only <10% Desktop Market Share. if it wasn't for mobile devices Apple wouldn't be mentioned a lot. I am glad they got Ribbon interface across whole Desktop. I thought they MS will stop there and focus more on back end changes and improvements such as Task Bar with Windows 8.

no, because the head of the windows division right now is very do it my way who cares what the public thinks... I think he got a big head when he said do the ribbon in office everyone will love it... now he seems to think he can do what ever he wants and people will love it

when we basically get blog entries from MS saying tough and deal with the UI you know they no longer care about public opinnion like they use to

Oh hello, you seem to be repeating arguments that people made about Windows 95. Thankfully, there weren't forums around then that I had to read your crap on.

Don't you think if enough people respond negatively regarding Metro that MS will implement a disable option like they did with UAC. Have you techno scientists looked into the bowels of 8 to see if its hiding.

No, that won't happen. They're going all in with Metro. I wouldn't be surprised if by Windows 9 there's no legacy mode.

I don't know if the actual code has been removed, but I DO know that the start orbs are no longer present AT ALL in explorer.exe

BUT, in Vista, the start orbs were located in Aero.msstyles. so they may have easily put them there (I highly doubt it though.)

One way I've found to bring back some Start Menu functionality is to create a toolbar in the taskbar which goes to this folder:

C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs

As long as you install programs for "All Users" instead of "Just Me" you'll have a menu which basically acts like the All Programs section of the traditional Start Menu.

It's not as if all Windows versions prior to Win 8 by default had much happening on the desktop, other than a wallpaper and desktop icons. I don't mind Metro really at all, at least the screen space is occupied with somewhat useful tiles, I'm just finding certain layouts awkward. For example, I find it cumbersome to access sleep / restart or power down. It would make better sense rather than have it hidden in PC settings to have it to the right of your profile picture in the upper right.

It's easy enough to add a tile linked to shutdown -s -t 00 I know, but it's a waste of tile space.

No, that won't happen. They're going all in with Metro. I wouldn't be surprised if by Windows 9 there's no legacy mode.

Can't. Not for another few (and by few I mean pretty much never) years. Too many legacy apps to support yet. FAR too many.

They took a bit of Apple approach but that explains why Apple has only <10% Desktop Market Share. if it wasn't for mobile devices Apple wouldn't be mentioned a lot.

That doesn't make any sense. Apple are in no way trying to eliminate Desktop apps on the Desktop (computer) where they have a <10% market share. The area where Apple is going with full-screen only immersive apps, is only on tablets, where they basically own the market with the iPad.

Microoft's (weird) reaction to this is to not only apply the iPad approach on tablets, but in the process rid themselves of the Desktop on regular computers as well, to the extent that that is possible. Newly added functionality, like the PDF reader, isn't even provided as a Desktop app anymore.

That doesn't make any sense. Apple are in no way trying to eliminate Desktop apps on the Desktop (computer) where they have a <10% market share. The area where Apple is going with full-screen only immersive apps, is only on tablets, where they basically own the market with the iPad.

Microoft's (weird) reaction to this is to not only apply the iPad approach on tablets, but in the process rid themselves of the Desktop on regular computers as well, to the extent that that is possible. Newly added functionality, like the PDF reader, isn't even provided as a Desktop app anymore.

I am just saying that if Apple had a good approach in the past they would own 90% of Market. But i agree. Not even Apple tried to do what MS is trying to do which is irrational.

They took a bit of Apple approach but that explains why Apple has only <10% Desktop Market Share. if it wasn't for mobile devices Apple wouldn't be mentioned a lot. I am glad they got Ribbon interface across whole Desktop. I thought they MS will stop there and focus more on back end changes and improvements such as Task Bar with Windows 8.

That's hilarious. What the hell do you think Win8 is targeted at genius?

The Mobile market is cutting out the bottom of MS's cash cow and this is release is a attempt to stem it.

I don't know if the actual code has been removed, but I DO know that the start orbs are no longer present AT ALL in explorer.exe

BUT, in Vista, the start orbs were located in Aero.msstyles. so they may have easily put them there (I highly doubt it though.)

Ahh finally some progress. Thanks for the infos.

I don't know if the actual code has been removed, but I DO know that the start orbs are no longer present AT ALL in explorer.exe

BUT, in Vista, the start orbs were located in Aero.msstyles. so they may have easily put them there (I highly doubt it though.)

But full menu start is present in Windows 8 Aero.msstylles, I've open it in WSB 1.5, all images, margins etc are on right place, I think MS can push one update to enable normal menu start ;)

Or they will remove this part later... who knows?

But full menu start is present in Windows 8 Aero.msstylles, I've open it in WSB 1.5, all images, margins etc are on right place, I think MS can push one update to enable normal menu start ;)

Or they will remove this part later... who knows?

Interesting! Wonder if they are seeing what the feedback is?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Lilly-Livered American Media Are Scared
    • Really? Despite the memory price rises, nothing can kill it? I thought something would.
    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!