Recommended Posts

Disregarding personal views of Microsoft's UI direction for a second: wow, could someone be so full of themselves...

Could've summed that entire thing up with one sentence: "suck it up, or shut up."

  • Like 2

I'm so glad Paul Thurrott "gets" Windows 8. Unfortunately, it seems as if there aren't many of us around :/ The problem with many is that they're trying to use it as if it's Windows 7 (which Thurrott likewise notes). It's an entirely new concept and it's clear that many of these people haven't opened their minds enough to even try to understand that new concept properly. Even though the new concept is highly different, the capabilities of the operating system (fast app switching, for example) will probably allow them to be just as productive, but they won't even give it a chance to see whether that is the case.

I haven't been able to give Windows 8 the chance I should in order to be able to determine for sure that it won't negatively affect my productivity. I expect to be able to be at least as productive as I currently am with Windows 7, but I won't be able to accurately measure that until I've used Windows 8 for some time (maybe even a couple of months). No one will be able to accurately compare how productive they are when using Windows 8 to how productive they are when using Windows 7 until the following: 1) They've either become used to the new interface and app switching capabilities (whether they're using touch gestures, a hardware mouse, or keyboard shortcuts) or they've at least tried for some time to become used to them; 2) They've used Windows 8 daily for some time, as much as they tend use Windows 7 daily.

  • Like 3

Yeah, they created yet another convoluted keyboard sequence, one that works the same in no previous version of Windows that I'm aware of, and is certainly NOT easily discoverable for something that literally takes two clicks of the mouse in Windows 7. As for his comment bashing those who shut down their computers, it seems that he isn't aware that running computers 24/7 is a huge waste of electricity (even if you allow them to go to sleep). Hibernate is even harder to get to than shutting down in this case.

Well, it could be easier. CTRL+ALT+DEL -> find shutdown somewhere -> shutdown! Works the same as Windows 7. ;) That said, an easy fix would be to include it in the user dropdown in the top right corner. People expect a logout link, since it uses the same convention as websites. (Like Neowin!) It would then be only natural to include a link for shutting down there, instead of stuffing it behind a settings button.

Also, Thurrott must've conveniently forgot the fact that Microsoft OPTIMIZED shutdown with a clever trick (hibernate kernel data, but terminate userlevel processes). Why would they optimize something if people won't use it?

"The desktop is not the OS. It's an app"

Paul Thurrott

"existing desktop environment looks and works almost exactly like its predecessor". Err, that might be the main point there, Paul...

"What I'm saying is that Windows 8 will have a Start screen and a desktop. And that the desktop will still be the primary UI for people on desktop computers with large displays. Given that, why not bring some Metro goodness to the desktop? Was this really not obvious?"

Paul Thurrott - http://bit.ly/yH0MRT

Wow - are there 2 Paul Thurrotts, is he bi-polar, or just a jelly-spined fool who can't help playing the contrary Alpha-geek based on which way the Wind's blowing?

Buffoon.

This my friends is a great example of a logical fallacy (Ad Hominem). The definition can be seen here: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ad%20hominem Don't attack a person's character just because you don't agree with them. ;)

It's really quite the opposite. I don't know how long you've been around the scene, but most of us have been fed up with Paul Thurrott for years and years and years. It's not a judgement based off one article. And the worst part of this article IS his character and attitude in the writing, not the content. Basically he's going to say shut the hell up and deal with it, then later on tell you to give MS feedback. He speaks like someone who has no clue about how project management or public testing goes. The whole point of a CONSUMER PREVIEW is to get the opinion of consumers. This isn't a "beta". They aren't looking for quality bug reports from quality testers, or else they would have a tech beta program like they have had previously with individually selected testers who have proven previously to give good bug reports and feedback. All of what people are talking about is feedback. You would hope and assume that MS would pay attention to this, or else it's rather pointless to have a consumer preview. The negative responses people are giving are their feedback. If everyone just shuts the hell up and deals with it, they won't get any useful feedback to change things that people don't like. Paul, as usual, is polluting the Internet with his pointless ramblings that are even counter-productive to what I can only assume is Microsoft's aim.

Of course, that whole argument could be put in question when you wonder if MS really gives a damn this time around what people say. I almost DO think the consumer preview is pointless and only a show off of what they have done. The current UI design teams at MS don't really seem to care what anyone thinks, and I'm really starting to wonder if this is going to be the one that really hurts them. If they release this and it's widely rejected, far more so than even Vista was (as I see it happening), they could drive a LOT of their customers away to increasingly popular competing platforms. Macs are getting far more common these days, and even Linux is starting to shape up into a nice alternative more so than it ever has before. I'll keep an open mind until it's all done, and give it a decent run to form a real opinion, but this whole thing is looking like a train wreck right now. Windows 8 looks bad, Visual Studio 11 looks bad, Office 15 actually looks halfway decent, but there are parts that seem overly "Metrofied". Metro to me stands out as flat bland looking graphics, too much text all over the place, and cumbersome. It's halfway decent on a phone and probably a tablet, but on a desktop it just doesn't even begin to say "I'm the future of Windows".

It's really quite the opposite. I don't know how long you've been around the scene, but most of us have been fed up with Paul Thurrott for years and years and years. It's not a judgement based off one article. And the worst part of this article is his character and attitude in the writing, not the content. Basically he's going to say shut the hell up and deal with it, then later on tell you to give MS feedback. He speaks like someone who has no clue about how project management or public testing goes. The whole point of a CONSUMER PREVIEW is to get the opinion of consumers. This isn't a "beta". They aren't looking for quality bug reports from quality testers, or else they would have a tech beta program like they have previously with individually selected testers who have proven previously to give good bug reports and feedback. All of what people are talking about is feedback. You would hope and assume that MS would pay attention to this, or else it's rather pointless to have a consumer preview. The negative responses people are giving are their feedback. If everyone just shuts the hell up and deals with it, they won't get any useful feedback to change things that people don't like. Paul, as usual, is polluting the Internet with his pointless ramblings that are even counter-productive to what I can only assume is Microsoft's aim.

Of course, that whole argument could be put in question when you wonder if MS really gives a damn this time around what people say. I almost DO think the consumer preview is pointless and only a show off of what they have done. The current UI design teams at MS don't really seem to care what anyone thinks, and I'm really starting to wonder if this is going to be the one that really hurts them. If they release this and it's widely rejected, far more so than even Vista was (as I see it happening), they could drive a LOT of their customers away to increasingly popular competing platforms. Macs are getting far more common these days, and even Linux is starting to shape up into a nice alternative more so than it ever has before. I'll keep an open mind until it's all done, and give it a decent run to form a real opinion, but this whole thing is looking like a train wreck right now. Windows 8 looks bad, Visual Studio 11 looks bad, Office 15 actually looks halfway decent, but there are parts that seem overly "Metrofied". Metro to me stands out as flat bland looking graphics, too much text all over the place, and cumbersome. It's halfway decent on a phone and probably a tablet, but on a desktop it just doesn't even begin to say "I'm the future of Windows".

You're right, the Office UX team seem to be the only ones who know what they're doing these days.

I'm so glad Paul Thurrott "gets" Windows 8. Unfortunately, it seems as if there aren't many of us around :/

Sorry Captain Awesome that we aren't as clever as you to "get" Windows 8.

Windows 7 didn't work on Tablets and Touch devices because it was designed for a desktop, now to try and cut into that market they have gone to the extreme polar opposite and Windows 8 won't work on desktops.

Before you say "omg you can use it as a desktop its 'better'" without proof, the very fact that people like this asshat and lots of other people around the web are telling people to "get over it" is evidence enough that you don't use a touch oriented UI on a desktop computer, nor do people want it.

You and Paul should "get over it".

"You are using Windows 8 like you would be using Windows 7"

So what this is saying, is that we cannot use Windows like we have been using them since Windows 95 now? I use Windows 7 the same as I use Windows 95 (besides the super bar and snap features).

I'm so glad Paul Thurrott "gets" Windows 8. Unfortunately, it seems as if there aren't many of us around :/ The problem with many is that they're trying to use it as if it's Windows 7 (which Thurrott likewise notes). It's an entirely new concept and it's clear that many of these people haven't opened their minds enough to even try to understand that new concept properly. Even though the new concept is highly different, the capabilities of the operating system (fast app switching, for example) will probably allow them to be just as productive, but they won't even give it a chance to see whether that is the case. I haven't been able to give Windows 8 the chance I should in order to be able to determine for sure that it won't negatively affect my productivity. I expect to be able to be at least as productive as I currently am with Windows 7, but I won't be able to accurately measure that until I've used Windows 8 for some time (maybe even a couple of months). No one will be able to accurately compare how productive they are when using Windows 8 to how productive they are when using Windows 7 until the following: 1) They've either become used to the new interface and app switching capabilities (whether they're using touch gestures, a hardware mouse, or keyboard shortcuts) or they've at least tried for some time to become used to them; 2) They've used Windows 8 daily for some time, as much as they tend use Windows 7 daily.

How can you sit there and say that no one gets Windows 8 like you and Paul do, and then promptly say you haven't used it enough to get a good idea of it? A lot of people here are speaking from actually using the OS and seeing with their own eyes that it's garbage. People keep talking about how there are plenty of shortcut keys to do things fast for power users, but they fail to understand that these shortcuts already existed and were frequently easier and faster to use before. You're right, fast app switching is a perfect example. "No more need to use Alt-Tab anymore" they say. Now you can mouse over to the side of your screen and the icon pops up... but Alt-Tab is easier and faster, and always has been. It's not like I have to stand on my head to press Alt-Tab. It's a simple fluid motion that DOESN'T require me to pause what I'm doing, move my mouse, or anything like that. My fingers are on the keyboard already, Alt-Tab takes a split second to press, mousing to the side, waiting for the fast app switching thing to pop out, and clicking on an icon takes FAR longer and FAR more "work". So how things are going to allow me to be just as productive when they are still slower than before doesn't compute to me. At least they've left a lot of the old methods like this, but to make it sound like new methods are easier reminds me of those infomercials that make a simple task seem like the hardest thing in the world to do, just to show you how their product will make it easy for you again.

  • Like 2

"You are using Windows 8 like you would be using Windows 7"

So what this is saying, is that we cannot use Windows like we have been using them since Windows 95 now? I use Windows 7 the same as I use Windows 95 (besides the super bar and snap features).

Yes, that is exactly what we're saying. Sometimes, for a major improvement to be made, a complete overhaul is required. For window management, Windows 8 should not be used in the same way people have been using Windows since Windows 95.

I might have taken him a bit more seriously if he he wasn't the author of "Windows secrete books". He is will now be making money off metro because of the fact there is now a lot more to put in a new book.

97764.jpg

1329035584_nehcg.jpg

He told Leo on "Windows Weekly that he is writing the Windows 8 secrets book to.

Paul Thurrott is entitled to his opinion as much as I am or anyone else but it is up to each and every individual to make up their mind about whether Widows * is correct for them or not, Microsoft are not forcing anyone to use this or any other Windows operating system, if you prefer Windows 7, fine, stay with it for the moment, no one forced anyone to download and use this Consumer Preview, if you have and don't like it, then un-install it, easy peasy, I like it, my wife did not, so I installed it mine and left her with windows 7, if and when the time comes that Windows 7 is no longer available to use, and that's some time away, then she might have to use Windows 8, personally speaking, I am sixty three just now, if they are supporting Windows 7 till 2020, I may have forgotten how to do it, I may be dead, I may be alive but nearly dead, so to conclude, I downloaded it, I installed ti, I like it, if you have downloaded it and installed it, and did not like, well I am sorry, but you can still use Windows 7 with a clear mind knowing "you" are doing what you want and I as a individual am doing what I wan't. Jim

If people have to shut up about whatever they don't like in Windows8 then what's the freaking point in releasing a preview, just wait until RTM and tell people to suck it up with every flaw that might have been fixed thanks to users feedback.

I really don't get all that "stop criticizing Windows8", people can say whatever they want about whatever subject they want.

If you can't deal with that, tough luck.

Jeez, going by the way some people jump to defend Windows8 one would think people were mocking a gimp.

  • Like 3

Most of the negative centers around the start screen changing the way people use Windows. I've found that once you get the hot corners its real easy

Upper left: App Switching/Selection

Lower Left: Start Screen

Upper Right: Charms Bar

I've had both technical and non technical friends try it and they love it. Just because the focus no longer centers on a start button doesn't make it an inferior windows. Sure the bundled apps need work but it has potential and it runs current software just fine. You can pin your folders (Documents, Pics), make groups and name them. Sure it requires a bit more initial setup than previous Windows but once it is, its beautiful. And just to add, I tend to snap metro apps to the right side of the screen while using the desktop on my 22" monitor just fine.

Yea, try to use those hot corners in a virtual machine such as Hyper-V then tell me how much you like them. They only work 10% of the time.

"Shutting down Windows 8 is easy, and that's true no matter which input type you use:

Keyboard.
WINKEY + I, UP ARROW, ENTER, U.
"

Yea, that works on a HOST machine, but not on a Hyper-V machine. How about looking at the same changes on a server or maybe actually use a computer in a business environment. The OS will DESTROY productivity. Yes, yes, change is good. 10% longer to do this, 15% for that, 5% for this. Now all of these businesses that waste an hour per employee per day that are trying to figure out how the **** to work their computers again. 12% reduced efficiency, 12% reduced income for a labor oriented computer labor company? How about we reduce your income by 12%, because change is good, right?

oh thank gawd its so much easier now... 4 actions now hidden under settings / power / shutdown compared to that old cumbersom method of start > shutdown....

what are you going to tell me next, that that its easier to use a shell command and type shutdown -f -s - t00 instead?

You forgot one thing, he's a Mac lover who drolls over windows because he knows he can make more money talking about it in the media... you see this guy out anywhere he has his macbook with him, not a windows laptop

You know what would be nice? Shutting down in a single action. Maybe even make it a hardware button. Maybe they could call it the 'power button' and devise some kind of standard where all computers are required to have this button. They could even have some options in windows to control what this button does if some people prefer hibernate/sleep over shutting down. Maybe they could even add a button to multimedia keyboards to support shutting down. /s

How can you sit there and say that no one gets Windows 8 like you and Paul do, and then promptly say you haven't used it enough to get a good idea of it? A lot of people here are speaking from actually using the OS and seeing with their own eyes that it's garbage. People keep talking about how there are plenty of shortcut keys to do things fast for power users, but they fail to understand that these shortcuts already existed and were frequently easier and faster to use before. You're right, fast app switching is a perfect example. "No more need to use Alt-Tab anymore" they say. Now you can mouse over to the side of your screen and the icon pops up... but Alt-Tab is easier and faster, and always has been. It's not like I have to stand on my head to press Alt-Tab. It's a simple fluid motion that DOESN'T require me to pause what I'm doing, move my mouse, or anything like that. My fingers are on the keyboard already, Alt-Tab takes a split second to press, mousing to the side, waiting for the fast app switching thing to pop out, and clicking on an icon takes FAR longer and FAR more "work". So how things are going to allow me to be just as productive when they are still slower than before doesn't compute to me. At least they've left a lot of the old methods like this, but to make it sound like new methods are easier reminds me of those infomercials that make a simple task seem like the hardest thing in the world to do, just to show you how their product will make it easy for you again.

I didn't say "no one" gets it like Paul Thurrott and I do; I said "many" don't.

I said many people do not "get" the new concept because they don't. Me "getting" the new concept has nothing to do with what I said about me not being able to give it a good use. I said I haven't been able to completely measure my level of productivity when using Windows 8 compared to my level of productivity when using Windows 7; however, I certainly "get" the new Windows 8 concept.

Even if I find that I'm more productive with Windows 7 (which I doubt will happen, but it might), I will still "get" the new Windows 8 concept.

I stand firm with my belief that none of you have had time to be able to accurately measure how productive you are with Windows 8 compared to how productive you are with Windows 7, especially as most of those complaining have inadvertently pointed out that they're having trouble adjusting to having only two apps on one screen at once. Less than one week is not enough time for any of those people to know for sure whether they'll ever get used to that.

If people have to shut up about whatever they don't like in Windows8 then what's the freaking point in releasing a preview, just wait until RTM and tell people to suck it up with every flaw that might have been fixed thanks to users feedback.

I really don't get all that "stop criticizing Windows8", people can say whatever they want about whatever subject they want.

If you can't deal with that, tough luck.

Jeez, going by the way some people jump to defend Windows8 one would think people were mocking a gimp.

It's exactly the same with OSX with the Apple can do no wrong, how dare you criticize crowd.

This guy is delusional. He was one of the few who complained about 7's taskbar and other things, and swore MS should have left the labels on by default in the taskbar. Even went as far to write an entire article just on the difference between simple and easy. It was around that time I stopped going to his site, because he had lost "it" by then.

How can you all call Thurrott biased, when all of you haters jump on any article from anybody who bashes Win8 and take that as truth.

But when somebody defends Win8 the person is biased and on MS's payroll.

How can you take yourself serious??? Doesn't matter if you like Paul or not, you got to see how silly this is getting.

And yes, you shouldn't use Win8 the exact same way is you used Win7

You are going to adjust just like we had to do when we all moved from Win 3.11 to Win 95, but I guess a lot of people here never had to make that jump.

You know what would be nice? Shutting down in a single action. Maybe even make it a hardware button. Maybe they could call it the 'power button' and devise some kind of standard where all computers are required to have this button. They could even have some options in windows to control what this button does if some people prefer hibernate/sleep over shutting down. Maybe they could even add a button to multimedia keyboards to support shutting down. /s

Or maybe try using a server in a controlled environment that physical access to a computer is limited for obvious reasons.

GD short sighted morons.

How can you all call Thurrott biased, when all of you haters jump on any article from anybody who bashes Win8 and take that as truth.

But when somebody defends Win8 the person is biased and on MS's payroll.

How can you take yourself serious??? Doesn't matter if you like Paul or not, you got to see how silly this is getting.

And yes, you shouldn't use Win8 the exact same way is you used Win7

You are going to adjust just like we had to do when we all moved from Win 3.11 to Win 95, but I guess a lot of people here never had to make that jump.

If someone likes something, no big deal.

When someone tells everyone else to stop bitching. Then they must be on someone's pay roll, or wait, lemme guess, we're all just "holding it wrong" ? right?

Let me be a little more clear. My main evaluation of Windows 8 was on the server side, not the client side. They did ALL THE SAME **** TO THE SEVERS TOO.

AllI care about at the moment! They want to make things simple. Use comon sense and add the shutdown and restart to the user menu. If you can signout and lock the computer from that menu, why not shutdown or restart it as well! Why seperate this ??

post-272310-0-76020300-1331054923.png

  • Like 4

AllI care about at the moment! They want to make things simple. Use comon sense and add the shutdown and restart to the user menu. If you can signout and lock the computer from that menu, why not shutdown or restart it as well! Why seperate this ??

BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HOLY CRAP!!!!!! It's useful, productive and it makes sense!!!!! Thus it has no business being in Windows 8!!!!! :rofl:

lemme guess you don't work at Microsoft do you?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • Indeed - drives me mad - usually because Refresh is hidden in the full menu.
    • Firefox has had rounded corners for many years. I take it you're not a fan of modern browsers?
    • The problem is in the fundamentals of how businesses are allowed to operate and the change should happen in the basics and certain consumer friendly and moral practices should be enforced by law. This would fix so many things, not just this ages old default browser issue which is a tiny drop in the backut that includes a flood of privacy and other issues.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!