Recommended Posts

That's a shame, I thought this was going to be a call for common sense, it's just another Metro propoganda post about shutting up and liking it.

I've used Windows 8 CP since it came out, I am trying to like it, and I do, but not Metro

Yes, The charm bar and hotspots are easy, but they're no good, unintuitive and I don't want them on my desktop, I wouldn't even pirate this OS, let alone purchase it.

i wonder what will MS do after being @ say beta , while getting so much negative response. I think it would be better if they release it on tablets first and then work for Desktops , just to stay at safe side..

One of the things they will do apparently, is update the software for the Microsoft Touch Mouse for Windows 8. If they can create a simple gesture to swipe an entire screen up/down/left/right it will make metro more viable on the desktop. The problem isn't that Metro sucks, it's great. I love my Windows Phone. It's just non-productive on a desktop with a keyboard+mouse. Only someone who doesn't actually do much work can't realize that immediately. I guess there's a lot of Gamers here and shills and not a lot of information workers. Unfortunately, the MS Touch mouse has some sensitivity issues with thumb swipes and is heavy as hell. Hopefully IHVs will provide lighter and more accurate alternatives. Full screen apps isn't going to cut it either. I like browsing the web in portrait myself, there's just a lot of issues.

I can't wait to get a Win 8 Tablet though. As long as it is as light as the iPad with typical x86 expandability.

...ok. That "stfu" was not warranted but whatever, do as you like. I don't agree with your approach as it would require even more support than what was discussed earlier...it would literally be 2 OS' than just one OS with an app inside of it.

I don't really think so. How different would it be to the way Windows Media Center works now? I think it should work EXACTLY like Windows Media Center. If you build a system as a Media Center, you've got it, you can put it in startup and it will start into it, just like you could do with the metro start screen. If your system isn't a media center (read touchscreen in talking about the metro start screen), then the option is there to use it if desired, or ignore it if it's unnecessary. I think this makes the most logical common sense.

What's going to happen if everyone hates W8, is Microsoft is going to bring in a group of people and show them something code named "Touchmetherebabyohya", then when people say they like it, Microsoft will say "You were just using Windows 8"

I bet history will indeed repeat itself. I feel sorry for the phone support people though even further complicating the issue of "what os are you on?"

Ok. Several have asked, this is what I personally think would be the best (and long winded) explanation of what the perfect outcome would be.

Windows 8 Home Basic - Cheapest OS setup specifically for older computers - Windows 7 UI only

Windows 8 Home Premium - Standard OEM OS Shipped with most computers - Windows 7 UI only

Windows 8 Tablet - Standard OEM OS shipped with all tablets - Tiles only

Windows 8 Media Center - Upgrade OS shipped on media centers and available through anytime upgrade or retail - Tiles Default, changable to Windows 7 UI - Has all multimedia bells and whistles

Windows 8 Mobile - Upgrade OS for tablets - Tiles default, changable to windows 7 UI

Windows 8 Professional - Upgrade OS for PC's - Windows 7 UI Default, changable to Tiles - has all home / business bells and whistles

Windows 8 Enterprise - Business VLK OS for PC's - Windows 7 UI Default, changable to Tiles - has all business bells and whistles

Windows 8 Ultimate - Upgrade OS for PC's - Tiles default, changable to Windows 7 UI - has all bells and whistles

What's going to happen if everyone hates W8, is Microsoft is going to bring in a group of people and show them something code named "Touchmetherebabyohya", then when people say they like it, Microsoft will say "You were just using Windows 8"

If everyone hates Windows 8, the same thing will happen as it did when everyone hated Vista. Only it will be much worse for Microsoft. I have a feeling a lot will change before they RTM. It better. Slapping metro on top of a crippled Explorer has a cheap feel to it. Windows 8 without Metro (Server) will Rock. Metro without Explorer (Windows Phone, Tablets) will Rock, together, just feels cheap.

Well it looks like this thread has failed :(

The same old change-averse people who've been trolling all the other Windows 8 threads now have ad hominem attacks to add to their pathetically tiny array of insults. We get it, you can't use Windows without a start button and you only like things that you're familiar with. If you have nothing useful to add then don't bother posting.

Amen

  • Like 2

I will not say that you can not run Windows 8. I will not say that it will not doing everything that you could possibly want in a computer. What I will say, is if you do go with Windows 8, I will not be installing it, I will not connect it to ANY server in your business directly or indirectly, I will not troubleshoot ANY application compatibility problems with it, and to the point, the most that I will do with it is help you get rid of it when you're done destroying your productivity and ready to come back to getting work done.

You will if your boss tells you too, or a client requests it.

I bet history will indeed repeat itself. I feel sorry for the phone support people though even further complicating the issue of "what os are you on?"

Ok. Several have asked, this is what I personally think would be the best (and long winded) explanation of what the perfect outcome would be.

Windows 8 Home Basic - Cheapest OS setup specifically for older computers - Windows 7 UI only

Windows 8 Home Premium - Standard OEM OS Shipped with most computers - Windows 7 UI only

Windows 8 Tablet - Standard OEM OS shipped with all tablets - Tiles only

Windows 8 Media Center - Upgrade OS shipped on media centers and available through anytime upgrade or retail - Tiles Default, changable to Windows 7 UI - Has all multimedia bells and whistles

Windows 8 Mobile - Upgrade OS for tablets - Tiles default, changable to windows 7 UI

Windows 8 Professional - Upgrade OS for PC's - Windows 7 UI Default, changable to Tiles - has all home / business bells and whistles

Windows 8 Enterprise - Business VLK OS for PC's - Windows 7 UI Default, changable to Tiles - has all business bells and whistles

Windows 8 Ultimate - Upgrade OS for PC's - Tiles default, changable to Windows 7 UI - has all bells and whistles

If there's one thing windows doesn't need, it's more SKU's.

Client Support: What version of windows are you using?

Client: Windows 8.

Client Support: But what version of Windows 8?

Client: Windows 8 Home

Client Support: What edition of Windows 8 Home?...

If there's one thing windows doesn't need, it's more SKU's.

Client Support: What version of windows are you using?

Client: Windows 8.

Client Support: But what version of Windows 8?

Client: Windows 8 Home

Client Support: What edition of Windows 8 Home?...

LOL they wouldn't even know they were using Windows 8 home. Hell you'd be lucky if they knew they were using Windows 8. I had a support call last week that I started wtih asking him which version of windows he was running. I gave him the list. he said Windows 7. So I get logged in and it's a 6 year old computer running windows xp

I don't really think so. How different would it be to the way Windows Media Center works now? I think it should work EXACTLY like Windows Media Center. If you build a system as a Media Center, you've got it, you can put it in startup and it will start into it, just like you could do with the metro start screen. If your system isn't a media center (read touchscreen in talking about the metro start screen), then the option is there to use it if desired, or ignore it if it's unnecessary. I think this makes the most logical common sense.

But I believe the user wasn't talking about just the Metro Start Screen, he's talking about still having the start menu, either start in Start Screen or go desktop (of course someone can make a utility to do this) but the desktop would still have Start Menu. That menu requires support for that, thus supporting 2 ways of doing the same thing (that's the only reason why I said OS')

LOL they wouldn't even know they were using Windows 8 home. Hell you'd be lucky if they knew they were using Windows 8. I had a support call last week that I started wtih asking him which version of windows he was running. I gave him the list. he said Windows 7. So I get logged in and it's a 6 year old computer running windows xp

I can top that. In high school I would fix people's PC's. Asked the person what version of windows they were running. Their reply: Windows 97 :huh:

I go on site, turns out their son replaced the windows 95 bootscreen with a custom windows 97 one. :rofl:

I can top that. In high school I would fix people's PC's. Asked the person what version of windows they were running. Their reply: Windows 97 :huh:

I go on site, turns out their son replaced the windows 95 bootscreen with a custom windows 97 one. :rofl:

Well then they weren't lying were they! Hell you should have given them some kind of award just for remembering what the boot screen says as the computer started up. :rofl:

If there's one thing windows doesn't need, it's more SKU's.

Client Support: What version of windows are you using?

Client: Windows 8.

Client Support: But what version of Windows 8?

Client: Windows 8 Home

Client Support: What edition of Windows 8 Home?...

That wouldn't be any additonal sku's ... just renaming them

http://www. << spam >> .com/tutorials/14422-compare-windows-7-editions.html

^^^ They really filter this??? HA omfg... Seven forums . com

6 OS's there, plus a tablet OS and a phone OS. There's your 8 os's, just with better names and functional uses.

This is what I have, and will continue telling my clients:

I will not say that you can not run Windows 8. I will not say that it will not doing everything that you could possibly want in a computer. What I will say, is if you do go with Windows 8, I will not be installing it, I will not connect it to ANY server in your business directly or indirectly, I will not troubleshoot ANY application compatibility problems with it, and to the point, the most that I will do with it is help you get rid of it when you're done destroying your productivity and ready to come back to getting work done.

You have practically paraphrased Thurott.

And you call HIM an arrogant p....?

You have practically paraphrased Thurott.

And you call HIM an arrogant p....?

No, he says, use it, like it and shut up. I say, do what you want, you can tell me ALLLL about it. I just wont do a thing to help you. =-p

Actually, I'd have to say the Outlook gadget works quite nicely for my e-mail (and refreshes every 30 seconds), weather.com's app works quite well, and I love my pandora app. Of course, keep in mind, I am talking about the evolved Windows 7 gadgets, not the crap implementation that was in Vista, and since you don't seem to know, all of those gadgets have full access to all of the same programming capabilities of the new tiles and MORE. Hell, the pandora app uses FLASH to play its music, from my understanding that functionality will be disabled in Windows 8 tiles.

Gadgets do NOT have access to full core Windows functionality as far as I understand it. Weren't they sandboxed and didn't it require a hack to build them with WPF? Tiles can be built with any portion of .NET with little to no problem. They can also communicate with each other (where gadgets couldn't) as far as I can remember. :)

No, he says, use it, like it and shut up. I say, do what you want, you can tell me ALLLL about it. I just wont do a thing to help you. =-p

No.

He says use or don't use it. If you use it, deal with it.

You say use or it don't use it. If you use it, deal with it.

I can sum up the article from Thurrot in one sentence: You WILL like this or else!

Seems to me that his attitude is, basically, that if we don't like it, too bad. YOU WILL COMPLY!

doo eet or ballmer might get angry and start sweating and stinking again and we don't want that....

I can top that. In high school I would fix people's PC's. Asked the person what version of windows they were running. Their reply: Windows 97 :huh:

I go on site, turns out their son replaced the windows 95 bootscreen with a custom windows 97 one. :rofl:

I LOL'd :D

The start screen is large and resource heavy, meaning wherever that line in system speed is where the start screen doesn't open instantly like the start menu does, everyone below that line will be waiting for the start screen to load just to launch and app, this is a BIG factor as waiting for a giant full screen start screen to load would be considered entirely unacceptable when the start menu was instant on basically every computer.

You are kidding right?!? :s The Start Screen is not resource heavy at all! Any tiny delay might be due to a bug in the animation that plays when you bring it on screen (and or debugging code due to it being a beta). You honestly think that they are going to make it a resource hog when they intend this to run on phones and tablets as well? One problem with that theory! They created this type of UI with Wndows Phone (on low end phone hardware) and it runs like a dream. What makes you think Windows 8 would be different in that area?

You are kidding right?!? :s The Start Screen is not resource heavy at all! Any tiny delay might be due to a bug in the animation that plays when you bring it on screen (and or debugging code due to it being a beta). You honestly think that they are going to make it a resource hog when they intend this to run on phones and tablets as well? One problem with that theory! They created this type of UI with Wndows Phone (on low end phone hardware) and it runs like a dream. What makes you think Windows 8 would be different in that area?

You don't think a full screen menu filled with icons won't take a second to load on an older system? Especially if you have Live Tiles on it. How about a system with poor graphic support. There are a lot of systems out there that are built as workstations that don't have a video card capable of drawing lots of graphics like that quickly. That's something you may take for granted, but go work in a corporate environment and you'll come across it more often than you'd think. I can tell you from first hand experience that it can be slow. I'm not saying it's a resource hog, I'm saying it's resource heavy compared to a standard start menu, and if it's not optional, you don't even have the ability to turn it off on a system where it's unnecessary and just adds delay. This may not sound like a lot, but compare it to complaints about taking 2 extra clicks to shut down. As people arguing have said, you shut down maybe a couple times a day at most. You open the start menu countless times a day though. Any delay AT ALL added by opening a pointlessly flamboyant start screen is unacceptable.

Who the hell says the start menu paradigm is the correct one -- you don't see people sloughing OS X because it doesn't have a start menu... Use what you're going to use and stop with your whining. It's absolutely ridiculous that some of you vocal idiots are so resistant to change... I've been using it and it doesn't add any more time to your workflow -- it's just changing it.

You folk are the same people who stymied the introduction of the car and every other technological change. And it's you vocal idiots who are going to ruin the experience as unfortunately the vocal minority always seems to push their agenda.

I like the change, it won't be any harder to support -- it's WAY more bodily intuitive. It feels natural and also feels like how you would interact with something.

To the dude with the 46 inch TV... It doesn't take you any longer with your mouse to mouse over the 46" TV than it would over a 100ft screen of the same resolution or my 15.4" monitor..... So stop with your TV excuse. It's lame. Resolution is resolution. As if they let you support users, you also don't have even the simplest grasp on support.... Calling Calum and Thurrot arrogant -- you just finished saying you WOULDN'T do your JOB unless you have your own way.

You don't think a full screen menu filled with icons won't take a second to load on an older system? Especially if you have Live Tiles on it. How about a system with poor graphic support. There are a lot of systems out there that are built as workstations that don't have a video card capable of drawing lots of graphics like that quickly. That's something you may take for granted, but go work in a corporate environment and you'll come across it more often than you'd think. I can tell you from first hand experience that it can be slow. I'm not saying it's a resource hog, I'm saying it's resource heavy compared to a standard start menu, and if it's not optional, you don't even have the ability to turn it off on a system where it's unnecessary and just adds delay. This may not sound like a lot, but compare it to complaints about taking 2 extra clicks to shut down. As people arguing have said, you shut down maybe a couple times a day at most. You open the start menu countless times a day though. Any delay AT ALL added by opening a pointlessly flamboyant start screen is unacceptable.

If it is capable of running well and being snappy on a tablet/phone, why would it be delayed on an old graphics card? The content updates occur asynchronously in the background. :) Even leo laporte has shown it off running on a very low end system and performing fluidly btw. :)

I think this is a fantastic article from Paul Thurrott. It's a preview for a reason; some people write on here complaining about apps that are incomplete in functionality. Very silly. The one thing I would disagree with is the metro-style explorer. I thought that looked good. But in any case, I already know based on what I have seen that I will be upgrading to Windows 8 from 7 as soon as it is out.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!