Recommended Posts

I'd also like to see, if it's not too late, when you click the individual app thumbnails for the desktop, which appear in the preview pane, that it takes you directly INTO that app as opposed to the desktop. As it stands now, when you do that you have to then click the app to go into it. I think that would also go along way toward a more seamless integration.

I discovered that is does show individual running desktop apps and goes into a specific app if you click but only if you have the desktop snapped. That's great actually. But, I would like to see individual, running, desktop app thumbnails when you simply pull up the preview pane as opposed to JUST the desktop thumbnail.

It wont happen because according to Microsoft, Desktop is just another full screen App within Metro Start Menu therefore no Metro elements will enter Desktop.

Desktop won't include any Metro elements because it is a Metro app? Huh?

  • Like 1

I hate hearing this. Th desktop is NOT an app. Its considered to be one but its not one.

Also, if it is an app, why cant I uninstall it? Why do some of the metro settings rely on the desktop to complete certain task? Such as task manager? or installing applications from a CD. Metro relies more of the desktop so I doubt the desktop is the app... Metro is consider to be an app itself. Basically a big folder that contains its own lil apps.

I hate hearing this. Th desktop is NOT an app. Its considered to be one but its not one.

Also, if it is an app, why cant I uninstall it? Why do some of the metro settings rely on the desktop to complete certain task? Such as task manager? or installing applications from a CD. Metro relies more of the desktop so I doubt the desktop is the app... Metro is consider to be an app itself. Basically a big folder that contains its own lil apps.

Metro isn't an app, it's a design language. Saying Metro is an app is similar to saying that Aero is an app.

It wont happen because according to Microsoft, Desktop is just another full screen App within Metro Start Menu therefore no Metro elements will enter Desktop.

Even that logic doesn't say they shouldn't do it.

There's a mention of an Aero lite desktop theme that is more Metro like in this article http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/31/windows-8-desktop-interface-kills-aero-for-metro-gets-with-the/ but I dont remember seeing it in the CP. Can anyone check their pc, at work ATM so cant check.

You would think that Device Centre theme previously mention would get a look in come RTM. As far as Metro being shoved down people's throats, we had the superbar shoved down our throats and the show desktop bar also in Win7. I don't think there is anything wrong with the start screen. Infact there are only 3 things they need to address. Content (more metro apps/live tiles = less wasted startscreen space) Multi-Screen behaviour (Metro on 1 screen desktop on the others is a little lame) and Hot spot differentiation when Remoting from Win8 to Win8 in the Metro Remote Desktop App.

The difference with both of those previous items you mention is that these were BONUS options that were quite minor in the overall effect...and, I can't state this clearly enough, YOU WERE FREE TO JUST NOT USE THEM if you didn't want to.

Windows has always been about "six ways to skin a cat, pick yours". Adopting Apple's "my way or the highway" approach is fine for small screen touch devices but not for the desktop.

I also really hope MS includes a Metro Theme for the desktop. It would create a much smoother transition from Metro to Desktop.

I'd MUCH rather be able to adjust Metro to fit my needs, not vice versa. For example, I'd like to be able to:

Run the Metro application as a window, so I can treat it as just another widget drawer and drag it wherever I want like I would any other widget/gadget.

Ditto with the "fullscreen" Metro applications, which are already a waste of space in many cases on much smaller screens, but on a 30" monitor? Give me a break...

Change the Metro application background (and widgets) to whatever I want, including and especially TRANSPARENT. This would allow the USER to choose if they want to make Metro look more like Aero or make the desktop more like Metro (as mentioned above).

Make the "invisible" core GUI operation gadgets VISIBLE by default. I'm sure there is an accessibility tweak for this, but new users, senior citizens, etc. are not going to know there is actually anything there to click on without something visible. It would also address issues with multimonitor and virtual machine/remote desktop users.

It wont happen because according to Microsoft, Desktop is just another full screen App within Metro Start Menu therefore no Metro elements will enter Desktop.

that's so wrong when we see its working , ending "Explorer.exe" task kills metro screen. Its all fake and lies

There's a mention of an Aero lite desktop theme that is more Metro like in this article http://www.engadget....-gets-with-the/ but I dont remember seeing it in the CP. Can anyone check their pc, at work ATM so cant check.

post-293012-0-37704800-1331286674_thumb.

This guy *maybe someone else , but idk where i read* says that they won't change UI of IE10 , and other desktop elements coz they want it to stay just like Windows 7 (kind of) so its easier for migration.

Win8 is just gonna add Metro to metro apps .

Would love to see more metro style applications on the desktop, such as these metro concepts; http://clindhartsen....allery/30645266 .

I'm a fan of metro but the UI in the screenshot above isn't nice. Half metro and half not metro, what makes metro great is the fonts blending in great with the UI. You can't take the look of metro and stick a bunch of standard icons and fonts in it.

Hopefully there will be a few changes to that UI.

I'm a fan of metro but the UI in the screenshot above isn't nice. Half metro and half not metro, what makes metro great is the fonts blending in great with the UI. You can't take the look of metro and stick a bunch of standard icons and fonts in it.

Hopefully there will be a few changes to that UI.

Probably not for Windows 8. But I could definitely see those improvements making it in later. They need to get a working product out this year. Polish can come later.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!