Recommended Posts

I agree with many of the items on the list. For instance, why does clicking on the network icon on the desktop bring up a Metro interface element? That doesn't happen when you click on the speaker icon or the clock. And there is definitely a need for a Metro version of Explorer, as Microsoft is being naive to believe that the inter-app sharing will be enough for power-users. The idea of a power-app is sensible and even if Microsoft doesn't do it themselves I imagine that - providing that the framework allows it - somebody else will implement that. The Start button is a tricky one, as providing an option to enable will lead to many users doing that and the Win8 experience will become very fractured - that's why the traditional Start Menu has been removed altogether. However, some of the other suggestions are a bit off base - for example, Metro apps are deliberately designed to work full screen, snapped or a combination and Microsoft couldn't simply allow users to resize them or snap multiple apps together without making app development considerably more difficult and less predictable. Certainly it would be possible to have a scaled down version behave like a normal app on the desktop but that would be even more inconsistent - I'd rather they improved the app switching method.

My list would be as follows:

1) Allow Aero Snap on multi-monitor systems. If you have a Metro app pinned to the side of your screen then you can Aero Snap to that side but you can't without it (you have to use the keyboard shortcut Win+Arrow). It's illogical.

2) On the Start screen it should automatically show the All Apps feature, rather than requiring you to right click. There should also be a Settings option (ideally from the user tile), rather than using the Charm bar.

3) Have screensavers appear over snapped Metro apps, as otherwise it's not really "saving" the screen. And make Bubbles use a live desktop image, as it's misleading having the clock show an inaccurate time.

4) Include a quick way to change between sound devices. I use Soundswitch to switch between my speakers and the HDMI audio on my connected TV.

5) Make the Metro gradients smooth on the Start screen. I have a 10-bit colour monitor and can see obvious banding.

6) Improve app switching. The left-hand panel app switching is rather clumsy, as is the Charm bar (especially on multi-monitor systems).

7) Rethink the Charm bar. It may work on tablets but it's clumsy and awkward on the desktop.

I'm happy with how Windows 8 is progressing but there's definitely plenty of room for improvement. I'm disappointed that Microsoft still hasn't introduced a scalable interface, despite making accommodations for high DPI displays with Metro. Apple is about to introduce 200+ DPI support for OSX and yet Microsoft seems to have ignored that for the desktop. There were rumours dating back to Vista that Microsoft would be moving to a vector based interface but that just hasn't materialised.

I would add this:

Make a control that will mimic start screen behavior.

Here is how I mean it. Start screen has two great behaviors: push scrolling and semantic zoom. Adding them to apps will greatly improve their usability. Take a look at Store. It has no push scrolling nor semantic zoom. It would be great if it would have it.

  • Like 2

I would add this:

Make a control that will mimic start screen behavior.

Here is how I mean it. Start screen has two great behaviors: push scrolling and semantic zoom. Adding them to apps will greatly improve their usability. Take a look at Store. It has no push scrolling nor semantic zoom. It would be great if it would have it.

Somehow I think that will all be available around RC or RTM, if not, it should because it's a great idea

  • 1 month later...

I agree with many of the items on the list. For instance, why does clicking on the network icon on the desktop bring up a Metro interface element? That doesn't happen when you click on the speaker icon or the clock. And there is definitely a need for a Metro version of Explorer, as Microsoft is being naive to believe that the inter-app sharing will be enough for power-users. The idea of a power-app is sensible and even if Microsoft doesn't do it themselves I imagine that - providing that the framework allows it - somebody else will implement that. The Start button is a tricky one, as providing an option to enable will lead to many users doing that and the Win8 experience will become very fractured - that's why the traditional Start Menu has been removed altogether. However, some of the other suggestions are a bit off base - for example, Metro apps are deliberately designed to work full screen, snapped or a combination and Microsoft couldn't simply allow users to resize them or snap multiple apps together without making app development considerably more difficult and less predictable. Certainly it would be possible to have a scaled down version behave like a normal app on the desktop but that would be even more inconsistent - I'd rather they improved the app switching method.

My list would be as follows:

1) Allow Aero Snap on multi-monitor systems. If you have a Metro app pinned to the side of your screen then you can Aero Snap to that side but you can't without it (you have to use the keyboard shortcut Win+Arrow). It's illogical.

2) On the Start screen it should automatically show the All Apps feature, rather than requiring you to right click. There should also be a Settings option (ideally from the user tile), rather than using the Charm bar.

3) Have screensavers appear over snapped Metro apps, as otherwise it's not really "saving" the screen. And make Bubbles use a live desktop image, as it's misleading having the clock show an inaccurate time.

4) Include a quick way to change between sound devices. I use Soundswitch to switch between my speakers and the HDMI audio on my connected TV.

5) Make the Metro gradients smooth on the Start screen. I have a 10-bit colour monitor and can see obvious banding.

6) Improve app switching. The left-hand panel app switching is rather clumsy, as is the Charm bar (especially on multi-monitor systems).

7) Rethink the Charm bar. It may work on tablets but it's clumsy and awkward on the desktop.

I'm happy with how Windows 8 is progressing but there's definitely plenty of room for improvement. I'm disappointed that Microsoft still hasn't introduced a scalable interface, despite making accommodations for high DPI displays with Metro. Apple is about to introduce 200+ DPI support for OSX and yet Microsoft seems to have ignored that for the desktop. There were rumours dating back to Vista that Microsoft would be moving to a vector based interface but that just hasn't materialised.

Great list! I really like the idea of the All App feature. Yeah, even a Tile could do the trick. And regarding the "quick way to change devices", I don't know if you knew, but if you click the sound icon, and then click the speaker or HDMI icon above the meter and you can quickly change between output devices (when there are multiple connected).

Regarding #6 I have to agree. Though Win Key + tab can do the job, they could implement something like small icons to quickly identify the program. I get lost when I try to browse through the open apps. Peeking would be a great feature!

Also, after having maxed out 9 apps, any other you chose to open will close another one in the background, because it does not allow running more than 9 (excluding the start screen hot corner).

With #7, they really should do something about it. It sometimes gets in the way, and is almost impossible to use when using extended monitors.

And regarding the "quick way to change devices", I don't know if you knew, but if you click the sound icon, and then click the speaker or HDMI icon above the meter and you can quickly change between output devices (when there are multiple connected).

All that does for me is bring up the properties for that device. The quickest way I've found to do it is to right-click the speaker, select Playback Devices, select the device and click Set Default - it's not exactly convenient.

With #7, they really should do something about it. It sometimes gets in the way, and is almost impossible to use when using extended monitors.

I imagine that the Charm bar will change for the Release Preview, as it is currently to easy to accidentally trigger it - it will often appear when you go to use Aero Peek or the speaker icon. The only time I ever use it is to shut down my computer. If Microsoft simply moved that to the Metro start screen (for instance, to the user tile) then they could disable it by default for non-touch displays. As I've said, I really like Windows 8 but the Charm bar and hot-corners don't really work well, especially on multi-monitor systems.

I imagine that the Charm bar will change for the Release Preview, as it is currently to easy to accidentally trigger it - it will often appear when you go to use Aero Peek or the speaker icon. The only time I ever use it is to shut down my computer. If Microsoft simply moved that to the Metro start screen (for instance, to the user tile) then they could disable it by default for non-touch displays. As I've said, I really like Windows 8 but the Charm bar and hot-corners don't really work well, especially on multi-monitor systems.

You are completely out of your mind. The charm bar is an essential part of Windows 8, you use it everytime, especially on metro apps. But it's also very usefull on the desktop, there won't be an option to disable it.
You are completely out of your mind. The charm bar is an essential part of Windows 8, you use it everytime, especially on metro apps. But it's also very usefull on the desktop, there won't be an option to disable it.

I don't think it's fair to say that I'm "out of my mind" when Microsoft has been making radical changes to the interface (just compare the Developer Preview to the Consumer Preview) and is still actively responding to user feedback. I mean, how often do you actually use the charm bar? The only time I ever use it is to shut-down my computer and even then there are keyboard shortcuts and I can use the button on my case. The charm bar serves no purpose on the desktop - only on a tablet. And Metro apps barely make use of it. There's no reason that Microsoft couldn't simply change it so that the charm bar appears when you right-click in Metro apps (afterall, there is no right-click for touch) - they could then remove the charm bar on the desktop, which would get rid of the issue with multi-monitor setups. The issues with multi-monitor setups impacts everyday computer usage, whereas the Charm bar itself is rarely needed.

As for the idea of moving the hot-corners to the far edge of multi-monitors, that really wouldn't work well for my setup. My second display is a HDTV at a 90 degree angle to my main monitor, which is used entirely for media consumption - having the charm bar appear on it would be highly impractical. It still makes more sense to have it on the primary display.

As for the idea of moving the hot-corners to the far edge of multi-monitors, that really wouldn't work well for my setup. My second display is a HDTV at a 90 degree angle to my main monitor, which is used entirely for media consumption - having the charm bar appear on it would be highly impractical. It still makes more sense to have it on the primary display.

Maybe they could have a switch to choose center, or end monitors. The feeling I get from Windows 8, it seems it would be better workflow to have the corners follow out to the end monitors. It would be nice to have the Start screen extend on all two or all three monitors.

Basically, the monitors all act in unison as one big monitor instead of three daisy chained together.

I don't think it's fair to say that I'm "out of my mind" when Microsoft has been making radical changes to the interface (just compare the Developer Preview to the Consumer Preview) and is still actively responding to user feedback. I mean, how often do you actually use the charm bar? The only time I ever use it is to shut-down my computer and even then there are keyboard shortcuts and I can use the button on my case. The charm bar serves no purpose on the desktop - only on a tablet. And Metro apps barely make use of it. There's no reason that Microsoft couldn't simply change it so that the charm bar appears when you right-click in Metro apps (afterall, there is no right-click for touch) - they could then remove the charm bar on the desktop, which would get rid of the issue with multi-monitor setups. The issues with multi-monitor setups impacts everyday computer usage, whereas the Charm bar itself is rarely needed.

I'm using the charm bar all the time! On metro apps but also on the start screen and the desktop (try to use search on the desktop).

Saying that a right click should bring the charm bar inside the metro apps just confirms what I said : You are out of your mind. The right click opens the app-bar which is something completely different.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Good, because the nonstop chattering from the voices in her head made me quit the second game.
    • This new cabinet design lets you run AMD, Intel, and Nvidia PCs inside one case by Sayan Sen At Computex 2026 earlier this month, AMD announced a couple of new X3D processors for both sockets AM4 and AM5 as it confirmed the support extension of the latter till 2029. And although Intel didn't unveil any new desktop chips, the company's Core Ultra 200S Plus series is relatively new too. Let's say though that you want the best of both worlds simultaneously, and instead of running two different systems, you can have both running together side-by-side, or rather on top of one another. That's exactly what Thermaltake's CAPO X dual system is made for doing. While it's not exactly mandatory to run AMD with Intel, or vice versa, you get the idea. As you can see in the render above, it is essentially like a double-decker PC case that is capable of holding two microATX (mATX) motherboards. Even running just one discrete graphics card in a PC can get toasty, so you may be wondering how well the cooling is designed on the CAPO X, Thermaltake has confirmed, as is evident from the marketing promo image above, that the case supports up to two 360 mm AIO liquid coolers. 420mm is not supported. In total there is room for 13 120mm case fans. In terms of I/O (input/output) options for the two systems, there are naturally two places for those ports, one at the top and one at the very bottom of the chassis in the front panel. In terms of use cases, there are many possibilities. Thermaltake itself, for example, highlights how one system can be your main PC while the other could be the AI agent PC. Another example given is how it can be used to stream and game simultaneously with dedicated systems instead of hogging one with the entire load. Nothing regarding pricing or availability was said. Source: Thermaltake (YouTube, X)
    • There might be some passive design improvements (cooling, etc), but I doubt they'd change the core performance spec of the hardware mid-generation when they've already got a new console in development.
    • State of Decay 3 is out in 2027, reveals Plague Nests with new co-op gameplay trailer by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe A few months ago, Undead Labs broke its silence about the third entry in the State of Decay series since its announcement in 2020. Today, the studio had a brand-new trailer to reveal at the Xbox Games Showcase, finally giving players a look at the Unreal Engine 5-powered title. A broad 2027 release window is now attached to State of Decay 3 too. The studio confirmed that every scene seen in the gameplay trailer (except for the studio logo) released today is from the game with no cinematic footage. "The quality bar of the moment-to-moment experience is higher than anything we’ve achieved in Undead Labs’ history," says the studio. "State of Decay 3 is being built in Unreal Engine 5, and we’re creating better quality versions of what makes our game the survival sandbox it is, and the combat experience is really, really important to us, and I think you can see it coming through in this trailer." One new aspect of this upcoming entry is the Plague Nests. These are supposed to be dynamic, dungeon‑like enemy hubs with varied “personas” that change tactics each time one appears on a map. These areas will have the best loot in the game for players brave enough to tackle them. The combat system is being overhauled too, letting players do quick and power attacks depending on the situation. This isn't just on the player's side though, as zombies themselves now have multiple new types of behaviors depending on how fresh or decayed they are. "All of these play very differently, especially as you start getting outnumbered or when you’re making noise and running around and trying to save your rear end or the rear end of your friend next to you," adds the developer. Of course, settlement building and community management are massive parts of this third entry too. These are being further expanded with the cooperative focus, giving players much more freedom for playing together than in State of Decay 2. Players will even be able to split up and build settlements in different areas of the same map with different goals. Undead Labs confirmed that playtests are already ongoing for the title, and interested players can sign up to participate by heading over here once more slots open up ahead of the full release. State of Decay 3 is coming out on PC, Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Game Pass sometime in 2027.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      68
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!