Recommended Posts

Please, every Windows 8 hater - read this carefully. I'm not justifying anything, I just think my input may help you realize the beauty of this change.

Why no regular start menu while browsing Metro?

I for one like Metro for my desktop PC. I love the fact that the desktop is now a "box" that runs inside a fluid environment. I also like the concept of the immersiveness and the chromeless interfaces instead of having a taskbar being there.

Also, applications can use toast notifications to notify when things are done, or something requires attention - globally. There's no longer need for individual applications such as Skype and Messenger to use their own notification types, and these notifications will be able to be turned off at one central location - the control panel. This theoretically elliminates the need for the cool Windows 7 progress bar indicators in the task bar. While not offering itself as an alternative, it is indeed a nice complementary feature.

Metro for desktop computers

I don't see how Metro is not good for desktops actually - please help me understand. I've read most complaints entirely, and I still don't understand. You move your mouse to the lower-left screen, and voila - there's your start menu.

Finding apps has never been easier - do a search while in the Metro menu.

Don't want Windows 8 to start up in Metro? Turn it off. I like when my PC starts up in Metro, because then my PC isn't spending 99% of its resources on launching all kinds of apps in the background, when I know exactly what I want.

For instance, if I want to start Visual Studio to do programming as the first thing I do, I click my pinned Visual Studio icon on the Metro screen. It takes me to the desktop, and starts loading the application - even with full priority (allowing it to be priored over all the other program processes while it starts up).

I get the idea that people want some kind of "Default" state that their PC is in, but really, I believe people have become way too used to the old "inside the box"-way of thinking. Let's face it. You start up your PC anyway, and you always start out by launching 1 single app to do your primary purpose, isn't that right? You never start out by launching 20 apps at a time. These will be started automatically for you.

Turning your computer off is harder - or is it?

For those having issues finding the power button I can only ask "really?". Pressing your power button on the computer itself will shut down your PC as default in Windows 8, so why bother anyway? Isn't it more natural to hit the power button to turn something off? They just removed the noise that we thought was needed for centuries. If you're not happy with that, you can configure what happens when clicking the power button.

If you're on a desktop, hitting "Windows + I" to launch the menu for shutting down your PC isn't that hard either, although, less intuitive. In this scenario I agree, if your power button is physically too far away from you.

Normal applications will be offered through the marketplace as well as Metro apps, so the app-store is still going to be awesome.

Why Metro as it is now?

As a developer, I see clearly what Microsoft is doing here. The following is based on knowledge within the field, and common sense. However, some of it is based on beliefs and assumptions.

  • Microsoft will make Windows Phone 7 apps compatible with Windows 8. When these apps run, they will run in the docked mode (left or right) always for compatibility reasons, since that'll match the proper phone aspect ratio.
  • Windows 8 apps that are compatible with the docked (left or right) app format will run in that mode always when running in Windows Phone 8.

Scaling is no problem, since Silverlight (or WPF for that matter) is resolution independent, and uses vector graphics. Hence a much higher compatibility with larger screens.

I will keep this post updated with new points of view as replies arrive - please read the post carefully before you reply!

If you're on a desktop, hitting "Windows + I" to launch the menu for shutting down your PC isn't that hard either, although, less intuitive. In this scenario I agree, if your power button is physically too far away from you.

Win+C is much more efficient and specifically designed to pull up the "C"harms. I restart/shutdown using Win+C every time and it's second nature now, was after 10 minutes.

You make good points and some that don't really matter at all - this is a preview and things will change between now and a potential RC build as well as the RTM which should be this year at some point. They have a long way to go.

Best thing I can say: people need to get over the whole Metro thing, really. It's there, use it, don't use it. I can sit here and use my machine for hours and hours and hours and never once see the Start screen at all - not one time. I start up the apps I normally keep open by their Taskbar buttons/shortcuts and that's it - I have no reason to see the Start screen and on the very rare times that I hit just the Windows key itself I type what I'm looking for and hit Enter so fast it's a non-issue, that means the Start screen is irrelevant in the big picture for those of us that continue to use Desktop "mode" since Metro apps are so few and useful at this point.

People don't like change, but they adapt in time.

  • Like 2

Win+C is much more efficient and specifically designed to pull up the "C"harms. I restart/shutdown using Win+C every time and it's second nature now, was after 10 minutes.

Win+I requires one less click to shut down compared to Win+C.

...every Windows 8 hater...

I stopped reading, and and taking this opinion seriously, here. Disliking one feature in a desktop environment doesn't mean people hate the whole OS and you'd know that if you actually read what people were saying, so given your opening and request that people read your post before replying, I'd say that qualifies you as a hypocrite. Good Day.

Oh boy.

Please, every Windows 8 hater - read this carefully. I'm not justifying anything, I just think my input may help you realize the beauty of this change.

Haytazzz!

Why no regular start menu while browsing Metro?

I for one like Metro for my desktop PC. I love the fact that the desktop is now a "box" that runs inside a fluid environment. I also like the concept of the immersiveness and the chromeless interfaces instead of having a taskbar being there.

I'm glad for you. But how is you liking it proving anything?

Also, applications can use toast notifications to notify when things are done, or something requires attention - globally. There's no longer need for individual applications such as Skype and Messenger to use their own notification types, and these notifications will be able to be turned off at one central location - the control panel. This theoretically elliminates the need for the cool Windows 7 progress bar indicators in the task bar. While not offering itself as an alternative, it is indeed a nice complementary feature.

Notifications are awful as they're too easy to miss. Look at same thing in upcoming OS X or how it's been for a few years in Ubuntu -- there are notification counters and you can see what you've missed. And "theoretically," they don't replace progress bars as they're not visible at all times (but not much is anyway in Metro).

Metro for desktop computers

I don't see how Metro is not good for desktops actually - please help me understand. I've read most complaints entirely, and I still don't understand. You move your mouse to the lower-left screen, and voila - there's your start menu.

And I just click the start menu, and, voila, there's my start menu. Actually, what you've mentioned is exactly one of the things that's wrong -- everything's hidden. From the clock to any taskbar indicator. Everything.

Finding apps has never been easier - do a search while in the Metro menu.

...or in the start menu. Plus you can still view your open app, no need to change views, like you have to to achieve anything in Metro!

Don't want Windows 8 to start up in Metro? Turn it off. I like when my PC starts up in Metro, because then my PC isn't spending 99% of its resources on launching all kinds of apps in the background, when I know exactly what I want.

You can't turn it off, at least not by a Microsoft sanctioned way. Btw, Metro still loads the desktop, so your argument's invalid.

For instance, if I want to start Visual Studio to do programming as the first thing I do, I click my pinned Visual Studio icon on the Metro screen. It takes me to the desktop, and starts loading the application - even with full priority (allowing it to be priored over all the other program processes while it starts up).

Not sure what this is supposed to mean? I can also click on an icon in the superbar, plus I don't have to confused by a gazillion animated tiles.

I get the idea that people want some kind of "Default" state that their PC is in, but really, I believe people have become way too used to the old "inside the box"-way of thinking. Let's face it. You start up your PC anyway, and you always start out by launching 1 single app to do your primary purpose, isn't that right? You never start out by launching 20 apps at a time. These will be started automatically for you.

Purely subjective, but I start the browser, email client, twitter app and possibly the music player the moment I sit in front of my computer. Later I add the programs I work in.

Turning your computer off is harder - or is it?

Yes, it is.

For those having issues finding the power button I can only ask "really?". Pressing your power button on the computer itself will shut down your PC as default in Windows 8, so why bother anyway? Isn't it more natural to hit the power button to turn something off? They just removed the noise that we thought was needed for centuries. If you're not happy with that, you can configure what happens when clicking the power button.

Haha, are you high? "They just removed the noise that we thought was needed for centuries." Yeah, that pesky shut down button has been a rock in our shoes for centuries.

Second part I'll post later as there are too many quote tags to fit in one post.

  • Like 2

Second part.

If you're on a desktop, hitting "Windows + I" to launch the menu for shutting down your PC isn't that hard either, although, less intuitive. In this scenario I agree, if your power button is physically too far away from you.

Haha, I never used this shortcut.

Normal applications will be offered through the marketplace as well as Metro apps, so the app-store is still going to be awesome.

Could agree with this, except it looks like crap.

Why Metro as it is now?

As a developer, I see clearly what Microsoft is doing here. The following is based on knowledge within the field, and common sense. However, some of it is based on beliefs and assumptions.

Microsoft will make Windows Phone 7 apps compatible with Windows 8. When these apps run, they will run in the docked mode (left or right) always for compatibility reasons, since that'll match the proper phone aspect ratio.

Windows 8 apps that are compatible with the docked (left or right) app format will run in that mode always when running in Windows Phone 8.

Scaling is no problem, since Silverlight (or WPF for that matter) is resolution independent, and uses vector graphics. Hence a much higher compatibility with larger screens.

Okay, have nothing to say about this one.

I will keep this post updated with new points of view as replies arrive - please read the post carefully before you reply!

Can't wait!

Yeah, I was bored.

snip

If you buy me a copy of Windows 8 when it is released then I will use metro. Until then, please don't tell me what to do.

Also, we're supposed to take your opinion as fact and just agree with you? Well I see the light now! The metro start screen is the super duper!

Why no regular start menu while browsing Metro?

I for one like Metro for my desktop PC. I love the fact that the desktop is now a "box" that runs inside a fluid environment. I also like the concept of the immersiveness and the chromeless interfaces instead of having a taskbar being there.

Also, applications can use toast notifications to notify when things are done, or something requires attention - globally. There's no longer need for individual applications such as Skype and Messenger to use their own notification types, and these notifications will be able to be turned off at one central location - the control panel. This theoretically elliminates the need for the cool Windows 7 progress bar indicators in the task bar. While not offering itself as an alternative, it is indeed a nice complementary feature.

Oh, you mean like Growl? Cool!

Turning your computer off is harder - or is it?

For those having issues finding the power button I can only ask "really?". Pressing your power button on the computer itself will shut down your PC as default in Windows 8, so why bother anyway? Isn't it more natural to hit the power button to turn something off? They just removed the noise that we thought was needed for centuries. If you're not happy with that, you can configure what happens when clicking the power button.

For the past 17 years, what have the masses been groomed to do?

A: The power button is off limits and that they should shut down through Windows. So that's what they think they're going to have to do with Windows 8.

Win+I requires one less click to shut down compared to Win+C.

Perhaps, but with Win+C I can do that with two fingers in a split second whereas even my large hand and fairly wide finger-reach can't do Win+I with the left hand - and that means you're using two hands to get Win+I so...

Win+C is still more efficient overall. ;)

Perhaps, but with Win+C I can do that with two fingers in a split second whereas even my large hand and fairly wide finger-reach can't do Win+I with the left hand - and that means you're using two hands to get Win+I so... Win+C is still more efficient overall. ;)

You either have tiny little girl hands, or a gigantic keyboard. :huh:

I stopped reading, and and taking this opinion seriously, here. Disliking one feature in a desktop environment doesn't mean people hate the whole OS and you'd know that if you actually read what people were saying, so given your opening and request that people read your post before replying, I'd say that qualifies you as a hypocrite. Good Day.

Did I ever state that? I realize my statement might have been harsh, but I had no bad intentions regarding this statement at all. I'm sorry if it came out that way. A guy that hates or doesn't like Windows 8 is a Windows hater, although the word "hater" might sound offensive. I should have used the term "Critics" instead probably. If you don't hate Windows 8 but only parts of Windows 8, then I'd say you are still hating it. I didn't mean to say that you hate in general, but just that you hate Windows 8 or parts of it.

Did I ever state that? I realize my statement might have been harsh, but I had no bad intentions regarding this statement at all. I'm sorry if it came out that way. A guy that hates or doesn't like Windows 8 is a Windows hater, although the word "hater" might sound offensive. I should have used the term "Critics" instead probably. If you don't hate Windows 8 but only parts of Windows 8, then I'd say you are still hating it. I didn't mean to say that you hate in general, but just that you hate Windows 8 or parts of it.

so the only way to like a product is to be it's fanboy?

If you buy me a copy of Windows 8 when it is released then I will use metro. Until then, please don't tell me what to do.

Also, we're supposed to take your opinion as fact and just agree with you? Well I see the light now! The metro start screen is the super duper!

It's funny how people react to a simple opinion. I was basically just trying to state my part of the whole experience, and perhaps help you understand a few things you might have missed. I'm no consultant, nor an expert within the field, and I can certainly not know what your opinions are, or what you're thinking. This whole post was just made because I don't understand your points, and I basically just shared a few experiences I made for myself to clear some confusions up in regards to Metro.

That's why I lead up to a discussion. It'd be great to keep hearing your criticism, and to figure out the pros and cons of Windows 8 constructively.

And no, I'm not saying that my opinion is a fact - that's entirely up to you. I just made my opinion, and you can choose wether or not to pay attention to it. You're a human, and you're acting like a child. If a guy tells you that he believes in God, it doesn't mean you have to as well. Be cool.

You either have tiny little girl hands, or a gigantic keyboard. :huh:

While it is possible to do Win+I with just the left hand, if I wanted to stress the muscles in the left hand with such a move it wouldn't take long to create some form of RSI doing it whereas Win+C is pretty much a bare twitch of the left thumb and index finger since my left thumb is resting on the very left edge of the Space bar pretty much constantly in my normal daily usage:

wincwini.jpg

Win+I for anyone with just the left hand is a stretch for anyone, pun very much intended. :)

It's basically the same on a full size desktop keyboard as well, actually slightly longer on the reach by about 1/2" (using a standard Dell USB desktop keyboard for comparison).

Still easier to do Win+C...

It's funny how people react to a simple opinion. I was basically just trying to state my part of the whole experience, and perhaps help you understand a few things you might have missed. I'm no consultant, nor an expert within the field, and I can certainly not know what your opinions are, or what you're thinking. This whole post was just made because I don't understand your points, and I basically just shared a few experiences I made for myself to clear some confusions up in regards to Metro.

That's why I lead up to a discussion. It'd be great to keep hearing your criticism, and to figure out the pros and cons of Windows 8 constructively.

And no, I'm not saying that my opinion is a fact - that's entirely up to you. I just made my opinion, and you can choose wether or not to pay attention to it. You're a human, and you're acting like a child. If a guy tells you that he believes in God, it doesn't mean you have to as well. Be cool.

And the people on the other side of the fence don't understand how anyone can like it in it's current form. As it stands now, I can do everything the metro start screen does more easily in Windows 7. Be more efficient, more organized, the entire thing. Metro start screen is a pointless addition for a desktop pc.

Why do I need to relearn how to use my computer just to do the things I do now... only different?

  • Like 2

from the latest entry on the B8 blog about Metro IE10, I thought this was interestingly worded:

Snap makes it easy to use Windows 8 for more than one thing at a time.

As a user in the comment section points out:

Has that actually been hard in the last two decades?

Haytazzz!

Yeah, sorry for that.

I'm glad for you. But how is you liking it proving anything?

Not at all. I was just hoping that (in some scenarios) my points of view had not been seen by you - and that they might have been a reasonable explanation to the design choices behind Metro.

Notifications are awful as they're too easy to miss. Look at same thing in upcoming OS X or how it's been for a few years in Ubuntu -- there are notification counters and you can see what you've missed. And "theoretically," they don't replace progress bars as they're not visible at all times (but not much is anyway in Metro).

The notifications will stay as long as you don't move your mouse or your keyboard. In other words, when you're at your computer. Future computers (including desktops) will have approximity sensors, allowing the PC to detect your presence as well. Windows 8 supports this natively. There's an old post full of leaks from years back which still holds so far. More specifically, this part may be interesting to you.

And I just click the start menu, and, voila, there's my start menu. Actually, what you've mentioned is exactly one of the things that's wrong -- everything's hidden. From the clock to any taskbar indicator. Everything.

I understand this criticism entirely. Showing the clock might prove a good thing, or getting a status of something while in Metro. I don't know why I didn't think of that before. It's not something I've noticed though, since my usage of Metro apps are often in and out, just like on Windows Phone. You get the basic information through tiles, and once there's more you'd like to catch up on, you quickly go in, and back out again. That doesn't justify anything though, and I agree.

On Windows Phone, when you swipe your finger from the top of the screen to the bottom, a task-bar fades in, showing battery status, connection status and the time. Perhaps that'll be the same for Windows 8?

...or in the start menu. Plus you can still view your open app, no need to change views, like you have to to achieve anything in Metro!

See, this is quite interesting. I was thinking the exact same thing the other day, until a Neowin member commented "how often do you actually use the Windows 7 start menu?". I quickly realized that most of my stuff is pinned to the taskbar anyway, and when I want to find specific information, I never browse through a list - searching just makes more sense.

As for the full-screen interface, it is not at all needed. Using the charm bar's "search" button will allow searching while on the desktop, or using the Windows + W, Windows + Q or Windows + F hotkeys for the different search categories respectively.

You can't turn it off, at least not by a Microsoft sanctioned way. Btw, Metro still loads the desktop, so your argument's invalid.

Metro only loads the desktop with really low priority. This has already been mentioned in a news post (I think it was even on Neowin), and on the Windows 8 blog (Engineering Windows 8). However, the heavy loading only occurs once you make a desktop-based activity. This is made to decrease load especially on tablets and phones. Combined with hybrid-boot tech, it does this quite well.

As it is right now, there's an application inbuilt in Windows 8 called "Show desktop". It's an EXE hidden in the system. Putting it as automatic startup with the system causes Metro to disable during boot. There's been rumors that this will be an option later. There are also security policy settings that can be disabled/enabled to achieve the same effect. Not very user-friendly and intuitive, I know.

Not sure what this is supposed to mean? I can also click on an icon in the superbar, plus I don't have to confused by a gazillion animated tiles.

Yes, but you can't do it as efficiently, because your PC will most likely be busy booting up other programs, while you (most likely) just want to load one thing with full priority. Metro gives you that control. Also, the Metro interface can show way more tiles, and by differentiating things in color, named categories and custom positions, I doubt you'll be confused by your own setup. Microsoft elaborated on their decissions on this here, showing scientific results through heatmaps that describe how the average user doesn't even use the Windows 7 start menu optimally (focus on the images in the post if you're a TL;DR guy :) ).

Purely subjective, but I start the browser, email client, twitter app and possibly the music player the moment I sit in front of my computer. Later I add the programs I work in.

Interesting. I take it back then! :) One could however argue that it would probably be wise for you to configure those to start up automatically.

Yes, it is.

Through the usual ways (as I also state), yes. Could you elaborate a bit more?

Haha, are you high? "They just removed the noise that we thought was needed for centuries." Yeah, that pesky shut down button has been a rock in our shoes for centuries.

No, not last time I checked :laugh: . What I mean by noise is elements that aren't needed for the functionality to still be there.

While it is possible to do Win+I with just the left hand, if I wanted to stress the muscles in the left hand with such a move it wouldn't take long to create some form of RSI doing it whereas Win+C is pretty much a bare twitch of the left thumb and index finger since my left thumb is resting on the very left edge of the Space bar pretty much constantly in my normal daily usage:

wincwini.jpg

Win+I for anyone with just the left hand is a stretch for anyone, pun very much intended. :)

It's basically the same on a full size desktop keyboard as well, actually slightly longer on the reach by about 1/2" (using a standard Dell USB desktop keyboard for comparison).

Still easier to do Win+C...

Couldn't resist. When a touch interface encourages you to touch your keyboard, often, it may be implemented improperly ... lol.

If you don't hate Windows 8 but only parts of Windows 8, then I'd say you are still hating it.

No, I disagree. If I see a car that has ugly wheels, I don't hate the car - I hate the wheels.

The same with Windows 8. I don't hate it. I might dislike a feature in it, but a feature doesn't make it the whole.

from the latest entry on the B8 blog about Metro IE10 ...

Snapping in Windows 8 is different. You can snap the "desktop box", and you can snap Windows 8 apps in the side at the same time, in an entire isolated environment outside the box. Here's a screenshot I just made demonstrating it, and here's the same concept just with the desktop-box in collapsed-mode. IE10 in Metro mode can snap like this too.

And the people on the other side of the fence don't understand how anyone can like it in it's current form. As it stands now, I can do everything the metro start screen does more easily in Windows 7. Be more efficient, more organized, the entire thing. Metro start screen is a pointless addition for a desktop pc.

Why do I need to relearn how to use my computer just to do the things I do now... only different?

Could you be more specific? I'm curious, and I'm not trying to be a tease. Sorry if I am. What (more specifically) do you do faster on your Windows 7 machine?

Sounds like BS Microsoft marketers at work to me.

You sound like a troll to me with no constructive comments what so ever.

No, I disagree. If I see a car that has ugly wheels, I don't hate the car - I hate the wheels.

The same with Windows 8. I don't hate it. I might dislike a feature in it, but a feature doesn't make it the whole.

Point taken, I get you. I take it back. I appologize. :)

so the only way to like a product is to be it's fanboy?

Surprisingly enough, I wouldn't call myself a Microsoft fanboy. I objectively use what I like the most. I use Microsoft Word instead of OpenOffice because of formatting issues with Microsoft OOML or whatever it's called, which is used almost everywhere. I use Google Docs instead of Office Live because it's just better when it comes to collaboration.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Neowin is saying these are good prices? Thats crazy. As others have said they are just ######. Time for big tech to bring down the prices for real not this fake crap.
    • The iFlyTek AINote 2 is among the thinnest E-Ink tablets. It has an EMR stylus, a built-in fingerprint reader, and plenty of built-in AI features. You had me until "and plenty of built-in AI features." That and any company that still does the iProduct naming trope is an immediate pass. It suggests the company isn't very imaginative or creative and is trying to piggyback off another company's success. Extremely lame. Also kind of expensive. Better choices at lower prices out there.
    • These are not "great" prices... just "less awful". Apparently "Those who forget the past are doomed to pay higher prices and think they've won."
    • Russia was able to invade Crimea because of those people. But my point is that I've personally heard how great it was to be "back in Russia" right afterwards - look how great it is now. I've asked you a question in another comment which you haven't answered, so I'll ask it again: is it better now without "Europrats"?
    • ZimaBoard 2 1664 Starter Kit review: it's a cool and affordable DIY NAS by Steven Parker IceWhale Technology reached out to me asking if I was interested in testing the ZimaBoard 2, and after convincing them to send me the Starter Kit, it arrived at my doorstep in May. A bit of background: it is a Shanghai-based Chinese company founded in 2020, which specializes in single-board servers and personal cloud solutions. From searching around online, user feedback on the company and ZimaOS is mostly positive, so we're off to a good start. In addition, I should probably point out that although they do not have a large portfolio of NAS devices, with just four of what they do offer, they seem to have covered everything from a relatively low-priced entry point with the ZimaBoard 2, right up to the high end, with the ZimaCube 2 Creator Pack that even includes an NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000. Anyway, as already mentioned, what we have today is the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit, and here are the full specifications: ZimaBoard 2 Model 832, 1664 CPU Intel Core N150 (4x E Cores/Threads, Max burst up to 3.6 GHz) TDP: 6W (Base) 10W (Max) Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (1.00 GHz) Memory 8 GB, 16 GB DDR5 4800MT/s non ECC SODIMM (soldered) Disk Capacity 60 TB (30 TB x 2) Supported RAID Types TRAID, TRAID +, RAID0, RAID1, RAID5, RAID 6, RAID 10 Storage 2 x SATA 3.0 6Gb/s Ports with Power Bootloader 32 GB, 64 GB eMMC Network 2x RJ-45 2.5 GbE PCIe 1 x PCIe 3.0 (via LPC) USB Ports 2 x USB-A 3.1 (5 Gbps) Display Mini-DisplayPort 1.4 (4K@60Hz) Hardware Transcoding Engine H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, VC-1 Maximum resolution: 4K (4096 x 2160); Maximum FPS: 60 Virtualization Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) Size (H/W/D) 140mm x 83mm x 31mm Weight 0.4 kg (only ZimaBoard 2 device) Power 12v 5A Power Supply Warranty 1 year (Global) 2 Years (EU) OS ZimaOS v1.6.1 MSRP $339, $399 ($548.60) As you can see above, there are two variants of the ZimaBoard 2. The lesser variant has half the eMMC storage and 8 GB less RAM, although it also costs $60 less than the top variant we are testing today. The above pricing is only for the ZimaBoard 2. I put the MSRP of the Starter Kit next to it in brackets, although as of publishing, it is discounted to $534.50. The ZimaBoard 2 started life on Kickstarter and shipped to backers in August last year. It became available via the official website in late 2025 and Q1 2026. This hobbyist NAS contains the still relatively new N150 Intel CPU released in the first quarter of 2025, with support for DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, although in this case, the memory is integrated into the board itself, so it will not be possible to upgrade or expand the amount. It also supports AV1 decoding, as well as H.264, VP8, VP9, H.265 (8 bit), and H.265 (10 bit). The different capabilities in the Alder Lake-N (and Twin Lake) series are listed below. Processor E-cores L3-cache Turbo clock GPU GPU-clock TDP Intel N355 8 6 MB 3.9 GHz 32 EUs 1.35 GHz 9 W Intel Core 3 N350 3.9 GHz 1.35 GHz 7 W Intel Core i3-N305 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 9 W Intel Core i3-N300 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz Intel N250 4 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 6 W Intel Processor N200 3.7 GHz 0.75 GHz Intel N150 3.6 GHz 24 EUs 1 GHz Intel N97 1.2 GHz 12 W Intel Processor N100 3.4 GHz 0.75 GHz 6 W The CPU is part of the Twin Lake series that sits near the bottom of the N-series, designed for low- powered systems and entry-level laptops, and as such has a base level TDP of just 6W. As I have noted before, we are seeing another NAS with a great amount of RAM. It's important to mention that the ZimaBoard 2's memory is integrated into the base board (which is why they have two variants of it). As a reminder, up until a couple of years ago, it was commonplace to only get 2 or 4GB max on a flagship Synology or QNAP home NAS. Ever since the likes of TerraMaster and more have entered the market with ample RAM sizes included in their NAS offerings, it has gone a long way in forcing the hands of the traditional makers to up their game a bit. First impressions The Starter Kit came in one outer box with several packages inside it (shown above). I forgot to take pics of it because when it arrived, it wasn't clear what was inside, and I had to confirm with my contact that I received the entire Starter Kit. In the box ZimaBoard 2 ZimaBoard 2 HDD Expansion Bracket + PCIe card frame Zimaboard Mini DisplayPort Male to HDMI Female Cable 4K 60Hz Zimaboard PCIe 3.0 x4 to Dual NVMe M.2 SSD Adapter Card Quick guide [full online guide] Limited warranty notice Screws Design Where to start? You'd be forgiven for mistaking it as an SSD enclosure if not for all the ports on it. It is completely made out of metal, and the top is an entire heatsink. It has a premium feel about it, but it definitely looks like a hobby device. As you will see, the completed build looks like it belongs in a server or meter closet rather than as a showpiece on someone's desk. On what I am calling the rear, there's a Mini DisplayPort (1.4), two 2.5 GbE ports, with Type A 3.1 USB ports, and then the barrel connector port. Around the front, there are two SATA6 ports with a power connector in the middle. Left side Right side One side is completely free of ports. On the other there's a slit that allows for the feed of a CPU fan cable, and a PCIe 3.0 X4 slot. Top Bottom The top is entirely made up of a heatsink except for the extended height for the I/O on the rear. Around the other side, you can find the ZIMA branding and some regulatory information stamped near the bottom. As you may see from the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, it scratches quite easily from just moving it around on my Ikea island. Teardown Before we get started, let's have a look at this thing on the inside. The steps to get to the board are as follows: Remove the four smaller Torx screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2; Remove the four larger Torx screws on the sides of the device; Carefully unstick the CMOS battery from the PCB; Remove two Phillips screws on the PCB; Lift out the PCB. Yes, as you can tell from the instructions, you need three different tools to remove Torx and Phillips screws (10 in total), and unhelpfully, one of the screws is located under the CMOS battery, which is stuck onto the PCB. Building Now comes the fun part. Because the ZimaSpace website does not provide any guidance on how to put the Starter Kit together. They only have guidance for connecting the CPU fan. However, they did upload a video to their YouTube channel that shows the entire process. To install the fan, first remove the four screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, then on the inside, there is a CPU FAN connector where you can attach the fan, reattach the ZimaBoard 2 frame, and feed the fan cable through the provided slit. Then remove the nearest screw on the side and attach the fan frame to the side of the device using the same screw. ZimaBard 2 screws Aligning the screws Bottom view Remember those four screws we removed to access the CPU FAN? Longer screws are provided in the box with the HDD Expansion Bracket, which is what you will now need to attach the ZimaBoard 2 to it. Helpfully, the orientation on how to attach it is made obvious when the frame can only be screwed on at the same overall length as the ZimaBoard 2. If you do it the wrong way around (which is what I did initially) one side hangs off the frame, and it becomes difficult to attach the PCIe Adapter Card cable. PCIe card frame Other side PCIe slot connector Next, it's time to attach the PCIe card frame, which is fastened with the help of 3.5-inch SATA HDD (3 screws). These are toolless screws that you can just use your fingers to fasten them with. Then it is time to connect the provided PCIe cable with the slot connector on one side of the ZimaBoard 2, feed it through the bottom of the HDD frame, and fasten it with two standoffs. Both bracket options 2280 standoffs with 2x 4TB MP44Q The PCIe 3.0 X4 card comes with a short bracket option, handy if you decide to place it inside a different NAS or rack server, but here we need the long bracket. Oddly enough, the M.2 standoffs were preinstalled into the 22110 position, but extra standoffs are included in the box, which I installed at the 2280 position for our use. I added a couple of MP44Q M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSDs (2 x 4TB) that can be availed on Amazon for $478.99 (the lowest price for 3 months) that TEAMGROUP supplied us with Then we have the almost completed build, you just need to push the card into the PCIe slot. Unfortunately, IceWhale Technologies did not provide a screw for the PCIe card frame (this is also apparent in their own video). Here it is at several different angles, with the last pic showing the SATA Y-Cable connected to the two WD Red Plus 4TB drives. Setup and Usage Next, you connect your cables to the I/O, and the ZimaBoard 2 powers on automatically, as there is no power button on the device. Power is controlled through the Settings in ZimaOS. BIOS The ZimaBoard 2 includes an Aptio BIOS from American Megatrends [1, 2, 3], and you can setup pretty much everything here including the boot order, which is locked to the UEFI OS, however above that choice you can enable or disable booting to a SATA/USB bootloader so this would still allow you to switch to an alternative bootloader and boot from it, or disable it to instead always start from the first disk with an OS installed on it. Initial Setup Upon connecting to the LAN and booting up, the ZimaBoard 2 can be reached by navigating to the IP address (shown if you have a monitor connected), or you can find it using the ZIMA Client desktop application, which is essentially a Zima device finder. Initializing the ZimaBoard 2 The ZimaOS setup process is pretty straightforward, through a wizard, and in full above, it basically consists of setting up an account and some handy tips, and that's that! Post Setup (ZimaOS update) Upon first boot, you are alerted that there is a ZimaOS update from 1.5.0 to 1.6.1, which I applied; the full process is shown above with the changelog. ZimaBoard 2 Storage Setup Next, it is time to set up the storage. ZimaOS actually throws everything onto the eMMC flash drive; it is also the default location of AppData, which is definitely something to be wary about, as the 45GB available storage could fill up quickly. HDDs I first attempted to create a Storage Pool using the two 4TB WD Red Plus NAS drives, and got an error message: After several attempts and then looking online, I discovered it was a bug with ZimaOS where the fix was simply to reboot ZimaOS and then try again, this time I was able to create a RAID mirror using the two drives. SSDs I did the same for the SSDs, as you will see in the above gallery, when I created the second Storage Pool, it only allowed me to select available drives. ZimaBoard 2 AppData ZimaOS comes with an App Store that includes a repository of almost 400 apps, so you will be able to find most of what you'll need for a NAS (although after a quick search, I wasn't able to find a Surveillance Manager), and now comes the important part: moving the default AppData location off the 45GB eMMC and onto a larger volume: Open Settings Then Apps Then, in the Select a new location field, click on the new Storage volume you want to move it to (in my case, the Apps Storage Pool), which is the SSD RAID mirror. Confirm the Migration warning Be praised! You can also do this for Docker (which by default installs onto the 45GB eMMC flash drive) and the User database. Plex Setup Next, I tested the configuration by installing the Plex Server app from the App Store. The library folders must already exist (which I placed into the Storage Pool). Plex Server setup is straightforward and requires very little configuration. In my case, all I had to do was add the media path I just created, which you can also browse to using the folder icon in the path field. In addition, you can now map the new Media library in Windows Explorer using the Zima Client. Oddly enough, it is not possible to access the ZimaBoard 2 over the Network Neighborhood; you must map drives using the client, which is shown in the last image in the above gallery. I watched one of my Blu-Ray rips, which is Dolby Vision with Dolby Atmos, and the content played fine with no stuttering or buffering, which is what anyone needs in this scenario. ZimaBoard 2 Zima Client mobile app There's also a client for mobile. It is pretty barebones, as shown in the above gallery, for example, the Apps screen launches the WebUI for that app, and the Backup must be done manually. On opening Backup, you can select internal storage folders on your phone to backup to the ZimaBoard 2's storage, and although this is constantly scanned, the backup action itself must be manually triggered. There is an option to allow foreground backup (last image in the above gallery), but this basically means the queued backup gets triggered when you manually open the app. Benchmarking SATA PCIe 3.0 X4 A CrystalDiskMark test on a mapped network drive from within a Windows 11 25H2 PC (image above) connected over a 2.5 GbE was well within acceptable ranges. Writes were generally better on the SSD RAID mirror. SATA PCIe 3.0 X1 I also ran the NAS Performance tester, which tests the link speed performance. As you can see, it pretty much maxes out the 2.5GbE connection. Of course, you can also opt to bond the two 2.5 GbE connections for a bit more umph, but I didn't do that. Thermals Top PCIe card SATA HDDs Next, I measured some hotspots while playing content on Plex. It's fair to say this will perform better than a NAS that is enclosed in a metal or plastic case, as almost everything storage-wise is exposed! Anyway, the ZimaBoard 2 did not break a sweat with Plex streaming or disk benchmarks. ZimaOS Factory Reset ZimaOS does not include a factory reset option. Instead, you have to download the ZimaOS image and flash it to the eMMC manually. The flashing process is shown in the above gallery. The steps to do so are listed below: Download the ZimaOS image here; Open BalenaEtcher (Run as Administrator) and select the image; Select your inserted USB drive (min 8 GB) Flash to it; Connect your USB drive, monitor, keyboard, USB hub (optional), mouse (optional), and network cable (recommended) to the ZimaBoard 2; Connect power and press F11 continuously; Select your USB drive starting with UEFI in the boot device menu; Press Enter on the Install ZimaOS option; Select /dev/mmcblk0 (MMC) flash drive as target; Confirm with (three times) to wipe the target disk; Wait a couple of minutes while ZimaOS installs; Remove the USB drive and confirm with a reboot; Your ZimaBoard 2 has been factory reset. However, you don't have to stick with ZimaOS, in fact the company also offers official CasaOS images, that are based on Debian; or as they say themselves, put anything you want on this "hackable single board server" it's up to you. Conclusion I had a lot of fun putting this together. I've custom-built all my own PCs and servers since the 90s, and this is the first time I have had to put a NAS together. Even if the actual base ZimaBoard 2 was already a completed build, it still feels pretty custom. I just wish that IceWhale Technology included a getting-started guide in the box for the Start Kit, which would have really completed this kit. Instead, I had to search for the official video on the YouTube channel to make sure I wasn't doing anything wrong. So who is this for? Definitely the hobbyist who is comfortable building their own PC and servers. It also has a much smaller footprint than its nearest equivalent (in terms of specs), like the Beelink Me Pro, which is another NAS I will be testing soon. Although the Beelink does not come with the PCIe 3.0 X4 expansion, the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit suddenly looks to be a great bargain, even if it only offers the two 3.5-inch bays over the four in the other example. It makes a lot of sense to use Intel's N150 chip inside a NAS; it is more than capable of doing what the ZimaBoard 2 is intended for, media streaming and backup. It also looks like the IceWhale Technology staff are quite active in the official forums helping people with issues they come across with ZimaOS and the devices, peer support seems to be good as well, I was quickly able to find why I was not able to create a new Storage Pool in ZimaOS v1.6.1 even though that is quite a serious bug, hopefully it will be fixed in the next update. If you are comfortable with the command line and Docker, you'll be fine. You can do great things with this hardware. This was my first time with ZimaOS. It seems a bit barebones in comparison to the likes of Synology DSM, TOS, and UGOS, but it has a ton of apps to get you started with your home or small business NAS. Where to buy As of publishing, IceWhale Technology is running a discount of up to 5% for the Starter Kit. If you opt to get just the ZimaBoard 2 itself, it does come with a SATA Y-Cable, so you will be able to connect up to two 3.5-inch HDDs to it. ZimaBoard 2 1668 Starter Kit for $534.50 on Amazon US (was $548.60) ZimaBoard 2 832 Starter Kit for $372.88 on Amazon US (was $390.60) Zimaboard 2 1668 (16GB+64GB) for $419.90 on Amazon US Zimaboard 2 832 (8GB+32GB) for $359.90 on Amazon Disclosure: IceWhale Technology provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. Good to know The Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, when you purchase through links on our site, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      487
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!