Recommended Posts

Oh, you mean like Growl? Cool!

For the past 17 years, what have the masses been groomed to do?

A: The power button is off limits and that they should shut down through Windows. So that's what they think they're going to have to do with Windows 8.

You're wrong dude. ACPI has been around for the past few versions.

I'm glad Microsoft stopped taking much input from outside tech nerds such as those on neowin. The complexity of the OS should always have been hidden away from the general user base. Apple has been taking this approach and now Microsoft is in pursuit. If anything, Microsoft needs to expediate the death of the classic desktop as quickly as possible. Had the the tech nerds have their way, Windows 8 would just be Windows 98 with a logo change.

Could you be more specific? I'm curious, and I'm not trying to be a tease. Sorry if I am. What (more specifically) do you do faster on your Windows 7 machine?

I could yes, but I don't see any reason why I should. Either you get that the metro start screen doesn't work well on a desktop pc for most people or you don't.

Curious, has anyone installed Photoshop on Windows 8...and all the apps that come with it (Bridge, Help, Extension Mgr, Device Central, Extend Script, etc?). Do you get tiles for each of these apps in Metro? I haven't really got around to installing Photoshop...but before I wrote the below it just popped into my head.

In regards to Windows 8, guess I am a "hater". I loath the Metro and it looks like some cheap "fisher price" interface that distracts from the regular windows desktop. There needs to be an option for the start menu...simple as that. Everything else about Win8 is pretty cool. Metro is just some ugly 3rd party desktop replacement wannabe.

I could yes, but I don't see any reason why I should. Either you get that the metro start screen doesn't work well on a desktop pc for most people or you don't.

Metro works much better with a mouse and keyboard than the classic desktop did. You see how this works? You provide information without evidence, therefore I do the same.

Metro works much better with a mouse and keyboard than the classic desktop did. You see how this works? You provide information without evidence, therefore I do the same.

Just go back and reread any of the other threads about it if you want to. There is no reason for me to restate them all.

So you are saying pressing the power button on the tower will trigger a shut down and not put the computer to sleep? I just tried it on my laptop and it put it to sleep.

Really? Sort of hoping that you are joking

Really? Sort of hoping that you are joking

Just asking because he said

Pressing your power button on the computer itself will shut down your PC as default in Windows 8, so why bother anyway?

I don't have Windows 8 on an desktop system just a laptop, but since Vista and 7 pressing the power button on the tower usually just put the computer to sleep.

So you are saying pressing the power button on the tower will trigger a shut down and not put the computer to sleep? I just tried it on my laptop and it put it to sleep.

For me by default, it shuts down. You can change it by typing power on the start scr... Wait, you're on Windows 7 right? I can't remember how to navigate the endless set of menus to get to where I need to be in Windows 7 anymore.

For me by default, it shuts down. You can change it by typing power on the start scr... Wait, you're on Windows 7 right? I can't remember how to navigate the endless set of menus to get to where I need to be anymore in 7.

Well yes 7 on my desktop, but i don't really care what my power button does, because my computer never gets shut off.

For me by default, it shuts down. You can change it by typing power on the start scr... Wait, you're on Windows 7 right? I can't remember how to navigate the endless set of menus to get to where I need to be in Windows 7 anymore.

Like hitting Start and typing in Power? God that's hard. You're right . . .

Just asking because he said

I don't have Windows 8 on an desktop system just a laptop, but since Vista and 7 pressing the power button on the tower usually just put the computer to sleep.

Just had to reload a fresh copy of Win7 on my notebook post hard drive death. The power button is defaulted to shutdown which I changed to sleep. Of course the OEMs may have it set differently and I honestly do not remember what setting it came with from Dell.

For me by default, it shuts down. You can change it by typing power on the start scr... Wait, you're on Windows 7 right? I can't remember how to navigate the endless set of menus to get to where I need to be in Windows 7 anymore.

Funny, thought you Metro folks liked the ability to type commands making it "easier". Win7 you can type "power o" which takes you to the proper area. If you don't have powerdvd you may even get away with typing just "power'

Like hitting Start and typing in Power? God that's hard. You're right . . .

Hahaha. I laughed out loud in person at that one. You're a funny person.

Funny, thought you Metro folks liked the ability to type commands making it "easier". Win7 you can type "power o" which takes you to the proper area. If you don't have powerdvd you may even get away with typing just "power'

Man, I like Windows 8 for a lot more reasons then that. And to be honest, I didn't think it would be good before I downloaded it. For one, I'm glad they're doing away with those endless menus and icons which we've come to know. Realize this, no one sat down to conduct a study on what the best desktop experience would be and came up with the current desktop we see today. The reason we've seen the classic desktop for so long is because of a kind of path dependence: The menus with icons was what was first introduced (courtesy of xerox) in the 80's and that's what people have gotten use to.

If a study was conducted, however, on say 200 volunteers who've never used a desktop computer before, one would never come with an endless array of menus, icons and folders within folders within folders. I would bet those 200 volunteers would overwhelmingly find Windows 8 far easier to use than every version prior.

I'll take that post above and add somewhat of a corollary with the idea that what we've been using and how we've been doing things with it might not be the best possible way of getting things done by saying one "word" of sorts:

QWERTY

The QWERTY keyboard layout was created with the specific intention of making typing difficult so people would not be able to type fast(er) - in the times of the original mechanical typewriters by IBM and Remington and the like, the metal hammers that actually impacted/imprinted the letters onto the paper (by hitting the ribbon, etc) could get jammed if you typed too fast. The hardware literally had a "buffer" of sorts that couldn't handle the hammers more than 1 at a time soooo...

The QWERTY layout came into being when a study was done to find out "Ok, we spend more time fixing typing machine jams than actually typing, and productivity is absolute crap because of it, we have to find a better way to do things" and someone thought it would be ok to design a keyboard layout with letters in the most inefficient ways possible to slow people down. "Let's make it hard to type, that'll work..." was the idea and it's stuck for over 130 years now.

Funny thing for me and many others is that if we test ourselves we can get pretty high speeds on QWERTY after using them for so long. I can manage about 115 wpm on a good day, with a typical speed of about 80-90 which is about what I'm at banging this post out right now. But... if I switch to Dvorak and give myself and my hands about 2-4 days to adjust and adapt, I can bang out 180-200 or more words per minute without much trouble at all.

The way things have always been done is rarely the actual best way to get them done, and when a new idea comes along, people don't like change and will resist it with every fiber of their being until, after some experience, they can learn that yes it's possible to change, and with change comes potential.

Like it, don't like it, doesn't matter. Change is coming, is already here, and it's got no intentions of stopping anytime soon.

"IMPROVISE, ADAPT, OVERCOME!" - Gunny Highway, "Heartbreak Ridge" ;)

The QWERTY keyboard layout was created with the specific intention of making typing difficult so people would not be able to type fast(er)

This is simply not true. http://home.earthlin...r/whyqwert.html

As for keyboards, some design mistakes cost a lot. In the Russian standard layout some smart-ass did put the comma in the upper register (i.e. we need to press SHIFT contrary to English layout), yet comma is statistically showing up much more often than the period (in Russian). I don't think it is easy to change now, but to me it was a big mistake.

So we have a miserable chance to still influence Microsoft (and we should do that) to remove from Metro UI that ugly PowerPoint cognitive taint.

The problem is with the shutdown talk, that isn't the argument at all.. we're talking about restarting the computer, switching users etc which has become more complicated. We have been able to Shutdown since XP just by pressing the power button, and in some cases windows 98 computers supported that as well.

The problem is with the shutdown talk, that isn't the argument at all.. we're talking about restarting the computer, switching users etc which has become more complicated. We have been able to Shutdown since XP just by pressing the power button, and in some cases windows 98 computers supported that as well.

No, it is about the shutting down. All the comments on every blog/website I have read about the subject always said it in the context of shutting down the PC. What you're attempting to do here is reframe the argument as to make it easier to refute. Now another question is why would you want to do that? I don't know, but nonetheless, I'll take your bait: how often are you going to restart your PC as to even make this an issue?

No, it is about the shutting down. All the comments on every blog/website I have read about the subject always said it in the context of shutting down the PC. What you're attempting to do here is reframe the argument as to make it easier to refute. Now another question is why would you want to do that? I don't know, but nonetheless, I'll take your bate: how often are you going to restart your PC as to even make this an issue?

I only restart, and in my article on a compromise for desktop users I made that point clear as well. I work full time from home and my PC is always on, unless I need to restart, and that includes switching from Windows 7 to 8 and back.

Also the boot loader is highly annoying, boot to Windows 8 boot manager, select Windows 7 and the whole PC restarts because the boot manager has already assumed you want to quickly boot into 8 (after already loading a bunch of files).

I only restart, and in my article on a compromise for desktop users I made that point clear as well. I work full time from home and my PC is always on, unless I need to restart, and that includes switching from Windows 7 to 8 and back.

Also the boot loader is highly annoying, boot to Windows 8 boot manager, select Windows 7 and the whole PC restarts because the boot manager has already assumed you want to quickly boot into 8 (after already loading a bunch of files).

Well if that's the case, you can change the power button to restart instead of shutting down when pressed.

Well if that's the case, you can change the power button to restart instead of shutting down when pressed.

The power button alternative is a cop-out, and only addresses the problem for some home users.

I have access to exactly zero physical Windows machines, every Windows instance I work with is either virtualized or remote. Or both.

All the Metro stuff about invisible hotcorners only works (kind of) for the single scenario where you are running Windows fullscreen on a physical box next to you, and as soon as you try to work with it any other way it's utter failure.

The OP goes about how people not liking Metro can't think out of the box, yet it's all that people saying that using the power button is a perfectly fine alternative or that invisible hotcorners are awesome because of infinite precision that don't seem to be able to get in their heads that there are more use cases that their own home desktop, and that Metro is a PITA in all those other use cases.

Same goes for window managemente and snapping: just because you can snap your chat and some other window together and don't see the point of needing any more windows at sight at the same time means exactly nothing. To begin with I might (and most time do) need to see more that just a couple of windows, and then not all of them benefit from horizontal snapping as some are useless with a reduced width.

I MS wants to go with chromeless tiling window management then implement a frigging tiling window manager, not a half assed one with a single 75/25 snap.

Regarding notifications, I'm already getting all my notifications unified through a single notificacion system (heck, I can even reply to chat messages from the very chat notification without opening a chat windows if there's no need, now how cool is that?) and I'm getting all that without losing sight of my work on the desktop.

I'm not saying that you shouldn't like notifications on Metro tiles. I don't like them, but it's perfectly fine if you do. What I'm saying is that I'd be getting absolutely no advantages over my current desktop when using Metro.

Some people seem unable to grasp this simple concept: just because you find Metro to be an improvement doesn't mean it's an improvement for everyone else. And those individuals go into lengthy explanations about how eveyone complaining are likely wrong: "if you don't like Metro then it's because you are using it wrong, not because there's something wrong with it".

See, maybe you should consider that a)not everyone uses the computer the same way or for the same things, and b)maybe some people's desktops were more advanced than your own previous desktops, and hence don't see Metro as an improvement in the same way you do.

Why no regular start menu while browsing Metro?

The Metro Start Screen is the Start Menu. I personally don't mind this at all, and I am sure once I get the chance to use it more then I'd like it even more. Not everyone's cup of tea but I don't have a problem with it.

Metro for desktop computers

I have to admit this can be seen that we have 2 interfaces to one OS, but then again, no-one is forced to use the Metro Apps. I'm particularly looking forward to trying some and see what they are all about with the knowledge that the desktop is only a click or 2 away.

Turning your computer off is harder - or is it?

Okay, the functions are an extra click than what they are in Windows 7 depending on the method chosen, personally not an issue and unsure why it's been made to be such as issue with others but as people say, everyone has there opinions. On my laptop I will press the power button, on my desktop which is generally out of the way and not as accessible, I generally use the start menu, in Win 8, I'd most probably create a shortcut on the Start Screen.

I have to admit this can be seen that we have 2 interfaces to one OS, but then again, no-one is forced to use the Metro Apps. I'm particularly looking forward to trying some and see what they are all about with the knowledge that the desktop is only a click or 2 away.

You are forced to use the Metro UI. So yes, you are forced to use two different UI designs at the same time. This is a bad idea.

You are forced to use the Metro UI. So yes, you are forced to use two different UI designs at the same time. This is a bad idea.

Yes you have to use the Metro UI, however I stated that you are not forced to use the Metro Applications.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
    • For me the Final Fantasy games, Langrisser I & II, Hardspace: Shipbreaker, Horizon Forbidden West Complete Edition, Metaphor: ReFantazio and LUNAR Remastered Collection
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!