Recommended Posts

Oh, you mean like Growl? Cool!

For the past 17 years, what have the masses been groomed to do?

A: The power button is off limits and that they should shut down through Windows. So that's what they think they're going to have to do with Windows 8.

You're wrong dude. ACPI has been around for the past few versions.

I'm glad Microsoft stopped taking much input from outside tech nerds such as those on neowin. The complexity of the OS should always have been hidden away from the general user base. Apple has been taking this approach and now Microsoft is in pursuit. If anything, Microsoft needs to expediate the death of the classic desktop as quickly as possible. Had the the tech nerds have their way, Windows 8 would just be Windows 98 with a logo change.

Could you be more specific? I'm curious, and I'm not trying to be a tease. Sorry if I am. What (more specifically) do you do faster on your Windows 7 machine?

I could yes, but I don't see any reason why I should. Either you get that the metro start screen doesn't work well on a desktop pc for most people or you don't.

Curious, has anyone installed Photoshop on Windows 8...and all the apps that come with it (Bridge, Help, Extension Mgr, Device Central, Extend Script, etc?). Do you get tiles for each of these apps in Metro? I haven't really got around to installing Photoshop...but before I wrote the below it just popped into my head.

In regards to Windows 8, guess I am a "hater". I loath the Metro and it looks like some cheap "fisher price" interface that distracts from the regular windows desktop. There needs to be an option for the start menu...simple as that. Everything else about Win8 is pretty cool. Metro is just some ugly 3rd party desktop replacement wannabe.

I could yes, but I don't see any reason why I should. Either you get that the metro start screen doesn't work well on a desktop pc for most people or you don't.

Metro works much better with a mouse and keyboard than the classic desktop did. You see how this works? You provide information without evidence, therefore I do the same.

Metro works much better with a mouse and keyboard than the classic desktop did. You see how this works? You provide information without evidence, therefore I do the same.

Just go back and reread any of the other threads about it if you want to. There is no reason for me to restate them all.

So you are saying pressing the power button on the tower will trigger a shut down and not put the computer to sleep? I just tried it on my laptop and it put it to sleep.

Really? Sort of hoping that you are joking

Really? Sort of hoping that you are joking

Just asking because he said

Pressing your power button on the computer itself will shut down your PC as default in Windows 8, so why bother anyway?

I don't have Windows 8 on an desktop system just a laptop, but since Vista and 7 pressing the power button on the tower usually just put the computer to sleep.

So you are saying pressing the power button on the tower will trigger a shut down and not put the computer to sleep? I just tried it on my laptop and it put it to sleep.

For me by default, it shuts down. You can change it by typing power on the start scr... Wait, you're on Windows 7 right? I can't remember how to navigate the endless set of menus to get to where I need to be in Windows 7 anymore.

For me by default, it shuts down. You can change it by typing power on the start scr... Wait, you're on Windows 7 right? I can't remember how to navigate the endless set of menus to get to where I need to be anymore in 7.

Well yes 7 on my desktop, but i don't really care what my power button does, because my computer never gets shut off.

For me by default, it shuts down. You can change it by typing power on the start scr... Wait, you're on Windows 7 right? I can't remember how to navigate the endless set of menus to get to where I need to be in Windows 7 anymore.

Like hitting Start and typing in Power? God that's hard. You're right . . .

Just asking because he said

I don't have Windows 8 on an desktop system just a laptop, but since Vista and 7 pressing the power button on the tower usually just put the computer to sleep.

Just had to reload a fresh copy of Win7 on my notebook post hard drive death. The power button is defaulted to shutdown which I changed to sleep. Of course the OEMs may have it set differently and I honestly do not remember what setting it came with from Dell.

For me by default, it shuts down. You can change it by typing power on the start scr... Wait, you're on Windows 7 right? I can't remember how to navigate the endless set of menus to get to where I need to be in Windows 7 anymore.

Funny, thought you Metro folks liked the ability to type commands making it "easier". Win7 you can type "power o" which takes you to the proper area. If you don't have powerdvd you may even get away with typing just "power'

Like hitting Start and typing in Power? God that's hard. You're right . . .

Hahaha. I laughed out loud in person at that one. You're a funny person.

Funny, thought you Metro folks liked the ability to type commands making it "easier". Win7 you can type "power o" which takes you to the proper area. If you don't have powerdvd you may even get away with typing just "power'

Man, I like Windows 8 for a lot more reasons then that. And to be honest, I didn't think it would be good before I downloaded it. For one, I'm glad they're doing away with those endless menus and icons which we've come to know. Realize this, no one sat down to conduct a study on what the best desktop experience would be and came up with the current desktop we see today. The reason we've seen the classic desktop for so long is because of a kind of path dependence: The menus with icons was what was first introduced (courtesy of xerox) in the 80's and that's what people have gotten use to.

If a study was conducted, however, on say 200 volunteers who've never used a desktop computer before, one would never come with an endless array of menus, icons and folders within folders within folders. I would bet those 200 volunteers would overwhelmingly find Windows 8 far easier to use than every version prior.

I'll take that post above and add somewhat of a corollary with the idea that what we've been using and how we've been doing things with it might not be the best possible way of getting things done by saying one "word" of sorts:

QWERTY

The QWERTY keyboard layout was created with the specific intention of making typing difficult so people would not be able to type fast(er) - in the times of the original mechanical typewriters by IBM and Remington and the like, the metal hammers that actually impacted/imprinted the letters onto the paper (by hitting the ribbon, etc) could get jammed if you typed too fast. The hardware literally had a "buffer" of sorts that couldn't handle the hammers more than 1 at a time soooo...

The QWERTY layout came into being when a study was done to find out "Ok, we spend more time fixing typing machine jams than actually typing, and productivity is absolute crap because of it, we have to find a better way to do things" and someone thought it would be ok to design a keyboard layout with letters in the most inefficient ways possible to slow people down. "Let's make it hard to type, that'll work..." was the idea and it's stuck for over 130 years now.

Funny thing for me and many others is that if we test ourselves we can get pretty high speeds on QWERTY after using them for so long. I can manage about 115 wpm on a good day, with a typical speed of about 80-90 which is about what I'm at banging this post out right now. But... if I switch to Dvorak and give myself and my hands about 2-4 days to adjust and adapt, I can bang out 180-200 or more words per minute without much trouble at all.

The way things have always been done is rarely the actual best way to get them done, and when a new idea comes along, people don't like change and will resist it with every fiber of their being until, after some experience, they can learn that yes it's possible to change, and with change comes potential.

Like it, don't like it, doesn't matter. Change is coming, is already here, and it's got no intentions of stopping anytime soon.

"IMPROVISE, ADAPT, OVERCOME!" - Gunny Highway, "Heartbreak Ridge" ;)

The QWERTY keyboard layout was created with the specific intention of making typing difficult so people would not be able to type fast(er)

This is simply not true. http://home.earthlin...r/whyqwert.html

As for keyboards, some design mistakes cost a lot. In the Russian standard layout some smart-ass did put the comma in the upper register (i.e. we need to press SHIFT contrary to English layout), yet comma is statistically showing up much more often than the period (in Russian). I don't think it is easy to change now, but to me it was a big mistake.

So we have a miserable chance to still influence Microsoft (and we should do that) to remove from Metro UI that ugly PowerPoint cognitive taint.

The problem is with the shutdown talk, that isn't the argument at all.. we're talking about restarting the computer, switching users etc which has become more complicated. We have been able to Shutdown since XP just by pressing the power button, and in some cases windows 98 computers supported that as well.

The problem is with the shutdown talk, that isn't the argument at all.. we're talking about restarting the computer, switching users etc which has become more complicated. We have been able to Shutdown since XP just by pressing the power button, and in some cases windows 98 computers supported that as well.

No, it is about the shutting down. All the comments on every blog/website I have read about the subject always said it in the context of shutting down the PC. What you're attempting to do here is reframe the argument as to make it easier to refute. Now another question is why would you want to do that? I don't know, but nonetheless, I'll take your bait: how often are you going to restart your PC as to even make this an issue?

No, it is about the shutting down. All the comments on every blog/website I have read about the subject always said it in the context of shutting down the PC. What you're attempting to do here is reframe the argument as to make it easier to refute. Now another question is why would you want to do that? I don't know, but nonetheless, I'll take your bate: how often are you going to restart your PC as to even make this an issue?

I only restart, and in my article on a compromise for desktop users I made that point clear as well. I work full time from home and my PC is always on, unless I need to restart, and that includes switching from Windows 7 to 8 and back.

Also the boot loader is highly annoying, boot to Windows 8 boot manager, select Windows 7 and the whole PC restarts because the boot manager has already assumed you want to quickly boot into 8 (after already loading a bunch of files).

I only restart, and in my article on a compromise for desktop users I made that point clear as well. I work full time from home and my PC is always on, unless I need to restart, and that includes switching from Windows 7 to 8 and back.

Also the boot loader is highly annoying, boot to Windows 8 boot manager, select Windows 7 and the whole PC restarts because the boot manager has already assumed you want to quickly boot into 8 (after already loading a bunch of files).

Well if that's the case, you can change the power button to restart instead of shutting down when pressed.

Well if that's the case, you can change the power button to restart instead of shutting down when pressed.

The power button alternative is a cop-out, and only addresses the problem for some home users.

I have access to exactly zero physical Windows machines, every Windows instance I work with is either virtualized or remote. Or both.

All the Metro stuff about invisible hotcorners only works (kind of) for the single scenario where you are running Windows fullscreen on a physical box next to you, and as soon as you try to work with it any other way it's utter failure.

The OP goes about how people not liking Metro can't think out of the box, yet it's all that people saying that using the power button is a perfectly fine alternative or that invisible hotcorners are awesome because of infinite precision that don't seem to be able to get in their heads that there are more use cases that their own home desktop, and that Metro is a PITA in all those other use cases.

Same goes for window managemente and snapping: just because you can snap your chat and some other window together and don't see the point of needing any more windows at sight at the same time means exactly nothing. To begin with I might (and most time do) need to see more that just a couple of windows, and then not all of them benefit from horizontal snapping as some are useless with a reduced width.

I MS wants to go with chromeless tiling window management then implement a frigging tiling window manager, not a half assed one with a single 75/25 snap.

Regarding notifications, I'm already getting all my notifications unified through a single notificacion system (heck, I can even reply to chat messages from the very chat notification without opening a chat windows if there's no need, now how cool is that?) and I'm getting all that without losing sight of my work on the desktop.

I'm not saying that you shouldn't like notifications on Metro tiles. I don't like them, but it's perfectly fine if you do. What I'm saying is that I'd be getting absolutely no advantages over my current desktop when using Metro.

Some people seem unable to grasp this simple concept: just because you find Metro to be an improvement doesn't mean it's an improvement for everyone else. And those individuals go into lengthy explanations about how eveyone complaining are likely wrong: "if you don't like Metro then it's because you are using it wrong, not because there's something wrong with it".

See, maybe you should consider that a)not everyone uses the computer the same way or for the same things, and b)maybe some people's desktops were more advanced than your own previous desktops, and hence don't see Metro as an improvement in the same way you do.

Why no regular start menu while browsing Metro?

The Metro Start Screen is the Start Menu. I personally don't mind this at all, and I am sure once I get the chance to use it more then I'd like it even more. Not everyone's cup of tea but I don't have a problem with it.

Metro for desktop computers

I have to admit this can be seen that we have 2 interfaces to one OS, but then again, no-one is forced to use the Metro Apps. I'm particularly looking forward to trying some and see what they are all about with the knowledge that the desktop is only a click or 2 away.

Turning your computer off is harder - or is it?

Okay, the functions are an extra click than what they are in Windows 7 depending on the method chosen, personally not an issue and unsure why it's been made to be such as issue with others but as people say, everyone has there opinions. On my laptop I will press the power button, on my desktop which is generally out of the way and not as accessible, I generally use the start menu, in Win 8, I'd most probably create a shortcut on the Start Screen.

I have to admit this can be seen that we have 2 interfaces to one OS, but then again, no-one is forced to use the Metro Apps. I'm particularly looking forward to trying some and see what they are all about with the knowledge that the desktop is only a click or 2 away.

You are forced to use the Metro UI. So yes, you are forced to use two different UI designs at the same time. This is a bad idea.

You are forced to use the Metro UI. So yes, you are forced to use two different UI designs at the same time. This is a bad idea.

Yes you have to use the Metro UI, however I stated that you are not forced to use the Metro Applications.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!