All of Iceland's public administrations moving towards open source


Recommended Posts

All of Iceland's public administrations moving towards open source

All public administrations in Iceland are increasing their use of free and open source software. The country's government recently launched a one year migration project for all of its public institutions. "The goal of the project is not to migrate public institutions to free and open source software in one single year but to lay a solid foundation for such a migration which institutions can base their migration plans on", reports Tryggvi Bj?rgvinsson, the project leader.

Examples include the three biggest public institutions in Iceland, all of the ministries, the city of Reykjavik and the National Hospital. "These are setting a good migration example", says Bj?rgvinsson.

The project will put up a common infrastructure for migrations, he explains. Here the public administrations will document and estimate the maturity of free and open source alternatives to proprietary software. "This will foster collaboration between public institutions, IT service providers and the free and open source community in Iceland."

One of the first steps in the migration project is a series of five letters sent to all the heads of public institutions, recommending for instance the use of open standards, pointing to examples that ease the move to free and open source.

Also, a group of specialists has been formed that will monitor the project, aiming to prevent future failures. The project is also compiling a list of ongoing projects surrounding the use of free and open source software by public institutions to allow collaboration on these projects.

No restrictions for open source

"Next, we are making sure that in our public schools, the national curricula does not restrict the use of free and open source software."

The project is working on a call for tender to purchase services based on free and open source software.

"Public institutions have slowly been migrating to free software over the last four years. This school year, 2011-2012, two new secondary schools moved their systems entirely to free and open source software, bringing the count to five out of 32 schools."

A majority of the secondary schools are already running Moodle, an open source course management system. Other public bodies such as the newly founded Media commission also run entirely on free and open source software.

"The country-wide migration project will build upon their experience and hopefully pave the way for other institutions to follow."

Source: European Comission Joinup

Let's see how long they last before they like everyone else who tried realize that total cost of FOSS is higher than regular licensed software. Training, higher admin accosts, higher maintenance costs and slower/less effective employees due to bad UX all added in.

Or maybe they'll be the first to succeed on a big scale...

Let's see how long they last before they like everyone else who tried realize that total cost of FOSS is higher than regular licensed software. Training, higher admin accosts, higher maintenance costs and slower/less effective employees due to bad UX all added in.

Or maybe they'll be the first to succeed on a big scale...

I would have agreed a few years ago, but at this point FOSS has caught up in the UI field, and computer users overall have gotten much more accustomed to using various applications of varying UI quality, mostly thanks to smart phones and web apps.

Let's see how long they last before they like everyone else who tried realize that total cost of FOSS is higher than regular licensed software. Training, higher admin accosts, higher maintenance costs and slower/less effective employees due to bad UX all added in.

That's interesting. Got any data that proves that?

That's interesting. Got any data that proves that?

All the government groups and districts in Norway, Germany, France, and other parts of Europe that tried and switched back or is in the progress of switching back.

All of them citing high operating costs as the reason.

All the government groups and districts in Norway, Germany, France, and other parts of Europe that tried and switched back or is in the progress of switching back.

All of them citing high operating costs as the reason.

I'd say it's a wash at this point, as Win8 will require training also. Also the high requirements of buying new hardware versus the lighter requirements in general for Linux. There are lots of factors that may or may not come into play. If it's well researched and implemented, there can be a huge savings. The problem is that people just jump into it expecting huge returns. You can't just have change for the sake of change.

Not to mention that there is probably a lot of price negotiation behind the scenes after switches like this are done to get people back into the Microsoft fold. Lined pockets aren't uncommon either for things like this.

Training isn't really the major one causing costs to raise though, if it was that would have passed after the first year, mostly. Familiarity is another one and the non ease of use compared to non FOSS alternatives like Office. Those aren't so much costs though as dissatisfied users and in some cases it could increase the workload of support staff and even require a bigger one.

The major costs comes from administration and operating.

And yes of course MS gives rebates to anyone coming back, ANY big institution gets much better licensing costs than small ones or especially you and me. that's how it works.However they move back because they see running costs are higher than they USED to be, and if they can get new licensed software, that's lighter and cheaper to run, and easier for the user. AND they can get it cheaper, then yeah, it's a no brainer.

As for Win 8 it will require less training than teachign them to use Win7 and the superbar. Hit windows key, click the program you want to run. Yeah that should take all of 5 seconds and be covered by the first start tutorial.

All the government groups and districts in Norway, Germany, France, and other parts of Europe that tried and switched back or is in the progress of switching back.

All of them citing high operating costs as the reason.

AFAIK France is still pushing FOSS and launched a support tender late last year for the office of the Prime Minister, Defense Minister, Internal Affairs, Justice, Labour, Education and others.

Extremadura (Spain) has been using FOSS for years and is planning to deploy on another 40.000 desktops this year.

Some migration projects have failed, some others worked.

Some migration projects have failed, some others worked.
Indeed. We had started the development and testing of a Linux distro called Linius, be used by the Ministry of Justice. All was going pretty smoothly, when the Microsoft bosses decided to make some high-profile trips to Portugal. They bribed a few pockets; Bill Gates got a medal from our president at the time; the majority of the replacement/migration projects were plugged out.

But in Switzerland their equivalent came out, and it is cool.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!