BASED ON EXPERIENCE which is more comfortable X360 controller or DualShock


BASED ON EXPERIENCE, which is more comfortable?  

203 members have voted

  1. 1. BASED ON EXPERIENCE, which is more comfortable: Xbox 360 controller or DualShock 3?



Recommended Posts

The Xbox 360 wireless controller feels so good in your hands. I was shocked at how good it was, considering the original Xbox controller was molded to either a gorilla's or Steve Ballmer's hands.

Had a PS2, then a Xbox, then a Xbox 360. The 360 controller was the most comfortable and the triggers/position of dual sticks make it nicer to use. In my opinion, I'd get a X360 controller ;).

Personally the 360 is the better controller. The whole controller is more solid, the triggers are brilliant and the analogue sticks give you much better feedback than the loose DS3 analogue sticks. Plus the 360 controller is officially supported and nowadays is supported by most games including button prompts.

Just shows how it all comes down to opinion, as I actually find the analog sticks of the Dualshock controller to be more precise. Their area of sensitivity is way wider then the 360's. They are looser indeed, but that winds up providing a larger area of coverage for better precision.

I truly like both controllers.

I will say that I also use Real Triggers on my Dualshocks, and they truly make such a difference. Having the trigger on the Dualshock is really key, and improves upon the regular design a whole lot.

With the above said, the 360 controller is the better controller overall. It is not as drastic as some people make it out to be, however it is overall the best controller, as you do not need to add things like the mentioned Real Triggers.

If you rely on the D-Pad a lot it's going to be a toss up between the standard Xbox 360 controller and the Razer Onza controller. Both should run up around the same price, if I'm right.

Neowin's fault. I actually did not type out any of those spaces....

I actually use the D-Pad a lot since most of you are talking about the joysticks. Just wanted to mention that :)

d pad on 360 is garbage... if that's the case, go dual shock.

I think the D-Pad on the 360 controller is pretty poor. I press up and it registers left. Press right, it goes up etc. Having a 1 piece moulded D-Pad seems like a weird idea to me.

Having used both, it depends. I personally prefer the PS3 controller for most things except for the fact that the handgrips are kind of small. I like the positioning of the joysticks and everything, but for some reason they made the handgrips really short, so if you have big hands your pinkies might get sore from being tucked up into the palm of your hand for long periods of time.

For me, depends on the game I'm playing. Since I mostly play sports games the DS3 is by far better than 360 for me. For FPS there's no doubt 360 takes the gold. I did enjoy Arkham City with the DS3. For me, I really like how light the DS3 feels and the buttons feel more comfortable to me.

I've got to be honest, I have pretty big hands and I've never really had a problem with the DS3.

The weight difference is obviously because of the rechargeable battery in the DS3 instead of 2X AA batteries the 360 controller has.

The one advantage I've noticed is that the DS3 controller gives you much more warning about the health of your battery than the 360 one does. The 360 just dies. You have to keep turning it back on and hoping you can find the next save point or you have spare or charged batteries.

If one does buy a 360 controller for windows, I would suggest you also get a good quality, rechargeable set of batteries and a charger. If you are a frequent gamer, those batteries run down pretty quickly. It is better to have 4X AA batteries charged. 2 in the controller and 2 ready for when they die.

I truly like both controllers.

I will say that I also use Real Triggers on my Dualshocks, and they truly make such a difference. Having the trigger on the Dualshock is really key, and improves upon the regular design a whole lot.

How do those triggers work. Do they slip on over the existing buttons or do you have to open the controller and remove the old buttons and install the triggers in their place? I've never used/seen them in real life before.

I've got to be honest, I have pretty big hands and I've never really had a problem with the DS3.

The weight difference is obviously because of the rechargeable battery in the DS3 instead of 2X AA batteries the 360 controller has.

The one advantage I've noticed is that the DS3 controller gives you much more warning about the health of your battery than the 360 one does. The 360 just dies. You have to keep turning it back on and hoping you can find the next save point or you have spare or charged batteries.

If one does buy a 360 controller for windows, I would suggest you also get a good quality, rechargeable set of batteries and a charger. If you are a frequent gamer, those batteries run down pretty quickly. It is better to have 4X AA batteries charged. 2 in the controller and 2 ready for when they die.

You do know that there's official rechargeable lithium batteries for the Xbox controller to, that can be charged in the controller. They will also warn you in plenty of time before they run out of juice.

As for six axis and Sony doing something different. Well not so different, MS tried the same thing with a pc controller years before and dropped it because it's useless ;)

The one advantage I've noticed is that the DS3 controller gives you much more warning about the health of your battery than the 360 one does. The 360 just dies. You have to keep turning it back on and hoping you can find the next save point or you have spare or charged batteries.

You do know that there's official rechargeable lithium batteries for the Xbox controller to, that can be charged in the controller. They will also warn you in plenty of time before they run out of juice.

+1 The Xbox 360 Play and Charge Kit.

http://www.amazon.co...32678860&sr=8-1

Official MS lithium battery pack and as HawkMan said, always give plenty of warning....and the controller with the transforming D-Pad I posted eariler comes with it...so that fixes both battery and D-Pad issues for the 360 controller.

I've used both. They're both comfortable, and they both work fine. I prefer the 360 controller for a couple reasons:

1) It's wired. I don't even know if they make wired PS3 controllers tbh. The ones that came with mine are wireless though.

2) Better compatibility. With most games it's just plug and play and everything works exactly as it should. Sometimes controls needed to be changed for the PS3 controller.

3) Some games like Assassin's Creed and Prince of Persia have color coded on-screen buttons to match the 360 controller. Was irritating as all hell in AC2 where it would teach me something new and display "Derp press the green and red buttons!" and then I'd have to think for a moment to remember which was supposed to be green and red. That was actually the game that inspired me to go out and buy the damned controller in the first place and I haven't regretted it since.

My only real complaint about the 360 controller is that the D-pad sucks.

How do those triggers work. Do they slip on over the existing buttons or do you have to open the controller and remove the old buttons and install the triggers in their place? I've never used/seen them in real life before.

Slip on and off, they have little plastic hooks so to speak, and once they are on, they are on pretty damn good. I have only lost one over the years, and that was when my cat used to treat the dualshock like a toy. They just require a little bit of force to take off. Seriously the best $5 I ever spent on anything gaming related. Highly, highly recommend them. I mentioned them a few months ago to another member and they picked them up and thanked me for the recommendation. Just sharing this to show how much they do indeed make a difference. As I said, I can no longer use a DS3 without them.

Now that people are mentioning it, what is the model number for the 360 controller with that "Transforming" D-Pad? If I considered the 360 controller, I would get that, as I use only the D-Pad for PC games.

Xbox controllers don't have model numbers...

Its just:

White Wireless

White Wired

Black Wireless

Black Wired

Silver with Transforming D-Pad

and then special edition ones tied to games. (MW, Fable Halo etc...)

Just do a search on google shopping for "xbox 360 controller transforming d-pad" or similar to find the cheapest price, or look at your favourite electronics retailers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!