BASED ON EXPERIENCE which is more comfortable X360 controller or DualShock


BASED ON EXPERIENCE, which is more comfortable?  

203 members have voted

  1. 1. BASED ON EXPERIENCE, which is more comfortable: Xbox 360 controller or DualShock 3?



Recommended Posts

Looks like there are too many MS fanboys here. IMO Sony controller is much more accurate and sensitive. I hate the R2 L2 in the 360 controller and the lack of USB rechargeable battery. MS might be the leader in software but Sony rules in Hardware..

What? Microsoft has had some of the best accessories in the business. http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/en-us

If everyone didn't up and ar so much about the first PS3 controller we would have it now, and it was designed to be more comfortable no matter how stupid it looked,

Xbox360 controller by leaps ahead. I tried the PS controller but felt it too antique compared to the comfortable and "modern" 360 controller. I have a 20gb 360 since 2007 and has been using it's wireless controller on my PC. I bought a wireless adapter for it on ebay couple years ago. Still works great and it has been a bliss experience playing games on Steam. Pretty much many PC games mainly support 360 controllers.

Yes, that's right, you can use a 360 controller labelled as for 360 consoles on PC. They are all the same. The only difference is the label and the "windows" version has a driver CD. You can even play xbox360 racing wheel on PC as well but it's support is partial (no force feedback). To have a wireless 360 device work on PC you need a wireless gaming adapter:

Xbox360-Pc-Wireless-Gaming-Receiver-11.jpg

I think he's mis quoting quite bad, or you're misunderstanding his quote.

If you charge the battery fully and then leave it alone it will lose 30% of it's "charge" every month. However, a NiMH battery is very little affected by age, whereas age and charge cycles is the primary reason for capacity reduction on Lithium. NiMH batteries primarily lose capacity from wrong usage. And even when they've gone bad, they can often be revived to higher capacity by cycling. though it's hard on these kind of batteries or without a special charger,

Wow, then I think I won't be buying a xbox battery pack ever again :s

Yes sorry badly quoted...as Hawkman said leaving it alone it can discharge that much over a month...it is not however losing capacity...charging it will get you back to 100%.

Looks like there are too many MS fanboys here. IMO Sony controller is much more accurate and sensitive. I hate the R2 L2 in the 360 controller and the lack of USB rechargeable battery. MS might be the leader in software but Sony rules in Hardware..

Yea, I guess I'm a fanboy because my hands always cramp up within 5 minutes of using a PS3 controller, I'm a fanboy because I have fairly large hands, I'm a fanboy because It feels to me like the PS3 controllers are too light and cheaply made, I'm a fanboy because I prefer my tech to feel like it has some weight to it and sturdy.

Yes, we're all fanboys because for our own reasons we prefer someone other an alternative. By your logic you're a PS3 fanboy, because you prefer the controller.

Ah ok, that's far more reasonable :D

What was I doing wrong? I always charged them fully (through the usb cable, with the battery attached to the controller) and used them until the controller stopped working.

I think I'll rather keep playing with the usb cable instead of spending money on new batteries or trying to fix these ones, but learning how to do things right never hurts :blush:

I think the primary problem is that there simply isn't enough power in the USB cable to properly charge the NiMH battery packs so they end up dying. they should be charged at around 1C or whatever it is. The charging station where you can charge two NiMH packs that connects directly to the power might do a better job at properly charging the batteries. it may also empty them first which will help. optimally for NiMH packs you should occasionally do a 5+ cycle, where you charge and empty the packs 5 or more times repeatedly. however this is mostly for heavy use battery like for those doing RC hobby. and requires expensive chargers.

Xbox 360 controller is so much better than the DS3 it is unreal. The playstation controller has barely changed since the original 15 years ago, bar adding to uncomfortable sticks and shoulder triggers. It was a crap design then and it is just as bad now. The GameCube's was the best controller in my opinion, but the 360 is a pretty close second.

Xbox360 controller by leaps ahead. I tried the PS controller but felt it too antique compared to the comfortable and "modern" 360 controller. I have a 20gb 360 since 2007 and has been using it's wireless controller on my PC. I bought a wireless adapter for it on ebay couple years ago. Still works great and it has been a bliss experience playing games on Steam. Pretty much many PC games mainly support 360 controllers.

Yes, that's right, you can use a 360 controller labelled as for 360 consoles on PC. They are all the same. The only difference is the label and the "windows" version has a driver CD. You can even play xbox360 racing wheel on PC as well but it's support is partial (no force feedback). To have a wireless 360 device work on PC you need a wireless gaming adapter:

Xbox360-Pc-Wireless-Gaming-Receiver-11.jpg

Unfortunately the wireless dongle is pretty crap. that is it works great but it tends to die after a while. I've had two die on me, one that came withe the controller, then it wasn't possible to get it for a while so I got the headset that came with the same one and it does. generally I believe it's a tiny condensator in them that tends to die. common problem. :(

Unfortunately the wireless dongle is pretty crap. that is it works great but it tends to die after a while. I've had two die on me, one that came withe the controller, then it wasn't possible to get it for a while so I got the headset that came with the same one and it does. generally I believe it's a tiny condensator in them that tends to die. common problem. :(

Did you have it plugged in all the time? Maybe only plugging it in when you're about to play might extend their lives. It might be a bit of a pain though if your USB ports aren't easily accessed.

I recently bought a wireless 360 controller for Windows. I'm just hoping my dongle doesn't die like the ones you've had.

The PS3 controller needs extras for me (triggers), the 360 doesn't, so it's better by default.

However whatever controller you use for days, months, years, will no doubt end up being easy for you - Unless it's really terrible.

360 needs a good d-pad next gen, PS3 needs better designed triggers. Analog stick location? Hard one, I can use my DS3 as easy as I can use a 360 controller, and vice versa.

Xbox 360 Controller hands down! :)

The Dual Shock is a bit small and awkward for my hands, so it gets very uncomfortable after sometime, especially in fast paced games.

Never had issues with either controller, but having used the Dual Shock for longer I am more familiar with the layout of buttons, I know that the triangle is at the top and that the circle is to the right. Things like this make the pad more intuative when playing games. As others have mentioned the triggers could be better, but can be enhanced with Real Triggers.

If you were starting a fresh with no previous experience of either pad then the 360 wins. If you are old and were playing on the PlayStation before the Xbox was even dreamed of then the familiarity of the pad is something not that easy to get past in my experience.

Unfortunately the wireless dongle is pretty crap. that is it works great but it tends to die after a while. I've had two die on me, one that came withe the controller, then it wasn't possible to get it for a while so I got the headset that came with the same one and it does. generally I believe it's a tiny condensator in them that tends to die. common problem. :(

Weird because I have mine plugged in 24/7 since dec 2009. I bought it on dec 2009 off ebay. and have worked great since. still the first one and it has been plugged in and sitting under my monitor (on the stand) for years. Perhaps your unlucky or unfornate to have got a faulty one.

I usually only just my wireless controller with it for steam games.

probably unlucky, but again, it's a very high failure rate on these. my first one was much older than from 2009, heck my second one is probably from around 2009 and it died much faster than the second one.

now I just got a wired one instead. on the computer I'm just sitting right in front of it anyway, and it also comes with a ridiculously long wire.

They are supposedly easy to fix if you have a sildering iron, as you just have to connect to point avoiding a rather useless fuse or something that tends to blow.

I love my Xbox 360 controller for Windows, works perfectly out of the box, and whilst Dual-Shock don't seem to 'mound' around your palms, fingers and such, the 360 controller does.

Yeah, I agree. The XBox 360 controller is the most comfortable controller I've ever used (And I've used MANY)...

Unfortunately the wireless dongle is pretty crap. that is it works great but it tends to die after a while. I've had two die on me, one that came withe the controller, then it wasn't possible to get it for a while so I got the headset that came with the same one and it does. generally I believe it's a tiny condensator in them that tends to die. common problem. :(

really? mine's going 2-3 years without issues. the problem i did have though was finding proper drivers for windows 7 x64 when i got it.

really? mine's going 2-3 years without issues. the problem i did have though was finding proper drivers for windows 7 x64 when i got it.

Yes, of course all of them isn't going to break, but they have a VERY high failure rate, known problem with a tiny SMD fuse on them.

I gotta be honest ... I have owned 4 Xbox 360's (due to RRD etc) and a PS3, and I still have my PS3 and have literally NO comfort issues. But the reality of this question is that you can't possibly just go by what others say. You should try yourself.

But yeah, for me ... PS3 controller is perfectly comfortable, and the Xbox one I found a little clunky in size and shape. But that's only my opinion, certainly not the word of many.

Xbox 360 controller is so much better than the DS3 it is unreal. The playstation controller has barely changed since the original 15 years ago, bar adding to uncomfortable sticks and shoulder triggers. It was a crap design then and it is just as bad now. The GameCube's was the best controller in my opinion, but the 360 is a pretty close second.

The gamecube one was great to be fair :) But I disagree with your statement about HOW much better than the PS3 pad the Xbox one is ... neither are THAT much better than the other. Even tho I prefer the PS3 one, that doesn't mean the Xbox one was awful. Vice versa ... it's a little extreme to say that. :)

The PS3 controller needs extras for me (triggers), the 360 doesn't, so it's better by default.

However whatever controller you use for days, months, years, will no doubt end up being easy for you - Unless it's really terrible.

360 needs a good d-pad next gen, PS3 needs better designed triggers. Analog stick location? Hard one, I can use my DS3 as easy as I can use a 360 controller, and vice versa.

Never had issues with either controller, but having used the Dual Shock for longer I am more familiar with the layout of buttons, I know that the triangle is at the top and that the circle is to the right. Things like this make the pad more intuative when playing games. As others have mentioned the triggers could be better, but can be enhanced with Real Triggers.

If you were starting a fresh with no previous experience of either pad then the 360 wins. If you are old and were playing on the PlayStation before the Xbox was even dreamed of then the familiarity of the pad is something not that easy to get past in my experience.

These. Both have something that makes each controller great and each controller annoying. Sony hasn't changed their design, because it mostly works. We haven't changed the wheel.... When something works, you stick with it until something requires you change it. Games haven't required the controller to change.

But for me, since I play more fighting games such as MvC3, the PS3 controller is my pick. But the 360 controller has a great feel. I just wish companies who make games for PCs would stop putting the color of the button on the "press this now" screen... cause if you don't have the 360 controller, your boned.

These. Both have something that makes each controller great and each controller annoying. Sony hasn't changed their design, because it mostly works. We haven't changed the wheel.... When something works, you stick with it until something requires you change it. Games haven't required the controller to change.

But for me, since I play more fighting games such as MvC3, the PS3 controller is my pick. But the 360 controller has a great feel. I just wish companies who make games for PCs would stop putting the color of the button on the "press this now" screen... cause if you don't have the 360 controller, your boned.

Sony did change their design to a new more comfortable and ergonomic design though. But they had to hold it back because all the fans ridiculed it for looking like a banana/boomerang...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!