Recommended Posts

Speaking to CNET in an interview, AT&T Device head Jeff Bradley told them about their upcoming launch of Nokia Lumia 900 as ?At all levels, this is a notch above anything we?ve ever done,?. This is pretty much expected from AT&T and Nokia since the info about their ?Operation Rolling Thunder? aggressive marketing strategy leaked few months ago.
For consumers, the blitzkrieg will begin right around when the phone launches on April 8. AT&T and Nokia are readying a massive television marketing campaign to raise consumer awareness. The Lumia 900 will be the centerpiece at AT&T stores, with massive signs and posters promoting the device. Nokia and AT&T spent considerable time training store reps, and a majority of them will be carrying one with them at all times. The phone will launch with a number of available, which Bradley said sends an indirect message to consumers that the device is unique and important enough to get significant support.

AT&T has also trained store reps about app alternatives available on Windows Phone platform to answer consumer queries. Hope the launch turns out to be a successful one ! Read the full interview at the source link.

Source: WMPowerUser

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/
Share on other sites

meh.... its still a crappy phone... own a WP but like all the fanboys claim here its not that great... its just ok.

Aren't you a guy who claimed the Lumia 900 was a cheaply made phone when it hasn't even been released yet?

And just to point out, it has an AMOLED plus screen (Nokia calls their version Clearblack), gorilla glass, a high quality polycarbonate unibody an a 8MP camera with Carl Zeiss lens that actually takes pretty damn good pictures (http://www.wpcentral.com/att-nokia-lumia-900-low-light-and-macro-camera-samples ) so they fixed w/e software issue the lumia 800 had. Hardly a cheaply made phone :rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594763146
Share on other sites

Aren't you a guy who claimed the Lumia 900 was a cheaply made phone when it hasn't even been released yet?

And just to point out, it has an AMOLED plus screen (Nokia calls their version Clearblack), gorilla glass, a high quality polycarbonate unibody an a 8MP camera with Carl Zeiss lens that actually takes pretty damn good pictures (http://www.wpcentral...-camera-samples ) so they fixed w/e software issue the lumia 800 had. Hardly a cheaply made phone :rolleyes:

still crappy to me!!! thanks for all the points

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594763156
Share on other sites

What do you expect your phone to be made out of? Titanium and diamonds?

So what? Big deal, the guy gave his opinion and we should respect it.

I would like to know how he came to his opinion but that is a different matter.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594763198
Share on other sites

So what? Big deal, the guy gave his opinion and we should respect it.

An opinion without solid reasons or evidence to support it is worth nothing and as such should garner no respect from anyone.

And no, "It's crappy" is not a strong argument.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594763208
Share on other sites

What do you expect your phone to be made out of? Titanium and diamonds?

Something I like!!!! It can even be made of plastic but if its good to me its good to me..

Why does it bother YOU so much that I feel that Lumia 900 is crappy phone???

Its weird how people get butt hurt if someone dont like a phone...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594763214
Share on other sites

Why does it bother YOU so much that I feel that Lumia 900 is crappy phone???

I doubt anyone is "butt hurt" over it, rather to present your case as a decent argument your sentences should be more like this;

"I think the Nokia Lumia is a bad phone because.." followed by various compelling reasons to indicate its flaws and how competition does this or that better and less like this: "It suxorz".

  • Like 3
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594763226
Share on other sites

I doubt anyone is "butt hurt" over it, rather to present your case as a decent argument your sentences should be more like this;

"I think the Nokia Lumia is a bad phone because.." followed by various compelling reasons to indicate its flaws and how competition does this or that better and less like this: "It suxorz".

because the phone does not have 3.5" screen, a circular home button at front, weak cellular antenna, 326ppi display, and runs ios, thats why he thinks it is a crappy phone

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594763248
Share on other sites

Something I like!!!! It can even be made of plastic but if its good to me its good to me..

Why does it bother YOU so much that I feel that Lumia 900 is crappy phone???

Its weird how people get butt hurt if someone dont like a phone...

Because you said the phone is cheaply made not that you didn't like it.

There's a difference. Cheaply made implies the phone is made with cheap low quality plastics, a low end TFT screen and held together by duct tape and spit (exaggeration but w/e). And the Lumia 900 isn't that.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594763254
Share on other sites

Because you said the phone is cheaply made not that you didn't like it.

There's a difference. Cheaply made implies the phone is made with cheap low quality plastics, a low end TFT screen and held together by duct tape and spit (exaggeration but w/e). And the Lumia 900 isn't that.

I hate the PS3 game The Elder Scrolls IV. Oblivion and its crappy to me... do you have anything to say on that???

My point being Its crappy to me and you cant make me like it... jeez , get a life rather than poking at someone's likes and dislikes.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594763286
Share on other sites

Regardless of what people say, there will always be someone who doesn't like something for whatever reason but the Lumia range seems to be doing fine in the markets it's been released. There seems to be a good deal of interest in the 900 and if AT&T's retail staff doesn't screw the pooch it'll sell good in the US as well.

No one is expecting iPhone sales, not even the best selling Android devices can match that, but so what? If Nokia matches whatever it's sales expectations are then they're fine and they know better than us to what that is.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594763308
Share on other sites

I hate the PS3 game The Elder Scrolls IV. Oblivion and its crappy to me... do you have anything to say on that???

My point being Its crappy to me and you cant make me like it... jeez , get a life rather than poking at someone's likes and dislikes.

Do you not understand English or something?

I said there's a difference between not liking a phone and calling a phone cheaply made. And your EXACT words were:

yeah, its cheap and cheaply made phone..

I don't give a **** whether or not you like the phone, that's your opinion. But you can't go calling it a cheaply made phone when its quite the opposite unless you seem to think a high end screen and high quality plastics constitute as cheaply made.

If you still can't understand that then go learn some English.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594763314
Share on other sites

anyone else getting the feeling WP is gonna flop? Not saying it's a bad platform or anything (i like it), it just seems that they are wayyyyyyyy too late into the smart phone game.

there is nothing called too late

it will be hard .but not impossible

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594763442
Share on other sites

At the rate the smartphone and mobile market in general is growing even if you're 3rd with 20% or something of the market you're making billions. Let's face it, I don't expect RIM to hold on and while WP probably won't make it into 1st or 2nd even if they're 3rd with a good enough chunk that's good enough. With Nokia showing OEMs how it's done and with WP8 opening up the hardware support more to what OEMs like (not limited to just SoCs from Qualcom etc) then I see no reason why WP can't fit in and take a nice slice.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594763550
Share on other sites

anyone else getting the feeling WP is gonna flop? Not saying it's a bad platform or anything (i like it), it just seems that they are wayyyyyyyy too late into the smart phone game.

I don't know. Time will tell, I guess. I do think that this may be Nokia's and WP7's last big chance, though. Blow this one and it may be over.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594764184
Share on other sites

Hello,

I'm genuinely curious: Could you please tell us which phone?or phones?you do not consider "crappy?" I would prefer to know currently shipping and supported models, but if there is nothing out there right now, a historical perspective would be welcome. Is there a Windows Phone that you like more than the Nokia Lumia 900 and, if so, what is it? Are there specific features of the Nokia Lumia 900 you would change in order to make it "less crappy?" What about Windows Phones in general?

Sorry for asking so many questions, it is just that your comment was so interesting I wanted to hear your thoughts.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

meh.... its still a crappy phone... own a WP but like all the fanboys claim here its not that great... its just ok.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594764714
Share on other sites

I don't like the name. Nokia Lumia 900 hardly rolls off the tongue, whereas iPhone is pretty much a perfect name. Nokia Lumia 900 implies there are other previous versions - if so, where are they and why haven't people heard of them? (I know there's an 800 but literally none of my non-geek friends has ever heard of this). If Nokia are going for a bigger launch than the original iPhone, they are clearly targetting this at the mainstream, so why do they have such a non-mainstream name? It just doesn't make sense to me. They should have called it the Nokia Neon or something like that, which people will remember and will stand out as a brand new, exciting phone that people will be proud to own.

"What phone do you want mum?" "Oh, I'm looking at the Nokia Lumia 900". Can you ever imagine that happening? Not my mum at least. Compare it to this, which is what my mum actually said to me:

"I like the look of those iPhones, how do I get one?"

EDIT: Same goes for "Windows Phone 7". Do you know what my dad thought Windows Phone was? An actual phone! And who can blame him? How is he supposed to know that something called "Windows Phone 7" isn't a phone at all, and is actually an operating system? Add this into the Lumia mess, and you have a "Nokia Lumia 900 running Windows Phone 7". Such confusing terminology for non-tech people.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594764732
Share on other sites

I don't like the name. Nokia Lumia 900 hardly rolls off the tongue, whereas iPhone is pretty much a perfect name. Nokia Lumia 900 implies there are other previous versions - if so, where are they and why haven't people heard of them? (I know there's an 800 but literally none of my non-geek friends has ever heard of this). If Nokia are going for a bigger launch than the original iPhone, they are clearly targetting this at the mainstream, so why do they have such a non-mainstream name? It just doesn't make sense to me. They should have called it the Nokia Neon or something like that, which people will remember and will stand out as a brand new, exciting phone that people will be proud to own.

"What phone do you want mum?" "Oh, I'm looking at the Nokia Lumia 900". Can you ever imagine that happening? Not my mum at least. Compare it to this, which is what my mum actually said to me:

"I like the look of those iPhones, how do I get one?"

EDIT: Same goes for "Windows Phone 7". Do you know what my dad thought Windows Phone was? An actual phone! And who can blame him? How is he supposed to know that something called "Windows Phone 7" isn't a phone at all, and is actually an operating system? Add this into the Lumia mess, and you have a "Nokia Lumia 900 running Windows Phone 7". Such confusing terminology for non-tech people.

At least do a fair comparison. Apple iPhone 4S is just as silly as Nokia Lumia 900. If anything it's sillier because the S is completely meaningless. Your criticism of the 900 is just as silly given that you admit that there are other models (and your anecdotal claim that nobody's heard of them can be dismissed). I don't think anyone's interested in your mum.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594764748
Share on other sites

At least do a fair comparison. Apple iPhone 4S is just as silly as Nokia Lumia 900. If anything it's sillier because the S is completely meaningless. Your criticism of the 900 is just as silly given that you admit that there are other models (and your anecdotal claim that nobody's heard of them can be dismissed). I don't think anyone's interested in your mum.

Most of the time when you hear about smartphones people will either say iPhone, HTC or Samsung, rarely do people refer to Nokia or Sony anymore. Those in my opinion are what the customers look to when it comes to phones. The Nokia Lumia might be a good phone but it's brand recognition that sells and honestly Nokia aren't the big hitters that they used to be when it comes to the consumer.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1066732-att-lumia-900/#findComment-594764752
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!