Windows 8 CP and Gaming (Or, Why Won't My Games Work?!)


Recommended Posts

I had this problem with the Dev Preview, as well, but I knew it wasn't meant for general consumption so I didn't make a big fuss over it. Now, however, it's just starting to get annoying. One of the big selling points of Windows 8 is that it can run all the same programs that Windows 7 can with no problems. However, this is clearly untrue if you're a gamer.

Now, while I used to steer clear of digital distribution, I've been using Steam for over a decade now. Because of that this may be a Steam issue, but I do not think it is. Many modern games will not work or will not work correctly, and here I'm going to detail 3 games that are particularly bugging me.

Bioshock 2 will not run at all. The launcher won't even launch. I think this is a securom issue, but since I get no errors whatsoever I cannot be sure. Yet Bioshock runs with no issues.

Batman: Arkham City runs, but the GFWL client does not load in the background. In fact, I believe this is an issue with every single game that uses GFWL. Some of them, like Arkham City, will run, but the client cannot be loaded and thus you can't sign into GFWL and play online. Also, since you're not signed into your GFWL profile, I believe that it's automatically forcing the use of a local offline profile, so you can't load your old save games.

Super Street Fighter IV: Arcade Edition will not run. It crashes immediately upon launch. Street Fighter IV runs fine, aside from the previously mentioned GFWL issue. I'm not sure what's going on here.

The thing is, I'm sure if I went down all the games in my library I would find many more that cannot run or will not run correctly if they require GFWL. This is particularly distressing since GFWL is a Microsoft program. Yet I see no one else asking about solutions to these issues. Is nobody using Windows 8 a gamer? If anybody else has experienced these headaches and has discovered any sort of solution I'd love to know about it!

I don't recall having much trouble with the Win 7 beta. If anything, perhaps a few games needed to be run in Vista or XP compatibility mode. Running games on Win 8 using Win 7 compatibility mode does not make them work. Anyway, I do not expect everything to run well until the final release, I know I'm using a beta product. I'm just amazed that nobody else is reporting any of these issues, when I know they are probably having them, and if nobody says anything now they aren't likely to get fixed until well after Win 8 is released with some sort of patch. However, if anybody knows of a workaround to get them working now, that'd be great, too.

Indeed Omen. OP, don't forget that every time a piece of software crashes on WIndows 8, it sends an error report. These are extremely critical during an OS beta as it allows them to focus on the issues that most people are seeing. So make sure you choose to send error reports when prompted.

That said, don't forget that Windows 8 is in EARLY beta. The CP was it's progression from Alpha to Beta. Things like this are to be expected, and you can be sure that the Games for Windows Live stuff will be fixed maybe by RC, but certainly by RTM. In fact, isn't all the live stuff going to be built into Windows 8? I bet they'll patch all the GFWL games so they utilise W8's built in Live functionality.

Getting annoyed by the fact that beta software has bugs (shock horror!) is just stupid.

I'm just amazed that nobody else is reporting any of these issues, when I know they are probably having them, and if nobody says anything now they aren't likely to get fixed until well after Win 8 is released with some sort of patch.

Who says we aren't reporting them? Do you even have the connect beta feedback tool installed? I use it every time a piece of software crashes on W8, AND I send an error report. Do you? I don't see the point in complaining about crashes in a forum that Microsoft doesn't keep track of.

I'm not complaining about the bugs or crashes. I'm wondering why nobody else is talking about the issues they're having and wondering if anybody has made any progress in getting these games working, so I started this thread so people could report if they're having similar troubles and what solutions have been found, if any. This forum is usually abuzz with issues like these, yet with Windows 8 everybody is mysteriously silent unless they're bitching about the new start screen.

Fair enough then.

So far I've had minimal issues. Only Command and Conquer Red Alert 2 (and Yuri's Revenge) from the "First Decade" pack have failed to work for me. I've reported both to Microsoft through the feedback tool.

Sick of reading threads like this with every single Beta pre or post about Games/Applications/Some other crap that doesn't work.

This is a consumer preview or in other words, an open beta like Windows 7 had. The final goal for RTM is for everything to work this is why we have betas/dev previews so developers and so on can work out bugs. By installing a dev preview or beta you then agree to accept that somethings _will_ be broken, not work as it should or work just fine. If you have issues, go back to your previous install and wait for RTM or at least, for developers of the products/games you have a problem with fix this issues at hand.

Right-click on the games in the Steam client, select Properties, then go to Local Files and click "Verify integrity of game cache."

I just tried BioShock 2 and it works fine, as do all my other GFWL games.

You also may need to update the GFW runtime... http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=5549

Sick of reading threads like this with every single Beta pre or post about Games/Applications/Some other crap that doesn't work.

If you're sick of reading them then don't. Everybody is aware of the risks and issues associated with running a pre-release operating system - in fact this forum is dedicated specifically to discussing such pre-release software. There are many people - myself included - who are running the Windows 8 Consumer Preview as their primary operating system and enjoying it. The vast majority of games and software run flawlessly and the operating system itself offers many very worthwhile improvements over Windows 7.

GFWL games work fine in Win8, as I was playing Bulletstorm earlier without issue. I also loaded up Bioshock 2 - which required activation beforehand - and it launched without issue. And I buy all of my games on Steam, so it's not a conflict there. The only games that I've had issues with are Crysis 2 (only works in DX9 mode) and LA Noire (doesn't work at all). I'm running the nVidia 301.10 drivers and they're working flawlessly, even though they're not officially for Windows 8 as the official drivers don't support the GTX680.

All the games you , mentioned run fine on my system even GTA 4 runs great as i have it running right this moment every game i own runs on windows 8 CP just fine steam or regular DVD based installs Edit: to the above poster LA Noire works fine on my system

system:

core i7 2600k stock

GTX 470 stock

16gb of ram

post-74594-0-24799200-1333321754_thumb.j

I play a tonne of games with the Consumer Preview and have had no issues, however I haven't tried playing any of the games you listed so I don't know if you're having bad luck or Windows 8 CP won't run them.

Right-click on the games in the Steam client, select Properties, then go to Local Files and click "Verify integrity of game cache."

I just tried BioShock 2 and it works fine, as do all my other GFWL games.

You also may need to update the GFW runtime... http://www.microsoft...ls.aspx?id=5549

I've had the latest GFWL installed, and I've tried verifying the cache and when that didn't work, uninstalling and reinstalling, but still no dice. :( I also have the latest drivers and directx installed. I'm using 64-bit Windows, but I was running Windows 7 x64 as well with no issues, so I'm not sure that is a factor or not.

Did you manually install the games for windows live client, older directx redistributable package and the visual c++ redistributable 2005/2008/2010 packages? When i installed the new ridge racer game, the game did not work in the beginning until i manually install all of those (note: some games will fail to install these right away, and you sometimes have to run as admin the install files)

Did you manually install the games for windows live client, older directx redistributable package and the visual c++ redistributable 2005/2008/2010 packages? When i installed the new ridge racer game, the game did not work in the beginning until i manually install all of those (note: some games will fail to install these right away, and you sometimes have to run as admin the install files)

Yes, everything has been installed. This isn't really a case of the games being installed properly or the prerequisites not being installed. They simply won't load the GFWL client in the background when they launch and in the case of Bioshock 2 and SSF4AE they won't launch at all or they crash immediately after launch. I think BS2 has something to do with securom (I think that the GFWL issue is separate, and it would just not load and force me to use an offline profile save, which would be fine with me if I could get it to run) and I think SSF4AE strictly requires GFWL to load and crashes when it refuses.

I don't think this is "just" a GFWL problem. I think it has to do with the way Windows 8 now handles programs' associations. For instance, I've installed SPlayer for my video playback, and associated it with all video file types, but Windows 8 refused to see the association until I opened the context menu on a video file and told it to "open with>splayer." Firefox is my default web browser, yet when I click on a link in another program it automatically launches it in IE instead of Firefox. There are many, many examples of minor irritations like these, but once you get used to them they're easily overlooked. Like with the file associations, once you tell Windows to open a filetype with a program, it tends to remember to use that program as the default in the future, so you only have to fix it once. This is somewhat different, though. Is Windows blocking GFWL from running? Is it having an issue with Steam and the way its DRM works? I suspect that if I used cracked executables they'd probably work, but I can't seem to find a crack for Bioshock 2 (and if you know where to get one, please don't try to help me, that kind of thing will get you in trouble around here).

No, they won't. GfWL is a piece of **** and needs to die faster.

I mostly agree with that. I don't think it's total crap, but I think it's a low priority for Microsoft and they don't really care all that much about updating it. I certainly don't seeing a "metro" replacement app anytime soon, and even if they make one, I'm not sure how that would integrate with the older games that run on the desktop; the two types of apps seem to be mutually exclusive.

I've had the latest GFWL installed, and I've tried verifying the cache and when that didn't work, uninstalling and reinstalling, but still no dice. :( I also have the latest drivers and directx installed. I'm using 64-bit Windows, but I was running Windows 7 x64 as well with no issues, so I'm not sure that is a factor or not.

Not sure what to say then... I'm using Windows 8 x64 as well. I had a few games that did nothing when launched after I copied my Steam folder over but verifying the cache fixed 'em.

Ok, now I feel like an ass. I do not know why it didn't work initially, as I made sure GFWL was installed, got the latest installer and made sure it was up to date, and had all these issues as I've detailed in this thread. However, it's solved. I uninstalled GFWL completely and then reinstalled it and now suddenly everything is working perfectly. GFWL loads when I load a GFWL game. Bioshock 2 loads. SSF4AE no longer crashes after loading. This is so bizarre, but now I feel like an idiot for making such a big deal out of it. I should have tried that before starting the thread. I went back from the Dev Preview to Windows 7 and stayed away from Windows 8 until the Consumer Preview because of this exact same issue and I likely could have saved myself a couple of formats if I'd just tried that months ago. I'd still like to hear from people if they have trouble getting a game to run on Windows 8 and what kind of errors they're getting, if they're luck enough to get an error.

Sick of reading threads like this with every single Beta pre or post about Games/Applications/Some other crap that doesn't work.

This is a consumer preview or in other words, an open beta like Windows 7 had. The final goal for RTM is for everything to work this is why we have betas/dev previews so developers and so on can work out bugs. By installing a dev preview or beta you then agree to accept that somethings _will_ be broken, not work as it should or work just fine. If you have issues, go back to your previous install and wait for RTM or at least, for developers of the products/games you have a problem with fix this issues at hand.

I think he was more than polite, and said he was understanding of the issues, just curious.

Quit being a jerk. The forums are for asking questions and discussions. Don't read it if you're sick of it.

Ok, now I feel like an ass. I do not know why it didn't work initially, as I made sure GFWL was installed, got the latest installer and made sure it was up to date, and had all these issues as I've detailed in this thread. However, it's solved. I uninstalled GFWL completely and then reinstalled it and now suddenly everything is working perfectly. GFWL loads when I load a GFWL game. Bioshock 2 loads. SSF4AE no longer crashes after loading. This is so bizarre, but now I feel like an idiot for making such a big deal out of it. I should have tried that before starting the thread. I went back from the Dev Preview to Windows 7 and stayed away from Windows 8 until the Consumer Preview because of this exact same issue and I likely could have saved myself a couple of formats if I'd just tried that months ago. I'd still like to hear from people if they have trouble getting a game to run on Windows 8 and what kind of errors they're getting, if they're luck enough to get an error.

This is a Beta release, problems are not just expected but guaranteed. If you are using Consumer Preview you have a gentleman's agreement with Microsoft that you accept that things will go wrong and if they do, you should report it to Microsoft. Your first post clearly has the tone of someone being disappointed with a final release they paid for rather than a beta and this stems from the fact that you have wrongly assumed it is built for general consumption, it is most certainly not. It is called "Preview" for a reason. If you are expecting a completely functional and stable OS, you should definitely stick with Windows 7 and wait till Windows 8 is released.

As for games, everything works fine for me except Crysis 2 in DX11 mode.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!