Recommended Posts

My brother has iMac... I like it, there are no icons on the desktop... the tasks on dock... which I want...

I like menubar that sits at top of the screen and dock at the bottom on the iMac...

Windows 8 has tiles on the desktop... which I don't want... I like the desktop with NO icons ... just display the weather info ... like I have it on my Windows 7. I may stick with Windows 7 for the rest of years until they end their support.

I know Mac do not have start button... I know mac is not the same as the rest of OS available today...

Hopefully I get either iMac or Mac Mini within a few months... I will see. If not, I stIck with Windows 7 for the rest of the years.

if i have a tablet, Windows 8 is fine on it... no problem..

There's no tiles on the desktop. The desktop is, well, almost exactly like Windows 7. The tiles start screen is merely a replacement of the start menu. That's it.

I have a 30" monitor + 23" in portrait next to it. Windows 8 works just fine on it. I don't spend more than 2 seconds in the start screen when I need to launch a program. I also do not need to look at some other window while my start screen is open, and neither does anyone else. I press start, type a few letters in, and press enter. Same as Windows 7 but I get all the new features of 8.

Exactly. I have a 30" 1600p and a 42" 1080p HDTV connected to my system and have found Windows 8 to be an improvement. It is clear that Metro Start has been designed as much for high resolution displays as it has for tablets or smaller screens.

The start screen is actually pretty awesome. I have weather pinned on it. All I need to do is hit the start button and it updates the weather on there. Hit the start button again and I'm back to where I was. More and more things will integrate into there and I will be able to just hit the start button to see any notifications, then hit it again to go back to where I was. I find this very efficient.

I've never found weather apps to be particular useful and certainly not on the desktop; occasionally I'll use the one on my phone but I see it as more of a "because I can" sort of app. And while tiles support dynamic info I don't really find it to be an advantage on the desktop, at least not with the apps currently available. The biggest advantage I've found for Metro apps is the ability to snap one to the side of your monitor, which is great for a news app like News Republic. However, I expect it will take many months - possibly even years - before it really starts to come into its own and become truly useful. Certainly it's a lot better than the gadgets nonsense they added in Vista, which I never found a use for - I imagine that gadget usage in Win7 is even lower.

I've actually seen a fair amount of gadget use in both 7 and Vista. Among people who don't know that it slows the system down.

People need to think of Windows 8 like the PS2 or PS3 at launch. Backwards compatibility is offered to start until the Windows 8 native apps are offered.

Good news then, there's TWO on screen ways and one hardware way of accessing the Start Screen! :yes:

Just a wee small note here; if had meant "Start Screen" I wouldda said "Start Screen". But you knew that already...diddn'tya... :rolleyes:

Just a wee small note here; if had meant "Start Screen" I wouldda said "Start Screen". But you knew that already...diddn'tya... :rolleyes:

start menu, start screen, same difference, they both launch apps there you go

I honestly don't care what method is used so long as it doesn't reduce the functionality. I've noticed that the metro start screen is less useful than the start menu when it comes to search.

For example:

Win7 - WinKey, type photo... PHOTOSHOP APPEARS... HIT ENTER

Win8 - WinKey type photo... Windows Live Movie Maker, Windows Live Photo Gallery appear... NO PHOTOSHOP UNTIL I TYPE THE WHOLE DAMN THING!!!

This is just bloody irritating.

This should work exactly as in Windows 7. Did you delete the Photoshop shortcut? If it shows up in the All Apps view, then search should find it without you typing the whole thing.

Its needed if you have say 100+ programs installed. I doubt you would remember the names of all 100+.

Actually, no - it still isn't.

Search is accessible at least four different ways (from the desktop) - for keyboard users (especially on desktops) the Windows logo key (by itself) is by far the easiest way. Hitting that one key by itself triggers Search; adding letters narrows the parameters to applications with that letter or set of letters. WinKey+O, for example, gives the options of Opera, Osmos, Outlook, and Oracle VM VirtualBox. WinKey+V drops (naturally) Opera, Osmos, and Outlook, but replaces them with VMware and Visual Studio (however many iterations of Visual Studio I have installed, as 2010 and the current beta of 2012 can coexist). Applications, games, utilitites, etc. installed on network shares or mapped cloud shares (as long as the computer can see them) are also included in Search by default (this will likely be the one feature that can help sell Windows 8 in enterprises - especially mobile enterprise users). Even better, it doesn't matter how organized (or not) the StartScreen is. Clutter is irrelevant.

It not the start button I want, rather the start menu. In fact, its more like I dont want the start screen.

I almost never use the start menu to browse through the programs list. I search, and that too I look at only the first two or three results. And to some extent, I use the pinned list of 5 or 6 apps, that I don't use frequently enough to get a place on the taskbar but frequently enough to not warrant a search everytime. Since what I use the start menu for uses so little screen estate, devoting a full-screen start screen is totally useless for me. In fact, those giant colorful blocks prove more of a distraction, rather than being useful. At least the start menu was small and subtle enough, but the strat screen shoves everything in your face. With the start menu, all the junk could be hidden behind the all programs menu never to be seen, but the start screen makes it impossible to ignore. Just a search bar tucked in some corner would be enough for my needs, not some 1920x1080 grid of colorful blocks. I could focus on just the search bar with the start menu and ignore the rest, because I can't ignore the start screen is why I do not want it.

  • Like 2

Even better, it doesn't matter how organized (or not) the StartScreen is. Clutter is irrelevant.

I would say that if what and how things are on the start screen doesn't matter, the start screen itself is irrelevant. You are using search to get your stuff and never browse the list of stuff, why forced to see the list - everytime you open the start screen - at all? Just the search bar and a results pane would be enough, aint it? That's what the start menu, to me, was.

I would say that if what and how things are on the start screen doesn't matter, the start screen itself is irrelevant. You are using search to get your stuff and never browse the list of stuff, why forced to see the list - everytime you open the start screen - at all? Just the search bar and a results pane would be enough, aint it? That's what the start menu, to me, was.

Now there's a point, something like Quicksilver for Mac, or heck even just the Spotlight function (although Quicksilver works a lot better than Spotlight). No need for the start screen at all, just a search bar.

Metro will fail so bad with Windows 8 that it is not going to be type of failure where people will install Windows 8 and bitch about it but type of failure where people won't give a damn about Windows 8 meaning won't even install it. MS is being arrogant and ignorant this time around...they will have to suck it up.

I don't have much of problem with Metro Screen as i have problem with no solution by Microsoft when i remove every pin and Metro App from it. I have no organized place to put my shortcuts like Start Menu used to be. And Metro Screen is annoying crap between where start and where i end my work flow. Metro does not belong to PC. Usability of it fails. Who doesn't see this should be embarrased of any word spoken as far as technology goes.

i haven't used it myself. it looks like the Wii's app design except everything is so big that that it might make it hard to find things. It also looks like an interface that lends itself to running only a single program at a time but would be horrible at multitasking.

i haven't used it myself. it looks like the Wii's app design except everything is so big that that it might make it hard to find things. It also looks like an interface that lends itself to running only a single program at a time but would be horrible at multitasking.

Metro will fail so bad with Windows 8 that it is not going to be type of failure where people will install Windows 8 and bitch about it but type of failure where people won't give a damn about Windows 8 meaning won't even install it. MS is being arrogant and ignorant this time around...they will have to suck it up.

I don't have much of problem with Metro Screen as i have problem with no solution by Microsoft when i remove every pin and Metro App from it. I have no organized place to put my shortcuts like Start Menu used to be. And Metro Screen is annoying crap between where start and where i end my work flow. Metro does not belong to PC. Usability of it fails. Who doesn't see this should be embarrased of any word spoken as far as technology goes.

i would personally skip windows 8. both mac and windows seem to have fallen into a design rut..

windows 2000/ME <-crap

windows xp <-good refinement

windows vista <-crap

windows 7 <- good refinement

leopard <- crap

snow leopard <-good refinement

lion <-crap

mountain lion <-likely good refinement

windows 8 <- likely crap

yeah except Windows 2000 was anything but crap, saying it was just shows how disconnected form reality you are. In fact it was in many ways better than XP.

XP itself was not a good refinement, the only good thign with XP was better directX compatibility, but in every other way you might as well run 2000, at least untill SP2.

Vista was in fact not crap either, it was perceived as crap because that's what the media said, most people who called it crap never actually even tried it or even knew anything about OS' much less vista. The problem was immature drivers, which sorted itself within a couple of months, and after SP1 it was a great OS', a faster recovery than XP which was far worse in it's original state.

As for Windows 8, as anyone who's actually used it and used it with an open mind willing to give the metro start screen a try, it is not crap, it is in fact a great improvement for the majority of users and how they use windows, and if you're willing to change your usage pattern a little bit, it's a great improvement for those who use windows in other ways to.

yeah except Windows 2000 was anything but crap, saying it was just shows how disconnected form reality you are. In fact it was in many ways better than XP.

XP itself was not a good refinement, the only good thign with XP was better directX compatibility, but in every other way you might as well run 2000, at least untill SP2.

Vista was in fact not crap either, it was perceived as crap because that's what the media said, most people who called it crap never actually even tried it or even knew anything about OS' much less vista. The problem was immature drivers, which sorted itself within a couple of months, and after SP1 it was a great OS', a faster recovery than XP which was far worse in it's original state.

As for Windows 8, as anyone who's actually used it and used it with an open mind willing to give the metro start screen a try, it is not crap, it is in fact a great improvement for the majority of users and how they use windows, and if you're willing to change your usage pattern a little bit, it's a great improvement for those who use windows in other ways to.

windows 2000/me were unrefined crap out the gate. And guess what. Drivers are just as much of a part of the windows experience as windows itself. Microsoft failed terribly in getting hardware manufacters on board for the changes to archetecture going into vista and they did an even worse job getting software programmers out of the mindset of always asking for admin privilieges.

Err, not 2000 was pretty damn well refined out the gate, not sure what you've been smoking but you definitely where not working in IT at that time.

As for Vista drivers, MS can't force anything on anyone, they make the software, they can't force Nvidia to make good drivers. they had a whole year on them, like everyone else. and Creative not only had a year, they helped design the new audio system. If they can't deliver good drivers, get hardware from someone who could, Vista worked fine for me from release, heck it worked fine from Beta 2 onwards in fact, and I had Nvidia and played BF2 on it, with better framerates ont he same hardware than XP provided thanks to the new DX even if the game wasn't coded for it, but it still offered better framerates due to the way the old DX ran inside the new. though the difference wasn't always there and generally was to small for any discernible difference. on the other hand, neither was it generally slower.

As for Admin privs. actually they did a pretty good job at that, new programs released after Vista generally learned to play well with the correct privs pretty fast, the exceptions where a few high end apps that take longer to recode out of bad practices (you can't change basic bad code in 3D Studio and Photoshop overnight), and some small crap apps by devs who had no idea what good code is or any proper education or training in good coding practices, and on that same though, you had the Firefox team which fits fine into that category, though their reason they kept asking for admin privs was because they on purpose changed the default browser for ALL users of the computer when you installed the browser, later they changed it so it asked to change, and then it set it default fo ALL users. either way bad coding practice. had they at least giving options of No, Me or All.

windows 2000/me were unrefined crap out the gate

As has already been stated, Windows 2000 was actually a very good operating system. It was basically XP without the distasteful, oversized blue interface. There were some compatibility issues - both drivers and games - but that was because the software and hardware ecosystems were incredibly poor back then and Microsoft hadn't standardised most of the driver components.

Certainly it's ridiculous to try to equate 2000 to ME and even when you were challenged you did nothing to validate your position. We should be engaging in intellectual discussion and articulating out perspective on the situation rather than resorting to needless vulgarity (like the constant use of term "crap").

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Passkeys: Think of them like a broken heart necklace. Imagine one of those heart necklaces that breaks into two matching pieces. One person keeps one half, and the other person keeps the other half. With passkeys, the website has one half, and you have the other half. If the website gets hacked and someone steals its half, that stolen piece is useless by itself. It cannot unlock your account without your matching half. This particular heart necklace is one of a kind, there is only one in existence. Your half of the necklace has to be stored somewhere. It might be stored on your phone, tablet, computer, security key, or a password manager that can sync it between all your devices. A security key is a small physical device that you keep with you, kind of like a house key, car key, or flash drive. I would not usually recommend a security key as the first option for the average person. For most people, it is easier to use their phone, computer, or a password manager that can sync passkeys between their devices. A security key is more like a spare key you keep in a safe place, just in case you lose access to your other devices or your password manager. Some security keys plug into your computer. Some plug into your phone or tablet. Some get tapped against your device. The idea is simple: a security key can hold another passkey for the same website. Think of it like creating a second one-of-a-kind heart necklace for the same account. One necklace could be paired with your password manager, while another necklace could be paired with your security key. That means the website has more than one matching half on file. One half matches the passkey in your password manager. Another half matches the passkey stored on your security key. So, if you lose access to your phone, computer, or password manager, you would still be able to log in using the passkey stored on your security key. Think of it like keeping an extra special necklace piece on a tiny keychain, stored somewhere safe. The website still has the matching half for that security key, but your half is safely stored inside the little key. A passkey does not automatically exist on every device you own. It lives wherever you save it. If your half is stored on one device, then that device is the one that has the matching piece. For example, if you create the passkey on your Windows computer and it is only saved to that computer, your iPhone does not automatically have that same half. If you create it on your iPhone and it only stays on that iPhone, your Android phone does not automatically have it either. That is where password managers come in. A password manager can act like a protected jewelry box for your passkeys. Instead of your half of the necklace being locked to only one device, the password manager can securely sync that half to your other approved devices. For example, Apple Passwords and iCloud Keychain can sync passkeys between your Apple devices. Google Password Manager can sync passkeys with your Google account. But password managers such as 1Password and Bitwarden can sync passkeys between everything, your phones, tablets and computers. Now, you might ask: “What happens if I lose access to the device that has my passkey?” That depends on where your passkey was saved and what recovery options the website gives you. If your passkey was synced through a password manager, you may be able to sign in from another device that has access to that same password manager. For example, if your passkey is saved in iCloud Keychain, Google Password Manager, 1Password, or Bitwarden, another approved device may still have access to it. If your passkey was saved only on one phone, computer, or security key, and you lose that device, then you may not have your half of the necklace anymore. In that case, you would usually need to use the website’s backup login or account recovery options. A lot of websites that support passkeys still let you fall back to your regular password. So if you lose access to your passkey, the site may still let you log in with your password, a code sent to your email, a text message, a recovery code, or some other account recovery process. That is convenient, but it is also important to understand: if the website still allows password login, then your password still matters. Passkeys are safer than passwords, but if your account still has a password as a backup, you should still use a strong, unique password and turn on two-factor authentication if the website offers it. This is why it is a good idea to have more than one safe way back into important accounts. For example, you might keep your passkey in a syncing password manager, add a second trusted device, save recovery codes somewhere safe, or set up a backup security key. A passkey is very secure, but just like a real key, you need a backup plan in case you lose access to it. Now, you might ask: “What stops a hacker from copying my half of the necklace?” That’s the important part: your half is protected. It is not something you type in, and it is not something the website gets to keep. Think of your half as being locked inside a tiny safe on your phone, computer, security key, or password manager. That safe only opens when you approve it with your fingerprint, face, PIN, or device password. When you log in, the website does not need to see your half. It only needs proof that your half matches its half. Your actual half is not handed over to the website. This is different from a password. With a password, you type the secret into the website. If you type it into a fake website, the hacker now has it. With a passkey, you are not typing your secret into the website. Your device is proving you have the matching half without giving the half away. That also helps protect you from fake websites. If someone makes a fake login page that looks like the real site, your device can tell it is not the real match. It will not use your passkey there. Now, could someone use your passkey if they stole your device, got into your password manager, or somehow unlocked the safe that holds your half? Yes, that is why your device password, PIN, fingerprint, face unlock, and password manager security still matter. But a hacker cannot just steal your passkey from the website or trick you into typing it into a fake page like they can with a password. That is why passkeys are safer than passwords. The two matching pieces have to come together, like two lovebirds who were once separated and are finally reunited.
    • Newegg offers insane combo deal on Amazon Prime Day 2026 that beats Steam Machine by Sayan Sen Building a PC is undoubtedly difficult nowadays but with this epic combo deal, Newegg is trying to make it as easy for you as it is possible. If you are making a new one or even upgrading an old system to a new Windows 11 device, this combo bundle is truly unmissable as you get AMD's Ryzen 9800X3D, a compatible X870 motherboard, a 240mm AIO liquid cooler and finally a Samsung 990 PRO SSD all for under $1000 (purchase link under the specs table down below). This should beat out the newly launched Steam Machine from Valve in terms of performance and performance per dollar especially if you are willing to set Linux up on it. Essentially with this combo you will get the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-core 3D V cache CPU, Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD, the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX Motherboard, and finally the Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240. Thanks to that massive vertically stacked L3 cache, the X3D desktop processors, including the 9800X3D, also come with the benefit of not needing fast memory. Even DDR5-5600 should be plenty for it. The technical specifications of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D are given in the table below: Specification Value Architecture Zen 5 Cores / Threads 8 / 16 Base Clock 4.7 GHz Max Boost Clock Up to 5.2 GHz L1 Cache 640 KB L2 Cache 8 MB L3 Cache 96 MB Total Cache 104 MB CPU Core Process TSMC 4nm FinFET I/O Die Process TSMC 6nm FinFET Socket AM5 Default TDP 120W Max Temperature (Tjmax) 95°C Thermal Solution Not included Memory Type DDR5 Max Capacity 256 GB Memory Speeds 2x1R: DDR5-5600 2x2R: DDR5-5600 4x1R: DDR5-3600 4x2R: DDR5-3600 PCIe Version PCIe 5.0 PCIe Lanes (Total/Usable) 28 / 24 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) 4 USB 2.0 1 Graphics Cores 2 CU RDNA 2 Frequency 2200 MHz DisplayPort over USB-C Yes Overclocking Unlocked Up next we have the tech specs for the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI Motherboard: Specification Value Chipset AMD X870 CPU Support AMD Ryzen 9000 / 8000 / 7000 Series Desktop Processors Socket AM5 Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Maximum Memory Capacity 256GB Memory Support DDR5 8400–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Integrated Graphics Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 FRL (up to 8K 60Hz) 2 × USB4 Type-C with DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3 (up to 4K 60Hz) Expansion Slots PCI_E1: PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) PCI_E2: PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) PCI_E3: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset) Audio Realtek ALC4080 Codec 7.1-Channel USB High Performance Audio Supports up to 32-bit/384kHz playback on front panel S/PDIF output M.2 Slots 4 × M.2 M2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 22110/2280) M2_2: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 2280/2260) M2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset, 2280/2260) M2_4: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset, 2280/2260) SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 for M.2 NVMe storage devices Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 2 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 2 × USB4 40Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 20Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126-CG 5G LAN Wireless Wi-Fi 7 (M.2 Key-E module pre-installed) Supports 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz bands Up to 5.8Gbps Supports 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4, MLO, 4KQAM Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 2 × CPU Power Connectors 1 × PCIe 8-pin Power Connector Fan Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan (Pump/System) 6 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable V2 RGB (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Other Internal Headers 1 × EZ Conn-header 2 × Front Panel Headers 1 × Chassis Intrusion 1 × Front Audio 1 × TPM 2.0 Header Debug Features 4 × EZ Debug LEDs 1 × EZ Digit Debug LED Rear I/O Ports Clear CMOS Button Flash BIOS Button HDMI 2 × USB 40Gbps Type-C 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 4 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 4 × USB 2.0 5G LAN Port Wi-Fi/Bluetooth Antenna Connectors Audio Connectors Form Factor ATX The Samsung 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification Value Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC DRAM Cache 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,200 TBW MTBF 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink No Get the combo deal at this link: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Samsung 990 PRO 2TB, MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI motherboard, Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240: $784.99 + $25 off with promo code FTTF77: $759.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) Good to know This Newegg deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I heard from a lot of people that driver support for the latest games when RDNA first came out (Radeon 5000 series) was pretty bad, but if you didn't buy the card on day one, or were not trying to play the latest titles, then you were isolated from that issue. Other than that, it's been good and only getting better.
    • Meta launches new AI glasses in 26 styles and Muse Spark multimodal capabilties by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta today announced a new line of Meta Glasses in partnership with EssilorLuxottica. The new AI glasses build on the company’s existing smart glasses portfolio, which is sold under the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta brands. The new Meta Glasses start at just $299, are compatible with prescription lenses, and will be available in 26 styles across different colors, lenses, and frames. At launch, Meta Glasses will be available in three frame styles. The Meta Adventurer features a clean rectangular design and comes in Standard and Large sizes. The Meta Fury is a bolder frame for users who want a stronger look. Meta Glasses by Kylie is a slim oval frame designed in collaboration with Kylie Jenner. Similar to existing Meta AI Glasses, the new Meta Glasses include a dedicated action button that can be used to quickly access Meta AI or launch a favorite feature. They also feature open-ear speakers for calls, music, and more. Meta has also included a multi-mic array with wind noise reduction for calls and messaging. Users can capture photos and videos hands-free using voice commands. Meta claims more than eight hours of battery life, while the portable charging case can provide up to 40 additional hours. As expected, Meta Glasses come pre-loaded with Meta AI powered by Muse Spark from day one. Muse Spark is the first model from Meta Superintelligence Labs with improved multimodal capabilities. The same Meta AI upgrade is also now available on existing Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta Glasses in the US and Canada via an update. With the Muse Spark-powered AI assistant, Meta AI in the new glasses can provide smarter answers, understand what the user is seeing, and help with daily tasks such as calendar management and navigation. Meta also announced an upcoming feature called the dynamic photo feature, which captures multiple frames and recommends the best one. Pedestrian navigation is also coming soon to these glasses. Meta is also adding support for 14 new live translation languages, including Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, and Korean. The new Meta Glasses are available starting today through Meta.com, Best Buy, Amazon, LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, and select retailers.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!