Recommended Posts

Hey

Im trying to get a web site hosted inside of my LAN so people can test it out. Its ran by Apache to be exact but I just cant seem to get it to work inside of my network. The only way I can get it to work is by editing the hosts file on each PC and pointing them at my IP resolving a FQDM (test.dev).

How can I do this? I have access to the router that forwards ports (although this may or may not have to do with anything)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1069600-interally-hosting-a-web-site/
Share on other sites

if you host a single site on that server by taping the ip (or name) they should open it. If not you need virtual hosts (define new site and enable it) and editing the host on each computer. Or you can setup apache to listen on another port for this site and do port forwading - like router ip:81 --> redirecting to server_ip:81 (or something)

you need virtual hosts (define new site and enable it) and editing the host on each computer

That is EXACTLY what I am currently doing and want to avoid it. I do not want to edit the host on each computer.

Going to the IP address of the site does not work, because it tries to go to "http://www.test.dev" which is not the site....

Well if you want the computers on your site to be able to resolve test.dev -- then setup local dns to do that! Editing the host file for every machine would not be the way to do it ;)

Going to www.test.dev when you go to http://ipaddress

Points to apache doing that on a redirect. You can clearly serve up a site off an IP quite easy with apache. When you say your going to the ipaddress of the site -- you do mean the private IP of the machine the apache is running on, and not your public IP correct?

Since its private, you could have apache listening on 100's of IPs to serve up 100's of different sites, etc. So you could get by without having to setup host headers/virtualhost/etc

Do you run Active Directory at this location? If so you already have DNS you could create a test.dev zone, etc.

Well if you want the computers on your site to be able to resolve test.dev -- then setup local dns to do that! Editing the host file for every machine would not be the way to do it ;)

Going to www.test.dev when you go to http://ipaddress

Points to apache doing that on a redirect. You can clearly serve up a site off an IP quite easy with apache. When you say your going to the ipaddress of the site -- you do mean the private IP of the machine the apache is running on, and not your public IP correct?

Yes. 192.168.100.73 which is my private IP of my PC on this LAN

Do you run Active Directory at this location? If so you already have DNS you could create a test.dev zone, etc.

No.

So your saying when you go to http://192.168.100.73 it redirects to http://www.test.dev

so what is in your host file on a machine that does this?

And what is your apache config look like? Do you have a .htaccess file with any sort of redirects in it?

so from a cmd prompt on a machine when you do

ping 192.168.100.73

What does the ping respond with, just the ip or does it return www.test.dev ?

If you want to setup DNS for your network - grab isc bind, runs on windows just fine. Or if you have a windows server OS, then you can install the dns role and create whatever zones and hosts you want. Or if you don't want to mess with full dns product like bind, you could grab tftpd32 which has a dns feature, that you could use to resolve test.dev, etc. etc.

http://tftpd32.jounin.net/

Tftpd32 is a free, opensource IPv6 ready application which includes DHCP, TFTP, DNS, SNTP and Syslog servers as well as a TFTP client.

So in your apache config, you sure you don't have something like this setup?

<VirtualHost *:80>

Redirect permanent / http://www.test.dev/

</VirtualHost>

So your saying when you go to http://192.168.100.73 it redirects to http://www.test.dev

so what is in your host file on a machine that does this?

Yes. If I put this in a hosts file on a machine

192.168.100.73 test.dev

It works. But I would have to go machine by machine...

so from a cmd prompt on a machine when you do

ping 192.168.100.73

What does the ping respond with, just the ip or does it return www.test.dev ?

If it is not in the hosts, it does not return test.dev

you could grab tftpd32 which has a dns feature, that you could use to resolve test.dev, etc. etc.

http://tftpd32.jounin.net/

Tftpd32 is a free, opensource IPv6 ready application which includes DHCP, TFTP, DNS, SNTP and Syslog servers as well as a TFTP client.

I thought about this as well but if I set this up wouldnt all other users on the network also have to point to me, a new DNS server? Kinda defeats the purpose....

So in your apache config, you sure you don't have something like this setup?

<VirtualHost *:80>

Redirect permanent / http://www.test.dev/

</VirtualHost>

I skipped over the first apache config question since you reasked it again in the same post. I have this setup in my httpd-vhosts.conf :

<VirtualHost *:80>

ServerAdmin [email protected]

DocumentRoot "C:/test"

ServerName test.dev

ServerAlias test.dev

<Directory "C:/test">

Options Indexes FollowSymLinks Includes execCGI

AllowOverride All

Order Allow,Deny

Allow From All

</Directory>

ErrorLog "logs/test.dev-error.log"

CustomLog "logs/test.dev-access.log" combined

</VirtualHost>

"a new DNS server? Kinda defeats the purpose...."

NO not really -- if you not going to run dns, how do you expect users to resolve test.dev to your IP without a host file? If you current dns does not allow you to create Records to resolve, then your going to have to fire up one that does and use it. Or you going to have to use host files on each machine, or you going to have to use IP address directly.. How else do you think you can resolve a fqdn??

DNS can be handed via dhcp, so you don't have to touch any box to get them to point to your dns.

You clearly have done something either with the site or apache itself to change the to www.test.dev when you access http://ipaddress

Here I just fired up apache on my test linux box. apt-get install apache2

And there you go access of site via IP with no redirects.. So either you messed with the config of apache, edited the .htaccess file or the page your loading from the site is doing the redirect.

What is the source of the site your serving up have in its headers? Are you doing something like

&lt;meta http-equiv="REFRESH" content="0;url=http://www.the-domain-you-want-to-redirect-to.com"&gt;

post-14624-0-58885600-1334160548.jpg

I even added your ServerName and ServerAlias tags -- those have nothing to do with redirection

<VirtualHost *:80>

ServerAdmin webmaster@localhost

DocumentRoot /var/www

ServerName test.dev

ServerAlias test.dev

"a new DNS server? Kinda defeats the purpose...."

NO not really -- if you not going to run dns, how do you expect users to resolve test.dev to your IP without a host file? If you current dns does not allow you to create Records to resolve, then your going to have to fire up one that does and use it. Or you going to have to use host files on each machine, or you going to have to use IP address directly.. How else do you think you can resolve a fqdn??

Internally, I dont care if they resolve test.dev or not. I want the internal site to work.

You may have not read correct but if they go to

http://192.168.100.73

they cannot see the site either. And yes, they can ping me.

The only way they can see my site is by editing their host file and putting

192.168.100.73 test.dev

then they can access http://192.168.100.73 AND http://test.dev

You clearly have done something either with the site or apache itself to change the to www.test.dev when you access http://ipaddress

Well, not sure what files to look at although Im almost certain Ive only touched that one. This is a Magento site if it makes any difference.

What is the source of the site your serving up have in its headers? Are you doing something like

&lt;meta http-equiv="REFRESH" content="0;url=http://www.the-domain-you-want-to-redirect-to.com"&gt;

Havent done this either.

So you setup this package http://www.magentocommerce.com/

Look at the index.html file or index.php file, etc. in you c:/test folder-- many of these canned sites have redirects built into them.. So yeah you hit http://ipaddress and right away your redirected to http://www.test.dev which no is not going to work, so nothing is going to be shown in the browser.

I have not used this application so would have to install it to see what it does out of the box.

edit: Ok just hit up a demo admin page, and yeah this could be an issue

post-14624-0-70314700-1334162753_thumb.j

It defaults to redirect vs no, and then there is also a setting in here that redirects to base url if cookies disabled, etc..

So your redirect is to www.test.dev that could be your problem right there, if the client can not resolve that.

So you need to either disable this redirection stuff, change it to IP address. Or use your host file, or setup dns.

Here is installation manual:

http://www.magentocommerce.com/wiki/1_-_installation_and_configuration/magento_installation_guide

You could try to run it on wamp server for windows or you could configure some Linux to serve it (it is required, based on manual). It seems to me like normal installation, make database in phpmysql, unzip archive in web folder and go to http://192.168.100.73/folder_where_are_magento_files.

Also, pay attention to this:

During the installation process Magento will set cookies and most browsers will refuse to accept cookies for localhost. This can lead to several problems but no error messages. E.g. when trying to set the locale the page will just refresh and revert to the standard En-US locale..

To avoid this problem, you can set up Magento to use 127.0.0.1 as its domain name or create another entry for localhost in your computer?s /etc/hosts file and use that hostname to access the site, as shown below:

There was something in there that stated if cookies not working, redirect to base url. So yeah if trying to set cookie for localhost, which browser refuses -- if your base url is www.test.dev then sure would explain what is happening.

Per your other thread seems like this site will be hosted elsewhere, this seems like a good idea to me ;)

There was something in there that stated if cookies not working, redirect to base url. So yeah if trying to set cookie for localhost, which browser refuses -- if your base url is www.test.dev then sure would explain what is happening.

But technically since they are other IPs, they arent localhosts.......

Per your other thread seems like this site will be hosted elsewhere, this seems like a good idea to me ;)

It will :) This was just for some internal testing.

Hosting it somewhere else is another complete challenge which I have never in my life done...

"But technically since they are other IPs, they arent localhosts......."

Which has nothing to do with the name on the cookie that application might set.

Fix up your redirect stuff in the admin page of that web app and you should be able to use http://ipaddress vs host name, etc. Which should remove your need for host file entries or dns.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello mysterious lamborghiniv10, I was in Australia and... now I'm in the Netherlands. 
    • EU says Meta must restore rival chatbots' access to WhatsApp by Hamid Ganji The European Commission has ordered Meta to restore third-party AI chatbots’ access to WhatsApp after the tech giant decided to block them from operating on the popular messaging platform. After Meta banned rival AI chatbots from operating on WhatsApp, the European Commission launched an antitrust investigation to determine whether the company had abused its market dominance. As a result of Meta’s decision, third-party AI chatbots, including Microsoft’s Copilot and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, were prevented from operating on WhatsApp. At the time, Meta said it wanted to reserve the WhatsApp Business API for other types of businesses and did not allow rival chatbots to use it. This effectively prevented the WhatsApp ecosystem from being used to distribute rival chatbot services. However, the European Commission has now announced an interim measures decision requiring Meta to restore access to WhatsApp for rival general-purpose AI assistants on the same terms and conditions as before October 15, 2025. The Commission has also asked Meta to maintain that access until the antitrust investigation is concluded. The Commission argues that Meta has used its dominant market position to prevent rival AI chatbots from accessing the WhatsApp Business API. While Meta allowed rival services to return to WhatsApp by paying a fee, the European Commission still considers that arrangement to be a de facto access ban. According to EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera, the fees introduced by Meta are so high that using WhatsApp is no longer economically sustainable for competitors. “It seems that Meta expects to leverage the vast reach and likely dominance of WhatsApp to benefit its own AI assistant and to foreclose rivals,” Ribera said. “We cannot let large digital incumbents leverage their dominance of the past to dictate who in Europe gets to compete and who gets to innovate in AI.”
    • A few years ago walmart had the 512 models on clearance for $35. I bought 3 of them. I should have purchased more.
    • I'm fine with a little reasonable promotion of Edge, but the degree which they do it right now I consider extremely unreasonable. 
    • Microsoft AI boss no longer believes that AI will replace human workers by David Uzondu Mustafa Suleyman, the head of Microsoft AI, recently took back his statements concerning white-collar jobs that he gave to the Financial Times in an interview made back in February, where he claimed that AI would replace office workers within 12 to 18 months. On Monday's episode of The Verge's Decoder, Suleyman recast the technology as more like a helpmate than a tool designed to take over your job. He explained that smaller office duties will "increasingly become digitized, automated" as people generate more digital materials. During the discussion, Suleyman emphasized a "very important distinction" between "tasks" and "jobs" to clarify his previous claims. He argued that his earlier comments only referred to individual actions that people perform at their desks. Suleyman used to work for DeepMind, the research lab he co-founded in 2010 alongside Demis Hassabis and Shane Legg, before he left in 2022 to establish Inflection AI and build an empathetic digital assistant. Microsoft hired him in March 2024 to lead its newly formed "Microsoft AI" division, placing him in charge of consumer products like Copilot, Bing, and Edge. His February comments also detailed plans for Microsoft to achieve self-sufficiency with a $140 billion infrastructure budget to train frontier models, predicting that creating a customized AI will soon feel like creating a podcast or a new blog: The 41-year-old is not the only AI executive who's softened his "AI will replace you" stance. OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, last month used X to push back against employment panic by arguing that his startup builds tools to assist humans rather than build replacements. He had previously garnered backlash by suggesting that many modern office roles that AI might replace did not qualify as "real work" in the first place, at least when you compare desk jobs to physical, historical labor like farming.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      134
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!