New Mac OS X backdoor Trojan, Sabpab, discovered


Recommended Posts

That's the point I don't understand. Flashback and this new supposed one are Java exploits....so if my Mac doesn't have Java installed how can my machine get infected and thus need this removal tool? Isn't the best defense on this just not to have Java installed along with a good a/v scanner?

Better to be safe than sorry I guess? If you run Adobe CS5 you're forced to install Java, so that's not always an option. For most of the public here a a/v scanner still isn't necessary really. Just disable Java in your browser and don't install software from untrusted sources.

I'm glad I upgraded all my Macs to Windows 7 in time.

Yes because we all know there are no trojans whatsoever for Windows.

Apples approach to security is light years ahead of Microsoft, Mac OS can require apps to be signed, each app is broken up into separate parts with each part only able to do one thing, like with QuickTime, the Video Decoder, is ONLY allowed read from teh disk and decry pt the content of a video stream. I could go on, but Ars had a great line up in their OS X Lion review.

I've never really looked into mac security all that much, but if you can exploit java then it doesn't matter HOW MUCH security you put in with signed executables (I don't think they need to be signed, it's got the same 'mark as dirty/from another computer' security bit that windows does which gives a 'are you SURE you want to run this application' message), because you can exploit valid signed programs and do things with them.

Anyway, macs are getting more popular so there's going to be a huge rapid increase in exploits and viruses for them in the future.

Edit: Also, PC vendors are all from different manufacturers and whatnot, (I'm talking laptops/netbooks/ultrabooks/tablets specifically here) whereas all of apples line use the same base hardware, which includes the exact same password say, for the administration functions of the battery, and with that power it doesn't take much to blow one up as a security researcher demonstrated (FYI; apple still haven't stopped using the same battery firmware password OR allowed you to change it).

I still have OS X but I have no real reason to use it anymore. The question then becomes, why did I get a Mac in the first place? I didn't know Windows 7 was so good. If I did at the time, I would have saved myself some money and built my own PC.

It depends if you have a desktop or not. Of all laptops that I have seen in my life, I would buy a MacBook with Windows 7 on it over anything else. They just gave me an HP from somebody else last week at work and couldn?t stand it, now I have my Toshiba for myself and it?s even worse. I?m still considering telling them I want to use my MacBook Pro instead :p

Then again, of all desktops I have seen, the iMac remains my favorite one too, but the difference is less marked with an iMac, because you can easily build a tower with exactly what you want.

When it comes to security, the only thing Apple is light years ahead of Microsoft on is denial.

and customer loyalty, and bank account, and tablet market, and phone sales, and service support, and apps, and on and on... and before you flame, i do not own a mac, i just am starting to see that apple hate is getting very annoying from kids that are too young (or adults that are too old) to comment on stuff they are obviously biased on.
  • Like 2

and customer loyalty, and bank account, and tablet market, and phone sales, and service support, and apps, and on and on... and before you flame, i do not own a mac, i just am starting to see that apple hate is getting very annoying from kids that are too young (or adults that are too old) to comment on stuff they are obviously biased on.

Apple !== Microsoft

Note the extra equal sign.

How can people get so charged up over tech companies is beyond me.

resol612:whatever platform i'm typing on

First and foremost I am not anti-Apple- However this should be a wake up call... for now it is only Flash and Java based attacks.... Apple should realize that now they are on the radar instead of flying just below. This is how it started for them before...You will have to remember back in the days when there was IBM DOS and they said back then... Only DOS gets viruses, then the attacks started for the Apple II machines...

The true question now is.... How will Apple handle this? Denial, Acceptance or Locking a user to only approved applications to be installed on OSX?

Days of Macs being virus proof are over.

In 1982, as a high school student at Mt. Lebanon High School, Skrenta wrote the Elk Cloner virus that infected Apple II machines. It is widely believed to be the first large-scale self-spreading personal computer virus ever created.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Skrenta

Seems like the Mac was a haven for virus right from the start. Apple have a wonderful way of brainwashing people. I own an ipod.

  • Like 2

and customer loyalty, and bank account, and tablet market, and phone sales, and service support, and apps, and on and on... and before you flame, i do not own a mac, i just am starting to see that apple hate is getting very annoying from kids that are too young (or adults that are too old) to comment on stuff they are obviously biased on.

Calm down dear! It's not "Apple hate", it's a dig response to Apple adoration, and completely on-topic with security, which your post is not.

First and foremost I am not anti-Apple- However this should be a wake up call... for now it is only Flash and Java based attacks.... Apple should realize that now they are on the radar instead of flying just below. This is how it started for them before...You will have to remember back in the days when there was IBM DOS and they said back then... Only DOS gets viruses, then the attacks started for the Apple II machines...

The true question now is.... How will Apple handle this? Denial, Acceptance or Locking a user to only approved applications to be installed on OSX?

Couldn't one say that if you didn't have flash or java installed then you wouldn't have this issue? So far....is there an actual virus/trojan/exploit for os x itself and not flash or java on os x?

So far....is there an actual virus/trojan/exploit for os x itself and not flash or java on os x?

Yes.

Anyway, that's a pointless argument. Does anyone ever say "Hmm, got a virus, but good thing [Company X] code wasn't involved!"

Trojan vs virus? [To your credit, you aren't making a distinction in your post, but others are] Does anyone ever say "Hmm, my computer is infected and taking commands from a remote server and transmitting my banking information to criminals. Good thing it's just a trojan!"

Couldn't one say that if you didn't have flash or java installed then you wouldn't have this issue? So far....is there an actual virus/trojan/exploit for os x itself and not flash or java on os x?

The problem actually could possibly be that Apple allowed people to install Java and Flash.... they could take the alternate route of only allowing approved programs to install-- I.E. those that are bought at through iTunes or on an Apple DVD. Though from what I understand java was included with OSX but has since been removed. Many programs still unfortunately require java in order to run though.

Though you could actually say if they were not installed then you would not have those issues, however, just in these programs being exploited one must ask the inevitable question.... "What else are the hackers and male-ware developers working on to exploit my system?"

For many years Apple has been under the radar of such exploits, now all of sudden something like this appears.

Sure, by all means remove Java and Flash, but the question is "Where is the next attack coming from and how to avoid it?"

Some have suggested- the next exploit could actually be the way it handles viewing images... but that remains to be seen.

The point is, for so long has there not been little research into avoiding Virus and Male-ware, but now it may be time to look into ways to prevent it.

In Windows now through Security Updates, Malicious Software Removal Tools, Anti-Virus, Script Blockers, Resident programs (like that in Spybot Search and Destroy) or other programs like that to block out the bad.

Also more and more programs are choosing to run in user modes and also inside memory sandboxes, it may now be time for Apple to consider applying programs like that in order to circumvent the next outbreak.

- I had always thought each system in order to do an update to help stop malicious code would need to reboot before installing them or actually having to insert a boot dvd in order to make system changes...

Windows downloads updates then prompts you to insert your install medium to reboot and install updates... also this would be required when a program wants to add itself to the start up of the computer.

(these were just thoughts to help stop the spread of Male-ware and Viruses)

Yes.

Anyway, that's a pointless argument. Does anyone ever say "Hmm, got a virus, but good thing [Company X] code wasn't involved!"

Trojan vs virus? [To your credit, you aren't making a distinction in your post, but others are] Does anyone ever say "Hmm, my computer is infected and taking commands from a remote server and transmitting my banking information to criminals. Good thing it's just a trojan!"

Good point... the relative term from what is a virus and male-ware are small.... but this should be a wake-up call that Apple is now on the radar.

Apples approach to security is light years ahead of Microsoft, Mac OS can require apps to be signed, each app is broken up into separate parts with each part only able to do one thing, like with QuickTime, the Video Decoder, is ONLY allowed read from teh disk and decry pt the content of a video stream. I could go on, but Ars had a great line up in their OS X Lion review.

Wow you can not be so wrong. Both companies try to build security into their products, but no security is perfect and that's where the similarities end. The companies' approach to security response is completely different.

One has a dedicated security team who puts out timely patches and advisories, tries to work pro-actively with hackers to prevent a 0-day release (a 0-day is where a security hole is being exploited before the company knows that there even was a security hole), puts out a patch to a 0-day hole as soon as possible, releases monthly removal tools for common Malware (especially those that used a 0-day), offers free antivirus to all paying users. There is nothing more they could possible do that they are not already doing.

The other likes to advertise their security quite strongly, especially compared to the other, but when a security hole is found despite all their "advanced securities" they keep it a secret for months, and then when it is found out that it is being actively exploited they deny that there is anything wrong with their software, say that it is not their fault that there is a security hole affecting their products, sit on their hands for more months while they decide if they even want to close the security hole, and then eventually many more months after that they decide to put out an update to clean up the infected machines.

I wonder how it will go next time that a security bug is found which Apple won't fix and a virus comes in which will silently overwrite all the time machine backups with dummy data either straight away (because many users leave their time machine disks always plugged in or use Time capsule) or waits until the Time machine backup is plugged in while making it look like the time machine is working properly.Then when it has finished making the time machine backup useless (PS: Time Machine supports only ONE backup destination) it will then wait until a certain time to allow the virus to spread without being detected. After this it will then overwrite all the data on the main computer itself and then all Mac users will be screwed with no backup and no data at the same time because Apple did not do anything about security.

...

I wonder how it will go next time that a security bug is found which Apple won't fix and a virus comes in which will silently overwrite all the time machine backups with dummy data either straight away (because many users leave their time machine disks always plugged in or use Time capsule) or waits until the Time machine backup is plugged in while making it look like the time machine is working properly.Then when it has finished making the time machine backup useless (PS: Time Machine supports only ONE backup destination) it will then wait until a certain time to allow the virus to spread without being detected. After this it will then overwrite all the data on the main computer itself and then all Mac users will be screwed with no backup and no data at the same time because Apple did not do anything about security.

I have heard that could be a possible exploit... the time machine-- whereby no active file is written which bypasses the security when the maleware/virus is inserted-... then when the user uses the time machine to go back - he then will have rights to write to system files without being signed, because a backup file does not have that signature and therefore won't be checked.

In other words-- if there can be an insertion point into the time machine (which is not monitored and protected by OS X) then when the user initiated a backup it will have the rights to write to system files... that is what I have heard as a possible way to exploit a system when file protection is enabled. (this is a concept with Windows Backups)... because the backup runs as a user but the writing the back to the main system is ran as a Power User or Administrator. Based upon that theory it could theoretically affect OSX in the same way just like that of Linux.

This is *APPLE MAC OSX BASED* malware that is loaded onto the system via an exploit in Java. This malware and Flashback were written specifically for the Mac.

There are still some Apple faithful out there trying to pass this stuff off as NBD, and still see their holier than thou OS as bulletproof, and are quickly laying the blame on Java.

Apples approach to security is light years ahead of Microsoft, Mac OS can require apps to be signed, each app is broken up into separate parts with each part only able to do one thing, like with QuickTime, the Video Decoder, is ONLY allowed read from teh disk and decry pt the content of a video stream. I could go on, but Ars had a great line up in their OS X Lion review.

Apple can be slower than Microsoft to plug hole's though.

Apple can be slower than Microsoft to plug hole's though.

This is true though. I prefer Apple?s approach over Microsoft when it comes to security, but they could fix them faster. With MS, under 24-48 hours, it would be a thing of the past already. Took like 4-5 days with Apple.

Having what is described as a great approach to security, Apple wouldn't have Trojan Virus issues on their OS X platform, it would be virus free. But since the take the longest time to release patches to fix issues after a period of denial, it just shows that the os isn't as secure as people once thought. It does seem like OS X has now be come the main target for viruses and malware just like Windows XP was.

Having what is described as a great approach to security, Apple wouldn't have Trojan Virus issues on their OS X platform, it would be virus free. But since the take the longest time to release patches to fix issues after a period of denial, it just shows that the os isn't as secure as people once thought. It does seem like OS X has now be come the main target for viruses and malware just like Windows XP was.

That comparison is pretty ridiculous.

On a sidenote: Apple's current teams are new to malware fixing (not brand new, but MS sure have a lot more expertise).

To be honest, I can see Apple buying up an AV company easily.

It would stay in the background like Defender on W8 and get updates through a more appropriate and faster channel than Software Update...

Glassed Silver:mac

Having what is described as a great approach to security, Apple wouldn't have Trojan Virus issues on their OS X platform, it would be virus free. But since the take the longest time to release patches to fix issues after a period of denial, it just shows that the os isn't as secure as people once thought. It does seem like OS X has now be come the main target for viruses and malware just like Windows XP was.

Except there still isn't a single virus out in the wild for OS X. There were for Mac OS 9 (an OS with a much lower market share), but not OS X.

Except there still isn't a single virus out in the wild for OS X. There were for Mac OS 9 (an OS with a much lower market share), but not OS X.

There's also not many games in the wild for OS X. I guess that's one of the trade-offs.

There's also not many games in the wild for OS X. I guess that's one of the trade-offs.

But every year becomes the best year for Mac gaming.

With the App Store, with Steam and with ported games from the iPhone and iPad to Mac OS X, and with companies who now recognize the Mac as a gaming platform, this isn?t really a valid argument.

On the other hand, there will always be like less than 3-5 malware for OS X every year. This has remained stable.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!