• 0

Transfering more than 2 files at the same time on SFTP (SSH) thru FileZilla


Question

15 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Open the file preferences and look for the maximum number of simutainious connections.

Unless you own the server or have full control over it I wouldn't really recommend it, if it's leased then chances are it's got a standard rule to block any IPs connecting more than a few times in 5 minutes to SSH ports.

  • 0

Open the file preferences and look for the maximum number of simutainious connections.

Unless you own the server or have full control over it I wouldn't really recommend it, if it's leased then chances are it's got a standard rule to block any IPs connecting more than a few times in 5 minutes to SSH ports.

It seems the limit is only 4 transfers at a time. If I put it at 10 (max permitted) only 4 at a time say "Transfering" (The rest say connecting) so.....I put it at 4 and its doing OK and a bit faster :)

  • 0

Unless you have somehow shaped connection (or the server does it on its own), you shouldn't get higher speeds from multiple connections - it'll just transfer the files and split the bandwidth amongst them.

  • 0

Unless you have somehow shaped connection (or the server does it on its own), you shouldn't get higher speeds from multiple connections - it'll just transfer the files and split the bandwidth amongst them.

With lots of small files you could get faster overall transfer... otherwise it has start/stop times while going 1 (pause) 2 (pause) 3 (pause). Same happens with XCOPY/ROBOCOPY in windows. No large benifits with large files, but drastic improvement on small ones.
  • 0

With lots of small files you could get faster overall transfer... otherwise it has start/stop times while going 1 (pause) 2 (pause) 3 (pause). Same happens with XCOPY/ROBOCOPY in windows. No large benifits with large files, but drastic improvement on small ones.

Exactly. For small files this is great and indeed has sped up the transfer drastically.

  • 0

If you have lots of small files to transfer you know what also makes it faster! Tar them up or zip/gz them etc.. into one larger file and then copy it, then expand them back out ;)

  • 0

If you have lots of small files to transfer you know what also makes it faster! Tar them up or zip/gz them etc.. into one larger file and then copy it, then expand them back out ;)

Thats one of those ideas that is actually crazy enough to work. :p

What formats does tar support? I was going to transfer a 7zip (most compressed) but not sure if tar supports it.

  • 0

What??

just 7z if your files if that is what you want? What does tar have to do with that if your going to use 7zip?

That would be my fault for not mentioning it :p

I only have access to a bash shell to where I transfer the file. There, I have the tar and the unzip utilities (AFAIK). Thats why behind my question :)

tar (known as a "tarball") is an alternative to .zip and .rar

tar is also a program on unix, which is what i have a SSH shell to.

I apoligize for not explaining correctly what I have access to.

  • 0

can you add stuff to this remote ssh box? So you can use what you want? But zip should be a given that should there.

here is my remote host shell account - it has an unzip support.

post-14624-0-92390300-1335196553.jpg

You normally can create .tar file on windows as well with pretty much any zip program. Here 7zip shows it can pack .tar and gzip, etc.

Packing / unpacking: 7z, XZ, BZIP2, GZIP, TAR, ZIP and WIM

So you should be able to create with 7zip and then expand it on your host.

  • 0

What type of OS are you running on the server and client, and what type of file transfers is it (If you're transferring it every day, is it something like log files or such?)

If it happens on a set schedule and you can get rsync on the client and server that would probably be the best bet, it can compress the data it transfers and can do delta encoding (so it only sends the differences), and it can use SFTP underneath so it's secure to boot.

  • 0

"I couldnt find a way to create a tar in 7zip"

post-14624-0-84869100-1335274603.jpg

But you don't have to tar it, you could just gzip it. or bzip2 is another one that is most likely on any linux distro.

But you can create your tar if you want, and then gzip the tar so you end up with tar.gz, etc..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!