Recommended Posts

Finally!

HWA disabled by default, so you have to enable it in Opera:config

Here at Opera HQ, we're buckling down for the final push before the beta launch of Opera 12. Right now, Wahoo is getting more complete, with even more fun things to come as we get closer to launch. We have one of those fun things today, in fact. This new snapshot includes the first look at the DirectX backend. Most users on Vista and Windows 7 will by default use this backend instead of the OpenGL backend for performance and stability reasons, but be aware that currently WebGL support using the OpenGL backend is more complete than when using DirectX.

There's also another change in this snapshot. After careful consideration and extensive testing, we've decided to let users of Opera 12 opt-in to WebGL and hardware acceleration.

We're doing this for an important reason. We want to bring the first true hardware accelerated browser to market. This means using the graphics processor to boost rendering speeds not only for the pages themselves, but also the UI of the browser. It means making it an awesome experience for as many Opera desktop users as possible, whether they're on Windows XP, Linux or Lion.

But in some cases, our hardware accelerated speeds do not yet beat our incredibly optimized software backend, Vega. Shipping a feature that could actually be less effective at boosting speed is a big no-no, especially if its a final release that many people will use for day-to-day browsing.

Now, if you're reading this blog post, you're probably in the group of people who will want to turn on WebGL and hardware acceleration. You enable these features by setting both opera:config#UserPrefs|EnableHardwareAcceleration and opera:config#UserPrefs|EnableWebGL to 1, then saving and restarting Opera.

Try it in this release and see how you like it. We think it ensures that Opera 12 will be a great release for everyone, whether you are a browser expert or just discovering Opera for the first time.

As Wahoo is approaching a beta release, we're focusing on stability and fixing regressions. This build includes an important performance and stability fix for plugins on Windows, and should speed up scrolling with plugins significantly.

Known Issues

HTML5 Drag and Drop is work in progress. Things like dragging to and from external applications may not work. Some existing demo sites may not work fully

HTML5test.com could freeze or show other problems on Mac

OTW-8246 Opera 64-bit on Windows not supported on Google+

DSK-361109 Address dropdown not populated when searching page content with multiple words

CORE-45774 [Windows] [HWA] Border-color messes up background colour for element with border-radius with DirectX

DSK-357831 [Windows] [HWA] Negative letter spacing with DirectX on 64-bit builds

http://my.opera.com/...ion-in-opera-12

It's about time. And not surprisingly, turning on the DirectX renderer will also turn on DirectWrite for the entire browser UI, minus menus.

edit: and it performs pretty well on integrated Intel graphics!

edit 2: but DirectWrite is still a bit slow. Oh well.

So how much is actually accelerated? Text and layers? Or full blown D2D?

Also it is still slower than software, better than OGL though.

On my machine it's faster than software with DirectX, in everything apart from scrolling with the mouse wheel. Dragging the scroll bar up & down with insane speed works perfectly fine though, so I'm not sure what's up with that :p

Opera say they want to be the "first true hardware accelerated browser", so I'm not sure how much is accelerated now, but they're planning on basically everything, including the UI and menus to be hardware accelerated (though a lot of the UI is already).

Except IE10 is still beta, so either could be first, depending on which releases a final version first.

In real life, we know that IE10 came into existence before this version of Opera despite whatever developmental progress tag you wish to attribute to it, but alright.

Opera say they want to be the "first true hardware accelerated browser", so I'm not sure how much is accelerated now, but they're planning on basically everything, including the UI and menus to be hardware accelerated (though a lot of the UI is already).

Mozilla recently had to disable hardware acceleration in menus due to random driver issues (Like the drop shadows sticking around after the menu was closed.). I don't see much point in using HW accel for rendering a menu though, unless you want to throw something like WebGL rendering in there.

Mozilla recently had to disable hardware acceleration in menus due to random driver issues (Like the drop shadows sticking around after the menu was closed.). I don't see much point in using HW accel for rendering a menu though, unless you want to throw something like WebGL rendering in there.

*shrugs* I suppose if they have the code they might as well do it and get everything running on the same code. But on Windows at least, DirectWrite text rendering is faster than normal GDI+ text rendering, so there's at least some tiny benefits to be had somewhere.

If you really want to be technical, the first fully HW accelerated browser (UI included) is Chrome for Android :p

Also I though IE9 just did HW acceleration for page content, instead of page content and UI.

Opera's OGL HWA in previous builds was atrocious and slowed things down immensely (instead of speeding it up) - I have no faith that they can deliver DX HWA which is any better.

OGL drivers on windows are often poor/buggy, give it a chance. its also still in early testing... Firefox's hardware accel used to suck in development, so did chrome's.

OGL drivers on windows are often poor/buggy, give it a chance. its also still in early testing... Firefox's hardware accel used to suck in development, so did chrome's.

Well the D3D10 HWA they added is slightly better. I still feel like they have the same issue as with OGL - it slows things down, not speeds them up for some reason.

Now it is less noticeable, but they should still keep HWA opt-in.

*shrugs* I suppose if they have the code they might as well do it and get everything running on the same code. But on Windows at least, DirectWrite text rendering is faster than normal GDI+ text rendering, so there's at least some tiny benefits to be had somewhere.

It still uses DirectWrite/Direct2D, it just doesn't use Direct3D for showing it on the screen.

I'm still not sure what Opera means by saying they want to be the first to be fully hardware accelerated, does that mean they'll do Theora/WebM decoding on the GPU? (Compared to Firefox that decodes on the CPU, and does colour space conversion/scaling/painting on the GPU)

, does that mean they'll do Theora/WebM decoding on the GPU? (Compared to Firefox that decodes on the CPU, and does colour space conversion/scaling/painting on the GPU)

Yes. The blog post says the following:

You enable these features by setting both opera:config#UserPrefs|EnableHardwareAcceleration and opera:config#UserPrefs|EnableWebGL to 1,

Well the D3D10 HWA they added is slightly better. I still feel like they have the same issue as with OGL - it slows things down, not speeds them up for some reason.

Now it is less noticeable, but they should still keep HWA opt-in.

Did you use the FF4 alpha builds when they first started adding HWA? It was crap and slowed things down, because it was in early development ;)

But yeah, its a good thing its opt-in until its optimized further.

It still uses DirectWrite/Direct2D, it just doesn't use Direct3D for showing it on the screen.

I'm still not sure what Opera means by saying they want to be the first to be fully hardware accelerated, does that mean they'll do Theora/WebM decoding on the GPU? (Compared to Firefox that decodes on the CPU, and does colour space conversion/scaling/painting on the GPU)

Yes. The blog post says the following:

That is impossible outside of CUDA / OpenCL. Then it is just very very unlikely / impractical and a massive amount of work.

Opera is just trolling, albeit, it would be nice if they added support for DXVA2.

That is impossible outside of CUDA / OpenCL. Then it is just very very unlikely / impractical and a massive amount of work.

Opera is just trolling, albeit, it would be nice if they added support for DXVA2.

How are they trolling? The blog post does not specifically mention theora acceleration (or anything about video acceleration really) When they say "fully hardware accelerated", they are referring to that the UI of the browser should be accelerated as well, not just the web pages like other browsers do.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. I guess you're conveniently ignoring the fact that your country and commonwealth just happened to work much better when it was still part of the E.U.? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Yeah... The root of my comment, ostensibly, is how to spin the story via the actual technical merits of the solution! * Decentralized (aka federated) solution with built-in encrypted ephemeral message transport, * Transport via Relays (intermediary servers) with no message archival, * Second configurable pathway are actual email servers (if DNS records are programmed accordingly) via IMAP protocols carriage, * "Chat-over-Email" is the design pattern adopted; it can either leverage full-blown Email Server (must use the INBOX folder) to exchange all received messages/edits/reactions (so be weary of notifications overloads) [best practice is creating a separate email acct used explicitly for federated chat purposes!] or leverage its built-in Relay Server mechanism which actually resides on-device (by default but can be configured otherwise), * By virtue of be a decentralized/federated model, all other intermediary servers who may pass-along messages (while the recipient's final relay/device is inaccessible) cannot snoop on the messages due to the encrypted nature of contents. The intermediaries may, however, analyze the metadata due to the simple fact that routing mechanisms require hints for relay destinations. Unfortunately, whomever is posting about DeltaChat across socials are misleading with "zero metadata" claims -- especially when the Relays (according to their own technical documents) mandate the addition of chat-version metadata and other decorations in order to actually transport any message. -- Based on this summary, I'd prefer if they'd better dual-path message transport (email server add-in, federated relay engine) rather than patch-on email protocols to existing federated social media frameworks. They're frankensteining something rather than extending widely-deployed technology stacks.
    • Decentralized search result anonymization...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!