Recommended Posts

Asteroid craters on Earth shelter life -- and they might do so on planets like Mars as well, a new study suggests.

Micro-organisms have been discovered living deep underneath a site in the U.S. where an asteroid crashed some 35 million years ago, wrote Charles Cockell of the University of Edinburgh?s School of Physics and Astronomy ? and similar craters on Mars would be a great spot to probe for aliens.

?The subsurface of craters on Mars might be a promising place to search for evidence of life,? Cockell wrote in this month?s edition of the science journal Astrobiology. ?The deeply fractured areas around impact craters can provide a safe haven in which microbes can flourish for long periods of time.?

NASA and other leading scientists agree -- and the discovery by Cockell and colleagues should impact future U.S. research on Mars.

more

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1071791-mars-craters-a-safe-haven-for-life/
Share on other sites

Asteroid craters on Earth shelter life -- and they might do so on planets like Mars as well, a new study suggests.

Micro-organisms have been discovered living deep underneath a site in the U.S. where an asteroid crashed some 35 million years ago, wrote Charles Cockell of the University of Edinburgh?s School of Physics and Astronomy ? and similar craters on Mars would be a great spot to probe for aliens.

?The subsurface of craters on Mars might be a promising place to search for evidence of life,? Cockell wrote in this month?s edition of the science journal Astrobiology. ?The deeply fractured areas around impact craters can provide a safe haven in which microbes can flourish for long periods of time.?

NASA and other leading scientists agree -- and the discovery by Cockell and colleagues should impact future U.S. research on Mars.

more

Oh damn I so hope they start putting more powder into getting us to mars. Or at least send better robots and more of them. Always thought that we humans needed to focus more on space exploration. Hope to be alive the day they find life out there.

And you don't necessarily need DNA - it' very likely that lifeforms could do fine with just RNA.

Then there is XNA - a synthetic "DNA" that can evolve. This brings up the possibility of lifeforms based on alternate coding systems.

http://news.national...s-life-science/

Step aside, DNA?new synthetic compounds called XNAs can also store and copy genetic information, a new study says.

And, in a "big advancement," these artificial compounds can also be made to evolve in the lab, according to study co-author John Chaput of the Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University.

Nucleotides, the building blocks of DNA are composed of four bases?A, G, C, and T. Attached to the bases are sugars and phosphates. (Get a genetics overview.)

First, researchers made XNA building blocks to six different genetic systems by replacing the natural sugar component of DNA with one of six different polymers, synthetic chemical compounds.

The team?led by Vitor Pinheiro of the U.K.'s Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology?then evolved enzymes, called polymerases, that can make XNA from DNA, and others that can change XNA back into DNA.

This copying and translating ability allowed for genetic sequences to be copied and passed down again and again?artificial heredity.

Last, the team determined that HNA, one of the six XNA polymers, could respond to selective pressure in a test tube.

As would be expected for DNA, the stressed HNA evolved into different forms.

This shows that "beyond heredity, specific XNAs have the capacity for Darwinian evolution," according to the study, published tomorrow in the journal Science. (Read "Darwin's Legacy" in National Geographic magazine.)

"Thus, heredity and evolution, two hallmarks of life, are not limited to DNA and RNA."

>

And you don't necessarily need DNA - it' very likely that lifeforms could do fine with just RNA.

Then there is XNA - a synthetic "DNA" that can evolve. This brings up the possibility of lifeforms based on alternate coding systems.

http://news.national...s-life-science/

Ok I couldn't understand a word of what you said but I still love it man! ;)

Hum, i'll bet you $500 right now we have people on Mars by 2022, just have to wait ten years to collect heheh :)

everything will change in the next five years, the realization that this is our ONLY real future is right now sinking in.

i'll bet you $500 right now we have people on Mars by 2022,

Are we capable of having people on Mars by 2022? Absolutely

Will our space programmes get enough funding to do so in the next 10 years? Unlikely.

Private Space exploration is the future.

I think we have more chance of getting a man to Mars using Kickstarter than any government funding :laugh:

The other day Musk tweeted that within 5 years they will be flying civilians to orbit, and by 2022 they will be taking them beyond Earth orbit. How far beyond Earth orbit he didn't say, but the Red Dragon proposal to land a robotic Dragon on Mars has advanced another level with a 2018 launch target.

The other day Musk tweeted that within 5 years they will be flying civilians to orbit, and by 2022 they will be taking them beyond Earth orbit. How far beyond Earth orbit he didn't say, but the Red Dragon proposal to land a robotic Dragon on Mars has advanced another level with a 2018 launch target.

Hopefully, it will remain within the earth's magnetosphere....unless it has radiation protection of some sort....either way, it's awesome!

Radiation protection and exposure treatments have advanced significantly the last few years, including the development** of a 2 drug mixture that looks like it can treat many cases of radiation sickness. Interesting times in radiobiology.

** by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Children?s Hospital Boston. A mix of a Cipro-like antibiotic and rBPI21, an engineered version of the human bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI).

simon, we've had the tech to get people to Mars since the 50's...so you are absolutely right in saying that it's the fact that we've entrusted space programs to goverments which has screwed us over. but as TRC pointed out, Curio is almost there and we will begin getting much closer looks at Mars over the next year or so, though i don't think she's supposed to visit any really deep or low-lying areas.

Thanks for posting that Doc, i really hope Elon can do this, if Red Dragon proves a success then there's really no reason why we can't have people working on Mars by 2022.

We are more likely to get life like human droids on to far distant planet given speedy innovations in this field.They would take the form of near live interactive feedback from an android body coupled with highly sophisticated sensors.Thus a two way trip would no longer be a neccesity, the overall payload could be reduced i.e.no food,reduced fuel requirements,less sophisticated planning requirements etc.

Just think of a "Data" [star Trek] like mass produced robot that you could drop off at several planets during one launch and collect data remotely from an orbiting satalite.

With governments struggling I doubt there is room to spend money on space and if we do then we are stupid. We need to pay off our debts then spend. By the way I am all for research and space exploration.

If you think about it the government spending on space is not to make money. But if a private company decides to explore space it would be for money. Which means they have the better chance of funding.

Musk has money, the means (SpaceX), and he is a driven man when it comes to getting to Mars.

He has already announced that late in 2012 or in 2013 a new family of rockets is going to be announced, and you can bet the top model will make Falcon Heavy and NASA's Space Launch System look tame.

In the past he's said he wants to be able to land about 50 metic tons on Mars per launch, which indicates an ability to loft about 200 metric tons (+/- depending on the transfer engine type - less for electric drive). A monster.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving for OpenAI by Pradeep Viswanathan Noam Shazeer is best known as one of the co-authors of the 2017 “Attention Is All You Need” paper, which introduced the Transformer architecture that now powers most large language models. He also worked on several major Google AI projects, including LaMDA, before leaving the company in 2021 to co-found Character.AI. He also authored the Sparsely-gated Mixture of Experts (2016) paper, which is popular among the AI community. After falling behind OpenAI and Anthropic a couple of years ago, Google brought Shazeer back in 2024 as part of a major deal with Character.AI. Through this deal, along with Noam, several other researchers returned to Google DeepMind. More recently, he was a vice president of engineering at Google and a technical co-lead for Gemini. Today, Noam Shazeer announced on X that he is leaving Google and joining OpenAI. In his post, Shazeer said it was a difficult decision to move on, adding that he was proud of the Google team and what it had built together. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman welcomed the move with a post of his own, saying Shazeer was one of the people he had most wanted to work with since OpenAI’s early days. Google has made strong progress with Gemini over the past year, closing the gap with OpenAI in several areas. But losing Noam Shazeer is a major talent setback for them, especially after bringing him back less than two years ago by spending a fortune. For OpenAI, the hire adds one of the industry’s most experienced language model researchers to a team that is already pushing ahead with ChatGPT, Codex, and its next generation of frontier models.
    • I'm lost too... what did you mean by your first comment then?
    • Couple years ago I got a brand new 4TB Samsung 990 Pro for $250 during Black Friday
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      541
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      85
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      64
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!