Can we get an addition to the Forum rules?


Recommended Posts

I'd like to see neowin have a rule about Necro Posts.

a necro post is when someone bumps a thread that is a set amount of time old (usually the poster is better off just creating a new thread)

a lot of forums I'm a member of have this rule and I think it is a good one

I've been seeing a lot of necro posts here on neowin lately, a lot of 2 to 3 year old threads being pointlessly bumped just because the person has a question that is "loosely" in line with what the thread was about

a good time set for a forum as big as nowin for what is considered a necro post i think would be ~6 months

what do you guys think, would it be worth it in the long run to add this rule?

I don't see how it hurts to really have an old thread be dug up if it is related to the original discussion - rather than start a new one. It always annoys me when things are closed for small reasons, like untagged posts or now this because it doesn't actually get rid of the thread, it just creates a bunch of locked threads in the middle of the page...

  • Like 2

Hi, there, Brando! Thank you for your comment!

I'd like to see neowin have a rule about Necro Posts.

a necro post is when someone bumps a thread that is a set amount of time old (usually the poster is better off just creating a new thread)

a lot of forums I'm a member of have this rule and I think it is a good one

I've been seeing a lot of necro posts here on neowin lately, a lot of 2 to 3 year old threads being pointlessly bumped just because the person has a question that is "loosely" in line with what the thread was about

a good time set for a forum as big as nowin for what is considered a necro post i think would be ~6 months

what do you guys think, would it be worth it in the long run to add this rule?

Online communities differ and Neowin is a unique one :)

Some forums have lax topic rules. The others strive for a greater thread count (for marketing/profit reasons) so they implement a policy against "necro" posts.

And then there are the others who are very conservative about it and would rather favour bumps to necro posts than having multiple new threads on the same topic.

Neowin is sort of in the middle. There's already an unwritten rule against resurecting old threads here. However, it usually goes on a case-by-case basis.

I agree with zhiVago, It is an unwritten rule, and one we didn't add because it doesn't get done often enough.

The people who bump old threads are usually spammers, and otherwise by members mainly because it's relevant to bump.

I bumped an old thread a couple of days ago "When threads collide" which hadn't been posted in for six months, in this case it was the right thing to do other than create a new thread, plus I don't see this as a huge problem. Such behavior can also be reported if a thread is incorrectly revived

I actually thought it was a rule to close old threads that have been bumped. I've seen it quite a bit over the years.

I'm glad there are exceptions, though. Like Neobond's example, there are sometimes cases where old threads should continue on even if they're old (IMO). It's been a while since I've checked out that thread, so I'll be headed there soon. :)

I wouldn't auto-lock them, just add a checkbox by default so if the thread is over 356 days old. Just make the user check a box that says "I realise that this thread is over 356 days old.".

this I like, just so the person is knowingly bumping the thread

I wouldn't want such a rule.

I have in the past (maybe not here), bumped 2 year old threads because they top Google search results but don't have an adequate answer. That would be annoying if it tops Google but doesn't have an answer and is locked.

As long as an old post is bumped with information that adds to it and isn't just spam I don't see it as a problem. Occasionally I see old posts bumped here but usually it's because someone has something to add not something stupid to say.

I wouldn't want such a rule.

I have in the past (maybe not here), bumped 2 year old threads because they top Google search results but don't have an adequate answer. That would be annoying if it tops Google but doesn't have an answer and is locked.

Very good point, actually. Makes Neowin look better if the top result is something helpful and even current. I hate when I'm looking for answers and run into that exact scenario.

I absolutely LOATHE the term "necro post". Whoever came up with it needs to be wiped from existence. It should be a permanent addition to the bad words filter.

Might as well just delete all posts older than whatever date you consider to be too old to post to, and get rid of the search feature altogether. It would save on server resources since searches are usually pretty resource intensive.

I also think it depends on the post. If the post adds something to the original thread then I think a bump might be a good thing. If it's just spam then by all means let's close it.

A good example might be a movie review. Instead of making a new post, say for a movie that's been out for a while, it seems to me to be meaningful to post in the original thread.

  • 6 months later...

I disagree, I don't think that there should be a time limit.

I see what you did there :shifty:

edit: actually, I see exactly what you did there. 6 months later almost to the minute. Brilliant :laugh:

  • Like 2

Already there:

No Spamming.

Spamming is characterized by the initiation of threads or posts that contribute nothing to a forum, be it off topic or on topic. Examples include: empty bodies, bodies with few words that have no relation to the current thread or discussion and those posts that state they are spam, either to annoy, advertise or increase a member's post count. Users may not use news item comments to advertise or promote another product. Resurrecting old forum posts is also not appreciated unless it serves a worthy cause to the forum. This determination is made by the forum Moderator or Administrator and is not up for discussion.

Forum signatures are to be used respectfully, Neowin already has to display ads to cover the running costs, so don't annoy our members by making your signature into your personal ad revenue opportunity.

And so, since this post itself was just necro'ed from April and has an answer...

[Thread closed]

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!