Google badmouths HTTP, proposes SPDY as a speedy successor


Recommended Posts

spdy-vs-http.png

If there's anything that Google doesn't like, it's things that collect dust. The company is famous for its annual spring cleaning efforts, in which the firm rids itself of redundant and dead-end projects, along with more bullish moves, such as its push to overhaul the internet's DNS system. Now it's looking to replace HTTP with a new protocol known as SPDY, and to that end, it's demonstrating the potential speed gains that one might expect on a mobile network. According to the company's benchmarks, mean page load times on the Galaxy Nexus are 23 percent faster with the new system, and it hypothesizes that further optimizations can be made for 3G and 4G networks. To its credit, Google has already implemented SPDY in Chrome, and the same is true for Firefox and Amazon Silk. Even Microsoft appears to be on-board. As a means to transition, the company proposes an Apache 2.2 module known as mod_spdy, which allows web servers to take advantage of features such as stream multiplexing and header compression. As for HTTP, it's no doubt been a reliable companion, but it seems that it'll need to work a bit harder to earn its keep. Stay weird, Google, the internet wouldn't be the same without you.

http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/02/google-proposes-spdy-replacement/

If you use Google Chrome you have actually been using it for ages. Most Google.com-based sites (Gmail, Search, ...) and Twitter all use SPDY automatically when using HTTPS.

To see when you're on a SPDY-powered site: use https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/mpbpobfflnpcgagjijhmgnchggcjblin

  • Like 4

If you use Google Chrome you have actually been using it for ages. Most Google.com-based sites (Gmail, Search, ...) and Twitter all use SPDY automatically when using HTTPS.

To see when you're on a SPDY-powered site: use https://chrome.googl...jhmgnchggcjblin

it's available for firefox as well https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/spdy-indicator/?src=ss

If you use Google Chrome you have actually been using it for ages. Most Google.com-based sites (Gmail, Search, ...) and Twitter all use SPDY automatically when using HTTPS.

To see when you're on a SPDY-powered site: use https://chrome.googl...jhmgnchggcjblin

it's available for firefox as well https://addons.mozil...dicator/?src=ss

Microsoft is implementing SPDY too.. hopefully in IE10

How?

The HTTP Speed+Mobility proposal starts from both the Google SPDY protocol (a separate submission to the IETF for this discussion) and the work the industry has done around WebSockets.

SPDY has done a great job raising awareness of web performance and taking a ?clean slate? approach to improving HTTP to make the Web faster. The main departures from SPDY are to address the needs of mobile devices and applications.

http://blogs.msdn.co...web-faster.aspx

a food thing???

foolish probably ?

If you use Google Chrome you have actually been using it for ages. Most Google.com-based sites (Gmail, Search, ...) and Twitter all use SPDY automatically when using HTTPS.

To see when you're on a SPDY-powered site: use https://chrome.googl...jhmgnchggcjblin

And its now supported by Firefox(Beta) too ! And to check if site uses SPDY use https://addons.mozil...tor/?src=search (as told above)

But of course HTTP is crap. Internets was never meant to be whatever it is now and what it will in an increasing pace continue to be evolved. Sometimes makes me wonder - didn't anybody see that s*it was going overboard really quickly and think "better pull the plug, it's gonna blow".

Good luck on replacing HTTP, and DNS, too, though. Then while they're at it, might as well replace HTML, too. It's all too widespread and fundamental.

But of course HTTP is crap. Internets was never meant to be whatever it is now and what it will in an increasing pace continue to be evolved. Sometimes makes me wonder - didn't anybody see that s*it was going overboard really quickly and think "better pull the plug, it's gonna blow".

Good luck on replacing HTTP, and DNS, too, though. Then while they're at it, might as well replace HTML, too. It's all too widespread and fundamental.

SPDY does not replace HTTP; it modifies the way HTTP requests and responses are sent over the wire.[1] This means that all the existing server-side applications can be used without modification if a SPDY-compatible translation layer is put in place.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPDY

But of course HTTP is crap. Internets was never meant to be whatever it is now and what it will in an increasing pace continue to be evolved. Sometimes makes me wonder - didn't anybody see that s*it was going overboard really quickly and think "better pull the plug, it's gonna blow".

Good luck on replacing HTTP, and DNS, too, though. Then while they're at it, might as well replace HTML, too. It's all too widespread and fundamental.

What's another proprietary standard?

SPDY is basically HTTP with a separate framing protocol, proper multiplexing and always on encryption (And a lot of the old crap removed). They're not replacing HTTP, and in fact SPDY seems to be the basis for HTTP 2.0.

The fact that you have to open a separate connection for each object retrieved didn't seem so bad when HTTP 1.0 was first created, but now when pages have have 100+ objects, that's 100+ connections per page load. Each one of those connections takes memory, each one fills a slot in the client and server, each one has to undergo the TCP connections algorithms (Such as trying to detect optimal bandwidth, etc.) and since there's so many, routers and such can have a hard time trying to prioritise traffic (Some traffic management systems for Linux operate on the connection level, so when you spawn 150 connections at the same time it can't do much to prioritise any of them)

HTTP 1.1 with pipelining solves some issues, but that's got it's own issues as well (proxies often don't support it, or break in funny ways, etc.), and at it's core it's still HTTP 1.0, with the ability to re-use a connection.

SPDY is actually one letter away from SPY, which is what Google wants to do to monetize your browsing experience and harvest more personal information from users.

No thanks, I will continue using HTTP and a browser with a tin foil hat extension.

  • Like 1

SPDY is actually one letter away from SPY, which is what Google wants to do to monetize your browsing experience and harvest more personal information from users

Tin foil hats, 99c

  • Like 2

SPDY is actually one letter away from SPY, which is what Google wants to do to monetize your browsing experience and harvest more personal information from users.

No thanks, I will continue using HTTP and a browser with a tin foil hat extension.

stupidest comment ever... SPDY is a protocol... Its like saying i would not use ftp protocol because of so and so....

then be aware that firefox will enable it by default in FF13 and Microsoft is implementing it in IE10 probably.

wonder what browser you will use?

so please also dont use Twitter and any server which uses Apache server for web request...

  • Like 2

stupidest comment ever... SPDY is a protocol... Its like saying i would not use ftp protocol because of so and so....

then be aware that firefox will enable it by default in FF13 and Microsoft is implementing it in IE10 probably.

wonder what browser you will use?

so please also dont use Twitter and any server which uses Apache server for web request...

lol I guess you didn't catch the sarcasm part about the tin foil hat.

Didn't they recently come out saying that SPDY has issues with domains that already use hardware to speed up https?

SPDY requires an extension to the TLS/SSL handshake (NPN - Next Protocol Negotiation), so hardware that does TLS/SSL will ignore that (without an update, if they can be updated), and stop the client using SPDY.

But there's nothing really strange about that, the software side is the same. If you want to use SPDY you still need your stuff to support it, etc.

Edit: People have also said SPDY breaks caching, that's true in the sense that it uses TLS/SSL, and that always has broken caching.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!