Recommended Posts

RAVENA, NY (AP) - Authorities say a 25-year-old upstate New York man has been arrested after troopers clocked him driving his motorcycle at 170 mph on the Thruway.

State police say a trooper first observed the motorcyclist going 166 mph Wednesday afternoon in the southbound lanes of Interstate 90 just south of Albany. The trooper pursued the biker and was able to get the Suzuki motorcycle's license plate number and a description of the rider when he slowed down in traffic.

But the man sped off again, and other troopers clocked him going as fast as 170 mph. Troopers eventually stopped him in New Paltz.

Police charged Nikkolaus McCarthy of Charlton with fleeing police, reckless driving, speeding and operating a motorcycle without a license.

He was being held in jail on $20,000 bail.

source

Why would you even want to go that fast on a moterbike. the slightest bump or pot hole and you are dead

Unless you've done it you'll never know. Some people ard cautious, and others are Type T personalities who get off on speed, climbing rocks. skydiving, X-Sports etc.

I've had my cycle license since age 16, 47 years, grew up in the country where roads were mostly vacant, and started riding superbikes with a Kawasaki KZ-900. It most definitely got aired out :)

  • Like 1

I was just reading in a Newspaper, 66 people died and 1,509 were injured in Maryland, last year. :/

Worth the thrill ... ?

It always amuses me the difference between US drivers and European. I.E. Highway vs Autobahn. It really shows the differences in mentalities and abilities, and how Americans really are special ed drivers.

I've gotten my cobra over 160 multiple times going through Arizona, Montana, Nebraska, Oregon, and in my home state of Colorado. I have not been in an accident in almost 20 years (when I was a teenager) and that accident was when I was doing 30 mph in the middle of the night going around a corner and hitting a pure black trailer without reflectors on it. If you're not retarded, and the people around you drive responsibly (i.e. using turning signals, only using the left lane to pass, etc) it's actually quite safe to do those speeds in vehicles made to handle them.

I don't, on the other hand, condone idiots doing 130+ in cheap crappy ~$15k cars like Geo Metro's that are not made to handle it.

It always amuses me the difference between US drivers and European. I.E. Highway vs Autobahn. It really shows the differences in mentalities and abilities, and how Americans really are special ed drivers.

The difference is the average speed, if everyone is going slow except one person weaving in and out of traffic at crazy speeds, the risks are very high. If everyone is going faster then the risk is a lot lower since the traffic flows better.

I agree highway speeds are way too slow in North America but going 170mph through the rest of traffic is just reckless

100+ on American highways really isn't a great idea. They haven't been improved much since the 50s, and there are still plenty of notorious examples of very poorly engineered curves out there. It would be nice if the speed limit was higher on longer stretches between states though.

I've no problem with speeding, I used to spend a lot of time driving at night, and you certainly get places faster at 120mph than at 60 mph.

The difference is the average speed, if everyone is going slow except one person weaving in and out of traffic at crazy speeds, the risks are very high.

Perfect example of what I just said. You're not weaving in and out of traffic at "crazy speeds" if everyone was obeying the law and staying to the right except to pass, and they are only "crazy speeds" because you feel they are. In the 1920's 60 mph was considered "crazy speeds" also.

To further explain also, since people are assuming I'm saying, "Hey lets do 200 mph on a 2 lane back country road", no, I'm talking about the 4 - 5 lane each direction interstate highways that are completely wide open but in the US you have old, slow people doing 45 in the far left lane saying everyone is doing "crazy speeds" while they're the ones causing accidents.

Perfect example of what I just said. You're not weaving in and out of traffic at "crazy speeds" if everyone was obeying the law and staying to the right except to pass, and they are only "crazy speeds" because you feel they are. In the 1920's 60 mph was considered "crazy speeds" also.

To further explain also, since people are assuming I'm saying, "Hey lets do 200 mph on a 2 lane back country road", no, I'm talking about the 4 - 5 lane each direction interstate highways that are completely wide open but in the US you have old, slow people doing 45 in the far left lane saying everyone is doing "crazy speeds" while they're the ones causing accidents.

Read my post again, I was agreeing with you that highways in NA are too slow. I was just saying that the guy is an idiot for weaving in and out of traffic.

Hopefully kids and dogs don't run out in front of you on the highway. :laugh:

The biggest issue with going fast on highways around here is that no one gets out of the left lane after they pass, so then people start passing on the right, and then the whole system turns into a cluster-F.

The typical stereotyping of drivers in the US doesn't nearly conclude the problem. The whole mentality behind our interstates is different than that of the autobahn. Interstates here are thought of simply as faster roads. Because of this, there isn't the respect that it deserves thus drivers don't stay in the right unless passing and they go too damn slow.

Read my post again, I was agreeing with you that highways in NA are too slow. I was just saying that the guy is an idiot for weaving in and out of traffic.

Ah yes, if he was weaving, he's a moron. I get up to those speeds, but stick in the left lane. If someone is going 40 mph, I get on their ass and turn on both sets of my HID's and get up on their asses. I've had a couple think they could slam on the breaks and cause an accident, but with my duel caliper breaks I can slow down faster, and accelerate faster than 90% of the cars in my state (there's a Bugatti and a labmo that kick my ass every time I see them though...)

The biggest issue with going fast on highways around here is that no one gets out of the left lane after they pass, so then people start passing on the right, and then the whole system turns into a cluster-F.

Exactly.... There was a 10+ car accident in Denver last year that I narrowly avoided when I was just getting onto the highway. Almost turned out ugly though because I was in my wife's grocery getter which has absolutely zero handling or breaking compared to my car.

Even though I'm an American, I agree with the comments about Europe, Germany specifically. I was stationed there for 3 years, and in the time I was out driving, I almost NEVER saw an accident. Take note govt. There is only a recommended speed on the Autobahn, although some turns or what not have speed limits, it's almost all limitless. In addition, it costs a lot more and is harder to get a license in Germany which I think adds to the increased awareness of drivers overall. Here in the US (at least California) it seems any retard can walk in the DMV and pass a drivers test. Every day I hear of "accidents", and I see people running red lights, doing dumb stuff.

Our driving system sucks and we could learn a thing or two from Germany, but we're not because we're too arrogant. The only accidents I ever saw in Germany were from Americans.

  • Like 1

I've done 165 mph on my superspot on I-10 during the daytime with normal traffic. It was only for 30 seconds though, and no cops were around :p And 135 mph in my Mazda RX8.

Maintaining those speeds for a consistant time is even more stupid though!

Anyways, for all the people saying that other countries have better drivers than America, that's simply not true. People in Germany run red lights too I'm sure, etc. Unless you look at true statistics on the matter, saying "I've never seen an accident in Germany" doesn't mean anything.

I personally have never been cut off by a car while riding my motorcycle. That means cars never cut off motorcycles right? Wrong. Same principle.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!