Recommended Posts

Exclusive to the Galaxy SIII? WTF? Android really doesn't need forced fragmentation due to business deals like this on top of the fragmentation issues that already exist :(

The day the GS3 hits the public the APK for Flipboard will go out to the public too, the beauty of Android, we can get around pesky things like exclusivity fairly quickly, even if it has any code to try and keep it on the GS3, it will be bypassed fairly quick.

Density independent pixels and scalable graphics and all that are great, if you don't care about your app looking like **** and conforming to different size devices.

For a good app it needs to be specifically designed for the device, for high res devices you need the proper size images for the proper size "buttons", then some of those devices with the same res can be up to 2 inches different in size, so one of them would have fewer and bigger but higher density thumbs which needs to be coded, but can to some degree be done with intelligent scaling algorithms.

Tis same problem recurs with every different resolution and screen size. Resolutions reasonably close can be fit into the same GUI, just be using flow and filling in white space and padding. But you gave to take physical screen size into account separately. A 3.5 inch device and a 4.5 inch device with the same res can't use the same layout, either one would have to big buttons or the other to small, or one would have to much padding while the other the icons would be on top of each other, one would have shap graphics, the other blurry.

Vectors would fix some of these problems, but they wouldn't work for flipboard and it's graphics anyway. And would just fix the blurriest, not the size and screen size and layout issues.

Nothing you said here makes any sense because "problems" you describe don't exist. You cab include graphics and visuals depending on what type of pixel density the display is and provide assets for that specific density.

ADT is pretty well thought out and provides great environment in development. Android devices are split into 3 categories: high density, medium density and low density and you can include assets for you specific designs and UI based on those 3 categories if you choose so. This is not by any means a must. You can always include assets and UI elements for higher density devices and they will scale down to other vsrsions the same way it works on iOS.

You don't have to code anything in that regard.

Stick to opinions because trying to argue something that you just off-handedly read somewhere online makes you look silly.

The day the GS3 hits the public the APK for Flipboard will go out to the public too, the beauty of Android, we can get around pesky things like exclusivity fairly quickly, even if it has any code to try and keep it on the GS3, it will be bypassed fairly quick.

Agreed, friend ran some program and changed the ID of his phone so he could put Netflix on it when Netflix first came out. I though that was Awsome.

Nothing you said here makes any sense because "problems" you describe don't exist. You cab include graphics and visuals depending on what type of pixel density the display is and provide assets for that specific density.

Yes you can, but that's still a lot more work. And doesn't solve the different sizes problem.

Either way, your argument is that developing for 20 different resolutions, and 20 different screen sizes and at least 3 different screen size ratios isn't more work. But your argument still include a lot more work. Just less work than if google hadn't made a good dev tool. It's still a lot more work, just not as much as it would have been.

Writing self contradicting argument only makes you look silly.

Yes you can, but that's still a lot more work. And doesn't solve the different sizes problem.

Either way, your argument is that developing for 20 different resolutions, and 20 different screen sizes and at least 3 different screen size ratios isn't more work. But your argument still include a lot more work. Just less work than if google hadn't made a good dev tool. It's still a lot more work, just not as much as it would have been.

Writing self contradicting argument only makes you look silly.

I'm not contradicting myself. You are jumping from one topic to another. I said, the reason they have more work and delay is because they designed the app for a single resolution and thus now have more work to do it properly on Android that supports multiple resolutions on various devices.

When you design and develop for Android initially it's not more work because you setup and design your app to the way you should on Android to accomodate different resolutions. You don't develop app for 3 different densities and code that way. That would be silly and usually happens when people developed something for a fixed resolution and are now trying to convert it to Android's way.

Different resolutions are not fragmentation. That's like saying, Windows and OSX development is fragmented because different Macs running OSX run with different resolutions. It's absurd.

So far the app is rather nice even though for the most part the only difference it has from Currants is the facebook/twitter integration.

The biggest problem with Flipboard and why I stopped using it is that there is no easy way to see all news and updates from feeds as a list.. you have to flip individually through each story which is really awful from usability standpoint. In Currents you can flip through them individually but you can also see a list of all items in a feed as a list and quickly glance over what you are might be interested in. Huge plus from me on that for Google.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!