Recommended Posts

how exactly are you setting up your pc to pc vpn? You may not be allowing IP traffic across the vpn (as simple as that may sound it isnt that simple). What are you using? As you can imagine there are a million and one different vpn solutions and some are much more configurable than others.

For instance if it were cisco, it would probably be a nat issue. the vpn traffic needs to be taken out of nat or be put into a no nat rule. Also another issue would be if the pc had an interface that has the same ip range as the vpn'd network. Though it could be one of the 15 other rules needed to have a successful tunnel up...that is just one that gets missed.

We dont have the equipment yet per say. Since we have seen that the routers Ive mentioned (NB2500 and NB1600) are working off a OpenWRT base and currently there are no alternatives for the siutation at hand, then we are testing on OpenWRT VMs.......

post up your config, obscure your ip addresses if you want.

here is a write up. sorry it took so long to respond back, was in deep do doo yesterday.

https://forum.openwr....php?pid=145557

something sounds as if it is missing..

here are the instructions, may take a few days to read through to fully understand what is going on.

http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/vpn.overview

post up your config, obscure your ip addresses if you want.

here is a write up. sorry it took so long to respond back, was in deep do doo yesterday.

https://forum.openwr....php?pid=145557

something sounds as if it is missing..

here are the instructions, may take a few days to read through to fully understand what is going on.

http://wiki.openwrt....to/vpn.overview

Thanks :)

I wanted to try this with VMs but the other day I accidently touched something in my OpenWRT VM and the DHCP server on it (dnsmasq) overrid the network's DHCP and started to hand out its own IPs so I had to take it off line :(

Anyways I already saw and tried the first link and it is outdated as now opkg is the package manager. Is there any way to download this external and put it on the VM to test it out?

diagram3.png

The yellow dots are equipment I have control over (the switch on the left side problably also)

On the bottom side, with have 2 PCs and a router. Nothing else.

On the top side, with have a already in place router. The right side (crossing the red line) is a office area which I have no access to and the right side should not know about the left side and visaversa. The "problem" is that (initially) I dont have access to that first router. Moving on: On the left side of the top side of that first router, we have a router running OpenWRT (possibly the NB2500) and a switch (again that switch I will problably have access to). Later those are end clients but they are NOT PCs. As a matter of fact, NOTHING on the left side at all will be a PC. They are simply machines. They DO however (if the NB1600 is chosen) have a configuration with OpenWRT.

Also, this is a industrial type setup. Reason why I cant just go with DD-WRT routers and call it a day (I dont think I would even convince my boss and anyways we need something like the NB1600)

Continue on that last line, the main probelm is the NB1600. I need that form factor/type of product for the machine they are attached to.

sc302, thank you for all your help and I hope this hast description helps you out on understanding and giving me a bit more information :)

Thank you!

The router that is hosting vpn needs to be on the edge, not behind another router that is doing nat. this can and will create issues if not done correctly. If you can have your router that you have control of access the outside directly that would be ideal, perhaps in a dmz that is not natted.

Would need to see the config one way or the other to try and make sense of what is going wrong. There are a lot of things that can stop you from commuicating, no routes setup, natting enabled on vpn traffic, and a few other things. to get down to the bottom of it as quickly as possible and to point you in the right direction I would need to see your config. I have given you the docs, even if old, that would get you there....and I am sure if you look at youtube you can find a video that will step you through the entire process. The technology doesn't change, the screens or places to check may.

The router that is hosting vpn needs to be on the edge, not behind another router that is doing nat. this can and will create issues if not done correctly. If you can have your router that you have control of access the outside directly that would be ideal, perhaps in a dmz that is not natted.

Would need to see the config one way or the other to try and make sense of what is going wrong. There are a lot of things that can stop you from commuicating, no routes setup, natting enabled on vpn traffic, and a few other things. to get down to the bottom of it as quickly as possible and to point you in the right direction I would need to see your config. I have given you the docs, even if old, that would get you there....and I am sure if you look at youtube you can find a video that will step you through the entire process. The technology doesn't change, the screens or places to check may.

Related to that, this is the setup that was shown to us by a 3rd party (the distributor of this equipment) and this does indeed work:

diagram4.png

Its a little different but one of the routers we always have control over physically instead of having it remotely. The one that would "host" VPN would be the one on the bottom on our side (bottom). The rest would basically be clients.

how are you routing data? do you have layer 3 switches in place to be able to handle routes? or are your specifically adding routes into the client pcs to state where to steer traffic to?

for simplicity sake, on the edge, there is less to troubleshoot when something fails. but if you really know what you are doing, how traffic works, and how to make things go it can be anywhere...how much troubleshooting to you know how to do? do you have a full understanding of how routing works, how port traffic works, and where things can get hosed along the way? If not, keep it as simple as possible with the least amount of possiblity to block and route along the way.

how are you routing data? do you have layer 3 switches in place to be able to handle routes? or are your specifically adding routes into the client pcs to state where to steer traffic to?

for simplicity sake, on the edge, there is less to troubleshoot when something fails. but if you really know what you are doing, how traffic works, and how to make things go it can be anywhere...how much troubleshooting to you know how to do? do you have a full understanding of how routing works, how port traffic works, and where things can get hosed along the way? If not, keep it as simple as possible with the least amount of possiblity to block and route along the way.

The thing is that this is not something I choose. This is the setup already given and I cant change it as we dont do tech stuff. We just setup the configuration on our end.

The current setup (without VPN equipment) is something like:

diagram5.png

I put R1 and R2 because after talking to my boss, it might have seem that the other company mixed up details and instead of 2 routers, there is only one.

Depending on the client, you could have a pc establish a VPN connection to the router, but from what you said you wanted an entire site to site VPN. You need to be specific in what you want and you also need to be specific as to what the client pcs are.

Site to site requires 2 edge VPN routers. Client to site requires 1 edge VPN router and a client that can be configured for VPN either natively or through add on software. If the client is a serial connection then that cannot be configured, the machine that that connects to would have to be configured. You lack a bit of details to get this working, and I am trying to ask the right questions to help you.

Depending on the client, you could have a pc establish a VPN connection to the router, but from what you said you wanted an entire site to site VPN. You need to be specific in what you want and you also need to be specific as to what the client pcs are.

Site to site requires 2 edge VPN routers. Client to site requires 1 edge VPN router and a client that can be configured for VPN either natively or through add on software. If the client is a serial connection then that cannot be configured, the machine that that connects to would have to be configured. You lack a bit of details to get this working, and I am trying to ask the right questions to help you.

I apoligize for not giving correct answers to your questions.

The end clients are basically industrial machines. Running on propiratory software, we want this system to able to do two things: Remote support and also transfer predone files (basically files, which are binary files that the machine understands) from our end to over there.

The USB port on the routers I mentioned (NB2500 and NB1600) allow to have some temporal space to transfer those files and read it via a share.

I BELIEVE Im not leaving out any details. If you need any more, just ask :)

Thanks and once again I apoligize for not answering your questions.

Although the usb ports on the routers allow for transfer of files, they are usually designed for a harddrive or a printer to be connected and configured. I do not know how it will connect up with another device that doesn't sound like one of the 2 devices that I have mentioned.

Again edge would be ideal without a great deal of troubleshooting to function properly. And by troubleshooting, meaning that if the config looks right we would need to go up the line to the next device to make sure it is passing traffic properly.

You are best off to connect a pc to the usb device, then through the pc you will have access for remote support as well as being able to setup a tunnel between the pc and the other host. Now technically there shouldn't be any difference between a pc router in this config, but the pc isn't doing any form of nat which makes it one less thing to have to troubleshoot to function properly. Keep it as simple as possible.

Although the usb ports on the routers allow for transfer of files, they are usually designed for a harddrive or a printer to be connected and configured. I do not know how it will connect up with another device that doesn't sound like one of the 2 devices that I have mentioned.

Again edge would be ideal without a great deal of troubleshooting to function properly. And by troubleshooting, meaning that if the config looks right we would need to go up the line to the next device to make sure it is passing traffic properly.

You are best off to connect a pc to the usb device, then through the pc you will have access for remote support as well as being able to setup a tunnel between the pc and the other host. Now technically there shouldn't be any difference between a pc router in this config, but the pc isn't doing any form of nat which makes it one less thing to have to troubleshoot to function properly. Keep it as simple as possible.

I explained incorrectly :) In the USB port there will be a small flash drive inserted (not 24/7 though)

The data protocal EDGE or something else? Im not familiar with the term. I have heard something about "edge servers".

The problem with these machine is that they are pretty expensive so adding a PC would increase the end cost. Thats why the configuration that was being looked at is one of these routers as they are embedded directly into the machine and can give remote access at a lower (overall) price.

Edge of Internet, not behind a nat firewall. I am pretty sure it isn't going to work as designed...the other side will not see the VPN gateway as an addressable device, it will see a computer behind the VPN gateway. If it were a VPN client, not a firewall, then it should see it. You need a computer to connect to.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      574
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!